[00:59] <micahg> fta: yeah, they're trying to reduce the size of the CDs
[07:01] <fta2> dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new pre-installation script (/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst): Exec format error
[07:01] <fta2> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xulrunner-2.0_2.0~b8~hg20101108r57083+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick_amd64.deb (--unpack):
[07:01] <fta2>  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
[07:01] <fta2> chrisccoulson, ^^
[07:08] <fta2> chrisccoulson, umd failed again, but this time, it's not my fault: http://paste.ubuntu.com/528029/
[08:01] <magcius> uh
[08:02] <magcius> so what's the status on 663294 wrt nightly builds?
[10:18] <I^llGetOverIt> hello, can anybody help me?
[10:19] <I^llGetOverIt> i have daily repositori added in my source list, byt allmost a month there is no update
[10:20] <I^llGetOverIt> I'm using ubuntu 9.04, and my version of firefox is 3.6.11
[10:20] <I^llGetOverIt> in official site there is version 3.6.12
[10:30] <Dimmuxx> 9.04 isn't supported any longer so that's probably why
[10:35] <I^llGetOverIt> why there is sypport for 8.04, but not for 9.04
[10:35] <I^llGetOverIt> yes I know 804 is LTS byt this is stupid
[10:35] <I^llGetOverIt> 9.04 is not so old distribution
[10:36] <I^llGetOverIt> to forget it
[10:47] <Dimmuxx> http://fridge.ubuntu.com/node/2132
[11:20] <chrisccoulson> fta2, that's weird - the file exists here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/control.pp
[12:48] <fta2> chrisccoulson, the bot got rev730
[12:50] <BUGabundo> oias o/
[14:22] <fta2> jcastro, hi, is there a way to poll the community? working on the chromium translations, i discovered upstream is unsure about translating the devtools (inspector) or not. http://codereview.chromium.org/173570/show
[14:24] <jcastro> fta2: perhaps asking on the translator list?
[14:24] <jcastro> let me ask dpm
[14:25] <jcastro> he appears to be not in today, I'll ask him when I see him
[14:30] <fta2> jcastro, he's aware of my question, but let me decide. i have no opinion on that as i don't use a translated desktop. but i have the feeling that if i did, i would have expected to have it 100% translated
[14:30] <fta2> jcastro, as i need to re-land the patch (and later maintain it), i'd like to know if it's worth it
[15:58] <fta> i guess i'm on my own for this one :(
[16:08] <fta> chrisccoulson, respining ff4 only
[16:34] <fta> for some reason, the merge didn't get the d/control.pp :(
[17:33] <chrisccoulson> fta - yeah, i just saw that again
[17:34] <chrisccoulson> i'm not sure why that happens :/
[17:34] <fta> chrisccoulson, now idea either. a manual merge shows nothing to do
[17:35] <fta> chrisccoulson, i will rollback the .daily branch to further in the past once again :(
[18:29] <fta> damn, it's a "criss-cross merge encountered" error now. i'm sick of this.
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> micahg - oh, i didn't realise it was the DMB meeting today ;)
[20:39] <micahg> chrisccoulson: heh
[20:39] <chrisccoulson> congratulations btw!
[20:39] <micahg> chrisccoulson: thanks
[21:12] <fta> chrisccoulson, ff4 dailies fixed manually. hundreds of reverts & commits :P  *sigh*
[21:13] <chrisccoulson> fta - thanks, and sorry. do you know what happened there?
[21:13] <fta> chrisccoulson, a series of bad luck.
[21:14] <magcius> argh
[21:14] <magcius> what's the reason that nightly firefox packages are gone?
[21:14] <magcius> still #663294 ?
[21:15] <fta> chrisccoulson, because of the clean thing, the bot aborted in mid-air, leaving left-overs behind, the sub-sequent runs caught a bad commit, then your d/control move hit a special trick i do in the bot (a bzr revert d/control) :P
[21:15] <chrisccoulson> ah, sorry about that ;)
[21:16] <fta> never happened before, in thousands of merges
[21:16] <micahg> magcius: should be back soon, just without PIE on natty for the moment
[21:16] <magcius> micahg, but for us still on 10.10?
[21:17] <micahg> magcius: oh, there's been an upload issue which I think is resolved now
[21:17] <magcius> micahg, also, about:buildconfig doesn't show build date; is there any way I can see that?
[21:17] <micahg> magcius: well, the package version should have the code date
[21:19] <fta> chrisccoulson, in fact, the revert should not be a problem, unless the file is moved and replaced, which was the case here. so it's a rare bug in my bot, but a bug anyway
[21:49] <bobby_> Is there a reason the latest update of XULrunner 2.0 won't upgrade?
[21:50] <micahg> bobby_: what series?
[21:50] <bobby_> All I did was run the update-manager, and it failed to upgrade, not sure though
[21:50] <bobby_> Daily PPA
[21:50] <micahg> bobby_: yes, what series though (lucid, maverick, natty)
[21:50] <bobby_> maverick
[21:50] <chrisccoulson> could you be a little bit more specific?
[21:51]  * micahg would think that's a bug...
[21:51] <bobby_> Here is part of what I get:
[21:51]  * micahg tries to update
[21:51] <bobby_> Preparing to replace xulrunner-2.0 2.0~b8~hg20101103r56850+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 (using .../xulrunner-2.0_2.0~b8~hg20101108r57083+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick_amd64.deb) ...
