[07:13] hi [07:18] hello [07:18] anyone pleasee triage this bug: [07:18] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/675887 [07:19] ubot2, is sleeping [07:19] Launchpad bug 675887 in firefox (Ubuntu) "download dialog box disturbs in firefox (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [07:19] Factoid 'is sleeping' not found [07:20] where is stlsaint? [10:34] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/671178 [10:34] Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] [10:34] This bug is driving me insane :-( [11:11] bug 210876 - although basilisk2 shows on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/basilisk2 that it is in maverick and natty... help1? [11:11] Launchpad bug 210876 in basilisk2 (Ubuntu) "BasiliskII has no networking because NetDriver 'sheet_net.c' doesn't compile on Gutsy/kernel 2.6.22 (affects: 2) (heat: 20)" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210876 [11:11] !? [11:20] hello to all, when apport retrace mark a bug as a duplicate of a private report Why it ask to look at the other report ? bug 675875 [11:20] Launchpad bug 675875 in ubuntu "apport retracing service tells me to view a private bug report (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675875 [11:20] njin, it just indicates it's a duplicate [11:22] seb128: yes, but have no sense to tell the reporter to look into a private report [11:22] njin: It's an automated messgae [11:23] njin, the retracer doesn't know you don't have access to the other bug [11:24] Members of Bug Control do, so you can just come in here if it hasn't been checked for private info and we can change it [11:25] xteejx: my opinion is that this is a bug, when a report is private and the reporter cannot see it, apport retrace have to look at thisù [11:25] njin: Then you need to file a bug against Launchpad itself, not Ubuntu [11:26] njin, it's a wishlist to update the comment yes [11:26] yes, [11:26] njin, it's normal that you don't have access, it would be a security issue if filing a duplicate was enough to gain access to a private bug [11:27] but to be honest it seems non trivial work for little benefit [11:27] yes i know that, but isn't right to send that message [11:27] it's not likely to change any time [11:28] ok, then assign to launchpad and ask for wishlist [11:28] you reported a bug against Ubuntu, we can't change that. You need to report a bug against Launchpad itself [11:28] njin, it's not a launchpad bug [11:29] seb128: Ignore me :) [11:29] ok, i close the report repling to the reporter [11:29] the retracer is a service running out of launchpad [11:29] you can reassign to apport if you want [11:29] the retracing code is in the apport source [11:30] uhm, apport is a package [11:31] yes [11:31] ok, i mark as invalid repling that the other report contain private date visible only to developers [11:31] njin: Yes, and the source for the retracer is in that source [11:32] bug 643486 checked and changed to Public [11:32] Launchpad bug 643486 in nautilus-share (Ubuntu) "Nautilus crashed when trying to share a large folder (92GB) (affects: 4) (dups: 3) (heat: 34)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643486 [11:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/671178 [11:32] Launchpad bug 671178 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[CA0106 - CA0106] ALSA test tone not correctly played back (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] [11:32] already solved ? === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson === zyga is now known as zyga-afk [15:35] JFo: is it possible to keep bug 675613 open for a while? [15:35] Launchpad bug 675613 in linux (Ubuntu) "dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675613 [15:35] hi hggdh let me take a wquick look [15:35] err quick rather [15:35] any type of look is good ;-) [15:36] :-) [15:36] sure, we can leave that one for a bit [15:36] even though he isn't on Ubuntu, I think the issue could be valid [15:36] or rather it is possible for us to see it as well [15:37] plus, his data will be valuable [15:44] JFo: yes, this is what I thought. But... since I was throwing a bug on your lap, I wanted your view on it [15:45] ah, no problem. Thanks for the head's up [15:45] :) [15:45] you are absolutely welcome :-) [16:09] hello, can someone verify if pressing esc during boot call grub setting screen? for me don't work and i'm sure i've got three kernel installed [16:11] should be a shift key iirc [16:11] been a while since I did that though [16:12] actually quite some time now that I think about it === You're now known as ubuntulog [16:30] I've tested on two pc and there's no way to escape from boot [16:32] afaik its via shift [16:40] pedro_: around? [16:41] persia: According to pressing the confirm button of a merge request over and over again is the only way to complete it. === You're now known as ubuntulog_ === You're now known as ubuntulog [17:01] ok it is via shift, then we have to update this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Freeze%20during%20boot%20or%20shutdown%20screen === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:07] njin: you are right. I believe karmic used esc, but am not sure of that. Lucid used right-shift, and maverick uses shift [17:07] and it is called "hold the key, instead of just hitting it" [17:08] charlie-tca: can I modify ? [17:09] that page [17:09] Yes, but be specific for the releases. right-shift applies to 10.04, 10.10, 11.04 at this time [17:09] charlie-tca: ok, thanks [17:09] Thank you for catching that. === zyga-afk is now known as zyga [17:14] charlie-tca: then instead of usplash is plymouth from lucid > [17:14] shift applies to karmic 9.10 too, since that's the release we started using grub2 [17:14] good you found that though :) [17:23] hello jcastro! sorry was having lunch [17:27] pedro_, hey pedro_ [17:27] pedro_, how are you? [17:27] pedro_, did you get over your cold? [17:30] charlie-tca:done [17:30] yofel:thanks [17:35] hello seb128! I'm good, thanks!. yeah i got over that ubuflu, long time without catching one... [17:35] seb128, how are you doing? enjoying the cold weather? :-P [17:36] pedro_, yeah, cold is nice ;-) I'm fine thanks [17:36] pedro_: hello, here