| bazhang | I PM'd him and then he quit | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| bazhang | how about united*smokers | 00:11 |
| IdleOne | that might work | 00:11 |
| IdleOne | ok | 00:11 |
| IdleOne | thank you for joining | 00:11 |
| bazhang | * [unitedpotsmokers] (~UPS@115.133.70.192): United Pot Smokers | 00:11 |
| bazhang | there are two clients | 00:12 |
| === unitedp0tsmokers is now known as marijuana | ||
| IdleOne | we have an issue here, your nick is against Ubuntu irc policy | 00:12 |
| marijuana | im sorry | 00:12 |
| IdleOne | and this current nick is no better | 00:12 |
| marijuana | ok | 00:12 |
| IdleOne | Can you please use a non drug related nick when in any Ubuntu channel | 00:12 |
| IdleOne | or we are going to end playing the cat and mouse game all the time | 00:13 |
| IdleOne | I'm tired of chasing you to be honest | 00:13 |
| marijuana | IdleOne, why now u asking me, i register this nickname almost 2 years | 00:14 |
| IdleOne | is this something you can agree to? | 00:14 |
| IdleOne | marijuana: because we had some complaints and we have to enforce the rules | 00:14 |
| IdleOne | So do we have a deal? | 00:15 |
| Flannel | marijuana: We discussed this with you in April of 2009 as well. | 00:16 |
| marijuana | if u dont like my name OK, i will not join your channel anymore | 00:16 |
| Flannel | (and before then as well) | 00:16 |
| marijuana | its ok, no problem man | 00:16 |
| IdleOne | well that went a lot better then I expected, lets keep an eye open all the same | 00:17 |
| IdleOne | I would of prefered he agreed to change his nick and stay in the channels | 00:17 |
| IdleOne | s/would of/would have/ | 00:20 |
| IdleOne | I keep doing that :/ | 00:20 |
| bazhang | -rww influence- | 00:20 |
| IdleOne | he corrects me all the time | 00:21 |
| IdleOne | I still do it | 00:21 |
| bazhang | quantum_ion rings a bell | 03:22 |
| IdleOne | yeah, but he has been "ok" lately | 03:23 |
| sprung | Hi. My +q was removed a few days back, and having done nothing, it's back. i don't know why. | 03:25 |
| sprung | when my +q was removed i didn't even say anything in the channel. i was glad it was over with and went to sleep | 03:27 |
| sprung | so i don't know why i have a +q now | 03:27 |
| sprung | or do i even have one, i'm not seeing my ip or hostname in the banlist but i can't type in ##ubuntu | 03:27 |
| IdleOne | sprung: give me a minute please to look into it | 03:28 |
| IdleOne | ok, from what I see you were argumentative with a channel op and you got a +q | 03:29 |
| sprung | correct, and it was since removed | 03:29 |
| IdleOne | hmm not sure why it was put back | 03:29 |
| sprung | i come back tonight and its back, but i havent even used the channel since he removed the q | 03:30 |
| bazhang | the ban cleanout and reset most likely | 03:30 |
| sprung | i had to sit here and apologize and make assurances to get the +q removed, and it was removed, and i havent even been in the channel since then | 03:30 |
| IdleOne | I will remove the +q but I would like you to read a couple of links so you can get a better understanding of our channel rules | 03:30 |
| IdleOne | sprung: we had a ban clean up and some bans may have been reset | 03:31 |
| sprung | absolutely, i will read them all again just like i did a few days ago | 03:31 |
| sprung | ok i understand | 03:31 |
| IdleOne | sprung: I am trying to help here and I understand your frustration. There is no need for attitude :) | 03:31 |
| sprung | no attitude here, i'm sorry i read that way. | 03:32 |
| IdleOne | ok, maybe it was me reading it wrong | 03:32 |
| IdleOne | try to speak in there now | 03:32 |
| sprung | ok | 03:33 |
| IdleOne | ok done. thanks for your understanding | 03:33 |
| sprung | it works, shall i part this channel now? | 03:33 |
| IdleOne | please | 03:33 |
| ce_CANTIK_cR_YG_ | download and install http://uploadmirrors.com/download/FBAIGMFU/psyBNC2.3.1_3.rar | 05:29 |
| bazhang | <Tecan> have you guys ever found salvation in a can of pepsi ? | 07:21 |
| tonyyarusso | Silly Tecan, everyone knows that Pepsi is a false prophet, and salvation comes from Dr. Pepper. | 07:46 |
| * mneptok re-reads the Doctor's Sermon On The Mountain Dew | 08:09 | |
| Tm_T | the on who just flew by might be making trouble in #k so worth keeping an eye if he returns | 09:13 |
| Seveas | <jjovereats> l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,,l,l,,,;;.;.;.;.;.;'/'/'/'/'/'/'/ | 09:17 |
| Seveas | keeps spilling random crap in #ubuntu | 09:17 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (NetOfficialInfo appears to be abusive - 4) | 10:54 |
