[00:24] Oh, I feel better now. I felt like crap all week! [00:25] I still do [00:26] but you have a good reaon to [00:27] I do? [00:27] Didn't you just get over the flu? [00:27] no [00:28] oh, then you don't have a reason either [00:28] aha [00:28] :-) [00:42] charlie-tca: http://acidcow.com/pics/20101022/acid_picdump_114.jpg [00:54] hehehe [00:54] My kind of worker ;-) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [01:20] hi [01:21] i have a problem with 10.10 .. when my machine hibernates - when it resumes my bluetooth mouse no longer works [01:21] lukus, #ubuntu for 10.10 [01:21] !support [01:21] #ubuntu+1 handles support for the development version of Ubuntu. Please join #ubuntu for all other Ubuntu support. Chat in #ubuntu-offtopic. [01:46] Well, wish me luck. Upgrading a fresh maverick install to natty (again) [01:47] charlie-tca: needless to ask, but how broken is natty? [01:47] I don't know yet. I am still trying to upgrade to it [01:49] see? [01:49] that's why I upgrade on day one [01:49] less chance of breakage [01:50] BUGabundo: wise guy you are [01:50] I broke it bad last nite trying to upgrade [01:50] pondering if I should jump in already too [01:50] I can't post to twitter with gnome-do so maverick is useless for me :) [01:51] jumping. It only takes me a couple of hours each install of maverick [01:51] "Account validation failed!" anyone else? [01:51] Oh, and a couple more hours to upgrade to natty and break it [01:51] Don't use gwibber myself. I only use xchat [01:51] charlie-tca: almost as effective as automated testing :D [01:52] charlie-tca: trying gnome-do over here [01:52] ah, xubuntu! [01:52] hours?? [01:52] hours [01:53] What? new system? [01:53] I bought the 64bit about 4 years ago now [01:53] 3 yo laptop [01:53] with brand new SSD [01:53] single core, athon 2.2Ghz [01:53] c2d 2.4 [01:54] t8300 [01:54] I think I only buy whatever is obsolete at the time [01:55] whatever you buy is probably obsolete by the time you pay for it [01:55] No, not here. Whatever I buy is on closeout clearance already [01:55] BUGabundo: can you tweet from gnome-do on natty [01:56] charlie-tca: my favorite department in computer stores [01:57] Alex not even configured [01:57] never used it [01:58] BUGabundo: twitter or do? [01:58] gnome-do posting to µblogs [02:00] BUGabundo: can you do a test for me please? [02:01] Errors were encountered while processing: [02:01] /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b20-1.10~pre2-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb [02:01] it's for sure broken on maverick :( === emma is now known as EMMA [02:01] can't even see what's in the screen [02:17] That's right. I forgot about my super speed internet. Just 200 more downloads to begin install packages [02:20] 8mb/s here [02:21] 150K here [02:21] oh, 150Kb/s [02:22] when it works. right now it looks like 80Kb/s [02:22] eewwww [02:22] BUGabundo: nice, what type of connection is that one? [02:22] see, back to hours [02:22] adsl 2+ [02:23] 2+? [02:23] its how its called [02:24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_Digital_Subscriber_Line [02:26] I see, guess my country is still stuck in ADSL [02:26] charlie-tca, that's pretty bad [02:27] we are on fiber now [02:27] ppl getting 122mbits/s [02:28] I love this kind of dumb reports http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=60382 [02:33] seems simple - Open settings, it crashes [02:34] right [02:34] but not always [02:35] Oh, One of those === BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_cookie [02:39] charlie-tca: so my slow upstream of 100KB/s is faster then your downstream [02:39] wow that hurts [02:40] BUGabundo_cookie, rubbing it in [02:40] no.. its slow... really [02:40] everyone I know, around here, has faster [02:41] like, my boss has a bigger piper then our DCs links :S [02:43] BUGabundo_cookie: what TLD are you at? [02:44] Everybody I know is faster too [02:49] charlie-tca: your TLD? [02:49] I'm in .mx and get ~210Kb/s downstream [02:54] same error today! base files failed to upgrade [02:54] Well, I guess this will wait until alpha1 to upgrade after all [02:55] I don't my TLD [02:55] http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=60382#c1 LOOOOOOOOL [02:56] Portugal [02:56] I give up [02:56] good night [02:57] nite === BUGabundo_cookie is now known as BUGabundo [04:26] bou mimir. guud nite === Mohan_chml is now known as IndianaJones === IndianaJones is now known as Mohan_chml [12:22] ooh a nice new fresh +1 channel [12:43] wb penguin42 :) [12:43] hi yofel === EMMA is now known as emma [14:38] BUGabundo, are you a bot ? [14:38] aahah [14:39] * penguin42 oils BUGabundo [14:39] * BUGabundo drips [14:42] Lessons forgot when upgrading to Ubuntu+1 - Must remove Nvidia hardware driver before the upgrade [14:42] lol [14:47] charlie-tca: I have a bug 636418 saying that Jockey should warn