[12:48]  * apw yawns
[15:01] <lag> pgraner: Hi Pete
[15:01]  * lag mpoirier Hi Mathieu 
[15:02] <lag> Lol
[15:02] <lag> mpoirier: Hi Mathieu 
[15:02] <mpoirier> lag: I'll get back to you in 5 minutes.
[15:02] <lag> No problem 
[15:04] <cooloney> hi lag and mpoirier 
[15:04] <cooloney> how's going, 
[15:05] <lag> Hey cooloney 
[15:05] <lag> Good thanks buddy, and you?
[15:05] <lag> Are you safely home?
[15:05] <cooloney> lag: i am still in Boston with ericm|ubuntu and minipanda
[15:06] <cooloney> lag: working from our lexington office
[15:06] <lag> Ah, is apw there too?
[15:06] <lag> And rtg?
[15:07] <cooloney> lag: sure, we are together
[15:07] <lag> How romantic 
[15:08] <cooloney> lag: they are in a meeting. i think
[15:12] <pgraner> lag, howdy
[15:12] <lag> Hey Pete
[15:12] <lag> Are you in Lex too?
[15:12] <pgraner> lag, no I'm home
[15:12] <ericm|ubuntu> pgraner, hope everything is OK with your house now?
[15:13] <pgraner> ericm|ubuntu, no house left, but we are all fine
[15:13] <lag> pgraner: Did you manage to find somewhere nice to stay in the mean time?
[15:14] <ericm|ubuntu> pgraner, sad to hear but glad you are all good
[15:14] <pgraner> lag, currently at my inlaws, looking for a rental house
[15:14] <pgraner> ericm|ubuntu, thanks
[15:16] <bjf> lag, irc meetings start up again tomorrow, you still going to report out ARM status?
[15:20] <lag> bjf: I don't believe I am
[15:21] <lag> bjf: You'll need to speak to pgraner for a replacement ARM spoke person 
[15:21] <bjf> lag, maybe we'll just skip ARM this cycle
[15:21] <lag> bjf: :)
[15:22]  * lag feels a weight lifted 
[15:25] <ogra> hey !
[15:25] <cooloney> bjf: no, actually, i will still work on ti-omap4
[15:25] <ogra> dare you 
[15:25] <ogra> :)
[15:25] <cooloney> ogra: heh, big brother you are here
[15:25] <ogra> sure i am ... someone said arm :)
[15:26]  * ogra hopes the kernel team can answer his questions on the ubuntu-devel ML
[15:26] <cooloney> bjf and pgraner, i will join the meeting this week. since I am still in Boston.
[15:27] <pgraner> cooloney, great glad to have you
[15:27] <bjf> cooloney, maybe while you are together in boston you can pick a regular victim for the weekly irc meeting?
[15:28] <bjf> cooloney, or you can just send the status to me and I can just report it out
[15:28] <cooloney> pgraner: thx. np for me. glad your family are good.
[15:28] <pgraner> cooloney, thanks
[15:31] <cooloney> bjf: i will be in the meeting. and thanks for lag 
[15:32] <cooloney> he sent out the email for collecting ARM status
[15:32] <cooloney> ericm|ubuntu: will you join the IRC meeting?
[15:32] <ericm|ubuntu> cooloney, no problem - as long as you guys are OK
[15:33] <bjf> cooloney, you'll be in the meeting every week?
[15:33] <lag> cooloney: I did this week, but probably won't do it again
[15:33] <lag> cooloney: Take a copy of it and remember to send it out to the ARM Kernel folks every week
[15:33] <cooloney> bjf: we will join the meeting this week.
[15:34] <cooloney> bjf: and how about we sent status to your every week later
[15:34] <bjf> cooloney, that works
[15:34] <cooloney> bjf: thanks, man
[15:35]  * cooloney feels good when working from office
[15:40] <ericm|ubuntu> cooloney, you been house boy for so long time
[16:23] <hallyn> jjohansen: hey - do you know if there is any trick i need to do, other than putting a bare git tree under /srv/git..../git/serge/, to have it show up in gitweb on kernel.ubuntu.com?
[16:23] <hallyn> (i looked at yours as example, didn't see any export-ok or anything like that)
[16:25] <jjohansen> hallyn: did you change the commit hook?
[16:26] <hallyn> nope
[16:26] <hallyn> i can git-clone it, fwiw
[16:28] <jjohansen> hallyn: hooks/post-update
[16:30] <hallyn> hm, created that, no listing yet
[16:31] <jjohansen> right, you need to run it manually
[16:31] <jjohansen> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/KernelGitGuide
[16:31] <jjohansen> the bottom of it
[16:31] <jjohansen> git update-server-info
[16:32] <hallyn> doh
[16:32] <jjohansen> hrmm, it seems I am using a slightly different hook in natty
[16:39] <hallyn> hm, still nothing.  i guess i'll start from scratch later and try again
[16:42] <jjohansen> hallyn: hrmm, that should work, the post-commit hook is only needed to update the web when new commits are made,
[16:42] <jjohansen> hallyn: just follow the wiki, it has worked for me everytime
[16:46] <hallyn> jjohansen: the wiki page you pointed me to doesn't list --bare, which someone was telling kees to use
[16:46] <hallyn> think i had used --bare, so i'll try without
[16:46] <jjohansen> hallyn: right just add --bare
[16:46] <hallyn> hm, tha'ts what i had done then :)  ok
[16:46] <jjohansen> hallyn: the whole move the .git out of the checkout is what --bare does
[16:48] <hallyn> ok, will try that workflow verbatim and then push my patches from externally, thanks
[16:53] <hallyn> jjohansen: oh, i just looked at index.README - i think my problem was actually just combination of not having originally called it 'name.git', and then not waiting an hour for the cronjob :)  (bc i thought the git update-server-info cmd would do it)
[16:53] <hallyn> will check later if cronjob did its thing -thx
[16:54] <jjohansen> hallyn: ah yeah that makes sense
[20:27] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, ping - so any chance ubuntu-lucid-lbm could be made to work on ARM and how?
[20:45]  * ogasawara lunch
[21:02] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, copying over the rt28* from lbm works for me just perfectly
[21:02] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, thanks man
[21:46] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, could you take a look at this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/668554
[21:46] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 668554 in linux (Ubuntu) "Blank display at startup in Sony Vaio CW series (affects: 1) (heat: 464)" [Undecided,New]
[21:47] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, there should be a fix in 2.6.36 (finding out which is just a matter of git bisect) but it's more like a feature than a fix for SRU?
[21:48] <apw> ericm|ubuntu, is not a blank screen a pretty obviously a bug thing ?
[21:48] <ericm|ubuntu> apw, cool - then I'll try figure out the patch and get it backported
[23:14] <lighta> hi guys, can we attribuate a specific processor for a process in unix ? if yes how ?
[23:16] <sconklin> lighta: http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/setting-processor-affinity-certain-task-or-process.html
[23:17] <lighta> thanks =)
[23:18] <sconklin> lighta: you're welcome
[23:26] <lighta> sconklin, may I ask how should I attribuate a % usage now ?
[23:27] <sconklin> lighta: if you mean te get a process to run on a particular CPU some % of the time, I don't know whether you can do that.
[23:28] <lighta> hmm ok thx, i'll continue dig info then
[23:29] <sconklin> "processor affinity" is probably the most useful search term for this topic
[23:31] <sconklin> lighta: in general, the types of problems solved by setting processor affinity would mean that you want to leave a task locked to one processor forever
[23:32] <lighta> yes, because it's long task but wasn't develop to run on multithread