m4t | i confirmed a bug involving CONFIG_MPENTIUMM=y and maverick's toolchain producing unbootable (hanging) kernels | 01:15 |
---|---|---|
m4t | happens with local builds both on real hw, and in qemu | 01:15 |
m4t | and i tested the build on a remote fresh 10.10 system, and it hangs in the same place | 01:15 |
m4t | affects at least 2.6.35.7, 2.6.35.8, and 2.6.36 | 01:16 |
m4t | does this belong under gcc bugs? | 01:16 |
m4t | also, gcc testsuite produces some fun results :) | 01:18 |
=== Pilif12p_ is now known as Pilif12p | ||
=== manusheel is now known as manusheel_afk | ||
=== fabbione|lpc is now known as fabbione | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
yofel | pitti: question about apport: when using 'ubuntu-bug --package XX' is file-bug mode supposed to be implied or do those options only work now if you add -f ? --help says that file-bug mode is implied if a single argument is given but for some people '--package=bash' is a single argument too but apport silently fails currently if you don't add -f/--file-bug | 12:34 |
yofel | (bug 665953) | 12:34 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 665953 in apport (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-bug --pid and --package options do not work" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/665953 | 12:34 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
=== oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away | ||
=== oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann | ||
=== tlyu_ is now known as tlyu | ||
=== sanchaz-away is now known as sanchaz | ||
jazzdog | not sure if this is relevant here, but latest flashplayer crashes on hardy when going fullscreen on any video site. flash tries to use gtk_widget_get_window which is available since gtk-2.14 and hardy has gtk-2.12. I have reported this bug on bugs.adobe.com | 18:04 |
jazzdog | i guess reporting this on launchpad is not neccessary but please tell me if otherwise | 18:05 |
ScottK | jazzdog: I think it has to be fixed at Adobe, so I think an LP bug isn't necessary. | 18:06 |
jazzdog | funny thing on bugs.adobe.com i can not see my own reported issue :) | 18:07 |
jazzdog | they say I reported a bug related to a non-public product or component | 18:08 |
micahg | jazzdog: well, flash 9 is still in multiverse | 18:08 |
ebroder | It seems like having an LP bug would still make sense, especially if multiple people start noticing this | 18:09 |
ebroder | For tracking purposes more than "we need to fix this" purposes | 18:09 |
jazzdog | it should affect everyone using hardy heron and watching videos on any video site in fullscreen | 18:10 |
micahg | and a link to the upstream Adobe bug in the description would help | 18:10 |
micahg | jazzdog: is this Flash 10 and Flash 9 or just Flash 10? | 18:10 |
jazzdog | latest flash from partner repo and from adobe.com download site | 18:11 |
jazzdog | so flash10 | 18:11 |
micahg | ok, so you can file against adobe-flashplugin | 18:11 |
jazzdog | but my reported bug is not public on adobe.com even I can not see it | 18:11 |
ebroder | That's fine. What matters is that we know the bug exists | 18:12 |
micahg | jazzdog: do you know about the public bug tracker for flash? https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? | 18:13 |
jazzdog | that's where I've submitted the bugreport, or at least the domain is the same | 18:14 |
mdeslaur | jazzdog: please file a bug in launchpad against adobe-flashplugin | 18:14 |
jazzdog | ok | 18:14 |
jazzdog | You need to specify a package or a PID. See --help for more information. | 18:22 |
jazzdog | after running ubuntu-bug adobe-flashplugin | 18:22 |
ScottK | It's in the Partner repository, not Ubuntu, so I'm not sure ubuntu-bug is intended to work for that case. | 18:24 |
jazzdog | it needs -p adobe-flashplugin | 18:24 |
jazzdog | -p was not on the wiki page | 18:24 |
micahg | jazzdog: ah, that's no longer necessary in LUcid | 18:25 |
jazzdog | what is not in lucid? and btw I'm on hardy :) | 18:25 |