[21:51] <bobby_> dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new pre-installation script (/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst): Exec format error
[21:51] <bobby_> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xulrunner-2.0_2.0~b8~hg20101108r57083+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick_amd64.deb (--unpack):
[21:51] <bobby_>  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
[21:51] <bobby_> Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
[21:51] <bobby_> ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
[21:51] <bobby_> Errors were encountered while processing:
[21:51] <bobby_>  /var/cache/apt/archives/xulrunner-2.0_2.0~b8~hg20101108r57083+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick_amd64.deb
[21:52] <chrisccoulson> hmmmm
[21:52] <fta> reported that this morning too
[21:52] <bobby_> Is it a problem with dpkg or the upgrade script?
[21:52] <chrisccoulson> oh?
[21:52] <bobby_> clearing my cache doesn't work either
[21:53] <bobby_> Some pretty epic bug
[21:54] <bobby_> suggestions?
[21:55] <chrisccoulson> ok, i see what's happened
[21:55] <bobby_> what happened? I'm lost :P
[21:57] <bobby_> Who's getting fired?
[22:02] <micahg> chrisccoulson: postinst w/out preinst for -gnome-support?
[22:02] <chrisccoulson> micahg, no, the mozilla text preprocessor has stripped every line beginning with a '#' (including the #!/bin/sh bit)
[22:03] <chrisccoulson> that seems like a bug ;)
[22:03] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ha
[22:03] <chrisccoulson> epic fail :)
[22:03] <bobby_> Anyone know if b7 is ever coming out btw?
[22:03] <chrisccoulson> soon
[22:03] <bobby_> I heard it is supposed to land by Friday
[22:03] <bobby_> b7 is the feature freeze right?
[22:04] <micahg> b7 was tagged already, just waiting for QA
[22:04] <bobby_> oh, thats good, any idea if we're getting a UI update, or is it just Winblows and OSX?
[22:05] <micahg> bobby_: we're getting some type of update, still unclear how much is actually in b7
[22:05] <bobby_> oh okay, I'm looking forward to the new single button menu...
[22:05] <micahg> I'm not sure how much of that made it to b7
[22:06] <bobby_> :(
[22:06] <chrisccoulson> none, is the short answer
[22:06] <chrisccoulson> but b7 does have a new tab style
[22:06] <bobby_> I thought that b7 is the universal feature freeze, that is why it is taking so long :(
[22:06] <bobby_> Also, are we getting openGL hardware acceleration? I know OSX is getting it...
[22:07] <micahg> I thought that was dropped for 4.0
[22:07] <bobby_> nooooooooooo...
[22:07] <bobby_> I was reading somewhere they are aiming for release for OSX by the first RC
[22:08] <bobby_> I just want to know if we'll get it...
[22:10] <bobby_> Wait... Are you going to be able to fix the bug, or has Mozilla taken over the release updates for beta releases?
[22:10] <micahg> bobby_: what bug?
[22:11] <bobby_> XULRunner 2.0 upgrade problem I just reported?
[22:11] <bobby_> Or is that... not a bug?
[22:11] <micahg> bobby_: we'll probably be able to work around it
[22:11] <bobby_> fair 'nuf
[22:12] <bobby_> dang it... still no natty pre-alpha :(
[22:13] <micahg> bobby_: for?
[22:13] <bobby_> ... Ubuntu?
[22:13] <micahg> oh, daily ISOs?
[22:13] <bobby_> yeah
[22:14]  * micahg has nothing to do with those
[22:14] <bobby_> lol, yeah i know :P
[22:14] <micahg> alpha 1 is Dec 2, so they should be starting soon
[22:14] <bobby_> Dec 2. is 22 days away
[22:14] <bobby_> Hence why I want a pre-alpha
[22:14] <micahg> bobby_: you can install maverick and upgrade
[22:15] <bobby_> Yeah I know, I know... Pre-alphas are pretty much raw code right out of UDS, with pretty much no new features
[22:15] <bobby_> hence, I'd be surprised if it even worked :P
[22:15] <bobby_> As long is I have FF4 on it...
[22:16] <micahg> bobby_: only in PPA ATM, chrisccoulson has been working tirelessly on getting FF4 ready for the archive
[22:17] <bobby_> *twitch*
[22:17] <bobby_> Dang I wish I could jump to January...
[22:17]  * micahg fiddles with bobby_'s system clock
[22:18] <bobby_> Ubuntu auto updated for the time change, and I got mad because I thought it was wrong, because my desktop clock didn't :P
[22:18] <micahg> ha
[22:18] <bobby_> Yes, I thought Ubuntu let me down, I actually changed the time...
[22:19] <bobby_> then I kind of realized that Ubuntu updated, not my clock... Which... can't... update...
[22:19] <bobby_> *facepalm
[22:19] <micahg> bobby_: some clocks can auto-update
[22:19] <bobby_> Not one from 15 years ago shaped like Garfield :P
[22:22] <bobby_> Well, you guys work on the bug, Ima go eat dinner.
[22:22] <bobby_> Mmmm... Chicken
[22:22] <bobby_> Have fun
[22:22]  * micahg was about to say chrisccoulson already fixed it...
[22:23] <micahg> s/fixed/worked around/