[18:37] <lifeless> grah
[18:37] <lifeless> Traceback (most recent call last):
[18:37] <lifeless>  File "fti.py", line 714, in <module>
[18:37] <lifeless>    sys.exit(main())
[18:37] <lifeless>  File "fti.py", line 664, in main
[18:37] <lifeless>    con = connect(lp.dbuser)
[18:37] <lifeless>  File "/var/launchpad/test/lib/canonical/database/sqlbase.py", line 796, in connect
[18:38] <lifeless>    con = psycopg2.connect(connect_string(user, dbname))
[18:38] <lifeless> psycopg2.OperationalError: FATAL:  database "launchpad_dev" does not exist
[18:38] <lifeless> make[1]: *** [create] Error 1
[18:38] <lifeless> Failed to create database or load sampledata.
[18:38] <lifeless> make: *** [check] Error 1
[21:12] <lifeless> does Launchpad.log_with need the second parameter
[21:13] <lifeless> login_with
[21:17] <jcsackett> lifeless: is the second param the cachedir path?
[21:17] <jcsackett> i think all the params are required.
[21:35] <lifeless> jcsackett: no, its instance apparently
[21:35] <lifeless> default is, of all things, staging
[21:35] <lifeless> speaking of staging, its help is terrible.
[21:35] <jcsackett> lifeless: huh. good to know.
[21:35] <lifeless> where should folk create accounts for staging ?
[21:36] <jcsackett> https://login.staging.launchpad.net/+new_account
[21:37] <jcsackett> lifeless, you should have a staging account already; my understanding is that periodically account info from the lp sso is moved to the staging.lp sso.
[21:37] <jcsackett> i can't tell you where i gleaned that info though, or even if it is correct.
[21:40] <lifeless> jcsackett: its not for me
[21:40] <lifeless> jcsackett: its for the help text on stging
[21:41] <lifeless> ./lib/lp/registry/help/home-page-staging-help.html
[21:41] <jcsackett> lifeless: ah, i see.
[21:41] <lifeless> I'm touching that file
[21:41] <lifeless> and it seems bogus
[21:41] <jcsackett> yeah, so, i should say that one *can* make an account via that link. i have no idea if they *should*.
[21:41] <lifeless> so I wanted to update it while I was here.
[21:41] <jcsackett> lifeless sounds good.
[21:41] <lifeless> but it seems nonobvious :)
[21:42] <lifeless> so perhaps you could file a bug ?
[21:54] <jcsackett> lifeless: does it need a bug if you're updating the docs now? or have i misinterpreted something?
[21:58] <lifeless> I don't know what to update them with
[21:58] <lifeless> we don't know what we should be saying
[21:58] <lifeless> I'm removing references to 'edge'
[21:59] <lifeless> and I don't want to block on figuring out the right answer to an opportunisitic fix.
[22:16] <jcsackett> lifeless: fair. i'll throw in a bug saying we need better staging documentation.
[22:16] <lifeless> reference that file perhaps ;)