[07:43] <wliao> hi. i'm trying to help iso-testing.
[07:43] <wliao> however, it seems that all the build cannot be found.
[07:44] <wliao> i always get this error msg.This build wasn't found on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily/20101007/maverick-alternate-amd64.iso (may no longer exists)
[07:44] <ara> good morning
[07:44] <ara> wliao, iso testing starts the week before alpha 1
[07:45] <wliao> sorry. i didnt quite under stand the schedule.
[07:45] <ara> wliao, Nov 30th is a good date to come
[07:45] <wliao> ara, thanks.
[07:45] <ara> wliao, any time
[07:45] <wliao> ara, im wondering what else can i do?
[07:47] <ara> wliao, it is a bit earlier in the cycle for testing the development version
[07:47] <ara> wliao, you can help with SRU
[07:47] <ara> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[08:08] <ara> mvo, good morning
[08:09] <ara> mvo, I added a ppa to the software sources and it didn't refresh the apt cache (maverick)
[08:25] <mvo> hey ara
[08:25] <ara> mvo, hey
[08:25] <mvo> ara: did you use add-apt-repository?
[08:26] <ara> mvo, I used the gtk interface ("Software Sources")
[08:27] <mvo> ara: meh, that should do that automatically
[08:27] <mvo> ara: it did not ask you nor did it automatically?
[08:28] <ara> mvo, no :(
[08:30] <mvo> on mav? dang, I check it out
[08:30] <mvo> ara: what was the ppa?
[08:30] <mvo> ara: did you do it via software-center or run software-sources directly (just so that I can easier reproduce it)?
[08:31] <ara> mvo, via software-center
[08:31] <ara> ppa:gm-dev-launchpad/ppa
[08:43] <primes2h> ara: 'morning.
[08:43] <primes2h> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/DevEnv
[08:44] <primes2h> .htaccess doen't exist on ubuntu-qa-website/code
[08:44] <ara> hello primes2h
[08:44] <primes2h> s/doen/doesn
[08:44]  * ara checks
[08:44] <primes2h> ara: hold on,
[08:45] <primes2h> I found out, it is in modules subdir
[08:45] <primes2h> ara: I update the wiki
[08:45] <ara> primes2h, ok, thanks
[08:47] <primes2h> ara: do you think it is worth adding a procedure to force installing php 5.2 on Lucid/Maverick?
[08:49] <primes2h> I mean "how to force"
[08:50] <primes2h> like creating /etc/apt/preferences.d/php file
[08:50] <ara> primes2h, sure, any thing you might find missing in the documentation, feel free to add it
[09:14] <mvo> ara: hrm, odd - I can not reproduce the failure here (the worst kind of bug)
[09:15] <ara> :(
[09:21] <ara> mvo, traceback when I close the software sources dialog: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/533401/
[09:43] <mvo> oh
[09:43] <mvo> ara: anything in /var/crash ?
[09:46] <mvo> ara: do you have /etc/apt/sources.list.d/gm-dev-launchpad-ppa-maverick.list ?
[09:46] <ara> mvo, nothing in /var/crash. and yes, I have it in /etc/apt..
[09:47] <mvo> odd, the error looks like it was expecting it and not finding it
[11:37] <primes2h> ara: I get this psql: FATAL:  Ident authentication failed for user "qatracker"psql: FATAL:  Ident authentication failed for user "qatracker"  trying to populate the database
[11:37] <primes2h> Just one :-) psql: FATAL:  Ident authentication failed for user "qatracker"
[13:19] <primes2h> ara: in fact I get the same error reconfiguring drupal with qatracker as username, password and db name and using default options (ident as authentication mode)
[13:24] <primes2h> if I re-try the reconfiguration, it works but I get the same error after psql qatracker < /tmp/dump_qatracker_safe.tar.gz
[13:27] <pokrak> l
=== zul is now known as ep
=== ep is now known as zul
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[14:59] <jibel> spineau, hi, any update on the totem testcase ?
