| MTecknology | I just 'love' this... I try to use the newer flash in firefox and when launched from cli. I see this message when I try to play the flash '2.4+ kernel w/o ELF notes? -- report this'. You guys have any idea what it might be complaining about? | 04:12 |
|---|---|---|
| MTecknology | I see in the kernel config for the latest generic there's not much about ELF that's not added | 04:14 |
| MTecknology | I wonder if that | 04:18 |
| MTecknology | I wonder if that has something to do with why flash doesn't work for crap for me on this system | 04:18 |
| akheron | apw: after ethtool -K eth0 tx on, the data still moves fast | 07:13 |
| akheron | apw: so the problem actually doesn't reassert itself | 07:13 |
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| apw | akheron, interesting, could you document that in the bug as well | 08:49 |
| apw | akheron, perhaps there is a source end clamping issue after all | 08:49 |
| smb | akheron, One thing I was wondering as well, was that tcpdump taken in the domU or dum0? | 08:50 |
| smb | apw, Good morning btw. :) | 08:51 |
| apw | smb morning | 08:54 |
| kraut | moin | 08:56 |
| akheron | smb: the tcpdump in the bug desc is not mine | 08:56 |
| akheron | smb: but I had the same dump in my domU, didn't dump at dom0 | 08:58 |
| smb | akheron, Ah ok. Hm, wondering whether it would add some insight to dump dom0. But probably its just the same | 08:59 |
| akheron | probably yes | 08:59 |
| akheron | apw: commented on the bug now | 09:05 |
| akheron | gah, there's a typo | 09:06 |
| akheron | I can't edit comments? | 09:06 |
| apw | nope, that would be useful | 09:07 |
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| dholbach | hey | 12:21 |
| dholbach | did anybody else report problems with the newest kernel in natty in vms? I can't start X in there: | 12:22 |
| dholbach | [ 8.358283] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.37/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:758 pci_mmap_resource.clone.9+0x156/0x1a0() | 12:22 |
| dholbach | [ 8.358297] Hardware name: Bochs | 12:22 |
| dholbach | [ 8.358300] process "Xorg" tried to map 0x00100000 bytes at page 0x00000000 on 0000:00:02.0 BAR 0 (start 0x f0000000, size 0x 2000000) | 12:22 |
| dholbach | full dmesg log: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/tmp/dmesg.log | 12:22 |
| === diwic_afk is now known as diwic | ||
| apw | dholbach, nope noone mentioned it before you | 12:38 |
| dholbach | want me to file a bug? with -4 it works | 12:38 |
| apw | dholbach, please and assign it to me | 12:39 |
| dholbach | will do | 12:39 |
| dholbach | apw, what would a good bug title be so you can find it more easily? | 12:39 |
| ogra_ac | "doesnt work" | 12:39 |
| ogra_ac | :) | 12:39 |
| dholbach | "IT DOESN'T WORK!!!!111!!!1!!111!11" | 12:40 |
| dholbach | apw, ok nevermind, bug 676963 | 12:44 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 676963 in linux (Ubuntu) "process "Xorg" tried to map 0x00100000 bytes at page 0x00000000 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/676963 | 12:44 |
| === cking is now known as cking|afk | ||
| === cking|afk is now known as cking | ||
| smb | dholbach, http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1111743.html | 13:17 |
| smb | apw, ^ upstream detection of regression of lp#676963 | 13:17 |
| apw | smb thanks ... that thread says "its fixed in master" ... so i'll go look | 13:19 |
| dholbach | smb, thanks | 13:29 |
| bond | hi list I recently began doing kernel programming | 13:35 |
| bond | I was able to develop a character device driver | 13:35 |
| bond | based on my search on internet and docs here and there | 13:35 |
| bond | I want to do bug fixing | 13:36 |