micahg | jazzdog: right | 18:25 |
jazzdog | i see | 18:26 |
jazzdog | okay I've reported it on LP | 18:30 |
jazzdog | oops I've just realized this was already reported on karmic | 18:42 |
jazzdog | which is strange because karmic has gtk-2.18 | 18:42 |
jazzdog | only adobe can solve this :) | 18:43 |
micahg | or lightspark or gnash | 18:43 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== MattJ100 is now known as MattJ | ||
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
psusi | cjwatson, I just proposed a merge for parted and dmraid to finally drop the ubuntu patches removing the 'p' from the device name. last we talked you wanted to do that during maverick but I guess didn't have time... hopefully you can just bzr merge and commit easily | 19:36 |
ebroder | psusi: this is for things like /dev/mapper/loop0p1? | 19:41 |
psusi | ebroder, no.. for /dev/mapper/nvidia_13412352435 | 19:43 |
ebroder | ah, ok | 19:43 |
psusi | ebroder, upstream went to inserting a 'p' between the base raid device name and the partition number a while ago but ubuntu has been carrying patches to reverse that for a while | 19:44 |
ebroder | err, right. dmraid, not dmsetup. neverm ind | 19:44 |
psusi | I believe it causes breakage when the base name happens to end in a digit | 19:44 |
psusi | things like grub can't figure out where the base name ends and the partition number begins | 19:45 |
psusi | pitti, you were trying to work out automounting of esata disks right? I've been looking into that a bit lately and it seems AHCI has the capability to tell the os a port is external, but the driver doesn't bother using that bit | 20:13 |
=== hanska is now known as dapal | ||
psusi | why does a process opening a partition device for write access generate a udev change event, and why is that a time we want to ask lvm to activate all volumes? | 21:47 |
ebroder | I don't exactly understand the first half, but the second half is easy - all of Ubuntu's device detection is event driven. So new LVM device -> bring it online | 21:48 |
ebroder | you need that sort of behavior for things like "LUKS on LVM on RAID" to come up in any sane way | 21:49 |
psusi | right, so you want to activate when a new disk is added, but why when a partition is "changed" which apparently means anything wrote to it | 21:49 |
ebroder | No, "changed" means the device changed. The partition was resized, or something like that | 21:49 |
ebroder | Like I said, I don't know opening the device for writing generates a change event | 21:49 |
psusi | nope, a change event is emitted simply from opening the dev node in read/write mode | 21:50 |
ebroder | A change event is *also* emitted if the partition is resized, which *is* a case where you need to bring VGs online | 21:50 |
psusi | on the partition device that is | 21:50 |
psusi | not the raw disk, which you would think would get a change event when you change the partition table | 21:50 |
psusi | I would think that if the change added a partition, you would get an add event on the partition and want to activate... but right now it activates on any add or change event for a disk or partition... which seems a bit more than needed | 21:51 |
psusi | so keybuck wrote a patch to lvm to make sure it does not open devices for write access unless absolutely needed or it caused a feedback loop where the open causes a change, which runs lvm, which opens, etc | 21:52 |
ebroder | The changelog does describe it as a "sledgehammer" | 21:52 |
ebroder | I can't quite come up with the exact scenario where you'd need it, although I'm sure cjwatson or Keybuk could explain it better | 21:53 |
psusi | but I don't understand why the problem happens in the first place since I can't see any sense to activating every time a partition is changed, if changed means somebody wrote to it | 21:53 |
psusi | hrm... | 21:53 |
ebroder | Running pvcreate /dev/sda2 -> activating VGs is the closest I can get | 21:53 |