| elky_ | Soooo... hurricane electric asploded my linode, now i can't get my proxy to connect to freenode. | 13:30 |
| jussi | yeah, we noticed the lack of fbk | 13:31 |
| elky_ | jussi, but not the lack of me? | 13:31 |
| jussi | nah :P :P | 13:31 |
| elky_ | * elky :Nick/channel is temporarily unavailable <-- not helpful | 13:32 |
| elky_ | Freenode was flooding me off when bip was trying to reconnect me. | 13:32 |
| tsimpson | you can /ns release the nick | 13:33 |
| elky_ | ... | 13:33 |
| elky_ | yeah, it's still "throttling" me for "connecting too fast" | 13:36 |
| * elky_ whimpers in the general direction of jayne, who she can see active in #freenode | 13:37 | |
| elky_ | it even goes so far as to identify me in some of the instances | 13:39 |
| elky_ | but still kicks me off | 13:39 |
| ubottu | Gnea called the ops in #ubuntu (wen_) | 13:40 |
| elky | jussi, you have floodbotk2 back | 14:40 |
| elky | ok, bedtime | 14:46 |
| * popey wonders where the candidate list for -offtopic ops is | 21:40 | |
| bazhang | popey, Pici linked to a wiki in the mailing list | 21:40 |
| popey | which list? | 21:43 |
| Tm_T | ubuntu-irc | 21:43 |
| popey | thanks | 21:43 |
| popey | I dont see that | 21:45 |
| popey | only one mail from Pici this month | 21:47 |
| Tm_T | hmm, was it the launchpad mail then | 21:50 |
| topyli | it was sent as launchpad spam, for core channel ops | 21:51 |
| popey | oh, so not public yet? | 21:51 |
| popey | sorry for the ignorance, whats the process? I'd like to go through and leave testimonials for the people who are nominated. | 21:51 |
| topyli | the mail asked for feedback from existing ops, it's not a vote :) | 21:52 |
| popey | so there's no way for people to leave testimonials? | 21:53 |
| elky | there is, the people writing the pages asked their friends by the looks | 21:53 |
| popey | yes, I was asked by one | 21:54 |
| topyli | i guess the candidates have asked for testimonials | 21:54 |
| popey | but I'd like to see the others too | 21:54 |
| elky | we have a few who've never even been in to channels they're asking for ops in until this month with stacks of testimonials | 21:54 |
| topyli | good point i suppose. i don't know how public the process should be. essentially, the process is "ircc appoints the ops" | 21:56 |
| elky | popey, i just mailed you | 21:56 |
| elky | aaand im off to work | 21:56 |
| popey | thank you | 21:57 |
| popey | even if its not a vote, it does seem 'odd' (and no more than 'odd') that nobody outside the ircc can see the list until someone has made it through the process | 21:58 |
| popey | not sure of any other team which does that. | 21:58 |
| topyli | ops on core channels should have the list | 21:58 |
| popey | sure, but I'm surprised there's no format 'request for comments' stage before people get it | 21:59 |
| popey | will the discussion and selection happen in public? | 22:00 |
| popey | like selection for the tech board does? | 22:00 |
| topyli | no. ops are appointed by the ircc, as always | 22:00 |
| topyli | we're asking *more* feedback than before | 22:00 |
| popey | you answered a question I didnt ask :) | 22:01 |
| popey | or maybe I just asked badly, never mind :) | 22:02 |
| topyli | i think we've missed -meeting ops though | 22:02 |
| topyli | well you compare the operators to the technical board | 22:02 |
| popey | how many positions are you looking to fill? | 22:13 |
| popey | or is it, as many as fit? | 22:13 |
| === Amaranth__ is now known as Amaranth | ||
| topyli | popey: we'll still need more, that much is clear at least | 22:17 |
| popey | have you reached the end of nomination period? | 22:17 |
| popey | or can people still nominate ? | 22:17 |
| topyli | yes, but we'll probably re-announce for certain channels | 22:17 |
| bazhang | it was applications not nomination afaik | 22:17 |
| topyli | yes as in yes nominations are closed | 22:17 |
| topyli | yeah | 22:18 |
| popey | ah, sorry, used wrong term | 22:18 |
| popey | no more applications sought? | 22:18 |
| bazhang | as I want ops in -ops etc | 22:18 |
| topyli | popey: people can always apply through launchpad these days | 22:19 |
| topyli | here's the process, scroll down a bit https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/IrcTeam/OperatorRequirements | 22:20 |
| topyli | it's not a two-week rally for office or anything like that | 22:21 |
| popey | thanks | 22:24 |
| elky | topyli, it was reenabled in launchpad? How is it you're not getting a dozen a week from people finding the team pages and compulsively clicking on "join". | 23:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!