| bond | and I had a look at the ubuntu kernel bugs page | 13:36 |
| bond | I am reasonably Ok in C and programming | 13:36 |
| bond | have been practising things for quite some time | 13:36 |
| bond | I am not sure as which bug should I start with | 13:36 |
| bond | can some one suggest me some thing | 13:36 |
| apw | bond, JFo normally has a list of bugs which are of priority to us perhaps something off there would be suitable | 14:01 |
| tgardner | sconklin, now that we have kernels in proposed, have you have any feedback from cert that they've gotten started? | 14:11 |
| tgardner | had* | 14:11 |
| apw | (or indeed have they been told they are there) | 14:20 |
| tgardner | skaet, ? ^^ | 14:21 |
| skaet | tgardner, heard from victorp and they're ready to go as soon as sconklin sends the signal. | 14:22 |
| tgardner | skaet, what signal? I think all we are lacking are the meta packages. | 14:23 |
| skaet | think the process is still going to be a bit manual in terms of the handover, until we get some flows and expectations nailed down. | 14:23 |
| sconklin | skaet: If the packages are there, then they can start. I'll ping victor (I just walked in) | 14:24 |
| skaet | signal is to tell victorp(?) that its ready to be kicked of (via IRC, phone, email, etc.) | 14:24 |
| skaet | sconklin, yup, that's what seems to be needed right now. :) | 14:24 |
| tgardner | sconklin, make sure they aren't depending on the meta packages to be up to date. | 14:24 |
| sconklin | tgardner: they probably are, but I'll ask | 14:25 |
| tgardner | sconklin, shall I upload those packages whilst you're talking to them? | 14:25 |
| sconklin | tgardner: make it so ;) | 14:26 |
| skaet | :) | 14:26 |
| tgardner | sconklin, maverick meta looks OK. 2.6.35.23.25, and the kernel ABI is 2.6.35-23.40 ( have to say it outlous 'cause these numbers make me dyslexic) | 14:29 |
| tgardner | outloud* | 14:29 |
| sconklin | tgardner: thanks | 14:29 |
| sconklin | I don't recall an abi bump for either, but my memory is not to be relied on | 14:30 |
| tgardner | sconklin, and lucid meta is 2.6.32.26.28, the kernel ABI is 2.6.32-26.47, so it all looks good. | 14:31 |
| sconklin | tgardner: thianks, I've just informed Victor, and they'll start testing. | 14:32 |
| apw | they both look up to date to me | 14:32 |
| apw | sconklin, bjf[afk] i have moved the pre-preproposed kernels over to master-next for maverick and lucid | 14:33 |
| tgardner | apw, I saw those go by on the c-k-t list this AM | 14:33 |
| apw | oh yeah, thats where the accept emails go | 14:34 |
| sconklin | apw, you did that yesterday around noon, right? | 14:34 |
| apw | nope, today around 10 my time | 14:34 |
| sconklin | apw: hmmm, there was a pile of stuff on both -next branches yesterday . . . | 14:35 |
| happyaron | could somebody have a look at bug 674952 ? | 14:35 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 674952 in linux (Ubuntu) "natty kernel doesn't work with voice input by microphone (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/674952 | 14:35 |
| * sconklin looks at the repo | 14:35 | |
| apw | sconklin, huh? i only switched over the checker to -next today at 10, so that was the first it would have noticed | 14:36 |
| tgardner | sconklin, what apw meant was is that he switched the pre-proposed builds to pull from master-next, | 14:36 |
| sconklin | oh, I get it now. | 14:36 |
| sconklin | Sweet, and thanks apw | 14:36 |
| sconklin | Only one cup of coffee so far | 14:36 |
| apw | sconklin, keep me in the loop if you are making -next for any other repos | 14:36 |
| sconklin | apw: ack | 14:37 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| apw | dholbach, ok i've posted some test kernels in your bug if you could test for me ... :) | 15:04 |
