[00:23] <bobby_> Have all of the b7 release features been merged into b8pre with todays update?
[00:24] <micahg> bobby_: huh?  b7 was released from trunk AFAIK, we'll be updating the firefox-next PPA next week
[00:24] <bobby_> so not all of the final features were added yet?
[00:27] <bobby_> oh yeah, and why does flash keep crashing? Started Monday...
[00:27] <bobby_> Never did that before
[00:38] <fta> *sigh* after a reboot on natty, all the indicators are gone
[01:04] <chrisccoulson> fta - i had my first proper natty bug today!
[01:04] <chrisccoulson> i popped out earlier, and when i returned to my computer, all the contents of all my windows were garbled
[01:04] <chrisccoulson> i ended up having to reboot in the end
[01:04]  * micahg is dreading updating his test machine to Natty
[01:05] <chrisccoulson> micahg - do it! it's fun......
[01:05] <chrisccoulson> :)
[01:05] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I have to make sure the maverick kernel works first, then I'll upgrade :)
[01:05]  * micahg is stuck on a karmic kernel ATM
[01:05] <chrisccoulson> just use the natty kernel ;)
[01:05] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no Natty ARM kernel AFAIK
[01:06] <chrisccoulson> ah, ok
[01:06] <chrisccoulson> wow, some people have a lot of time on their hands: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11717510
[01:06] <fta> chrisccoulson, do you still have the indicators?
[01:06] <chrisccoulson> fta - i do, but i haven't updated any packages today
[01:06] <chrisccoulson> i'm quite conservative with updating ;)
[01:07] <fta> oh
[01:07] <fta> i've lost the netspeed applet too
[01:08] <chrisccoulson> fta - do you have gnome-panel-bonobo installed?
[01:08] <fta> no
[01:08] <chrisccoulson> i think we're running the new dbus based panel, which probably means some applets still using bonobo won't work
[01:08] <chrisccoulson> try installing that
[01:08] <chrisccoulson> that might get the old bonobo applets working again
[01:08] <fta> oohhhh
[01:08] <fta> ahhhhh
[01:08] <fta> \o/
[01:09] <fta> thanks
[01:09] <chrisccoulson> :)
[01:10] <chrisccoulson> fta - have you seen gnome bug 631410 before?
[01:10] <ubot2> Gnome bug 631410 in gio "Port gapplookupgconf.c to using x-scheme-handler/" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631410
[01:10] <chrisccoulson> this has implications for firefox and chromium, in that they need to declare that they handle x-scheme-handler/http mimetypes in their desktop files now
[01:11] <chrisccoulson> (and https)
[01:11] <chrisccoulson> the protocol handlers are no longer stored in gconf anymore
[01:11] <fta> hm, i think so
[01:12] <fta> in evo
[01:12] <fta> but it's gone now
[01:12] <chrisccoulson> yeah, evo should have one for the mailto URI's too
[01:13] <chrisccoulson> and thunderbird too, i guess
[01:13] <chrisccoulson> i notice in natty that protocol handling is broken, because no apps are specifying the x-scheme-handler types
[01:14] <fta> well, it was broken from me in evo with http links this morning, but it's fine now
[01:14] <chrisccoulson> oh, it's strange that it's working again now :/
[01:14] <fta> natty all upgraded & freshly rebooted
[01:14] <chrisccoulson> perhaps i should try updating ;)
[01:15] <fta> grr, i wish liferea was faster
[01:15] <fta> 30 sec to mark a single feed as read
[01:16] <chrisccoulson> yeah, liferea is painfully slow here as well
[01:16] <chrisccoulson> it's becoming so unusable that i'm almost feeling compelled to fix it
[01:25] <fta> sftp:// links are broken in nautilus
[01:26] <fta> Error reading from unix: Input/output error
[01:26] <fta> weird clueless error
[01:27] <chrisccoulson> fta - yeah, broken here too
[01:27] <fta> and context menus: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/menu.png
[01:28] <chrisccoulson> fta - i guess that's related to the bonobo -> dbus port
[01:29]  * chrisccoulson runs upgrade now :)
[18:48] <fta> jdstrand, hi, why is 7.0.517.44 in -update while in -security, it's still .41?
[18:50] <jdstrand> fta: it shouldn't be. let me look
[18:51] <jdstrand> that's weird, I totally copied to -security
[18:51]  * jdstrand does it again
[18:58]  * jdstrand wonders if it is because he did the pocket copy for -updates and to -security at the same time rather than waiting one publishing cycle
[18:58] <jdstrand> shouldn't make a difference
[18:58] <jdstrand> anyway, it's done
[19:06] <fta> thanks
[19:07] <fta> http://www.osnews.com/story/24021/WebM_Update_80_of_Daily_YouTube_Videos_Now_in_WebM
[20:50] <fta> is there anything in the policy preventing me from building a package with icc instead of gcc?