[07:13] <AbhiJit> hi
[07:18] <AbhiJit> hello
[07:18] <AbhiJit> anyone pleasee triage this bug:
[07:18] <AbhiJit> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/675887
[07:19] <AbhiJit> ubot2, is sleeping
[07:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 675887 in firefox (Ubuntu) "download dialog box disturbs in firefox (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[07:19] <ubot2> Factoid 'is sleeping' not found
[07:20] <AbhiJit> where is stlsaint?
[10:34] <blemish> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/671178
[10:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]
[10:34] <blemish> This bug is driving me insane :-(
[11:11] <xteejx> bug 210876 - although basilisk2 shows on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/basilisk2 that it is in maverick and natty... help1?
[11:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 210876 in basilisk2 (Ubuntu) "BasiliskII has no networking because NetDriver 'sheet_net.c' doesn't compile on Gutsy/kernel 2.6.22 (affects: 2) (heat: 20)" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210876
[11:11] <xteejx> !?
[11:20] <njin> hello to all, when apport retrace mark a bug as a duplicate of a private report Why it ask to look at the other report ? bug 675875
[11:20] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 675875 in ubuntu "apport retracing service tells me to view a private bug report (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675875
[11:20] <seb128> njin, it just indicates it's a duplicate
[11:22] <njin> seb128: yes, but have no sense to tell the reporter to look into a private report
[11:22] <xteejx> njin: It's an automated messgae
[11:23] <seb128> njin, the retracer doesn't know you don't have access to the other bug
[11:24] <xteejx> Members of Bug Control do, so you can just come in here if it hasn't been checked for private info and we can change it
[11:25] <njin> xteejx: my opinion is that this is a bug, when a report is private and the reporter cannot see it, apport retrace have to look at thisù
[11:25] <xteejx> njin: Then you need to file a bug against Launchpad itself, not Ubuntu
[11:26] <seb128> njin, it's a wishlist to update the comment yes
[11:26] <njin> yes,
[11:26] <seb128> njin, it's normal that you don't have access, it would be a security issue if filing a duplicate was enough to gain access to a private bug
[11:27] <seb128> but to be honest it seems non trivial work for little benefit
[11:27] <njin> yes i know  that, but isn't right to send that message
[11:27] <seb128> it's not likely to change any time
[11:28] <njin> ok, then assign to launchpad and ask for wishlist
[11:28] <xteejx> you reported a bug against Ubuntu, we can't change that. You need to report a bug against Launchpad itself
[11:28] <seb128> njin, it's not a launchpad bug
[11:29] <xteejx> seb128: Ignore me :)
[11:29] <njin> ok, i close the report repling to the reporter
[11:29] <seb128> the retracer is a service running out of launchpad
[11:29] <seb128> you can reassign to apport if you want
[11:29] <seb128> the retracing code is in the apport source
[11:30] <njin> uhm, apport is a package
[11:31] <seb128> yes
[11:31] <njin> ok, i mark as invalid repling that the other report contain private date visible only to developers
[11:31] <xteejx> njin: Yes, and the source for the retracer is in that source
[11:32] <xteejx> bug 643486 checked and changed to Public
[11:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 643486 in nautilus-share (Ubuntu) "Nautilus crashed when trying to share a large folder (92GB) (affects: 4) (dups: 3) (heat: 34)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643486
[11:32] <blemish> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/671178
[11:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]
[11:32] <njin> already solved ?
[15:35] <hggdh> JFo: is it possible to keep bug 675613 open for a while?
[15:35] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 675613 in linux (Ubuntu) "dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675613
[15:35] <JFo> hi hggdh let me take a wquick look
[15:35] <JFo> err quick rather
[15:35] <hggdh> any type of look is good ;-)
[15:36] <JFo> :-)
[15:36] <JFo> sure, we can leave that one for a bit
[15:36] <JFo> even though he isn't on Ubuntu, I think the issue could be valid
[15:36] <JFo> or rather it is possible for us to see it as well
[15:37] <JFo> plus, his data will be valuable
[15:44] <hggdh> JFo: yes, this is what I thought. But... since I was throwing a bug on your lap, I wanted your view on it
[15:45] <JFo> ah, no problem. Thanks for the head's up
[15:45] <JFo> :)
[15:45] <hggdh> you are absolutely welcome :-)
[16:09] <njin> hello, can someone verify if pressing esc during boot call grub setting screen? for me don't work and i'm sure i've got three kernel installed
[16:11] <JFo> should be a shift key iirc
[16:11] <JFo> been a while since I did that though
[16:12] <JFo> actually quite some time now that I think about it
[16:30] <njin> I've tested on two pc and there's no way to escape from boot
[16:32] <shadeslayer> afaik its via shift
[16:40] <jcastro> pedro_: around?