| dholbach | apw, sweet - thanks | 15:05 |
| sconklin | dholbach: the lucid kernel in -proposed may fix your audio problem, it would be great if you could test it for me | 15:12 |
| dholbach | sconklin, I'm in the office now, I'll test it tonight and send you a mail | 15:12 |
| dholbach | I'm VERY much looking forward to it working again | 15:12 |
| dholbach | :-) | 15:12 |
| bjf | sconklin, if we just start telling people the -proposed kernel will fix their bug, we get more -proposed testing, good plan | 15:13 |
| bjf | sconklin, :-) | 15:13 |
| dholbach | haha | 15:13 |
| sconklin | bjf: heh, yeah - only this time there's some fact-based reasoning behind that ;-) | 15:13 |
| dholbach | bjf, there might be a future in marketing for you! | 15:13 |
| bjf | dholbach, i thought i was in marketing | 15:14 |
| dholbach | right......... | 15:14 |
| dholbach | :-) | 15:14 |
| dholbach | apw, it works | 15:18 |
| apw | dholbach, ack thanks | 15:18 |
| dholbach | good work | 15:19 |
| dholbach | thanks apw, sconklin, smb, ... and bjf: you rock! :) | 15:19 |
| sconklin | dholbach: That's provably true now, and I'll continue their roadie training so they have a second career to fall back on ;-) | 15:20 |
| dholbach | haha, excellent :) | 15:21 |
| tgardner | bjf, don't forget to upload the LBMs for lucid/maverick | 15:22 |
| bjf | tgardner, ack | 15:22 |
| tgardner | lots of ogasawara goodness therein | 15:22 |
| * apw pops to the bank | 15:47 | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| pgraner | bjf, sconklin, smb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2010-11-22-SR can you look over and add any points/questions as necessary pls. | 18:14 |
| * smb looks | 18:14 | |
| JFo | skaet, speaking of which, do you have any bugs other than the one noted for me to keep an eye on? | 18:16 |
| apw | JFo, yo ... yogout | 18:16 |
| JFo | did you just call me yogurt? ;-) | 18:16 |
| skaet | JFo, for the tomorrow agenda - just culling through the bugs right now. Will post something out after lunch. :) | 18:17 |
| JFo | coolness thanks :) | 18:17 |
| vanhoof | anyone decent with bug mail w/ lp? | 18:18 |
| vanhoof | i keep getting everything (including direct subscriptions) in kernel-bugs | 18:18 |
| vanhoof | i even tried leaving the team, but they're still coming | 18:18 |
| * vanhoof cant figure out why | 18:18 | |
| vanhoof | You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel | 18:18 |
| vanhoof | Bugs, which is subscribed to linux in ubuntu. | 18:18 |
| vanhoof | ... must be some indirect association? | 18:19 |
| * tgardner lunches | 19:07 | |
| apw | vanhoof, probabally some other team is a member of that team, you can tell somewhere though | 19:11 |
| cking | never sure how though | 19:12 |
| vanhoof | apw: i cant seem to find anything :\ | 19:12 |
| vanhoof | its weird, this just started on Nov 5th | 19:12 |
| vanhoof | at 3am | 19:12 |
| vanhoof | i certainly wasnt playing w/ mail or lp at 3am | 19:12 |
| JFo | that is probably when that crackhead put all those lists on Kernel-Bugs | 19:13 |
| JFo | I remember seeing the e-mail | 19:13 |
| cking | which crackhead? | 19:13 |
| JFo | can't remember the guy's name now | 19:13 |
| cking | annoying-mailing-list-dude? | 19:13 |
| JFo | but there was someone creating all these lists and adding tons of others | 19:14 |
| JFo | yeah :) | 19:14 |
| JFo | so not a literal crackhead :) | 19:14 |
| apw | vanhoof ubuntu-kernel-team is a member of kernel-bugs | 19:15 |
| apw | and i suspect you are an indirect member of that | 19:15 |
| vanhoof | apw: right, but would that trump me being a subscriber? | 19:17 |
| vanhoof | bugs i subscribe to are landing in kernel-bugs w/ that verbiage in them | 19:17 |
