=== kees___ is now known as kees
=== nisshh_linux is now known as nisshh
=== nisshh is now known as Guest76709
=== Guest76709 is now known as nisshh
=== Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo
=== cfmcguire_ is now known as cfmcguire
=== ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga
=== fenris- is now known as ejat
=== jorge__ is now known as jcastro
=== CaioAlonso_ is now known as CaioAlonso
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
[14:28] <hjd> Hi. I have reported a bug, which I am unable to reproduce on other systems, so I'm starting to suspect the Ubuntu upgrades (every version from 8.04 to 10.04) might have caused it. I have commented this in the bug report, but should just change it to invalid?
[14:30] <hjd> bug 633425 for details
[14:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 633425 in klavaro (Ubuntu) "When attempting to reopen Introduction only a thin, blank window is shown (affects: 1) (heat: 50)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/633425
[14:32] <charlie-tca> hm, looking at the report, it appears it may have started with the 8.04 to 8.10 upgrade?
[14:37] <hjd> I'm not sure. I think I first noticed it some time earlier this year.
[14:41] <charlie-tca> You are the only one that can reproduce it?
[14:42] <charlie-tca> I am not familar with klavaro, can anyone else reproduce the bug? If we can't tell developers how to do that, they probably can not fix it.
=== CaioAlonso_ is now known as CaioAlonso
[14:53] <hjd> seems like it. And I've only been able to reproduce it on one computer. Which is why I'm considering just setting it to invalid, since it seems like it will be hard (if not impossible) to reproduce.
[14:57] <jcastro> bdmurray: Unity section doesn't come up for me yet?
[14:57] <charlie-tca> I would agree with that then. If someone can tell how to reproduce it later, it can be marked back to new
[15:06] <joumetal> should bug #284325 be in package libpng as libpng3 is transitional package?
[15:06] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 284325 in libpng3 (Ubuntu) "libpng12-0 could do with an extra symlink for compatibility (affects: 7) (dups: 2) (heat: 22)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/284325
[15:06] <hjd> charlie-tca: done. It's now set to invalid.
[15:07] <charlie-tca> Thank you for doing that. It is rare to have the reporter question such things.
[15:12] <hjd> You're welcome.
[15:13] <hjd> Another question: I've found bug 479233 and bug 671545 which are duplicates, but I'm unsure which should be kept.
[15:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 479233 in gnat-gps (Ubuntu) "gnat-gps doesn't have a menu entry (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/479233
[15:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 671545 in gnat-gps (Ubuntu) "GPS does not show in Applications Menu (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/671545
[15:15] <charlie-tca> Normally, we want to make the report that is most complete the master. In this case, it is simply a desktop file to be built, so make the oldest report the master
[15:16] <charlie-tca> It should be tagged "desktop-file' too
[15:19] <hjd> done. +confirmed :)
[15:24] <charlie-tca> Thank you very much for helping
[15:28] <hjd> Just contributing a bit where I can. :)
[15:32] <charlie-tca> joumetal: the application with the missing symlink is a .rpm file from outside the repositories?
[15:33] <joumetal> yes I think so.
[15:33] <charlie-tca> Then we won't actually touch it
[15:34] <charlie-tca> If the missing link is something we use in Ubuntu, it is a valid bug. Otherwise, the report should not be against ubuntu. The reporter needs to report it against the rpm file instead
[15:36] <charlie-tca> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Packages%20not%20provided%20by%20Ubuntu
[15:45]  * joumetal still thinks it would be easier to have that symlink.
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[16:54] <bdmurray> jcastro: working on it
[17:04] <Fanshawe> Hello, bug squad. I was looking for some clarification on the Evolution sound bug.
[17:04] <Fanshawe> I can't get Evolution to play sounds on scheduled events.
[17:07] <charlie-tca> Fanshawe: what kind of clarification? If it is a bug, is it filed as a bug?
[17:08] <Fanshawe> I believe so. But I couldn't find a fix. That's what I was looking for.
[17:08] <Fanshawe> In fact I think there are more than a few instances of the bug being reported.
[17:09] <charlie-tca> A bug being reported means their is no fix yet
[17:10] <charlie-tca> By checking the report, you might find a workaround for the issue.
[17:13] <Fanshawe> I see
[17:13] <Fanshawe> well thank you, I'll look around more
[17:37] <stlsaint> AbhiJit: ping
[17:56] <AbhiJit> stlsaint, pong
[18:17] <stlsaint> AbhiJit: hey sorry man could you send those two bugs again
[18:17] <AbhiJit> stlsaint, which?
[18:18] <stlsaint> hrm, maybe your last wo
[18:18] <AbhiJit> let me chech in my lp
[18:19] <AbhiJit> stlsaint, see here https://bugs.launchpad.net/~abhi-navale
[18:19] <AbhiJit> i think last 4 you are talking about.
[18:20] <stlsaint> aye
[18:44] <AbhiJit> bye stlsaint
=== shadeslayer is now known as evilshadeslayer
[19:20] <bdmurray> jcastro: okay it is showing up now
[19:20] <jcastro> rock and roll dude
[20:04] <blemish> any ubuntu sound experts here?