ebroder | I guess vgcreate will write to the PVs, and activating the VG after that happens makes sense | 21:53 |
ebroder | But the behavior definitely makes sense to me, even if I can't explain it exactly | 21:54 |
psusi | there's nothing in it to activate yet when you pvcreate though.. | 21:54 |
ebroder | vgcreate, though, not pvcreate | 21:56 |
psusi | same thing... when you first create a volume group it is empty.. | 21:58 |
ebroder | Like I said, I don't know the exact scenario, but it's very easy for me to imagine that there are scenarios *like* those where the behavior is desirable | 21:58 |
psusi | though I suppose if lvcreate does not automatically activate the new volume then you would do that with this udev rule... | 21:59 |
ebroder | This rule only triggers on PVs, not LVs, no? | 22:00 |
psusi | the rule triggers whenever any block device is added or changed | 22:00 |
psusi | and it has been identified by blkid as being a pv actually... | 22:00 |
ebroder | Right. "ENV{DM_UDEV_RULES}=="", GOTO="persistent_storage_dm_end"" | 22:00 |
psusi | yea... | 22:01 |
ebroder | In general, there's more than enough subtlety in LVM that I try not to assume behavior is unnecessary just because I can't come up with a scenario that needs it | 22:03 |
ebroder | (especially if I can imagine scenarios that *almost* need it) | 22:04 |
psusi | that's why I asked ;) | 22:04 |
RoAkSoAx | kirkland: i was thinking for powernap. Roll back to original (before adams changes) for the main trunk and create a series with his changes. So that I can first work with the main trunk by commiting stuff, because I;ve not yet dec | 22:08 |
RoAkSoAx | kirkland: haven't yet decided what to do. So I was planingn first to do everything related to pm-powersave and then work on the Monitors. My approach right now is to use the original branch... but I might decide for adam;s approach | 22:10 |
CarlFK | natty http://dpaste.de/mGIK/ *** buffer overflow detected ***: tftp terminated======= Backtrace: =========/lib/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f29b446b527]... | 22:12 |
CarlFK | what's the cli to post that to lp? | 22:12 |
ebroder | CarlFK: Do you get anything if you run apport-cli? | 22:13 |
CarlFK | juser@dhcp232:~$ apport-cli | 22:14 |
CarlFK | No pending crash reports. Try --help for more information. | 22:14 |
CarlFK | ran the tftp command manually (instead of the python Popen([tftp shaz... - crash, but still "No pending crash reports. | 22:17 |
kees | ebroder: hehe "You and @ebroder both follow... Marigold Farmer" *high-five* | 22:17 |
kees | CarlFK: you may need to enable apport for it to catch that. edit /etc/default/apport and then sudo /etc/init.d/apport start | 22:18 |
micahg | or sudo service apport start force_start=1 | 22:20 |
micahg | on Lucid and later | 22:20 |
ebroder | kees: will apport catch glibc throws like that? | 22:20 |
CarlFK | http://dpaste.de/wssw/ (gdb) bt full#0 0x00007ffff7a8cba5 in raise (sig=<value optimized out>)... | 22:21 |
CarlFK | enabled=0 Souldn't that be =1 for betas? | 22:22 |
kees | ebroder: yes | 22:22 |
kees | ebroder: I wrote the code to do it. :) | 22:23 |
RoAkSoAx | kirkland: /win 3 | 22:23 |
RoAkSoAx | -_- sry bout that :) | 22:24 |
CarlFK | 1: Launch a browser now... grumble. I am in an ssh shell | 22:24 |
kees | lynx! ;) | 22:24 |
CarlFK | ok, I am playing along.. "copy this URL into a browser on another computer." | 22:25 |
ajmitch | times like that, you wish that it'd file the bug by email | 22:26 |
kees | CarlFK: which tftp is that, btw? | 22:26 |
CarlFK | kees: whatever is installed by apt-get install tftp | 22:26 |
kees | netkit-tftp, ok | 22:26 |
CarlFK | "The file "CoreDump.gz" was attached to the bug report." um... I am on a different box? | 22:29 |
CarlFK | oh wow. | 22:29 |
CarlFK | did it push stuff up to some secrit place? | 22:29 |
kees | CarlFK: in the meantime, you might try tftp-hpa | 22:30 |
kees | CarlFK: yeah, it send it directly to LP, and then the bug report creation uses the hash to look it up | 22:30 |