| * vanhoof is puzzled | 19:17 | |
| bjf | is "kernel-bugs" a legitimate group or one the crackhead created? | 19:18 |
| JFo | legitimate | 19:18 |
| JFo | created by Brian Murray | 19:19 |
| JFo | iirc | 19:19 |
| JFo | been around a while | 19:19 |
| bjf | well he's a crackhead :-) | 19:19 |
| JFo | heh | 19:19 |
| JFo | sigh* | 19:19 |
| JFo | <-late lunch | 19:19 |
| JFo | I have got to do better at looking at the time | 19:19 |
| === JFo is now known as JFo-food | ||
| cking | #include <garbage.h> | 19:25 |
| vanhoof | JFo-food: where did that email get sent? | 19:26 |
| vanhoof | this is pissing me off :\ | 19:26 |
| JFo-food | vanhoof, what do you mean? | 19:45 |
| JFo-food | Oh, Kernel-bugs... let me look | 19:46 |
| JFo-food | vanhoof, when you look at https://launchpad.net/~kernel-bugs what does it say in the active members section? | 19:48 |
| vanhoof | 62 active members | 19:50 |
| vanhoof | You are a member of the team that owns this team. You are not currently an active membe | 19:50 |
| Sarvatt | not a member here | 19:51 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: those b43 updates went to kernel-bugs, even though im a subscriber | 19:51 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: which is why i didnt see it :) | 19:51 |
| JFo-food | so vanhoof you do or do not want mail from there? | 19:51 |
| JFo-food | just so I understand | 19:51 |
| JFo-food | Sarvatt, are you a member on https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel-team? | 19:52 |
| Sarvatt | yeah I've been following, it's something you're in that i'm not. he doesn't want to be in it | 19:52 |
| Sarvatt | nope! | 19:53 |
| vanhoof | JFo-food: well ive been in it since june | 19:53 |
| JFo-food | yeah, I see that | 19:53 |
| JFo-food | Sarvatt, want to be? :) | 19:53 |
| vanhoof | JFo-food: i left last night in an effort to fix mail | 19:53 |
| JFo-food | hmm | 19:53 |
| Sarvatt | not if it's going to screw my mail filters :) | 19:53 |
| JFo-food | heh | 19:54 |
| JFo-food | it shouldn't | 19:55 |
| JFo-food | I don't see anything that would make me think something here is what hosed you vanhoof | 19:55 |
| vanhoof | ok | 19:55 |
| vanhoof | here's an example: | 19:55 |
| vanhoof | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663442 | 19:55 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 663442 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "S3 resume fails to restore video on Intel Sandybridge platforms (affects: 2) (heat: 127)" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 19:55 |
| vanhoof | all that lands in kernel-bugs | 19:56 |
| vanhoof | maybe i should have a few beers and search aruond :D | 19:56 |
| JFo-food | what mail client are you using? | 19:56 |
| vanhoof | tbird | 19:57 |
| JFo-food | because there may be a duplicates handling issue at play here | 19:57 |
| === JFo-food is now known as JFo | ||
| vanhoof | yeah good idea | 19:58 |
| Sarvatt | JFo-food: do you have the mailing list as the team contact address list for the team maybe? I dont have that problem with X bugs I'm subscribed to while being subscribed to the ubuntu-x-swat list manually, I think we did that for this exact problem | 19:58 |
| JFo | where do you mean Sarvatt? | 19:59 |
| Sarvatt | (for kernel-bugs) | 19:59 |
| JFo | no, that isn't my team. | 19:59 |
| JFo | it has it's own e-mail address | 20:00 |
| Sarvatt | https://launchpad.net/~kernel-bugs - change details - set contact details | 20:00 |
| Sarvatt | oh ok, what a pain in the butt :) | 20:00 |
| JFo | it has no contact e-mail address set | 20:00 |
| JFo | yeah | 20:00 |
| JFo | :) | 20:00 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: do me a favor | 20:00 |
