Chloric | evening guys | 00:16 |
---|---|---|
dorgan | so everyone set for Senchacon?? | 01:35 |
dorgan | oops wrong channel | 01:35 |
Chat8742 | orlando 31 male here | 01:36 |
chloric | wrong IRC | 01:36 |
Chat8742 | anyo | 01:37 |
Chat8742 | this BB app sucks | 01:37 |
mhall119 | bb app? | 01:52 |
MichelleQ1 | I dunno... bulletin board? | 01:53 |
=== jck77_ is now known as jck77 | ||
reya276 | Morning everyone | 13:30 |
reya276 | Is it just me or is everyone in the community a bit bummed about the changes Mark S. has been making for the future of Ubuntu, no more Rhythmbox, Gnome replace by Unity, X by wayland and probably something else towards having more MONO (.NET) stuff in it? | 13:32 |
reya276 | Or maybe the reason why everyone has been so Quiet lately is due to being over worked if that is the case then I can totally understand I'm in that same boat right now feeling like I'm ready to crash, speaking of that my Work PC is acting real funny. | 13:34 |
reya276 | How can I give it a good clean up does anyone have a safe guide as to how to do that. Bleach Bit is one option | 13:34 |
mhall119 | reya276: depends on what you mean by cleanup | 13:41 |
reya276 | well yesterday my display drivers started acting all crazy(I have the deafult drivers not proprietary ATI) and today the system is extremely slow for some reason and this machine is a beast | 13:43 |
mhall119 | hmmm, did you get an x.org update? | 13:44 |
reya276 | well I did that reset command dpkg-resetconfig etc... | 13:49 |
reya276 | but now everytime I logout it says my X config is messed up | 13:50 |
reya276 | oh man Remmina for Terminal Servers Connection is awesome, works flawless | 14:26 |
reya276 | GnomeRDP can suck it, be Gone from my Desktop | 14:26 |
reya276 | ok now lets see if my X issues where fixed | 14:28 |
reya276 | yeap it seems that the X issue is fixed no more error msg at login/logout | 14:48 |
maxolasersquad | Anyone see this. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-November/145273.html | 14:50 |
maxolasersquad | It looks like Fedora believes Wayland is the way to go as well. | 14:51 |
dantalizing | morning | 15:01 |
mhall119 | so it is | 15:16 |
mhall119 | zoopster: morning | 15:54 |
zoopster | hi mhall119 | 15:54 |
mhall119 | zoopster: so after talking with my manager, it seems that using Ubuntu is going to be a harder sell than implementing a cloud | 15:55 |
mhall119 | the company is trying to standardize on a single distro, and right now it's redhat | 15:55 |
zoopster | that's a interesting excuse | 15:55 |
zoopster | what other os's are in use? | 15:56 |
mhall119 | Windows server | 15:56 |
mhall119 | that's it for servers that I know of | 15:56 |
zoopster | only one flavor? | 15:56 |
mhall119 | though I'm sure there's some mainframes and ancient AIX boxes running around somewhere | 15:56 |
zoopster | right | 15:56 |
mhall119 | only RHEL as far as I know | 15:56 |
zoopster | for linux | 15:56 |
mhall119 | don't know what version of Windows Server | 15:56 |
mhall119 | will UEC run non-Linux OSes? | 15:57 |
zoopster | uec is a product specific to ubuntu | 15:57 |
zoopster | you can run eucalyptus on rhel | 15:57 |
mhall119 | I meant guest OS | 15:57 |
zoopster | sure | 15:58 |
zoopster | we don't support windows on it, but it will run | 15:58 |
mhall119 | ok, if they can run Windows and RHEL instances as the guests, they might be okay with Ubuntu on the hosts | 15:58 |
zoopster | an upsell the enterprise version will provide windows guest support | 15:58 |
mhall119 | enterprise UEC? | 15:59 |
zoopster | basically, yes | 15:59 |
mhall119 | are they different software, or just different support levels? | 15:59 |
zoopster | it's additional software to the open core | 15:59 |
mhall119 | ok | 15:59 |
mhall119 | they might go for that | 15:59 |
mhall119 | do you know if Oracle supports running their DB products in the cloud? | 16:00 |
zoopster | they do on EC2 | 16:00 |
zoopster | I don't know about private | 16:00 |
zoopster | but expect they treat it as virtualization | 16:01 |
mhall119 | do they provide images, or just support it if you do it? | 16:01 |
mhall119 | I think Moffitt will go for at least a pilot project | 16:03 |
dantalizing | run oracle in a vm and pay them for all the cpus on the hardware anyway ... win! not! | 16:08 |
mhall119 | yeah | 16:09 |
mhall119 | we were discussing what to do with out MySQL installs yesterday | 16:09 |
dantalizing | mariadb? | 16:10 |
mhall119 | I heard rumor that InnoDB is going to be dropped from the free version | 16:10 |
mhall119 | yeah, mariadb is my preference | 16:10 |
dantalizing | i think dorgan is using mariadb | 16:10 |
mhall119 | but my manager says Moffitt will probably pay for the commercial MySQL+InnoDB | 16:10 |