[16:41] <sense> persia: According to <https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad-registry/+question/119712> pressing the confirm button of a merge request over and over again is the only way to complete it.
[17:01] <njin> ok it is via shift, then we have to update this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Freeze%20during%20boot%20or%20shutdown%20screen
[17:07] <charlie-tca> njin: you are right. I believe karmic used esc, but am not sure of that. Lucid used right-shift, and maverick uses shift
[17:07] <charlie-tca> and it is called "hold the key, instead of just hitting it"
[17:08] <njin> charlie-tca: can I modify ?
[17:09] <njin> that page
[17:09] <charlie-tca> Yes, but be specific for the releases. right-shift applies to 10.04, 10.10, 11.04 at this time
[17:09] <njin> charlie-tca: ok, thanks
[17:09] <charlie-tca> Thank you for catching that.
[17:14] <njin> charlie-tca: then instead of usplash is plymouth from lucid >
[17:14] <yofel> shift applies to karmic 9.10 too, since that's the release we started using grub2
[17:14] <yofel> good you found that though :)
[17:23] <pedro_> hello jcastro! sorry was having lunch
[17:27] <seb128> pedro_, hey pedro_
[17:27] <seb128> pedro_, how are you?
[17:27] <seb128> pedro_, did you get over your cold?
[17:30] <njin> charlie-tca:done
[17:30] <njin> yofel:thanks
[17:35] <pedro_> hello seb128! I'm good, thanks!. yeah i got over that ubuflu, long time without catching one...
[17:35] <pedro_> seb128, how are you doing? enjoying the cold weather? :-P
[17:36] <seb128> pedro_, yeah, cold is nice ;-) I'm fine thanks
[17:36] <njin> pedro_: hello, here i'm singing "it's raining again"
[17:37] <pedro_> njin, hello! hehe, here he said that 'it's raining roasted ducks'
[17:37] <njin> klol
[19:08] <jcastro> pedro_: I need two things
[19:08] <jcastro> 1) a banshee bug day
[19:08] <jcastro> and 2) https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=product:banshee%20whiteboard:ubuntu
[19:09] <jcastro> there's no way that there are only 4 feature parity bugs
[19:09] <ScottK> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/675347 somehow got a patch tag added by your script.  I removed it, but thought you'd want to know about a false positive.
[19:09] <jcastro> so I was thinking of putting out a mail asking for people to file feature parity bugs
[19:09] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 675347 in gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "volatile int causes inline assembly build failure (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [High,Confirmed]
[19:09] <jcastro> pedro_: so my question is, how would we do that?
[19:09] <jcastro> should we ask people to file them in lp, go through them all and then send the ones we care about upstream or ... ?
[19:10]  * ScottK would not recommend asking users to bombard upstream directly.
[19:11] <jcastro> ScottK: well, they're keen on getting these bugs, but right, not without a pedro-filter
[19:12] <bdmurray> ScottK: it got tagged because it has an attachment that is flagged as a patch
[19:12] <ScottK> OK.
[19:12] <ScottK> Thanks.  I'll fix that too then.
[19:16] <pedro_> jcastro, for the first  , i can organize one for next week
[19:17] <jcastro> pedro_: that would be brilliant
[19:17] <pedro_> jcastro, asking people to file them on lp sounds fine to me, we can then filter those
[19:17] <jcastro> pedro_: lmk when and I will tell upstream
[19:17] <jcastro> pedro_: ok is this something we can do as part of bug  day you think?
[19:17] <pedro_> jcastro, totally :-)
[19:17] <hggdh> +1
[19:19] <jcastro> pedro_: ok so like, what's the procedure then?
[19:19] <pedro_> jcastro, ok i've scheduled the bug day
[19:19] <jcastro> link me up!
[19:19] <jcastro> should we have a tag or something for feature-parity bugs?
[19:20] <pedro_> lets work on the page next week and with the same announcement we say ' hey btw we need parity bugs please go ahead and file those!'
[19:20] <pedro_> jcastro, we could use that one 'feature-parity'
[19:30] <vish> pedro_: hi, you admin the BC list right? is there any way you add mail filters to  a team's mailing list?
[19:31] <vish> or hggdh too..
[19:31] <pedro_> vish, hello, no idea if those can be added
[19:31] <vish> :(
[19:32] <pedro_> the admin interface is trough LP and  i haven't seeing those options
[19:32] <micahg> vish: why would we do that?