| JFo | it does have a list that I am not subscribed to | 20:00 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: update 663442 with something | 20:01 |
| vanhoof | i want to watch procmail | 20:01 |
| JFo | vanhoof, think it is the duplicate handling I mentioned? | 20:01 |
| vanhoof | well im doing no filtering in thunderbird | 20:02 |
| vanhoof | unless its server side duplication handling | 20:02 |
| JFo | hmmm | 20:02 |
| Sarvatt | vanhoof: done | 20:03 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: k | 20:03 |
| * vanhoof waits for mail | 20:06 | |
| Al_5 | hi guys, I have a question about a bug that was solved with a patch, but that patch wasn't integrated upstream in the kernel. I know maybe this is not the appropriate place, but maybe someone could point me to the right direction :) | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: JFo here we go | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | From bounces@canonical.com Thu Nov 18 20:12:09 2010 | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | Subject: [Bug 663442] Re: S3 resume fails to restore video on Intel | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | Folder: /home/vanhoof/af/autofolder 5097 | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | autofolder: launchpad lpproj="kernel-bugs" | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | autofolder: delivering message via dovecot to folder lp.kernel-bugs | 20:12 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 663442 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "S3 resume fails to restore video on Intel Sandybridge platforms (affects: 2) (heat: 22)" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/663442 | 20:12 |
| vanhoof | wtf ... | 20:12 |
| JFo | very odd | 20:12 |
| JFo | you said you were unsubscribed or never subbed to the kernel-bugs list yes? | 20:13 |
| vanhoof | i unsubscribed last night | 20:13 |
| JFo | ah | 20:13 |
| JFo | may not have been done yet then | 20:13 |
| JFo | (it is possible) | 20:13 |
| JFo | try it again | 20:13 |
| JFo | :) | 20:13 |
| JFo | shades of reboot | 20:13 |
| Al_5 | this is the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/278648?comments=all . until now I used a patched kernel, but this solution is not available in maverick. | 20:13 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 278648 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[regression]snd-hda-intel sound input does not work at all with Conexant CX20549 (Venice) chips (affects: 12) (dups: 1) (heat: 67)" [Undecided,New] | 20:13 |
| vanhoof | lol | 20:14 |
| vanhoof | i find it hillarious my email address is chris.van.hoof | 20:14 |
| JFo | lol | 20:14 |
| JFo | I didn't notice that | 20:14 |
| vanhoof | i dont use it | 20:15 |
| vanhoof | use the alias for in/out | 20:15 |
| JFo | you should get it changed to chris.von.und.zu.hoof@ | 20:15 |
| JFo | :) | 20:15 |
| vanhoof | X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (linux in ubuntu) @kernel-bugs | 20:15 |
| vanhoof | weird | 20:15 |
| JFo | yeah, so no unsub processed | 20:15 |
| JFo | did you try the unsubscribe again? | 20:15 |
| JFo | oh wait a sec... | 20:16 |
| vanhoof | i cant | 20:16 |
| vanhoof | i can join/part it | 20:16 |
| JFo | :-| | 20:16 |
| vanhoof | JFo: just joined and left again | 20:18 |
| vanhoof | we'll see :\ | 20:18 |
| JFo | k | 20:18 |
| JFo | good luck | 20:18 |
| * JFo is looking at something that could be related | 20:18 | |
| vanhoof | JFo: is there launchpad support? lol | 20:19 |
| vanhoof | i tried #launchpad, no luck | 20:19 |
| * vanhoof could just file a bug i guess | 20:19 | |
| JFo | dunno | 20:19 |
| vanhoof | JFo: well thanks for looking for me | 20:21 |
| JFo | I see that I am getting the e-mail from them, but I am not subscribed either | 20:21 |