CarlFK | kees: brilliant! | 22:31 |
CarlFK | what is the package that contains libc-dev or -dbg or whatever debug symboles? | 22:31 |
ebroder | kees: out of curiosity, how do glibc bug reports get captured? patch to glibc? | 22:31 |
kees | CarlFK: what's the bug#, btw? I can add some comments | 22:31 |
CarlFK | #672325 | 22:32 |
CarlFK | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netkit-tftp/+bug/672325 | 22:32 |
ubottu | 'Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: HTTP Error 401: Unauthorized\nResponse headers:\n---\ncontent-length: 21\ncontent-type: text/plain\ndate: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 22:32:11 GMT\nserver: zope.server.http (HTTP)\nstatus: 401\nvary: Accept-Encoding\nvia: 1.1 wildcard.edge.launchpad.net\nx-powered-by: Zope (www.zope.org), Python (www.python.org)\n---\nResponse body:\n---\nBug 672325 is private\n---\n (https://launchpad.net/bugs/672325)' | 22:32 |
kees | CarlFK: look for -dbg and -dbgsym https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash but -dbgsym needs a separate repo | 22:32 |
kees | ebroder: yes. I wrote code for glibc to retain the abort message. drepper took it without crediting me. \o/ | 22:32 |
CarlFK | opps, marked it private.. fixing... | 22:32 |
ebroder | Haha, awesome | 22:33 |
CarlFK | at least I would like to un-private it.. how do I do that? | 22:34 |
kees | CarlFK: upper right corner | 22:34 |
CarlFK | This bug report should be private fixed | 22:34 |
CarlFK | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netkit-tftp/+bug/672325 | 22:34 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 672325 in netkit-tftp (Ubuntu) "tftp assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: tftp terminated" [Undecided,New] | 22:34 |
CarlFK | juser@dhcp232:~$ aptitude search '~i' | fgrep -e '-dbg' | 22:35 |
CarlFK | i libc6-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging | 22:35 |
CarlFK | er, nm - thougth that was installed | 22:35 |
CarlFK | "libc6-dbg is already the newest version." so it is installed. anything else I can do? | 22:38 |
kees | installed tftp-dbgsym for more readability (check that wiki page I linked to) | 22:38 |
kees | 0x4013bc <makerequest+44>:callq 0x401118 <__strcpy_chk@plt> | 22:40 |
kees | cp = tp->th_stuff; | 22:41 |
kees | strcpy(cp, name); | 22:41 |
* ebroder sighs | 22:41 | |
kees | gah, this is a bug in gcc again! | 22:45 |
kees | I will take a closer look on monday | 22:46 |
lifeless | gcc has bugs? | 22:47 |
* lifeless is shocked | 22:47 | |
mwhudson | it's almost as if it was software | 22:47 |
CarlFK | Failed to fetch http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty/Release Unable to find expected entry main/source/Sources in Meta-index file (malformed Release file? | 23:22 |
mdeslaur | Is maverick-proposed still frozen? | 23:22 |
mdeslaur | slangasek, lool: can I upload a fix for LP: #631980 to maverick-proposed? | 23:24 |
slangasek | mdeslaur: go ahead; the freeze doesn't block you from uploading anyway, it just means the package won't necessarily be accepted right away | 23:26 |
geser | mdeslaur: the mail to u-d-a mentions Nov 8th as date of -proposed thaw | 23:26 |
mdeslaur | slangasek: ok, thanks | 23:26 |
slangasek | the freeze isn't quite cleared yet because we've had some difficult-to-verify SRUs in the queue that I need to bypass; but things should be opened up by tomorrow | 23:26 |
CarlFK | no source packages? http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty/main/ | 23:27 |
slangasek | CarlFK: ddebs are supplementary binary packages generated at build time; look to the main archive for source packages | 23:28 |
CarlFK | slangasek: k - just wanted to make sure it was expected | 23:28 |
CarlFK | kees: http://dpaste.de/IarY/ | 23:35 |
CarlFK | should I add that to the bug report as an attachment? | 23:36 |
CarlFK | i guess it isn't that big... I was thinking it was too big for pasting into a comment | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!