[19:32] <vish> micahg: nah not for the BC team, but i'm trying to find out how to do that  for another new team..
[19:32] <vish> pedro_: k, thx..
[19:33] <pedro_> no problem
[19:33] <njin> I'm searching an idea for installing hardy on spark bug 675343
[19:33] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 675343 in ubuntu "8.04 Hardy and 9.04 Jaunty installation fails on SPARC (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675343
[19:34]  * micahg saw that bug and ran
[19:34] <njin> *ran away ?
[19:35] <micahg> njin: sparc hasn't worked well for a while
[19:35] <micahg> from what I've heard
[19:36] <njin> i think from hardy
[19:39] <micahg> njin: you might want to make sure the user has a SPARC ISO: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/8.04/release/
[19:39] <micahg> the ports archive certainly has hardy still
[19:39] <njin> micahg: I ask for
[19:40] <njin> micahg thaks
[19:40] <njin> *thanks
[19:40] <micahg> njin: you also might want to edit 9.04 out of the title and note it's EOL
[19:40] <njin> micahg:ok, yes
[19:45] <vish> pedro_: another question, how do you guys 'allow' mails to the list? is it possible to delete mails received mails to the list? from the list archive?
[19:46] <pedro_> vish, by going to lp.net/~team/+mailinglist-moderate
[19:47] <pedro_> vish, i don't know if there's another way to administrate the emails on the queue
[19:47] <pedro_> but that's the page lp sends you when an email is waiting on the queue
[19:47] <vish> pedro_: cool, so you can allow from that link, can you also delete a mail?
[19:47] <pedro_> and yes you can delete, approve, set on hold, etc
[19:48] <vish> hmm..
[19:48] <vish> pedro_: thanks.. :)
[19:48] <pedro_> vish, you're welcome
[19:50] <jcastro> pedro_: ok so where's the wiki page for the bugday? Mind if I start announcing it, etc.?
[19:50] <pedro_> jcastro, i guess is too soon to announce it
[19:50] <jcastro> is it written down yet?
[19:50] <pedro_> jcastro, i cannot create the page for the bug day because it will make the bugday tool to not work
[19:50] <jcastro> oh I see
[19:51] <jcastro> so what day can I tell upstream?
[19:51] <pedro_> jcastro, Friday 19th
[19:51] <jcastro> ok
[19:51] <pedro_> jcastro, i'll create the page that day too
[19:52] <pedro_> it should be something like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20101125
[19:52]  * micahg wonders what we're having a bugday for
[19:55] <pedro_> micahg, this thursday for GPM and next one for Banshee
[19:55] <micahg> pedro_: very cool, I might want to schedule a bug day if I ever get the Mozilla bug docs rewritten :)
[19:56] <pedro_> ;-)
[19:56] <charlie-tca> 25th is an American Holiday - Thanksgiving
[19:58] <charlie-tca> micahg: why not a couple? one for firefox, one for thunderbird?
[19:59] <micahg> charlie-tca: actually, I was going to do a whole month ;)
[19:59] <micahg> probably Feb, we have 3 FF sources + thunderbird
[20:00] <micahg> about 3800 bugs :0
[20:00] <jcastro> pedro_: ok they are all set
[20:02] <charlie-tca> micahg: Great idea.
[20:02] <pedro_> jcastro, great! thank you
[20:07] <micahg> pedro_: do you have any objection to a bug week?
[20:07] <micahg> i.e. set up the page on a Tuesday and let it go to the following tuesday?
[20:08] <pedro_> micahg, nope, we just need clear instructions on how to use the bugday tool for such cases if there's a bug day also organized on thursday of that week
[20:09] <pedro_> micahg, planning one for firefox?
[20:09] <micahg> pedro_: well, like I said above, planning a whole month of bugweeks actually for the 3 firefox sources and thunderbird
[20:09] <pedro_> cool
[20:11] <micahg> pedro_: 2 of the sources will be EOL at the end of April, so I'd like to also as part of this move the bugs or add a task to teh firefox source package so we can make sure we don't lose them and also try to get as many issues upstreamed as we can
[20:12] <pedro_> micahg, great, just make sure to add that to the planning page so we can help you with the organization
[20:12] <micahg> pedro_: ok, will do that, thanks
[20:12] <pedro_> gotta run now, see you guys later
[21:51] <TLF> hello
[21:51] <TLF> what can I do to confirm a bug?
[21:51] <TLF> thanks
[22:06] <CaioAlonso> TLF, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Confirming
[22:18] <TLF> CaioAlonso: thank you very much
[22:19] <CaioAlonso> TLF, you're welcome :)