| JFo | hmmm | 20:21 |
| JFo | vanhoof, my pleasure | 20:22 |
| vanhoof | JFo: so you're seeing it too? | 20:22 |
| JFo | wonder if you are getting them via the ubuntu-kernel-team | 20:23 |
| JFo | yea | 20:23 |
| JFo | I see Robert's mail as the last one | 20:23 |
| vanhoof | JFo: find a bug you're physically subscribed to | 20:23 |
| vanhoof | see if its in the right place | 20:23 |
| JFo | and apparently I have been getting them too since the 5th | 20:23 |
| JFo | so it would seem I am in the same boat | 20:24 |
| vanhoof | hmm | 20:24 |
| Sarvatt | bryceh: are you around? what did you do to ubuntu-x-swat to make it stop doing what they're describing? | 20:24 |
| vanhoof | JFo: too odd its on the 5th ... | 20:24 |
| JFo | yeah | 20:24 |
| Sarvatt | bryceh: tormod complained everyone on the team was subscribed to bug mail so you made a mailing list and let people opt in to the bug mail | 20:24 |
| JFo | makes me think something is broken on the back end | 20:24 |
| vanhoof | unless something was changed by accident | 20:25 |
| vanhoof | but ive looked everywhere | 20:25 |
| Sarvatt | everyone on kernel-bugs is getting bug mail looking at the mailing list subscriber list | 20:25 |
| vanhoof | and if its impacting you ... | 20:25 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: im not even in kernel-bugs anymoer and im getting it | 20:25 |
| JFo | and I only see one subscriber to kernel-bugs e-mail | 20:25 |
| JFo | huh, and it looks like the team mail list is deactivated on that page anyway | 20:27 |
| JFo | from looking here: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-bugs/+mailinglist | 20:27 |
| vanhoof | Sarvatt: where did that sandybridge email land for you? | 20:28 |
| vanhoof | whats in the header under X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale | 20:28 |
| * jjohansen lunches | 20:32 | |
| JFo | yeah, I dunno how/why we are getting this e-mail now. the mail list for kernel-bugs is deactivated | 20:36 |
| * JFo sends a test e-mail to the list | 20:37 | |
| JFo | sent | 20:38 |
| JFo | got mail delivery failure to kernel-bugs@lists.launchpad.net | 20:40 |
| JFo | so that isn't where it is coming from | 20:40 |
| JFo | vanhoof, ^^ | 20:40 |
| JFo | found this though: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-bugs | 20:42 |
| JFo | so that may be where it is coming from | 20:42 |
| JFo | bdmurray, any idea why we are suddenly seeing e-mail from kernel-bugs since the 5th of November with no interaction from us? | 20:44 |
| JFo | I tried to unsubscribe but I got Error: Illegal Email Address: Jeremy Foshee | 20:44 |
| bryceh | Sarvatt, yeah | 20:45 |
| JFo | ooh wait | 20:45 |
| JFo | I think I may have figured it out vanhoof | 20:45 |
| bryceh | Sarvatt, yeah by default teams are set up to send bug mail to all members | 20:46 |
| bdmurray | JFo: can I see one of these emails with all the headers | 20:46 |
| JFo | sure | 20:46 |
| * vanhoof reads | 20:46 | |
| bryceh | I'm trying to remember exactly how it was done | 20:47 |
| bryceh | I *think* I created a second team ${team}-bugs and set it as the bug contact for the team | 20:47 |
| JFo | sent bdmurray | 20:47 |
| vanhoof | JFo: you figure something out? | 20:49 |
| JFo | maybe vanhoof gimme a sec :) | 20:49 |
| vanhoof | heh | 20:49 |
| bdmurray | X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (linux in ubuntu) @kernel-bugs | 20:49 |
| bdmurray | the "kernel-bugs" team is subscribed to all linux bug reports | 20:50 |
| bdmurray | however all the mail should go to the kernel-bugs mailing list | 20:50 |
| JFo | right, but we only suddenly started getting e-mail on the 5th | 20:50 |
| JFo | that seems odd | 20:50 |
| vanhoof | and | 20:50 |