i'm singing "it's raining again" [17:37] njin, hello! hehe, here he said that 'it's raining roasted ducks' [17:37] klol [19:08] pedro_: I need two things [19:08] 1) a banshee bug day [19:08] and 2) https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=product:banshee%20whiteboard:ubuntu [19:09] there's no way that there are only 4 feature parity bugs [19:09] bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/675347 somehow got a patch tag added by your script. I removed it, but thought you'd want to know about a false positive. [19:09] so I was thinking of putting out a mail asking for people to file feature parity bugs [19:09] Launchpad bug 675347 in gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "volatile int causes inline assembly build failure (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [High,Confirmed] [19:09] pedro_: so my question is, how would we do that? [19:09] should we ask people to file them in lp, go through them all and then send the ones we care about upstream or ... ? [19:10] * ScottK would not recommend asking users to bombard upstream directly. [19:11] ScottK: well, they're keen on getting these bugs, but right, not without a pedro-filter [19:12] ScottK: it got tagged because it has an attachment that is flagged as a patch [19:12] OK. [19:12] Thanks. I'll fix that too then. [19:16] jcastro, for the first , i can organize one for next week [19:17] pedro_: that would be brilliant [19:17] jcastro, asking people to file them on lp sounds fine to me, we can then filter those [19:17] pedro_: lmk when and I will tell upstream [19:17] pedro_: ok is this something we can do as part of bug day you think? [19:17] jcastro, totally :-) [19:17] +1 [19:19] pedro_: ok so like, what's the procedure then? [19:19] jcastro, ok i've scheduled the bug day [19:19] link me up! [19:19] should we have a tag or something for feature-parity bugs? [19:20] lets work on the page next week and with the same announcement we say ' hey btw we need parity bugs please go ahead and file those!' [19:20] jcastro, we could use that one 'feature-parity' [19:30] pedro_: hi, you admin the BC list right? is there any way you add mail filters to a team's mailing list? [19:31] or hggdh too.. [19:31] vish, hello, no idea if those can be added [19:31] :( [19:32] the admin interface is trough LP and i haven't seeing those options [19:32] vish: why would we do that? [19:32] micahg: nah not for the BC team, but i'm trying to find out how to do that for another new team.. [19:32] pedro_: k, thx.. [19:33] no problem [19:33] I'm searching an idea for installing hardy on spark bug 675343 [19:33] Launchpad bug 675343 in ubuntu "8.04 Hardy and 9.04 Jaunty installation fails on SPARC (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675343 [19:34] * micahg saw that bug and ran [19:34] *ran away ? [19:35] njin: sparc hasn't worked well for a while [19:35] from what I've heard [19:36] i think from hardy [19:39] njin: you might want to make sure the user has a SPARC ISO: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/8.04/release/ [19:39] the ports archive certainly has hardy still [19:39] micahg: I ask for [19:40] micahg thaks [19:40] *thanks [19:40] njin: you also might want to edit 9.04 out of the title and note it's EOL [19:40] micahg:ok, yes === blueyed_ is now known as blueyed [19:45] pedro_: another question, how do you guys 'allow' mails to the list? is it possible to delete mails received mails to the list? from the list archive? [19:46] vish, by going to lp.net/~team/+mailinglist-moderate [19:47] vish, i don't know if there's another way to administrate the emails on the queue [19:47] but that's the page lp sends you when an email is waiting on the queue [19:47] pedro_: cool, so you can allow from that link, can you also delete a mail? [19:47] and yes you can delete, approve, set on hold, etc [19:48] hmm.. [19:48] pedro_: thanks.. :) [19:48] vish, you're welcome [19:50] pedro_: ok so where's the wiki page for the bugday? Mind if I start announcing it, etc.? [19:50] jcastro, i guess is too soon to announce it [19:50] is it written down yet? [19:50] jcastro, i cannot create the page for the bug day because it will make the bugday tool to not work [19:50] oh I see [19:51] so what day can I tell upstream? [19:51] jcastro, Friday 19th [19:51] ok [19:51] jcastro, i'll create the page that day too [19:52] it should be something like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20101125 [19:52] * micahg wonders what we're having a bugday for [19:55] micahg, this thursday for GPM and next one for Banshee [19:55] pedro_: very cool, I might want to schedule a bug day if I ever get the Mozilla bug docs rewritten :) [19:56] ;-) [19:56] 25th is an American Holiday - Thanksgiving [19:58] micahg: why not a couple? one for firefox, one for thunderbird? [19:59] charlie-tca: actually, I was going to do a whole month ;) [19:59] probably Feb, we have 3 FF sources + thunderbird [20:00] about 3800 bugs :0 [20:00] pedro_: ok they are all set [20:02] micahg: Great idea. [20:02] jcastro, great! thank you [20:07] pedro_: do you have any objection to a bug week? [20:07] i.e. set up the page on a Tuesday and let it go to the following tuesday? [20:08] micahg, nope, we just need clear instructions on how to use the bugday tool for such cases if there's a bug day also organized on thursday of that week [20:09] micahg, planning one for firefox? [20:09] pedro_: well, like I said above, planning a whole month of bugweeks actually for the 3 firefox sources and thunderbird [20:09] cool [20:11] pedro_: 2 of the sources will be EOL at the end of April, so I'd like to also as part of this move the bugs or add a task to teh firefox source package so we can make sure we don't lose them and also try to get as many issues upstreamed as we can [20:12] micahg, great, just make sure to add that to the planning page so we can help you with the organization [20:12] pedro_: ok, will do that, thanks [20:12] gotta run now, see you guys later [21:51] hello [21:51] what can I do to confirm a bug? [21:51] thanks [22:06] TLF, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Confirming [22:18] CaioAlonso: thank you very much [22:19] TLF, you're welcome :)