=== delan is now known as Guest55426 === Guest55426 is now known as delan_ === AbhiJit_ is now known as AbhiJit [10:50] is there a way to report spam in lp bug comments? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:47] can someone have a look at bug 631080 and mark it as triaged (guess it is complete) [14:47] Launchpad bug 631080 in msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) "[MASTER] package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.0 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 42) (dups: 43) (heat: 342)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/631080 [15:21] geekosopher: wouldn't that be a dupe of bug 274421 [15:21] Launchpad bug 274421 in msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) "Cannot download fonts, "Error parsing proxy URL http://:8080/" (affects: 110) (dups: 52) (heat: 243)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274421 [15:24] mdeslaur: oh yes, it looks the same, got fooled by the title, I just got all the ones with same title [15:25] geekosopher: I'm slightly confused though...this should already be fixed in lucid [15:25] but people are also complaining in natty [15:26] version 3.2 [15:26] geekosopher: could you find me one of the bugs that affects natty? [15:27] just a minute [15:27] mdeslaur: will be back in 10 mins some urgent work [15:52] ubuntu 10.10 after recent upgrade seems to hang often when using py OpenCL gpu cpomputing lib (using Radeom). Was there any update recenlty that could cause that [16:14] xelister: see /var/log/apt/history.log what was recently upgraded on your system and then check what of those was graphics related [16:21] yofel: libqt4-opengl-dev linux-image-2.6.35-23-generic linux-libc-dev libc-bin libc* [16:21] might have been the kernel update then, do you still have -22 installed to try it? [16:45] mdeslaur: sorry, 10 mins became > 1 hour, and there are none of the dupes in natty, === bilalakhtar_ is now known as bilalakhtar [19:57] vish, what's involved with the help needed fr papercuts ? [20:04] bcurtiswx: hey, for bug triage and just helping new members, any questions they have .. [20:22] vish, I was reading a canonical post that said the papercuts project needed more members [20:23] bcurtiswx: yea, for checking/triaging the bugs and when possible fixing them would be neat too ;) [20:23] vish, OK count me in :) [20:23] bcurtiswx: cool, thx just apply and I'll approve :) [20:24] vish, whats this? the papercuts project needs more members? [20:25] nisshh: yup.. :) [20:25] nisshh: http://design.canonical.com/2010/11/paper-cuts-need-you/ [20:25] * nisshh looks [20:26] vish, i might join in, i recently finished a couple of projects :) [20:26] nisshh: more the merrier ;) [20:27] hehe [20:27] bcurtiswx , nisshh : https://launchpad.net/~papercutters just apply and i'll approve the membership.. [20:28] i was lookin for that.. :P joined [20:28] there's probably a ton of possible papercuts with empathy, i figure I can find and attack those on my own. [20:29] bcurtiswx: yea, i figured you were looking for the link.. ;) just started another team as well, setting up a mailing list lp is really crappy with mailing lists :( [20:29] i dont know what ill try and fix tbh :) [20:30] vish, wow, only 30 active members? i thought it was really popular among newer users looking to contribute :| [20:31] nisshh: fixing bug descriptions are the easiest.. ;) tip, just follow the HowtoFix wiki and it done.. [20:31] it;s* [20:31] yeah, i would prefer something a little more challenging tbh [20:31] although im happy to fix whatever [20:32] nisshh: well, the papercutters team is for bug triagers but random people fixing the bugs are more [20:32] vish, ok, im joined up too [20:32] ah i see [20:32] there is a new open team coming up for that too : https://launchpad.net/~papercuts-ninja [20:33] vish, one thing that i dont quite get, can a trivial bug in a non-default installed application be considered a papercut? [20:33] nisshh: ^so that people can just get notified when a bug lands/upload fixes to ppa or ask questions [20:33] ah ok [20:34] nisshh: until now non-default app descriptions were looked into, this Natty cycle we would be having the preferred applications as well [20:35] rather, the featured applications [20:35] yeah [20:36] vish, what i mean is, can say, a trivial bug in vlc, which is not a default app, be nominated to be a papercut? or do we only do default and featured apps? [20:36] nisshh: only default and featured.. so no vlc [20:37] vish, ah ok, thats cleared that up then [20:37] vish, also, should i look at papercuts in the maverick series? or natty series? [20:38] nisshh: all bugs, /not/ series restricted.. [20:39] vish, no, i mean i want to fix a papercut? should i fix one in the maverick series? [20:40] fixes always go into the development release, stable only if SRUable [20:40] nisshh: yea, for those too, not restricted to series.. if it is not fixed in time for maverick, we fix for natty [20:40] vish, ok [20:42] vish, so all the unfixed bugs in the papercut maverick series, should they be retargeted to the natty series? [20:42] nisshh: yup.. [20:42] vish, want me to do that? [20:43] nisshh: i'm right now, setting up the natty series' milestones.. so the milestones are not yet available … should be there tomorrow, or late in the evening for you ;) [20:43] ah ok [20:44] i guess ill look for potential papercuts till then :) [20:44] i would imagine papercuts wouldn't ever qualify for a SRU, so thats why they would need to be retargeted to natty [20:45] bcurtiswx, good point [23:51] vish, do you just want the new and triaged bugs moved to the natty series? or the in progress bugs as wel? [23:51] well*