| vanhoof | bugs im a direct subscriber on are only going to kernel-bugs | 20:51 |
| vanhoof | with the same header you just posted | 20:51 |
| JFo | how wound we individually unsubscribe if that was wanted bdmurray? | 20:51 |
| bdmurray | This team's mailing list has been deactivated. | 20:51 |
| JFo | right | 20:51 |
| JFo | and yet we are getting e-mail | 20:51 |
| JFo | :) | 20:51 |
| bdmurray | well because it is deactivated it likely goes to the team members | 20:51 |
| Sarvatt | did the mailing list get deactivated on the 5th? | 20:52 |
| bdmurray | I thought the email address used to kernel-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com | 20:52 |
| bryceh | aha, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+contactaddress | 20:52 |
| bryceh | by default the email notifications are set to go to 'Each member individually'. You can set up a mailing list for the team and then direct the bug mail to go there instead. | 20:52 |
| bryceh | then people can sub/unsub as appropriate | 20:53 |
| vanhoof | check this out | 20:53 |
| vanhoof | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-bugs/2010-November/thread.html | 20:53 |
| JFo | bdmurray, I sent an unsubscribe through https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-bugs but I have gotten nothing back yet | 20:53 |
| vanhoof | Starting: Mon Nov 1 00:02:04 GMT 2010 | 20:53 |
| vanhoof | Ending: Fri Nov 5 05:15:12 GMT 2010 | 20:53 |
| bdmurray | JFo: I believe the team email address used to be k-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com and somebody changed it | 20:54 |
| JFo | I am thoroughly confused now | 20:55 |
| vanhoof | so perhaps it should be changed back to k-bugs@ ? | 20:56 |
| bdmurray | I'd be happy to mumble about it | 20:56 |
| bdmurray | well aside of the fact that I like the song I am listening too ;-) | 20:57 |
| JFo | heh | 21:02 |
| vanhoof | JFo: think we should change it? | 21:04 |
| JFo | I just want the mail to go to the right place again. | 21:05 |
| JFo | I don't care how we accomplish that | 21:05 |
| JFo | :) | 21:05 |
| bdmurray | I'll fix it then | 21:05 |
| bdmurray | hmm, can't | 21:05 |
| JFo | thank you bdmurray sorry to pull you into all of this | 21:05 |
| JFo | uh oh | 21:05 |
| bdmurray | anyway set team email to kernel-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com | 21:06 |
| Al_5 | hi, anyone wanting to look into that conexant problem? :) | 21:21 |
| vanhoof | JFo: bdmurray thanks guys :) | 21:21 |
| * vanhoof feels better about life now | 21:21 | |
| * ogasawara lunch | 21:32 | |
| vanhoof | bdmurray: JFo: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-bugs ... didn't you just set this to the list? | 22:14 |
| JFo | no, that mail list is deactivated | 22:14 |
| JFo | list is @ubuntu.com | 22:15 |
| vanhoof | Team details | 22:15 |
| vanhoof | Email: | 22:15 |
| vanhoof | No contact email Set contact address | 22:15 |
| vanhoof | oh i see | 22:16 |
| vanhoof | he said he cant do it | 22:16 |
| vanhoof | JFo: want me to set it? | 22:17 |
| JFo | no | 22:17 |
| JFo | I'd ask pete about it as he is the penultimate owner | 22:17 |
| vanhoof | JFo: right, i guess what im saying is that ntohing has been changed yet | 22:19 |
| JFo | I have no idea | 22:19 |
| JFo | all I do know is that nothing has changed | 22:20 |
| JFo | still getting the e-mail I mean | 22:20 |
| vanhoof | im still getting kernel-bugs | 22:23 |
| kees | what's the tool to track disk access? it'll show each block and the process responsible... can't remember now | 22:26 |
| kees | blktrace! | 22:28 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| === dannf is now known as dannf_afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!