users about that :-) [14:47] Launchpad bug 636418 in jockey (Ubuntu) "update should clean up/warn about jockey" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/636418 [14:48] probably wouldn't help this early though [14:58] hm, the catch is I can install them after upgrading the system to natty. I just can not upgrade with them installed [15:01] so, do-release-upgrade -d doesn't do anything yet, and update-manager -d doesn't do anything yet - so is the correct way apt-get dist-upgrade ? [15:02] Change sources.list manually and then apt-get dist-upgrade [15:02] ah ok, the old school way [15:02] penguin42, its because its really early on...you have to change it all [15:02] But, if nvidia hardware driver is installed, you break it. I reinstalled maverick 4 times before I got it right [15:03] ahahah [15:03] nah, it's Intel on this <---- machine [15:03] good reason to stick with nouveu [15:03] penguin42: no changes to DIST so you can't dist-upgrade [15:04] sed your sources and do a aptitude full-upgrade [15:04] good luck... you will need it [15:04] ah, there we go - 503 updated packages, 30 new [15:07] for natty, this channel really should be something like 'life at the sharp end' [15:11] I did the dist-upgrade after changes the sources === Monotoko is now known as Daniel2 [15:11] I'm still amazed debian unstable is on 2.6.32 [15:11] charlie-tca: go with aptitude [15:11] there are two packages broken [15:12] I never use aptitude [15:12] * penguin42 really should look at some debian bugs, there is a local debian bug day meeting in a few weeks and it seems worthy [15:12] you should [15:13] how is skype latelly ? [15:13] can't get ppl to use mumble as much as I would like [15:13] so I guess ill have to install skype [15:14] is this wiki up to date? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Skype [15:18] Failed to fetch http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/dists/stable/non-free/binary-amd64/Packages.gz 404 Not Found [IP: 204.9.165.82 80] [15:18] guess not === wzssyqa1 is now known as wzssyqa [17:33] * penguin42 reboots - see you in Natty [17:45] wahey! [17:53] ooh the nominate for release now lets you natty something [18:07] I just tried to install AMD64 Kubuntu 10.10: it seems to be having trouble seeing my pre-existing Root Ext3 Partition... What should I do...? [18:08] Craigwdy2k: This channel is now for 11.04, 10.10 is in #ubuntu [18:08] Craigwdy2k: However, I'd check to see if you can see the root partition from the install CD and go from there [18:09] When did Kubuntu 11.04 come out...? [18:09] it hasn't yet - that's why this channel is +1 - i.e. the next version [18:12] I see: yeah: not only can it not see my partition but I got a weird X Low Resolution display error after attempting to use the Rescue a Broken System boot option... [18:13] I tried to reconfigure X but then I get stuck in a infinite configuring Display Loop... [18:43] ooh, my first natty upgrade failure [18:50] How lucky can you get, huh? [18:50] charlie-tca: Well that's 50/50 :-) [18:51] update-grub seems to have screwed up the paths [18:57] don't suppose anyone has a grub.cfg from a machine with a separate /boot that I could compar ewith? [19:07] ah, it's bug 665471 [19:07] Launchpad bug 665471 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "[natty] GRUB no longer finds kernel with separate /boot partition" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471 [19:30] penguin42: I have a natty machine with seperate /boot here (that is still running 2.6.35 since I never bothered to reboot..) [19:31] oh, and still has maverick grub installed.. [19:31] penguin42: if it helps, grub.cfg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/518863/ [19:32] /boot is sdb1 / is sdb7 [19:46] yofel: Right, I'd bet on that not rebooting [19:48] ah wait, that has natty grub installed, I looked at the wrong ssh session -.- [19:48] yofel: Don't worry, now I've found the other bug I don't need it [19:50] yeah right, '/boot' isn't supposed to be there.. [20:01] * penguin42 wonders why the iscs_trgt module has gone missing, I can see it's still in the git tree and I can see the config is still on [20:36] looks like next to nothing from the ubuntu tree in the kernel is built in the 2.6.36 package [20:57] Hello, In order for me to be able to boot. I need to edit my "linux" line and change /boot/ to '(hd0,msdos1)' each time. I have tried to reinstall grub2 and I still get the "Error no file found" and "Error must load kernel first" messages on boot. [20:58] Ohh and my initrd line also. [20:58] Any help would be appreciated. [21:00] http://paste.ubuntu.com/518896/ [21:02] grubhelp: Welcome to bug 665471 [21:02] Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471) [21:02] I said, bug 665471 [21:02] Launchpad bug 665471 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "[natty] GRUB no longer finds