[16:24] <wrst> cyberanger: is that something new?
[16:53] <pace_t_zulu> cyberanger: ping
[16:55] <cyberanger> pong
[16:55] <cyberanger> pace_t_zulu: pong
[16:55] <pace_t_zulu> cyberanger: you asked if i was planning something ^ ?
[16:56] <cyberanger> I did
[16:57] <cyberanger> two days ago I asked, seems we didn't have any future events in planning for any section
[17:01] <pace_t_zulu> cyberanger: currently nothing planned
[17:02] <cyberanger> ok, well...hrm
[17:02] <cyberanger> does any region I wonder?
[17:02] <cyberanger> hey Genphlux
[17:03] <cyberanger> wrst: os what new?
[17:03] <Genphlux> Howdy
[17:03] <cyberanger> wrst: is what new?
[17:03] <wrst> howdy Genphlux
[17:03] <cyberanger> Genphlux: how's things
[17:03] <wrst> cyberanger: ubuntulog_
[17:04] <Genphlux> Not bad, trying to figure out something that is either really simple or not possible.  Related to VMWare Player in Windows.
[17:04] <pace_t_zulu> wrst: anything interesting happen with natty over the last few days? i was out of town
[17:05] <Genphlux> Does anyone here happen to know if its possible to bind a virtual machine to a specific physical NIC?
[17:05] <cyberanger> wrst: yes & without notifing the team's point of contact, which is extremely bad form IMO
[17:05] <wrst> how did that happen then cyberanger?
[17:05] <Genphlux> All I can find is the setting that says the VM either uses NAT, Bridged.......etc
[17:05] <cyberanger> Genphlux: yes that can be done for Virtual Machines
[17:06] <Genphlux> I ran the vmnetcfg utility that binds a physical NIC to a virtual NIC
[17:06] <Genphlux> but I see nowhere to bind a specific VM to any specific physical or virtual NIC
[17:06] <pace_t_zulu> how is ubuntulog_ different from locobot_4 ?
[17:07] <cyberanger> unfortunately for VMware I cannot tell you how (or if you can in your version) since I use VirtualBox
[17:07] <pace_t_zulu> cyberanger wrst do we have to accept ubuntulog_ if we aren't even an official loco?
[17:07] <cyberanger> pace_t_zulu: we asked for locobot_4 afaik nobody asked for ubuntulog_
[17:07] <cyberanger> idk if it is offical
[17:07] <cyberanger> the bot I mean
[17:07] <wrst> Genphlux: i think netritious makes a lot of use out of VMWare?
[17:07] <wrst> i don't know pace_t_zulu
[17:08] <wrst> ubuntulog_: what are you doing here?
[17:08] <wrst> well never hurts to try :)
[17:08] <pace_t_zulu> wrst, you'll like this http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
[17:08] <cyberanger> pace_t_zulu: if were offical, that shouldn't change anything, no decesion afaik has been made on the issue
[17:09] <wrst> ahh yes i saw that looks like we will be getting even faster on the desktop :)
[17:09] <pace_t_zulu> #ubuntu-us-fl and #ubuntu-us-ga have 'ubuntulog' and 'ubuntulog2'
[17:09] <cyberanger> wrst: it happened simply, a bot joined here
[17:09] <wrst> yeah just popped in :)
[17:10] <wrst> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/11/18/
[17:11] <wrst> its in lots of channels it appears
[17:11] <wrst> and cyberanger this is interestign: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/11/18/%23ubuntu-us-pa.txt
[17:11] <wrst> you should have been contacted
[17:12] <cyberanger> that's my opinion on it too
[17:13] <wrst> well cyberanger you can always kick it
[17:13] <cyberanger> esp since I have to notify people that we do log (they make an assumption here, we do notify with ChanServ as people join, but it's a very bad assumption)
[17:14] <cyberanger> there's allways repurcussions from such acts
[17:16] <cyberanger> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Bots
[17:17] <cyberanger> "ubuntulog can be joined to a #k/x/ubuntu-* channel to provide official Ubuntu logging, which will appear on Ubuntu's official irclogs page. If ubuntulog is present in your channel, you must add the following entrymsg via ChanServ:"
[17:17] <cyberanger> Welcome to #channel. This channel is publicly logged at irclogs.ubuntu.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of the terms at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/TermsOfService
[17:17] <cyberanger> The owner of the channel can add the message with the following command:
[17:17] <cyberanger> You can slightly modify the entrymsg if necessary, but you must clearly get across the fact that the channel is being logged and that use of the channel implies acceptance of the terms at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/TermsOfService.
