[10:50] <ssam> is there a way to report spam in lp bug comments?
[14:47] <geekosopher> can someone have a look at bug 631080 and mark it as triaged (guess it is complete)
[14:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 631080 in msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) "[MASTER] package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.0 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 42) (dups: 43) (heat: 342)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631080
[15:21] <mdeslaur> geekosopher: wouldn't that be a dupe of bug 274421
[15:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 274421 in msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) "Cannot download fonts, "Error parsing proxy URL http://:8080/" (affects: 110) (dups: 52) (heat: 243)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274421
[15:24] <geekosopher> mdeslaur: oh yes, it looks the same, got fooled by the title, I just got all the ones with same title
[15:25] <mdeslaur> geekosopher: I'm slightly confused though...this should already be fixed in lucid
[15:25] <geekosopher> but people are also complaining in natty
[15:26] <geekosopher> version 3.2
[15:26] <mdeslaur> geekosopher: could you find me one of the bugs that affects natty?
[15:27] <geekosopher> just a minute
[15:27] <geekosopher> mdeslaur: will be back in 10 mins some urgent work
[15:52] <xelister> ubuntu 10.10 after recent upgrade seems to hang often when using py OpenCL gpu cpomputing lib (using Radeom). Was there any update recenlty that could cause that
[16:14] <yofel> xelister: see /var/log/apt/history.log what was recently upgraded on your system and then check what of those was graphics related
[16:21] <xelister> yofel:  libqt4-opengl-dev  linux-image-2.6.35-23-generic  linux-libc-dev  libc-bin  libc*
[16:21] <yofel> might have been the kernel update then, do you still have -22 installed to try it?
[16:45] <geekosopher> mdeslaur: sorry, 10 mins became > 1 hour, and there are none of the dupes in natty,
[19:57] <bcurtiswx> vish, what's involved with the help needed fr papercuts ?
[20:04] <vish> bcurtiswx: hey, for bug triage and just helping new members, any questions they have ..
[20:22] <bcurtiswx> vish, I was reading a canonical post that said the papercuts project needed more members
[20:23] <vish> bcurtiswx: yea, for checking/triaging the bugs and when possible fixing them would be neat too ;)
[20:23] <bcurtiswx> vish, OK count me in :)
[20:23] <vish> bcurtiswx: cool, thx just apply and I'll approve :)
[20:24] <nisshh> vish, whats this? the papercuts project needs more members?
[20:25] <vish> nisshh: yup.. :)
[20:25] <vish> nisshh: http://design.canonical.com/2010/11/paper-cuts-need-you/
[20:25]  * nisshh looks
[20:26] <nisshh> vish, i might join in, i recently finished a couple of projects :)
[20:26] <vish> nisshh: more the merrier ;)
[20:27] <nisshh> hehe
[20:27] <vish> bcurtiswx , nisshh : https://launchpad.net/~papercutters  just apply and i'll approve the membership..
[20:28] <bcurtiswx> i was lookin for that.. :P joined
[20:28] <bcurtiswx> there's probably a ton of possible papercuts with empathy, i figure I can find and attack those on my own.
[20:29] <vish> bcurtiswx: yea, i figured you were looking for the link.. ;)  just started another team as well, setting up a mailing list lp is really crappy with mailing lists :(
[20:29] <nisshh> i dont know what ill try and fix tbh :)
[20:30] <nisshh> vish, wow, only 30 active members? i thought it was really popular among newer users looking to contribute :|
[20:31] <vish> nisshh: fixing bug descriptions are the easiest.. ;)  tip, just follow the HowtoFix wiki and it done..
[20:31] <vish> it;s*
[20:31] <nisshh> yeah, i would prefer something a little more challenging tbh
[20:31] <nisshh> although im happy to fix whatever
[20:32] <vish> nisshh: well, the papercutters team is for bug triagers but random people fixing the bugs are more
[20:32] <nisshh> vish, ok, im joined up too
[20:32] <nisshh> ah i see
[20:32] <vish> there is a new open team coming up for that too : https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja
[20:33] <nisshh> vish, one thing that i dont quite get, can a trivial bug in a non-default installed application be considered a papercut?
[20:33] <vish> nisshh: ^so that people can just get notified when a bug lands/upload fixes to ppa or ask questions
[20:33] <nisshh> ah ok
[20:34] <vish> nisshh: until now non-default app descriptions were looked into, this Natty cycle we would be having the preferred applications as well
[20:35] <vish> rather, the featured applications
[20:35] <nisshh> yeah
[20:36] <nisshh> vish, what i mean is, can say, a trivial bug in vlc, which is not a default app, be nominated to be a papercut? or do we only do default and featured apps?
[20:36] <vish> nisshh: only default and featured.. so no vlc
[20:37] <nisshh> vish, ah ok, thats cleared that up then
[20:37] <nisshh> vish, also, should i look at papercuts in the maverick series? or natty series?
[20:38] <vish> nisshh: all bugs, /not/ series restricted..
[20:39] <nisshh> vish, no, i mean i want to fix a papercut? should i fix one in the maverick series?
[20:40] <yofel> fixes always go into the development release, stable only if SRUable
[20:40] <vish> nisshh: yea, for those too, not restricted to series..  if it is not fixed in time for maverick, we fix for natty
[20:40] <nisshh> vish, ok
[20:42] <nisshh> vish, so all the unfixed bugs in the papercut maverick series, should they be retargeted to the natty series?
[20:42] <vish> nisshh: yup..
[20:42] <nisshh> vish, want me to do that?
[20:43] <vish> nisshh: i'm right now, setting up the natty series' milestones.. so the milestones are not yet available … should be there tomorrow, or late in the evening for you ;)
[20:43] <nisshh> ah ok
[20:44] <nisshh> i guess ill look for potential papercuts till then :)
[20:44] <bcurtiswx> i would imagine papercuts wouldn't ever qualify for a SRU, so thats why they would need to be retargeted to natty
[20:45] <nisshh> bcurtiswx, good point
[23:51] <nisshh> vish, do you just want the new and triaged bugs moved to the natty series? or the in progress bugs as wel?
[23:51] <nisshh> well*