kernel with separate /boot partition" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471 [21:03] Ahh k, thought I broke something [21:03] Thanks penguin42 [21:54] hey guys on last boot, the kernel upgrade boosted [21:54] cant boot anymore [21:54] grub complains it needs to select a kernel [21:55] but i didnt change anything in grub recently === DanaG1 is now known as DanaG [21:55] hey DanaG [21:56] u have a G1 ? [21:56] BUGa_brokenkerne: Bug 665471 [21:57] Launchpad bug 665471 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "[natty] GRUB no longer finds kernel with separate /boot partition" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471 [21:57] aaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh [21:57] any work around? [21:57] i have /boot on ext4 because of BTRFS [21:57] just edit the /boot out of the kernel and initrd lines [21:58] ohh its just a grub bug? [21:58] i can downgrade from cache version, right ? [21:58] BUGa_brokenkerne: I think it's update-grub that's the problem [21:58] probably [21:59] BUGa_brokenkerne: The devs just put that type of thing in to keep those of us silly enough to try it this early on our toes [21:59] :) [22:00] BUGa_brokenkerne: I was tempted to file a separate bug that grub doesn't let you get back to the menu from that point [22:02] ok, let me reboot and change directly in grub console [22:02] to see if that works [22:04] thanks penguin42 [22:04] that worked marvelous [22:07] penguin42: can you tell me the bug again? [22:07] so I can CC [22:07] 665471 [22:07] bug 665471 [22:07] Launchpad bug 665471 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "[natty] GRUB no longer finds kernel with separate /boot partition" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471 [22:08] it's almost worth topicing that one [22:08] I would say so [22:09] humm what OP is awaked at this hour ? [22:09] on a saturday night? [22:09] ikonia: jpds: please put bug 665471 on /topic. thanks [22:10] hang on [22:10] Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471) [22:10] kk [22:10] something between launchpad and the bot isn't very happy tonight [22:10] does that need to be in the topic ? [22:10] (I find it quite serious, it would affect me personally quite bad) [22:11] ikonia: it would have helped me [22:11] did this not happen until an update ? [22:11] and we usually use /topic for this kinda of stuff [22:11] ikonia: Lot of people hitting it [22:11] or has this been there from day one [22:11] serious bugs that affect a large part of users [22:11] ikonia: it hit me today [22:12] I don't disagree, it's just the first I've read of it [22:12] was fine last night and this morning [22:12] so it's an update [22:12] and since its weekend, won't probably be addressed until Monday [22:12] I think it was kernel 2.6.36.1 [22:12] ikonia: Read back, I asked about it a few hours ago, and there were one or two others inbetween - not sure anything else has been asked about! [22:12] at least its in my latest batch of aptgetables [22:12] hang on [22:13] for some odd reason I was working on 10.10 in my head, sorry [22:13] eheh [22:13] nope [22:13] 11.04 in here [22:13] ikonia: Bah that's old :-) [22:13] I know, sorry, I lost track [22:13] yeah, that's old [22:14] Natty Narwhal 11.04 | UDS Oct 25-29 | Happy Bug Hunting! |Maverick/10.10 support in #ubuntu | seperate /boot user - Narwhal is broke, check bug #665471 [22:14] Launchpad bug 665471 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "[natty] GRUB no longer finds kernel with separate /boot partition" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665471 [22:14] ikonia: Ta [22:15] you missed something [22:15] what ? [22:15] oops [22:15] ahahah === ikonia changed the topic of #ubuntu+1 to: Natty Narwhal 11.04 | UDS Oct 25-29 | Happy Bug Hunting! |Maverick/10.10 support in #ubuntu | seperate /boot user - Narwhal is broke, check bug #665471 [22:16] better :-) [22:16] much [22:16] sorry, not with it [22:16] separate or separated ? [22:16] seperate [22:16] kk [22:16] not being native lang, some words ilude me [22:16] either would technically work [22:17] lp is dead [22:17] pages are half loading :S [22:18] can't sub to the bug [22:18] lol [22:22] the amount of updates on a stable release (this recent) is staggering [22:22] 73 updates, 115MBs in just one week [22:26] BUGabundo: Don't forget the number is multiple packages for a single fix [22:27] still too much [22:28] but I guess, needed [22:38] meh, my rt2860 works crappy with 2.6.36... when I try to transfer some data continously over wireless the connection drops after a few minutes and I have to reload the module for it to connect again [22:38] if I don't it hangs at the AP scan [22:39] funny [22:39] janitor doesn't recommend the removing of older kernel [22:39] I've got like 6 now === IdleOne is now known as MC_Hammer === MC_Hammer is now known as IdleOne