[17:18] <cyberanger> The command was stripped out, but if that's what I must do, they must notify me to do it
[17:19] <elijah-mbp> heh, ubuntu-tn — tunisia :)
[17:20] <cyberanger> elijah-mbp: yep
[17:20] <cyberanger> nobody has notified anybody about this afaik
[17:21] <pace_t_zulu> wrst: the latest natty iso is *REALLY* slow at redrawing screens on a live boot
[17:21] <wrst> the latest updates i ran make natty really bad :)
[17:22] <pace_t_zulu> wrst: really slow
[17:22] <wrst> but hey not to alpha one yet so what should i expect
[17:22] <wrst> yeah i meant slow too pace_t_zulu
[17:23] <wrst> but i suppose slow is bad :)
[17:23] <cyberanger> it's a cloaked bot & as such...
[17:23] <pace_t_zulu> wrst: i've never seen something quite like this
[17:23] <cyberanger> Bots can be cloaked if the following conditions are met
[17:23] <cyberanger> #
[17:23] <cyberanger> The bot is allowed by the channel admins of the channels it is in
[17:23] <wrst> like what pace_t_zulu?
[17:23] <wrst> the live cd?
[17:23] <cyberanger> allowed?
[17:23] <pace_t_zulu> like you watch screen redraws take several seconds
[17:24] <pace_t_zulu> you can watch the screen redraw line by line
[17:24] <pace_t_zulu> brb
[17:24] <wrst> oh gosh that is awful my install that i'm updating isn't near that slow
[17:29] <cyberanger> I think I'll be bringing this up in an hour & a half
[18:52] <wrst> cyberanger: your hour and half are nearing completion
[19:06] <elijah-mbp> :)
[19:06] <elijah-mbp> irc meeting today?
[19:21] <wrst> we are admiring the new bot ubuntulog_ that just entereed elijah-mbp
[19:23] <elijah-mbp> yeah
[19:23] <elijah-mbp> someone going to complain somewhere?
[19:26] <wrst> i think cyberanger was considering it
[19:26] <wrst> elijah-mbp: i may be missing something but i don't guess i overly oppose it but does feel kinda like it was forced
[19:28] <cyberanger> I am not complaining on the bot itself, but the lack of knowledge
[19:29] <cyberanger> it just joined, in the process breaking many gidelines & regulations & such
[19:30] <cyberanger> a channel's admin had no knowledge, the channel hadn't given explicit consent
[19:30] <cyberanger> there was no notifacation (aside from the bot's nick & cloak, which isn't enough)
[19:32] <cyberanger> apperently also added without a formal requirement for logging
[19:33] <cyberanger> so while we do log (with MootBot for meetings & locobot_4 for the rest of the time)
[19:34] <cyberanger> that's really the issue, there is a process & this sidestepped it completely
[19:35] <cyberanger> elijah-mbp: no meeting today
[19:35] <cyberanger> the loco council is meeting, but our application missed the deadline (opps)
[19:36] <cyberanger> so I'll just continue updating the applacation, we'll keep increasing the loco's activities & try again
[19:37] <cyberanger> wrst: does that explain things on the bot?
[19:38] <wrst> yeah that makes sense pretty much came into our house without an invite and didn't knock on the door
[19:40] <cyberanger> & there are laws against trespassing
[19:44] <elijah-mbp> the uninvited bot doesn't seem very community-like.
[21:36]  * cyberanger hates domain issues, I've got my site temporaly using http://cyberangerwas.strangled.net/ (catchy name huh? ;-)) I will not using a small dns host again
[21:38] <wrst> cyberanger:  that sounds fun
[21:42] <cyberanger> fun, HA, there is a reason I chose that name
[21:43] <wrst> yeah i figured that to be the case
[21:43] <cyberanger> the full name if I had the choice would have been cyberangerwas.strangled.by.asmallnowdefunctdomainhost.ontheinter.net
[21:44] <cyberanger> but that was long & didn't roll off the tounge as nice
[21:46] <wrst> godaddy somes to be about as cheap as anyone
[21:48] <cyberanger> well, I got mine for 5/yr
[21:49] <cyberanger> but defunct changed that
[21:49] <wrst> ahh gotcha
[21:49] <cyberanger> plus .uk allways drives the price
[21:49] <cyberanger> with this promotion making that sweet
[21:49] <cyberanger> a steal even
[21:52] <cyberanger> but I will be switching to get mine back
[21:52] <wrst> i had always wondered why you ahd the .uk
[21:52] <pleia2> hah, I love domain name hacking
[21:53]  * pleia2 has simcoec.at and caligulac.at for her... cats
[21:53] <pleia2> expensive, but gosh they're fun :)
[21:53] <pleia2> also snagged krumba.ch (my last name is krumbach)
[21:56] <wrst> ha ha pleia2 that's pretty cool
[21:57] <mhall119> nice
[21:57] <mhall119> alas, I don't think there's a .ll TLD
[21:58] <mhall119> yeah, no
[22:02] <cyberanger> mhall119: same boat with .ns
[22:03] <cyberanger> random.doma.in could be fun
[22:03] <cyberanger> set a php script to redirect people to other domains
[22:04] <cyberanger> just for laughs (wonders how 4chan would apply this, dare I ask