[17:26] <czajkowski> aloha from my new house :)
[18:00] <cjohnston> AlanBell: your kidding right?
[18:00] <cjohnston> hey czajkowski
[18:01] <AlanBell> cjohnston: about what?
[18:01] <cjohnston> It's been 14 hours
[18:01] <cjohnston> the email
[18:02] <AlanBell> which bit of the email?
[18:03] <cjohnston> the part about not seeing any interaction from the design team
[18:03] <AlanBell> oh that bit
[18:04] <AlanBell> um, no not kidding, however I don't really know who is and isn't on the design team
[18:04] <AlanBell> there just isn't much traffic to that list overall
[18:04] <cjohnston> its still the weekend
[18:04] <czajkowski> sounds very interesting
[18:04] <AlanBell> traffic per month is low
[18:04] <cjohnston> yes it is
[18:04] <cjohnston> there isnt much traffic needed
[18:05] <AlanBell> newz2000 passed on a message from the design team a few weeks back, then retracted it
[18:05] <AlanBell> my take on that was that because messages from the design team to the list were done by passing through the webmaster that they were not directly participating in the list
[18:06] <AlanBell> I might well be wrong in my assumption, but I wasn't kidding
[18:06] <AlanBell> https://lists.canonical.com/archives/ubuntu-website/2010-October/001067.html
[18:14] <czajkowski> *sigh(
[18:15] <AlanBell> cjohnston: not sure if I have said something wrong here
[18:16] <AlanBell> the point I was trying to make was that I can't see any overlap between the names here http://design.canonical.com/theteam/ and the names in the mailing list archive
[18:17] <cjohnston> just because they dont talk doesnt mean they arent on it
[18:18] <cjohnston> I don't know if they are or not, but Matt has said a few times that two of them are on the list.
[18:18] <AlanBell> indeed, hence my question marks!
[18:18] <czajkowski> also folks
[18:18] <czajkowski> it is the weekend
[18:18] <cjohnston> ^
[18:18] <czajkowski> folks may not be looking at email
[18:19] <czajkowski> which I think at times community folks forget
[18:19] <czajkowski> we may look at mail, but I think canonical folks like a weekdn away from work and bug reports
[18:19] <czajkowski> which I think the comments on that mailing list seem to be over looking
[18:19] <AlanBell> yes, I know it is the weekend
[18:21] <AlanBell> I wasn't demanding answers from the design team or anything like that, just responding to the specific point that the conversation was being taken to the list in order to engage with the design team. My question was simply whether that was the right list and whether they would be subscribed to it.
[18:49] <czajkowski> Bed made
[18:49] <czajkowski> 1 suitcase unpacked
[18:49] <czajkowski> *phew*
[19:28] <AlanBell> cjohnston: I may well have made an error of tone with that email
[19:29] <AlanBell> I was basically asking if something like the Ayatana list might be a more appropriate place to get the design team involved
[19:29] <AlanBell> although that is mostly desktop based I think
[19:33] <czajkowski> whooo all done
[19:33] <czajkowski> :D
[20:41] <AlanBell> cjohnston: seems they do read the list which is great https://lists.canonical.com/archives/ubuntu-website/2010-November/001108.html
[20:57] <cjohnston> I saw. :-)