[00:45] okay, something funny is going on [02:04] kirkland: ? [02:04] ixokai: hi, did you get some help? when did you put the tickets in to the login support form ? [02:05] lifeless: Weeks ago. I didn't yet-- well, mthaddon looked into it a bit a few days ago, but we didn't get a resolution [02:05] so mthaddon is an appropriate person to look [02:05] I certainly can't look where he can :) [02:06] `He changed my email account to see if the + in the address was causing the problems: it wasn't. He was going to talk to someone to look at the mail logs, but I dunno how that went. [02:07] I suggest you follow up on monday [02:07] How? :| [02:07] Since the tickets seem to not work too. [02:07] Come here again and .. ping? again? [02:07] he should be in this channel from UTC 0900 through 1700 [02:07] okay [02:07] The last couple of weeks have been a bit sparse admin-wise. [03:01] Can I request a URL change for my project on Launchpad? [03:04] George_e: File a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion and an admin can rename it for you. [03:04] Thanks. [04:10] lifeless: seemed a reboot solved it [04:11] lifeless: i was having some really weird failures trying to do bzr things against lp:* [04:11] lifeless: bzr+ssh:// worked fine [04:11] lifeless: but not shortnames a la lp: [04:11] lifeless: no matter, working now [04:12] I uploaded a package to my ppa... before it started building, I realized I made a mistake, so I deleted it. Now it won't let me upload the corrected version. It keeps rejecting it saying that version is already there, but I deleted it. [04:17] psusi: You can't upload the same version twice -- that doesn't make sense. [04:17] psusi: You need to increment the version number. [04:17] wgrant, but I deleted it [04:17] it is no longer there [04:18] It is remembered, to avoid confusing everybody and everything. [04:18] it never even got built [04:18] well, still. [04:19] It is confusing to both computers and people, not to mention a lie, to have packages with the same version but different contents. [04:33] Will a deleted ppa remain listed in a person's ppa list? [04:33] happyaron: At the moment they do (but they're only shown to you, not anybody else). [04:35] wgrant: I see, thanks. [05:03] so once you have deleted a package from your ppa, it is impossible to replace it? [05:06] psusi: It's impossible to upload a new package claiming to be the old version. [05:17] but... there is no old version.. it's gone === doko_ is now known as doko === yofel_ is now known as yofel [15:46] Hi! [15:47] I need help about rosetta, can I ask here ? [16:33] xapantu: Yes, though at a weekend, it's harder to get in contact with Canonical employees (obviously), so you might need to re-ask on Monday [16:33] ok, I didn't think to that ^^ [16:34] So, a user spammed our japanese translation, and we would like to remove it, is there a nice way ? or we must remove it by hands ? [16:39] xapantu: I suggest you log a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta/+addquestion [16:39] ok, I am going to do that :) [16:39] Thanks :) === bilalakhtar_ is now known as bilalakhtar === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away [22:33] I'm trying a source package recipe and got this failure: "dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no orig.tar file found" under maverick, but build worked on lucid. [22:33] build log is here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/59379869/buildlog.txt.gz [22:44] jderose: support for Natty only here === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [22:45] charlie-tca: not sure i follow. do you mean a should be asking on another channel? [22:45] If you are asking about lucid/maverick, then yes [22:46] Perhaps #ubuntu , which is support for all versions except Natty [22:46] Never mind. My mistake [22:46] charlie-tca: this isn't an Ubuntu issue, it's a PPA issue... [22:46] Yeah, I see that now. I am on the wong channel [22:46] :) [22:47] jderose: sorry, didn't mean to upset things [22:47] np [23:24] jderose: Source package recipes don't support orig.tar.gz files at the moment. dpkg in Lucid and earlier falls back to a native package, but Maverick's doesn't. [23:25] jderose: You'll need to change the format to 3.0 (native) and manually apply any patches you need. [23:25] wgrant: okay, thanks! [23:26] wgrant: one more question. so will recipes automatically run ./autogen.sh? [23:27] jderose: Recipes do whatever debian/rules says. [23:29] wgrant: so a recipe would need different rules for building from upstream branch vs a release tarball, correct? (FYI, I'm a little autotools dumb) [23:29] jderose: Probably, yes. [23:29] Yay autotools. [23:29] or something like that :)