| smplman | when ever i run a ./configure on anything i get an error that gcc cannot create executables. Any ideas\ | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | smplman: make sure you have gcc and libc6-dev installed | 00:34 |
| === sanchaz is now known as sanchaz-away | ||
| psusi | pitti, I got it... kernel patch to put the attribute saying the drive is external in the drive device in sysfs for esata | 04:15 |
| op_amp | /join #ubuntu-devel | 08:32 |
| op_amp | Can I install Daily Build image of Natty using simple wubi installer? | 08:33 |
| === dapal is now known as dapal|thesis | ||
| tmzt_dg2root | op_amp: you might want to ask in #ubuntu+1 this is a development channel | 08:55 |
| tmzt_dg2root | or is natty the released one? | 08:56 |
| tmzt_dg2root | so just #ubuntu | 08:56 |
| === AlanChicken is now known as AlanBell | ||
| === evilshadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| op_amp | ok | 09:20 |
| === hunger_ is now known as hunger | ||
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| directhex | http://i.imgur.com/oqgFC.png | 11:45 |
| geser | what's the meaning of the red lines? | 11:48 |
| === sanchaz-away is now known as sanchaz | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === sikon is now known as lucidfox | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === LibertyZero_ is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| === ivoks is now known as ivoks-afk | ||
| === ivoks-afk is now known as ivoks | ||
| === sanchaz is now known as sanchaz-away | ||
| nemo | trying to locate https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/i386/libghc6-utf8-string-dev/0.3.1.1-2 for lucid or maverick | 20:44 |
| nemo | ah | 20:45 |
| nemo | exists for lucid | 20:45 |
| nemo | hm | 20:45 |
| nemo | is in bytestring according to unc0rr | 20:45 |
| * nemo looks | 20:45 | |
| marcosroriz | hi guys | 20:54 |
| marcosroriz | guys I'm helping out uploading screenshots for debian and debian-derivated (Ubuntu/DL/Etc) but there are some questions in my mind here.. | 20:54 |
| marcosroriz | is there any guideline for uploading screenshots of cli app | 20:54 |
| eitch0000 | marcosroriz: interesting question. And what is with all the library packages? Shouldn't they be filtered out on the screenshots website? | 21:03 |
| marcosroriz | I tried to demonstrate the use of the cli app --> http://screenshots.ubuntu.com/package/ant | 21:04 |
| marcosroriz | eitch0000, yep and also there is a problem with -data -common pkgs | 21:04 |
| eitch0000 | marcosroriz: your pic is looking good | 21:05 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| marcosroriz | thanks :) | 21:09 |
| nemo | hm. can't find it in maverick. well. I guess figuring out how to build it without cabal is up to the package maintainers | 21:17 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| ScottK | marcosroriz: Since it's Debian's screenshots project, I'd ask them. | 21:28 |
| ebroder | Do we generally update the maintainer field for no-change rebuilds? My inclination is that you shouldn't, but I'm not sure | 21:57 |
| Laney | no I wouldn't bother | 21:58 |
| ebroder | Hmm...how about the version number for a no-change SRU? Is the different between ubuntu0.1 and build0.1 semantically interesting in that case? | 22:04 |
| ebroder | *difference | 22:04 |
| ScottK | It's important that it be lower than the version in the next release. | 22:04 |
| kklimonda | if it's ubuntu you have to change Maintainer | 22:04 |
| ebroder | kklimonda: I'm looking at your bug 673789 | 22:05 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 673789 in librmagick-ruby (Ubuntu) "lucid (and probably newer?) version has to be rebuilt against newer imagemagick" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/673789 | 22:05 |
| kklimonda | it looks almost like someone is... right ;) | 22:05 |
| Laney | the tools will try to make you, depending on your DEBEMAIL, but you don't /have/ to | 22:05 |
| kklimonda | Laney: at least bzr bd -S will fail if you use ubuntu version and Maintainer isn't set to @ubuntu.com | 22:05 |
| Laney | DEBEMAIL= bzr bd -S | 22:06 |
| ebroder | So it sounds like build0.1 + no maintainer change isn't offensive to anyone | 22:06 |
| kklimonda | right | 22:06 |
| ebroder | Err...except there's already a librmagick-ruby 2.11.1-1ubuntu0.1 sitting in lucid-updates | 22:09 |
| kklimonda | hmm | 22:09 |
| kklimonda | now that's embarassing :) | 22:09 |
| ebroder | No worries. It's bug #518122; I'm going to dup yours to it | 22:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 518122 in librmagick-ruby (Ubuntu Lucid) "Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/518122 | 22:10 |
| ebroder | I'm...very confused by the bug's history, though | 22:10 |
| ebroder | I guess it went to updates with the outstanding other bug (which isn't a regression), so that makes sense | 22:11 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| chrisccoulson | could a core-dev please add lucid and maverick tasks to bug 655707 for me please? (it's already fixed in natty) | 22:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 655707 in pango1.0 (Ubuntu) "Firefox crashes opening pages that use webfonts " [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655707 | 22:32 |
| stgraber | chrisccoulson: done | 22:39 |
| chrisccoulson | stgraber, excellent, thanks | 22:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
