[05:50] <rtdp> wanted to start contribution to ubuntu with bug reportings... joing bug sqlad.. info is nice on site about it... but seems too much info there... confused where to start?
[05:56] <mrand> rtdp: most people are asleep (as I am about to be)... Just pick a package that you are interested in and then investigate bugs for that package, using https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs and the subpages to answer specific questions you have.
[05:56] <rtdp> mrand : ok will start that way
[05:57] <rtdp> thankis
[05:57] <rtdp> *thanks
[05:57] <mrand> Thank you!
[11:47] <Gigacore> today is a hug day right?
[11:47] <kamusin> Gigacore, yes sir
[11:48] <Gigacore> kamusin: thank you :)
[11:49] <yofel> hm, only noticed that now but the response on the bugday page is wrong
[11:49] <yofel> we don't have a 'Report a bug' menu entry anymore
[11:50] <yofel> I'll change it to the one from Bugs/Responses
[11:50] <kamusin> doh.. right
[11:52] <yofel> fixed
[11:54] <Gigacore> just a question, how is this bug #670570 triaged?
[11:54] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 670570 in linux (Ubuntu) "Left speaker doesnt work with Realtec ALC275 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/670570
[11:54] <Gigacore> I am still a newbie
[11:54] <Gigacore> because the status is still new
[11:55] <Gigacore> damn
[11:55] <Gigacore> got it
[11:56] <kamusin> thanks yofel :)
[11:56] <Gigacore> but what confuses me is that in the page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20101111 there are few bugs which have status as "New" and marked green
[12:11] <nigelb> Gigacore: the bug day is about bugs without a package, that's why some are new and still green
[12:12] <Gigacore> nigelb: oh, thank you! When would you get time to teach some basic stuffs for me?
[12:13] <nigelb> Gigacore: I'm waiting for my laptop to get fixed.  In a week perhaps?
[12:13] <nigelb> In the meanwhile feel free to ask in the channel :)
[12:13] <Gigacore> nigelb: ok no problem
[12:13] <Gigacore> sure
[12:15] <pedro_> btw i'll be adding new bugs to the page in a few minutes
[12:15] <pedro_> grabbing the list right now
[12:17] <kamusin> wohoo
[12:26] <pedro_> folks: another round of bugs without of packages was added to the bug day page!
[12:26] <pedro_> lets squash them!
[15:59] <kiwinote> hggdh: hi! Do you mind renewing my bug control membership?
[16:13] <hggdh> kiwinote: on it
[16:13] <kiwinote> hggdh: thanks
[16:15] <hggdh> kiwinote: done, thanks you for helping
[16:16] <kiwinote> hggdh: nice new expiry date you managed to get there ;)
[16:28] <hggdh> kiwinote: yes, I could not resist ;-)
[16:47] <krisphillips> Hey guys,  I have a bug report i was wondering if someone could give me an idea for a workaround while I wait on the bug report
[16:47] <krisphillips> Its located at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/674112
[16:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 674112 in xorg (Ubuntu) "XOrg Segmentation Fault with XServer when running MultiSeatX (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[16:48] <krisphillips> Anybody in here?
[16:58] <charlie-tca> people being here vs people with a workaround for a bug just filed are different
[16:59] <micahg> charlie-tca: too late (also wrong channel for workarounds :))
[17:23] <vish> charlie-tca: for the logo , maybe file a bug in 'ubuntu' and a needs-artwork tag to it?
[17:24] <charlie-tca> I'll get in touch with doctormo, I think. Artwork team seems to on ignore again
[19:30] <leighman> I reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/673787 which was rejected by Oo.o upstream, is it acceptable to add 'Affects Project' libreoffice and link to a bug in their bug tracker
[19:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 673787 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "cannot highlight text in attached document (.doc) (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Low,Confirmed]
[19:33] <ScottK> leighman: We don't have libreoffice in Ubuntu, so it can't be a valid Ubuntu bug against it.  You could report it in their bug tracker and see.
[19:35] <micahg> ScottK: I think that's just a matter of time though, the plan is to move to LibreOffice this cycle, I think leighman was just requesting this not get lost
[19:35]  * micahg needs to think more before typing
[19:36] <leighman> yeh, any idea what's going to happen for the transition?
[19:36] <ScottK> micahg: Sure, but in any case it needs to go upstream to be addressed and we've got no place to not lose it for libreoffice at this point.
[19:36] <micahg> ScottK: well, if they have a tracker already, we can add the upstream project (just not a package in Ubuntu)
[19:37] <micahg> leighman: first, they need to find someone to drive it
[19:38] <leighman> there is https://launchpad.net/libreoffice and https://code.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice
[19:38] <leighman> second looks like the official one
[19:40] <hggdh> leighman: in this case the frame overlaps the text -- so when you try to select the text you are actually over the frame
[19:41] <hggdh> leighman: when you look at the doc under OO, you should be able to see the frame(s) -- the one you want to either take off, or reduce, is the one that extends to the right
[19:42] <hggdh> just did it, and it works now
[19:42] <hggdh> of course, the poster upstream could have been a bit more clear...
[19:44] <leighman> ok, thanks
[19:44] <leighman> figure it should work if it works in Word tho.  In an ideal world!
[19:45] <hggdh> leighman: this may still be a bug...
[19:45] <hggdh> if the original Word doc shows (and works) with the frame *as it is displayed on OO*, then it is still a bug
[19:46] <hggdh> or if the frame is shown on Word much reduced
[19:46] <hggdh> leighman: in this case we would need to have a screenshot showing the frames on both Word and OO
[19:46] <leighman> Word 2007 doesn't show the frame at all (which I guess is how stupid things like that happen) but selecting still works fine
[19:47] <hggdh> leighman: there is at least one real frame -- the logo. Can you select it on Word?
[19:48] <leighman> yup
[19:48] <hggdh> but you do not see any other frame on Word, correct?
[19:48] <leighman> no other frames though
[19:49] <hggdh> good. Then the bug is on frame management: either OO is "creating" a frame on the fly, or it is extending an existing frame
[19:49] <hggdh> but the bug is not that you cannot select text ;-)
[19:52] <hggdh> leighman: so I suggest: (1) changing the title/dscription of the bug; (2) adding a screenshot of how the page is displayed on both Word and OO; (3) resubmitting a (new) bug upstream
[19:53] <leighman> what would be a better title?
[19:56] <hggdh> hum
[19:57] <hggdh> unknown frame overlays Word doc when opened by OO
[19:57] <hggdh> and you state it does not happen with Word (and give out the Word version)
[20:11] <gamerpro2000> Can someone please look at my bug.  I'm getting desperate here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/674112
[20:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 674112 in xorg (Ubuntu) "XOrg Segmentation Fault with XServer when running MultiSeatX (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[20:15] <scubes13> looking for assistance with bug 567188 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/567188) or at least help determining if I am experiencing the same issue or not
[20:15] <ubot2> scubes13: Bug 567188 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/567188 is private
[20:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 567188 in krb5 (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "krb5 and ADS error using 10.04, not 9.04 (affects: 3) (heat: 31)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[20:18] <ikonia> scubes13: worth putting a prod on the bug too
[20:18] <scubes13> prod? ie, add a comment on the bug?
[20:19] <scubes13> (could it be more obvious that this is my first time doing this) :P
[20:35] <njin> Hello to all the room and please pay attention to the posture.
[20:58] <hggdh> scubes13: yes, add a comment to the bug. Have you tried the test in comment #12?
[21:18] <hggdh> OK. I will be offline for a while (testing KVM, and I usually get a kernel OOPS) to try to guarantee my filesystems integrity