dantalizing | you should talk to him | 16:10 |
mhall119 | we're already throwing support money at Oracle, why not | 16:10 |
dantalizing | but you'll end up on a dead platform ... mysql is dead, lets face it | 16:11 |
mhall119 | yeah, that's what I told him | 16:11 |
mhall119 | and he agrees | 16:12 |
mhall119 | but, the DBAs and purchasing people all like Oracle | 16:12 |
mhall119 | so they'll be just as happy to require us to move our apps to it | 16:12 |
dantalizing | boo | 16:12 |
mhall119 | yeah | 16:12 |
zoopster | mhall119: there are ec2 images for some oracle technology | 16:35 |
zoopster | I thought the innodb discussion was a misunderstanding of the conversation | 16:36 |
zoopster | so you use various flavors of sql db's what's the difference in rhel vs ubuntu? | 16:37 |
mhall119 | zoopster: they'd like us to use only Oracle and MS SQL | 16:38 |
mhall119 | we're bucking the trend using MySQL already | 16:38 |
zoopster | yeesh | 16:38 |
mhall119 | we're already being encouraged to use Oracle for any new projects | 16:38 |
zoopster | I guess your company has a big IT budget to waste | 16:39 |
mhall119 | I guess so :( | 16:39 |
mhall119 | I'm trying to convince my manager that it's better to ask forgiveness than permission, and build out an Ubuntu+Django+MySQL cloud product on the cheap | 16:40 |
zoopster | here's some proof points that ubuntu is best of breed for cloud deployments - http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/11/11/does-the-operating-system-still-matter-part-4/ | 16:41 |
dantalizing | nice, fedora switching to wayland also ... someday | 16:42 |
zoopster | and I saw where ubuntu has more than that much share in rackspace as well | 16:42 |
dantalizing | zoopster: thats awesome ... rackspace started off as such a redhat place | 16:50 |
RoAkSoAx | itnet7: ping pong | 17:03 |
maxolasersquad | We are running into the Oracle-license-by-core problem. | 17:55 |
maxolasersquad | We want to put our new development in 11g, and keep our old systems in 10g. But the cost of 11G on our five-core server is astonishing to say the least. | 17:56 |
maxolasersquad | Anyone in here planning on picking up a Boxee Box? | 18:14 |
maxolasersquad | http://www.boxee.tv/buy | 18:15 |
dorgan | anyone know if facebook has an icons available? | 18:17 |
dorgan | i am looking to use a fcacebook icon on a customers site...but want to use the image from facebook itself | 18:17 |
maxolasersquad | dorgan: http://facebookicon.net/ | 18:18 |
maxolasersquad | "We have no permission to use their trademark and we are in no way competing with their website or business model. All icons/buttons available on this site are the result of user submissions." | 18:20 |
maxolasersquad | http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like may be helpful as well, depending on what you are trying to do. | 18:21 |
dorgan | i am just looking for a little facebook icon to put next to a link :) | 18:23 |
dorgan | but I would like it to be hosted by facebook | 18:23 |
maxolasersquad | Are you looking to link to their facebook profile? | 18:27 |
maxolasersquad | Looking around their site, I don't see any good way to use an official Facebook image, hosted by facebook, that they are officially sanctioning. | 18:28 |
itnet7 | RoAkSoAx: pong | 18:48 |
RoAkSoAx | itnet7: dude!! how's it going?? I texted you the other day... have you received my sms? | 18:56 |
zoopster | dorgan: did you look here? http://www.facebook.com/badges/ | 19:14 |
zoopster | dorgan: and here's the plugin links http://developers.facebook.com/plugins | 19:15 |
dorgan | yeah problem with that stuff is its all javascript I just want an image | 19:17 |
dorgan | and its going to have to look good @ 20 x 20 | 19:18 |
Chat6761 | wassup | 19:19 |
Chat6761 | orlando | 19:20 |
zoopster | what about a google search for images dorgan? | 19:30 |
maxolasersquad | zoopster: He's looking for an official image hosted by Facbook, which I don't think he's going to find. | 19:40 |
zoopster | agreed other than consuming their tools which link to their logo's you are correct | 19:44 |
maxolasersquad | dorgan: http://www.facebook.com/brandpermissions/ | 20:00 |
maxolasersquad | "We generally do not allow the use of the Facebook logo. If you would like to request special permission for a specific use, please work with your Facebook business contact." - http://www.facebook.com/brandpermissions/logos.php | 20:01 |
maxolasersquad | However in there is an "f" logo that you can use. | 20:02 |
maxolasersquad | However you need to download and host it locally. The good news is that using height and widht, making it shows as a 20x20 image should be really easy. | 20:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!