[14:59] <jibel> pedro_, thanks for brasero, I'm reviewing it.
[15:00] <pedro_> jibel, awesome! thanks
[15:01] <spineau> jibel: hi, I found a way to check that a playback is well ... played with some fft stuff. I'm designing the mago class for that now
[15:01] <pedro_> jibel, i'm modifying the baobab one following your recommendations on the brasero , will update the branch and propose shortly
[15:03] <pedro_> spineau, nice!, perhaps we could use that class for checking banshee ;-)
[15:05] <jibel> spineau, great, do you think you'll get some results today ?
[15:05] <spineau> pedro_: sure !
[15:06] <spineau> jibel: I expect to have results this week
[15:06] <spineau> jibel: I will let you know of course
[15:06] <jibel> pedro_, thanks, i'll review boabab with pleasure
[15:07] <jibel> spineau, if you can post even a basic testcase today that would be great.
[15:15] <mvo> what branches do you guys have this in? I'm curious too see what the code looks liek
[15:16] <mvo> (and how to leverage it for software-center ;)
[15:23] <jibel> mvo, lp:mago
[15:30] <mvo> thanks
[16:05] <jibel> mvo, your help is more than welcome, that would be awesome.
=== cypher_ is now known as czajkowski
[16:51] <charlie-tca> QA meeting in #ubuntu-quality in 10 minutes
=== jdstrand is now known as jdstrand_
=== zul_ is now known as zul
=== xfaf is now known as zul
=== Tscheesy_ is now known as Tscheesy
[21:14] <cprofitt> hggdh: I need some advice on loco-testing if you have a few minutes
[21:15] <hggdh> cprofitt: shoot
[21:15] <cprofitt> when does ISO testing start?
[21:16] <cprofitt> do we have people on -testing that would be willing to walk some loco folks through the process via IRC?
[21:21] <hggdh> ISO tests could start now; care should be taken in that Natty is changing frequently right now, though
[21:21] <cprofitt> ok.. sounds good... ISO testing goes through beta?
[21:22] <hggdh> and yes, any of us would be happy to walk testers through the process
[21:22] <hggdh> ISO testing goes on until release :-)
[21:22] <cprofitt> awesome
[21:22] <hggdh> and we want to add more tests (not necessarily ISO)
[21:23] <cprofitt> Alright... I am working on crafting an email to go out on the loco teams list
[21:23] <cprofitt> and invite them all to come help with testing...
[21:23] <cprofitt> the first step being ISO testing
[21:23] <cprofitt> I am shooting for next week
[21:23] <hggdh> the only issue on ISO testing now is the site is not accepting input (it is only officially opened for the milestones
[21:24] <cprofitt> do you think it would be possible (or even necessary) for a class to be run on how ISO testing is done?
[21:24] <cprofitt> I am thinking IRC
[21:24] <hggdh> IDK, but it probably would not hurt
[21:24] <hggdh> and yes, IRC
[21:25] <hggdh> if you go -- right now -- to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ you will see that we still have the results from the 10.10 final test
[21:27] <cprofitt> yep
[21:27] <cprofitt> I noticed that the week back from UDS
[21:27] <cprofitt> which is why I was asking
[21:28] <hggdh> so what would happen is we can still use the tests instructions, but we cannot update iso.qa.u.c -- but we still can open bugs and tag them QA
[21:28]  * cprofitt nods
[21:28] <cprofitt> sounds good...
[21:28] <cprofitt> when does the iso.qa.u.c open?
[21:29] <hggdh> it will open for alpha1 -- the week before or so (officially)
[21:29]  * cprofitt nods
[21:29] <cprofitt> ok
[21:30] <cprofitt> I will send you an email when I get the rough draft done and work with Paolo and pleia to see if we can get an IRC session setup for loco leads
[21:38] <hggdh> OK