=== asac_ is now known as asac [06:49] jdstrand, mdeslaur: ping [09:21] dpm, hi, i think i misunderstood your remark about the formatting bug in the last thread. just filed bug 670821 [09:21] Launchpad bug 670821 in rosetta "translator comment formating lost (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/670821 [10:06] fta2, yeah, that's what I meant on 3rd point in my e-mail - thanks for filing the bug [10:19] dpm, yep, got confused with another issue, which was about the folding of msgstr which is crazy in rosetta, but i managed to deal with it [10:19] ok, right [10:24] dpm, i've implemented a workaround for bug 669831, but it has some rejects: http://paste.ubuntu.com/525566/ [10:24] Launchpad bug 669831 in rosetta "obsolete translations exported to the branch (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/669831 [10:29] let me re-read the bug to remind myself of the details... [10:37] fta2, what am I looking at in that pasted output? What does the "fixed n bogus strings" part mean? And the "compared:" output? [10:41] dpm, bogus. [10:41] ? [10:41] bogus in what sense? [10:42] dpm, the "compared" are strings i get from lp a translation that differ from existing upstream translations (which means conflicts to resolve) [10:43] right [10:44] dpm, bogus means: for a given "id" (the long digit in the comment), the untranslated string read from lp's po is not the same as from the po i fed to lp [10:44] ok, gotcha [10:45] i fix some by unescaping some xml codes. but if it's still different, i give up [10:45] fta2, one other question on the "compared:" output - to which language does it apply? [10:46] E.g. the following string sounds more Spanish than French: [10:46] lp669831: skipped 0 / fixed 2 bogus strings from google_chrome_strings/fr.po [10:46] compared: [10:46] <> and [10:46] <> [10:46] dpm, i should add the lang in the output [10:46] hold on [10:47] chrome/app/resources/google_chrome_strings_es.xtb [10:47] 'es' then [10:48] dpm, ^^, the Compared and lp669831 lines are unrelated [10:48] yeah, I understand it now [10:50] fta2, It might also be worth converting Unicode codes into actual characters in the output - strings such as <>'>> are otherwise unreadable [10:50] (just suggesting, not trying to be picky) [10:51] yep, it's from repr(string). i work in regular xterms, they suck for unicode [10:51] i needed to easily compare strings "visually" [10:51] right [11:49] fta2: hi! [13:38] mdeslaur, jdstrand: fyi, imminent security update for chromium, also impacting webkit and libvpx [13:38] fta2: cool, thanks...let us know [13:40] mdeslaur, i don't do libvpx myself (i use it as system lib for chromium-*-ffmpeg though) [13:43] mdeslaur, so i'm not sure about the details (we have 0.9.1 in lucid, 0.9.2 in maverick natty, debian has 0.9.5 :() [13:44] fta2: libvpx is in main in maverick, so the security team will backport fixes for it [13:44] excellent [13:45] fta2: libvpx in lucid is in universe, so someone needs to create a debdiff with backported fixes which we can then sponsor [14:28] chrisccoulson, should i re-enable umd for natty? [14:28] hmm.. natty for umd [14:28] fta2 - the firefox-4.0 builds should be ok [14:28] i still need to push the workaround for all the other builds [14:28] should i or not? ;) [14:29] fta2, i'll add the workaround for all the other builds in the next hour or so, so, if you re-enable them, they will be fixed before you next run them ;) [14:29] ok [14:29] done [14:29] thanks [15:48] heh, only 7 patches in our xulrunner package now [15:48] * chrisccoulson uses axe [15:49] still 16 patches in firefox though [15:49] :( [16:27] [Branch ~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels] Rev 411: linux/stable (7.0.517.41 -> 7.0.517.44) [16:27] [Branch ~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels] Rev 410: linux/beta (7.0.517.41 -> 8.0.552.28) [16:27] oh my [17:33] chrisccoulson: any tb patches? [17:33] davidascher, i'll get to those in a bit. IIRC, we don't have many tb patches, and i'm trying to trim down our distro patches as much as i can [17:34] we have way too many patches for firefox :/ [17:34] chrisccoulson: do you know how many of those patches are functionally equivalent to patches that other distros have? [17:36] davidascher, i'm not sure about that. you can view our current patchset at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird.head/files/head%3A/debian/patches/ though === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:08] chrisccoulson: I see 4.0b7 has been tagged, after you upload to Natty (would suggest waiting until release), I'll backport to the firefox-next PPA [21:09] * micahg is making an assumption that beta 7 is landing in Natty after it's released.... [21:11] micahg - yeah, that's the plan, although i still need to get language packs sorted out [21:11] chrisccoulson: oh, right... [21:12] chrisccoulson: if you want to ditch LP, I can convert the thunderbird-locales package, has dpm had any luck with upstream contacts? [21:12] not sure yet [21:12] chrisccoulson: k, I think we have about a week until beta 7 is released if no major show stoppers are found [21:13] i should be pretty much done by then, which will hopefully mean i have ubufox ported and the new profile migrator working [21:14] chrisccoulson: wow, you work fast :) [21:29] \o/ landed my 1st translation patches in chromium daily :) [21:30] cool [22:28] evening