[07:51] good morning! [07:54] nigelb, are you planning anything to get people in action for cleansweep this cycle? [07:54] dholbach: oh yes, you didn't see my blog post? [07:54] the one with the statistics? [07:54] yeah [07:54] more to come :) [07:55] I wonder if we should ask folks to pick the patch-accepted-* ones and push them into sponsoring [07:55] We'd have to make sure it hasn't come into Debian/Ubuntu yet [07:57] well, if it's in Ubuntu already, we can just close the bug [07:57] in the other case it'd be more about merging/syncing [08:01] Yeah [08:01] The thing is we'd have to show the different 'opportunies' to help from patch review [08:01] One would be to review new patches [08:01] the other would be to review the patches that have already been reviewed [08:01] like the ones accepted [08:01] well [08:01] that should be easy [08:02] we can feed them into harvest [08:02] I was getting there :) [08:02] Do you want me to do something regarding that or would you be able to take care of it? [08:03] I think bdmurray can easily get lp to spit out a list of bugs that can be fed into LP [08:03] we just need to make sure that we add proper explanation to it, so people know what it's about [08:03] which bug lists do you think would make sense? [08:05] one would be just the patch tahg [08:05] and one would be the ones that have been upstreamed [08:05] and accepted [08:05] and the last woule be ones that need work [08:05] (so anyone can help if required) [08:06] patch tag but no other of the patch-* tags, right? [08:06] Yep [08:07] ok, that sounds good to me [08:07] If you want to do a call to nail down specific things, I can :) [08:10] maybe you could file a bug on harvest-data about that? and subscribe brian-murray? [08:21] dholbach: No worries, I'll talk to Brian myself today :) [08:23] nigelb, super === yofel_ is now known as yofel