[00:23] <smplman> when ever i run a ./configure on anything i get an error that gcc cannot create executables. Any ideas\
[00:34] <cjwatson> smplman: make sure you have gcc and libc6-dev installed
[04:15] <psusi> pitti, I got it... kernel patch to put the attribute saying the drive is external in the drive device in sysfs for esata
[08:32] <op_amp>  /join #ubuntu-devel
[08:33] <op_amp> Can I install Daily Build image of Natty using simple wubi installer?
[08:55] <tmzt_dg2root> op_amp: you might want to ask in #ubuntu+1 this is a development channel
[08:56] <tmzt_dg2root> or is natty the released one?
[08:56] <tmzt_dg2root> so just #ubuntu
[09:20] <op_amp> ok
[11:45] <directhex> http://i.imgur.com/oqgFC.png
[11:48] <geser> what's the meaning of the red lines?
[20:44] <nemo> trying to locate https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/i386/libghc6-utf8-string-dev/0.3.1.1-2 for lucid or maverick
[20:45] <nemo> ah
[20:45] <nemo> exists for lucid
[20:45] <nemo> hm
[20:45] <nemo> is in bytestring according to unc0rr
[20:45]  * nemo looks
[20:54] <marcosroriz> hi guys
[20:54] <marcosroriz> guys I'm helping out uploading screenshots for debian and debian-derivated (Ubuntu/DL/Etc) but there are some questions in my mind here..
[20:54] <marcosroriz> is there any guideline for uploading screenshots of cli app
[21:03] <eitch0000> marcosroriz: interesting question. And what is with all the library packages? Shouldn't they be filtered out on the screenshots website?
[21:04] <marcosroriz> I tried to demonstrate the use of the cli app --> http://screenshots.ubuntu.com/package/ant
[21:04] <marcosroriz> eitch0000, yep and also there is a problem with -data -common pkgs
[21:05] <eitch0000> marcosroriz: your pic is looking good
[21:09] <marcosroriz> thanks :)
[21:17] <nemo> hm. can't find it in maverick. well. I guess figuring out how to build it without cabal is up to the package maintainers
[21:28] <ScottK> marcosroriz: Since it's Debian's screenshots project, I'd ask them.
[21:57] <ebroder> Do we generally update the maintainer field for no-change rebuilds? My inclination is that you shouldn't, but I'm not sure
[21:58] <Laney> no I wouldn't bother
[22:04] <ebroder> Hmm...how about the version number for a no-change SRU? Is the different between ubuntu0.1 and build0.1 semantically interesting in that case?
[22:04] <ebroder> *difference
[22:04] <ScottK> It's important that it be lower than the version in the next release.
[22:04] <kklimonda> if it's ubuntu you have to change Maintainer
[22:05] <ebroder> kklimonda: I'm looking at your bug 673789
[22:05] <kklimonda> it looks almost like someone is... right ;)
[22:05] <Laney> the tools will try to make you, depending on your DEBEMAIL, but you don't /have/ to
[22:05] <kklimonda> Laney: at least bzr bd -S will fail if you use ubuntu version and Maintainer isn't set to @ubuntu.com
[22:06] <Laney> DEBEMAIL= bzr bd -S
[22:06] <ebroder> So it sounds like build0.1 + no maintainer change isn't offensive to anyone
[22:06] <kklimonda> right
[22:09] <ebroder> Err...except there's already a librmagick-ruby 2.11.1-1ubuntu0.1 sitting in lucid-updates
[22:09] <kklimonda> hmm
[22:09] <kklimonda> now that's embarassing :)
[22:10] <ebroder> No worries. It's bug #518122; I'm going to dup yours to it
[22:10] <ebroder> I'm...very confused by the bug's history, though
[22:11] <ebroder> I guess it went to updates with the outstanding other bug (which isn't a regression), so that makes sense
[22:32] <chrisccoulson> could a core-dev please add lucid and maverick tasks to bug 655707 for me please? (it's already fixed in natty)
[22:39] <stgraber> chrisccoulson: done
[22:40] <chrisccoulson> stgraber, excellent, thanks