[20:06] <blemish> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671178
[20:06] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]
[20:06] <blemish> this is the bug that's been keeping me up for days :-(
[20:09] <bbordwell> blemish, its very odd that it works on a live cd but not on his install
[20:12] <bbordwell> blemish, is this your bug or are you just trying to triage it?
[20:16] <sense> bdmurray: My Bug Control membership is about to expire. Could you please renew it for me?
=== ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk
[20:54] <blemish> bbordwell - my bug
[20:54] <blemish> I suspect there's something wrong with my sound settings
[20:55] <blemish> dont know what though
[20:55] <blemish> brb
[21:05] <blemish> bbordwell: ok, I'm back
[21:06] <bbordwell> blemish, alright I am not immedietly seeing anything, but just to be sure have you checked alsamixer and made sure all the sliders are up?
[21:11] <blemish> bbordwell: yes. and the alsa modules are loaded
[21:12] <bdmurray> sense: did anybody take care of your membership yet?
[21:12] <sense> bdmurray: Not yet.
[21:13] <bbordwell> blemish, alright, do you have a integrated sound chip as well as the pci card?
[21:14] <bdmurray> sense: you are all set now
[21:15] <sense> bdmurray: Thank you!
[21:20] <blemish> bbordwell: yes, but the integrated chip is disabled in bios
[21:21] <blemish> bbordwell: sound works in windows 7, which is set up on another hdd
[21:22] <bbordwell> blemish, in sound settings>hardware what is selected in the drop box?
[21:23] <blemish> ca0106 Soundblaster - the only option
[21:24] <bbordwell> blemish, below that, under where it says "setting for selected device"
[21:25] <blemish> Analog Stereo Duplex
[21:26] <bbordwell> blemish, sounds right...
[21:34] <blemish> bbordwell: what about the input settings
[21:34] <bbordwell> blemish, afaik input settings are just for recording
[21:35] <blemish> I see
[21:35] <blemish> out of curiosity: which option do you have set?
[21:36] <bbordwell> blemish, I have it set to my onboard sound cuz I never bothered to change it to my x-fi
[21:38] <bbordwell> blemish, have you tried playing changing the profile under output setting just to see if it has any effect? stereo duplex should be right but you never know, perhaps analog stereo?
[21:38] <bbordwell> oops delete playing out of that sentence
[21:39] <blemish> bbordwell: to analog stereo output?
[21:40] <bbordwell> blemish, ya just try a few other setting to see if it has any effect, i doubt it but worth a try
[21:44] <blemish> bbordwell: nope, didn't work
[21:44] <blemish> btw, what's the difference between anallog and digital outputs?
[21:53] <njin> hello, verified: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/674692
[21:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 674692 in ubuntu "Ubuntu Software Center should indicate that Ultraedit is a trial version (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[21:54] <njin> Is a wrong version?
[21:57] <njin> yofel: sorry, ^^^ we have in the repo software wothout licence and in trial version
[22:00] <njin> persia: hello, sorry if disturb, ^^^^sorry, ^^^ we have in the repo software wothout licence and in trial version
[22:01] <persia> njin, Are you sure?  I don't see ultraedit available.
[22:01] <yofel> well, it's in partner, so under canonicals maintenance
[22:01] <persia> Oh, that's not our repo then.
[22:01] <yofel> http://paste.ubuntu.com/530904/
[22:02] <persia> Yeah, not ours at all.
[22:03] <ScottK> Yes.  I assigned the bug to the correct package.
[22:04] <njin> Ah, thanks for the explication, i've enabled partner
[22:08]  * persia wishes that assign-bugs-to-PPAs was working, and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/partner-packaging/+spec/partner-to-ppas was implemented, to resolve the semantic confusion of that being a bug against "uex (Ubuntu)"
[22:16] <yofel> I would really like to see that you can one day assing a package to something like 'packagename (PPA name)'
[22:20] <persia> Dunno if it will, but would be nice to have as part of https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/DerivativeDistributions or https://dev.launchpad.net/SoyuzArchiveDerivatives or https://dev.launchpad.net/VersionThreeDotO/Soyuz/PPAUI
[22:21] <persia> Doing it right really requires someone to engage the LP team with a clear vision and rationale, supported by either someone willing to do the coding or some overwhelmingly good arguments why someone else should do the coding.
[22:48] <blemish> can anybody help with this bug
[22:48] <blemish> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671178
[22:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]
[22:48] <blemish> it's driving me nuts
[22:48] <blemish> no sound for weeks
[22:48] <blemish> or at least if you can point me to an expert in the field
[23:47] <calaen0> Maybe this is the right place  to ask this question. If not, pardon me....
[23:47] <calaen0> I have a custom-compiled arcmsr module that I want to try to resolve some issues with the arcmsr module that ships with Ubuntu. I have it built and it is in /lib/modules/*/extras/ However, when I restart the machine, the default module in /lib/modules/*/drivers/scsi/ gets loaded. How do I tell Ubuntu to load the module from extras/ ? I want to see if it solves a hangup bug.
=== blueyed_ is now known as blueyed