rsalveti | GrueMaster: from what I saw, it seems that the one at the proposed was the linaro's one, not ubuntu | 01:55 |
---|---|---|
rsalveti | the message from martin pit is from 10-26, but the proposed ubuntu kernel is from 11-05 | 01:56 |
GrueMaster | I didn't think it would automatically install unless we had the linaro kernel on the original image. | 01:56 |
rsalveti | GrueMaster: ok, I was confused if the user actually tested with the ubuntu one | 01:58 |
rsalveti | as the linaro's kernel got the fix and released some days before the ubuntu one | 01:58 |
rsalveti | but if you say it was tested with the ubuntu kernel, please move it to verification-done and add an extra kernel | 01:59 |
GrueMaster | The test process he used was to image an SD card with our released image, update uImage per your instructions on the wiki, then after booting and running through oem-config, he enabled maverick-proposed per the wiki instructions and ran an update. | 01:59 |
rsalveti | because the latest message said you were waiting the tester to confirm the kernel used | 01:59 |
rsalveti | ok then :-) | 02:00 |
rsalveti | should be the correct one | 02:00 |
rsalveti | sorry for the confusion, wasn't clear for me | 02:00 |
GrueMaster | Unfortunately I really have no way to test this (other than procedural) and my system is not setup at the moment (office restructuring and I lost a monitor). | 02:01 |
rsalveti | sure, np, you need a xm a3 to be able to test it | 02:01 |
GrueMaster | That's why I had someone on #beagle do it. | 02:02 |
rsalveti | np :-) | 02:02 |
rsalveti | I'll be out again, tomorrow is a national holiday here but will be on-line most of the day | 02:03 |
rsalveti | see ya | 02:03 |
GrueMaster | That a holiday, dude. You work too hard. | 02:03 |
rsalveti | will be on-line most of the time because I'm going to plan the vacation properly :-) | 02:04 |
GrueMaster | I meant "take". | 02:04 |
GrueMaster | Ah. | 02:04 |
rsalveti | that will be the next week | 02:04 |
rsalveti | alright, wife is going to kill me, see ya | 02:04 |
GrueMaster | Later. | 02:04 |
=== lilstevie|ZNC is now known as lilstevie | ||
=== hrw|gone is now known as hrw | ||
hrw | morgen | 08:15 |
silverroots | Hi, i m newbie to this channel. Have a query regarding how can i compile a arm binary on maverick ? | 10:01 |
silverroots | i have installed arm-linux-gnueabi- package | 10:02 |
hrw | silverroots: how you would compile it for your machine? | 10:05 |
silverroots | hrw, thats actually my Q is..? Can i compile using cross tool chain available in maverick? | 10:14 |
hrw | yes, you can | 10:15 |
silverroots | is there any guide for that? | 10:15 |
silverroots | normally i m compiling for x86 is using ./autogen && make && make install..but i assume there should be pre things to be done to make it arm binary | 10:16 |
silverroots | hrw, thanks i guess i got a good link :) | 10:19 |
silverroots | nope..its not..it has how to for just kernel..not any regular module | 10:20 |
hrw | configure --target arm-linux-gnueabi | 10:23 |
silverroots | hrw, ok will try that now.. | 10:24 |
sveinse | Are there anyone who happen to have Qt 4.7 embedded compiled against SGX for maverick? | 10:30 |
hrw | ogra_ac: bug 675542 | 13:32 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 675542 in x-loader-omap4 (Ubuntu) "Fails to apply patches (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675542 | 13:32 |
ogra_ac | hrw, why isnt that properly triaged ? | 13:33 |
ogra_ac | please make sure to subscribe ubuntu-armel to bugs you want to be seen by us | 13:33 |
hrw | ogra_ac: I just filled it | 13:33 |
ogra_ac | ah, yeah, 50sec ago, sorry | 13:34 |
hrw | ogra_ac: and I prefer to not subscribe teams to bugs on packages/projects which have living maintainer | 13:34 |
hrw | ~curse LP for breaking formatting | 13:36 |
ogra_ac | hrw, works fine for me | 13:36 |
ogra_ac | (on maverick in a natty chroot) | 13:36 |
hrw | fun | 13:38 |
ogra_ac | and given that there was no change to the package since maverick release i would wonder why the patch cant apply | 13:38 |
hrw | let me check other arm | 13:39 |
