[07:17] <c2tarun> can anyone please tell me how to install xnest.
[07:19] <c2tarun> this happened when i tried... http://paste.ubuntu.com/534184/
[07:20] <ajmitch> c2tarun: you need to run 'sudo apt-get update' first
[07:21] <c2tarun> thanx ajmitch
[07:52] <micahg> bdrung: ping
[07:54] <micahg> bdrung: I asked feranick to add the dep3 headers to the vlc SRU and change the version, I noticed that you did this for the natty upload, should I just make the changes myself?
[07:58] <c2tarun> i installed xnest and opened emacs into it by my chroot environment of hardy. i want gnome to be installed in hardy.. how can i do that???
[07:58] <micahg> !support | c2tarun
[08:00] <c2tarun> sorry...
[08:09] <c2tarun> sorry to say but there is too much crowd there and noone is replying to my problem :( can i post them here
[08:11] <micahg> c2tarun: it's either the middle of the night or early morning for most of the people here and there
[08:11] <c2tarun> ok sorry
[08:42] <dholbach> good morning
[09:06] <iulian> Good morning Daniel.
[09:09] <bdrung> micahg: you may wait a while for him doing what you requested
[09:11] <dholbach> hey iulian
[10:09] <syskkk> how can I search for "bitesize" tagged bugs?
[10:23] <dholbach> syskkk, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize
[10:25] <syskkk> thx, didnt notice the tags oon the right side
[10:35] <syskkk> im trying to register to launchpad but the confirmation email doesnt contain the confirmation code
[10:35] <syskkk> weird
[10:36] <syskkk> http://pastebin.com/0YFPzq7L
[12:30] <geser> syskkk: the mail reads like an account with that e-mail address already exists
[13:25] <bilalakhtar> back from a (short) vacation
[13:36] <jpds> bilalakhtar: I went out of the room for 5 minutes, though it seemed like a holiday.
[13:37] <bilalakhtar> jpds: The case is similar for me, I am also Addicted To Ubuntu™
[13:37] <bilalakhtar> Since It Rocks™
[13:42] <ari-tczew> welcome bilalakhtar
[17:43] <nigelb> hrm, now that the files inside the bzr are tar'd, how do I work with them?
[17:44] <nigelb> I don't see the documentation updated to reflect that :(
[17:46] <geser> nigelb: which files get tar'd?
[17:47] <nigelb> geser: Just branched the source of a package for udd, and everything outside of debian dir is tar'd
[17:50] <geser> a tar-in-tar package?
[17:50] <geser> I don't like touching those
[17:50] <nigelb> No No
[17:51] <nigelb> nigelbabu@nigelbabu-laptop:~/sources/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap.fix-bugs$ ls
[17:51] <nigelb> debian  nss_ldap-264.tar.gz  nss_ldap-264.tar.gz.md5
[17:51] <nigelb> nigelbabu@nigelbabu-laptop:~/sources/libnss-ldap/libnss-ldap.fix-bugs$ ls
[17:51] <nigelb> debian  nss_ldap-264.tar.gz  nss_ldap-264.tar.gz.md5
[17:51] <nigelb> gah!
[17:51] <nigelb> geser: ^^meant to paste only once, sorry ^-^
[17:52] <geser> nigelb: yep, one of those tar-in-tar packages
[17:52] <nigelb> yuck, how do we build these things? :(
[17:52] <geser> (see the inclusion of /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/tarball.mk in debian/rules)
[17:53] <nigelb> yeah
[17:53] <geser> debian/rules (through cdbs) knows how to unpack them, but don't ask me how to call debian/rules to get something to work with
[17:53] <geser> I prefer to skip those packages if possible
[17:54] <nigelb> Sigh, patch review.
[17:54] <nigelb> geser: Any doc that I can look to make sense of this mess?
[17:55] <nigelb> (why do maintainers do this torture!)
[17:55] <geser> that way they could use tar.bz2 in v1 packages
[17:55] <cjwatson> it's an obsolete technique, people are moving away from it
[17:56] <cjwatson> not everyone's got round to updating yet
[17:56] <cjwatson> usually I run 'debian/rules build' and watch what it does
[17:57] <nigelb> oh, that would probably untar it for me?
[17:57] <geser> certainly
[17:58] <nigelb> I do have a certain flair for picking the more complicated packages
[17:59] <nigelb> Now I have a new tar.gz.cdbs-config_list
[17:59] <nigelb> wonder what that's supposed to do
[18:20] <SpamapS> micahg: just saw xulrunner-2.0 uploaded into natty... should we start moving everything to it?
[18:26] <ari-tczew> BlackZ: what about bug 677133 ? is it ready to sponsor? it wasn't in sponsors queue and bilalakhtar has duplicated a work (he has proposed another fix)
[18:28] <ari-tczew> siretart: you can upload SRU for emacs23 (bug 449729) to -proposed.
[18:28] <ari-tczew> then pitti will accept your package and ask in bug for testing
[18:29] <ari-tczew> (will accept or not) ;)
[18:47] <BlackZ> ari-tczew: I was about to propose a new fix (talked to seb128). However, can you give me the bug number?
[18:48] <ari-tczew> BlackZ: bug number with Bilal's fix? he did a merge bzr proposal, but he deleted branch when I told him about your bug (dunno why)
[18:49] <micahg> SpamapS: you can if you like
[18:49] <BlackZ> ari-tczew: I see, the correct libs should be added to the gcc call
[19:18] <ari-tczew> cjwatson: could you merge package console-tools? I saw that you
[19:18] <ari-tczew> are last merger (not uploader)
[19:40] <siretart> ari-tczew: I've uploaded a testpackage of emacs to my PPA, but it seems the font patch doesn't work for me :-(
[19:40] <siretart> needs further investigation
[19:59] <ari-tczew> ok
[20:03] <cjwatson> ari-tczew: yeah, can look on Monday or so (more or less finished for the week now)
[20:05] <ari-tczew> okok
[22:00] <deadwill> ScottK, o/
[22:00] <deadwill> siretart, o/