hrw | crap. on efikasb it works | 13:42 |
hrw | ~curse pandaboard | 13:42 |
ogra_ac | works on panda too here | 13:43 |
hrw | marked invalid | 13:43 |
ogra_ac | thanks | 13:43 |
hrw | bad things happen in armel world ;( | 13:43 |
hrw | qt/kde ftfbs | 13:44 |
ogra_ac | blame gcc | 13:44 |
hrw | I know | 13:44 |
ogra_ac | but there are workarounds | 13:44 |
hrw | and nokia for ignoring thumb2 | 13:44 |
ogra_ac | yeah | 13:44 |
lool | The qt FTBFS is actually a qt one, not a gcc bug | 13:45 |
lool | at least the thumb=it part of it | 13:45 |
ogra_ac | oh ? | 13:45 |
ogra_ac | i thought its gccs fault | 13:45 |
hrw | ogra_ac: gcc-4.5 dropped workaround | 13:45 |
ogra_ac | ah | 13:45 |
hrw | sth like that | 13:46 |
ogra_ac | well, changed defaults | 13:46 |
ogra_ac | but if the defaults carried a workaround, i agree | 13:46 |
hrw | qt is armv6 and is UP | 13:46 |
hrw | no thumb support, no smp | 13:46 |
ogra_ac | and still broken neon detection | 13:46 |
lool | It was a flag to assume that lack of specifier meant thumb specifier, which is ugly and not the upstream default | 13:46 |
ogra_ac | yeah | 13:47 |
hrw | I hope that one day "mem=1G" will work on my panda | 13:49 |
ogra_ac | fix the kernel ;) | 13:50 |
hrw | ;D | 13:50 |
simosx | Is there a guide where I can use Ubuntu, add some packages, and be able to cross compile to Arm? My current way is to download the CodeSourcery compiler .tar.gz file. | 13:50 |
hrw | simosx: wanna cross build ? http://42.pl/u/2u8U | 13:50 |
hrw | next thing to blog about... "how to use xdeb in cross builds" | 13:51 |
ScottK | ogra_ac: implicit-it=thumb wasn't just removed from defaults, it doesn't work at all currently (see 675240). Not sure if that was on purpose or not. | 13:53 |
simosx | hrw: thanks :-). It's much easier this way. I need to upgrade to 10.10 to get the ARM GCC. I promise to blog about the proper way. | 13:53 |
ogra_ac | ScottK, ouch | 13:53 |
hrw | simosx: I have to blog about it too. will replace current link in /topic then | 13:54 |
hrw | shit... I forgot that natty+panda == kernel panic on boot | 13:55 |
ScottK | ogra_ac: Yes. And give Thiago's comment in 673085, I suspect we are just about stuck between a rock and a hard place. | 13:55 |
hrw | bug 673085 | 13:55 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 673085 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Qt/KDE fails to build on ARM without implicit-it=thumb (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/673085 | 13:55 |
ogra_ac | ScottK, well, we can always carry a distro patch as workaround for now | 13:56 |
ScottK | ogra_ac: If we have one that works, yes, but I'd want to understand why upstream wouldn't accept it (I suspect it won't just be cosmetic reasons). | 13:57 |
ogra_ac | no, unlikely | 13:57 |
suihkulokki | lool, hrw, is the thumb2/multicore issue reported upstream? I didn't spot it in a quick search. | 13:57 |
hrw | suihkulokki: no idea, did not tracked | 13:59 |
hrw | suihkulokki: but I assume that it is not present in qt bugtracker | 13:59 |
hrw | or does nokia care at all | 13:59 |
* ogra_ac guesses nokia will also have to support A9 at some point ;) | 14:00 | |
suihkulokki | Its hard to care about issues people dont report :) | 14:00 |
ScottK | hrw: Considering Thiago Maciera is commenting in 673085, I think not caring isn't it. | 14:00 |
hrw | shit. booted panda to 460+256MB setup, refetched xloader source and still fail | 14:05 |
hrw | now test in tmpfs | 14:06 |
ogra_ac | i dont think you have a ram issue there, loolks more liek filesystem corruption to me if a patch doesnt apply | 14:06 |
hrw | same | 14:06 |
hrw | fresh tmpfs fails | 14:07 |
hrw | md5sums of archive are correct | 14:07 |
ogra_ac | lool, do you plan to SRU your debootstrap workaround into maverick ? (would that make sense) | 14:11 |
ogra_ac | (for the dpkg segfault) | 14:11 |
lool | suihkulokki: Dunno | 14:21 |
lool | suihkulokki: I guess not | 14:22 |
lool | ogra_ac: Is it a problem under maverick? | 14:22 |
ogra_ac | lool, if you build natty, yes | 14:22 |
ogra_ac | its nattys dpkg that has the issue so building a natty chroot in maverick causes the same issue | 14:22 |
lool | ogra_ac: I wouldn't mind; but I'd rather get the fix merged in Debian first; you're welcome to SRU it too; I don't debootstrap natty from maverick myself these days, albeit I could have to in the future | 14:23 |
ogra_ac | but effectively its just a workaround | 14:23 |
lool | Ideally, we'd fix dpkg in natty and this would fix debootstrap from maverick as well | 14:24 |
ogra_ac | which i expect to be dropped as soon as dpkg is fixed | 14:24 |
ogra_ac | well, i think thats still the plan | 14:24 |
ogra_ac | so SRUing back and forth for the workaround probably doesnt make sense | 14:24 |
lool | ogra_ac: Would you have time to reduce the test case in dpkg? | 14:33 |
lool | I'm not sure James is looking at it and I certainly don't have the time to look into it this week | 14:33 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
ogra_ac | lool, i think james is supposed to do that | 14:36 |
ogra_ac | at leqast thats how i understood colin | 14:37 |
=== hrw is now known as hrw|gone | ||
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== hrw|gone is now known as hrw|n900 | ||
fagan | Quick question I want to get a toshiba ac100 and I know that most stuff works out of the box in 10.10, is there anything to stop me getting one and sticking ubuntu on it? | 16:36 |
* fagan is looking to get one | 16:37 | |
fagan | Last I heard sound and video werent working all that well | 16:37 |
ScottK | ogra_ac: I'm working on testing the IT patch from michaelh1 for qt4-x11. My plan is to build a fixed Qt locally and then if I can build a package that currently FTBFS due to the lack of implicit-it=thumb, then I'll declare victory and upload it. | 16:47 |
ogra_ac | ScottK, awesome | 16:48 |
ScottK | It's a LOT easier to work on armel stuff once one has some hardware ... | 16:48 |
ogra_ac | heh, yeah | 16:48 |
=== mturquet1e is now known as mturquette | ||
=== j_ack_ is now known as j_ack | ||
=== hrw|n900 is now known as hrw | ||
hrw | ScottK: what HW you are using for builds? | 21:36 |
Martyn | Hey all. | 21:42 |
Martyn | anyone even vaguely awake? | 21:47 |
hrw | a bit | 21:55 |
ScottK | hrw: I've got three Efika MX smarttops (running Karmic) sharing the build using icecc. | 21:59 |
hrw | nice | 22:00 |
ScottK | The trickiest part was arranging to have icecc also distribute the compiler to use so they all build their bits using the same GCC version. | 22:02 |
* ScottK didn't figure out that part - was a team effort. | 22:02 | |
=== hrw is now known as hrw|gone | ||
Guest89205 | Anyone awake? I have a question about platform devices... | 22:41 |
Guest89205 | specifically, initializing the data that goes into the pdev->dev.platform_device | 22:41 |
Guest89205 | er dev.platform_data | 22:41 |
=== JaMa is now known as JaMa|Zzz | ||
=== Guest89205 is now known as Martyn | ||
Martyn | 'ogra, you online? | 22:50 |
Sp0tter | I've been told that the pandaboard supports 1080p playback, but that xbmc and mythtv do not work with that yet, but "ubuntu does".. could anyone clarify the usefulness of a pandaboard with ubuntu as a media front end? | 23:40 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: you may have to wait for a bit for someone to answer | 23:41 |
Sp0tter | alrighty | 23:41 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: the other person to as is robclark | 23:41 |
Sp0tter | prpplague: do you know where to purchase a case for the pandaboard? | 23:41 |
Sp0tter | or is it just make your own only | 23:42 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: no case is available currently | 23:42 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: pretty much | 23:42 |
Sp0tter | k | 23:42 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: there is plans for an accessory board plus case called the Bamboo | 23:42 |
prpplague | Sp0tter: http://www.elinux.org/Panda_Bamboo | 23:42 |
Sp0tter | yea it seems to be evolving quickly | 23:42 |
Sp0tter | thats the only reason i'm hesitant to order one | 23:43 |
Sp0tter | 1 month wait too | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!