[00:00] I PM'd him and then he quit [00:11] how about united*smokers [00:11] that might work [00:11] ok [00:11] thank you for joining [00:11] * [unitedpotsmokers] (~UPS@115.133.70.192): United Pot Smokers [00:12] there are two clients === unitedp0tsmokers is now known as marijuana [00:12] we have an issue here, your nick is against Ubuntu irc policy [00:12] im sorry [00:12] and this current nick is no better [00:12] ok [00:12] Can you please use a non drug related nick when in any Ubuntu channel [00:13] or we are going to end playing the cat and mouse game all the time [00:13] I'm tired of chasing you to be honest [00:14] IdleOne, why now u asking me, i register this nickname almost 2 years [00:14] is this something you can agree to? [00:14] marijuana: because we had some complaints and we have to enforce the rules [00:15] So do we have a deal? [00:16] marijuana: We discussed this with you in April of 2009 as well. [00:16] if u dont like my name OK, i will not join your channel anymore [00:16] (and before then as well) [00:16] its ok, no problem man [00:17] well that went a lot better then I expected, lets keep an eye open all the same [00:17] I would of prefered he agreed to change his nick and stay in the channels [00:20] s/would of/would have/ [00:20] I keep doing that :/ [00:20] -rww influence- [00:21] he corrects me all the time [00:21] I still do it [03:22] quantum_ion rings a bell [03:23] yeah, but he has been "ok" lately [03:25] Hi. My +q was removed a few days back, and having done nothing, it's back. i don't know why. [03:27] when my +q was removed i didn't even say anything in the channel. i was glad it was over with and went to sleep [03:27] so i don't know why i have a +q now [03:27] or do i even have one, i'm not seeing my ip or hostname in the banlist but i can't type in ##ubuntu [03:28] sprung: give me a minute please to look into it [03:29] ok, from what I see you were argumentative with a channel op and you got a +q [03:29] correct, and it was since removed [03:29] hmm not sure why it was put back [03:30] i come back tonight and its back, but i havent even used the channel since he removed the q [03:30] the ban cleanout and reset most likely [03:30] i had to sit here and apologize and make assurances to get the +q removed, and it was removed, and i havent even been in the channel since then [03:30] I will remove the +q but I would like you to read a couple of links so you can get a better understanding of our channel rules [03:31] sprung: we had a ban clean up and some bans may have been reset [03:31] absolutely, i will read them all again just like i did a few days ago [03:31] ok i understand [03:31] sprung: I am trying to help here and I understand your frustration. There is no need for attitude :) [03:32] no attitude here, i'm sorry i read that way. [03:32] ok, maybe it was me reading it wrong [03:32] try to speak in there now [03:33] ok [03:33] ok done. thanks for your understanding [03:33] it works, shall i part this channel now? [03:33] please [05:29] download and install http://uploadmirrors.com/download/FBAIGMFU/psyBNC2.3.1_3.rar [07:21] have you guys ever found salvation in a can of pepsi ? [07:46] Silly Tecan, everyone knows that Pepsi is a false prophet, and salvation comes from Dr. Pepper. [08:09] * mneptok re-reads the Doctor's Sermon On The Mountain Dew [09:13] the on who just flew by might be making trouble in #k so worth keeping an eye if he returns [09:17] l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,l,,l,l,,,;;.;.;.;.;.;'/'/'/'/'/'/'/ [09:17] keeps spilling random crap in #ubuntu [10:54] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (NetOfficialInfo appears to be abusive - 4) [13:30] Soooo... hurricane electric asploded my linode, now i can't get my proxy to connect to freenode. [13:31] yeah, we noticed the lack of fbk [13:31] jussi, but not the lack of me? [13:31] nah :P :P [13:32] * elky :Nick/channel is temporarily unavailable <-- not helpful [13:32] Freenode was flooding me off when bip was trying to reconnect me. [13:33] you can /ns release the nick [13:33] ... [13:36] yeah, it's still "throttling" me for "connecting too fast" [13:37] * elky_ whimpers in the general direction of jayne, who she can see active in #freenode [13:39] it even goes so far as to identify me in some of the instances [13:39] but still kicks me off [13:40] Gnea called the ops in #ubuntu (wen_) [14:40] jussi, you have floodbotk2 back [14:46] ok, bedtime [21:40] * popey wonders where the candidate list for -offtopic ops is [21:40] popey, Pici linked to a wiki in the mailing list [21:43] which list? [21:43] ubuntu-irc [21:43] thanks [21:45] I dont see that [21:47] only one mail from Pici this month [21:50] hmm, was it the launchpad mail then [21:51] it was sent as launchpad spam, for core channel ops [21:51] oh, so not public yet? [21:51] sorry for the ignorance, whats the process? I'd like to go through and leave testimonials for the people who are nominated. [21:52] the mail asked for feedback from existing ops, it's not a vote :) [21:53] so there's no way for people to leave testimonials? [21:53] there is, the people writing the pages asked their friends by the looks [21:54] yes, I was asked by one [21:54] i guess the candidates have asked for testimonials [21:54] but I'd like to see the others too [21:54] we have a few who've never even been in to channels they're asking for ops in until this month with stacks of testimonials [21:56] good point i suppose. i don't know how public the process should be. essentially, the process is "ircc appoints the ops" [21:56] popey, i just mailed you [21:56] aaand im off to work [21:57] thank you [21:58] even if its not a vote, it does seem 'odd' (and no more than 'odd') that nobody outside the ircc can see the list until someone has made it through the process [21:58] not sure of any other team which does that. [21:58] ops on core channels should have the list [21:59] sure, but I'm surprised there's no format 'request for comments' stage before people get it [22:00] will the discussion and selection happen in public? [22:00] like selection for the tech board does? [22:00] no. ops are appointed by the ircc, as always [22:00] we're asking *more* feedback than before [22:01] you answered a question I didnt ask :) [22:02] or maybe I just asked badly, never mind :) [22:02] i think we've missed -meeting ops though [22:02] well you compare the operators to the technical board [22:13] how many positions are you looking to fill? [22:13] or is it, as many as fit? === Amaranth__ is now known as Amaranth [22:17] popey: we'll still need more, that much is clear at least [22:17] have you reached the end of nomination period? [22:17] or can people still nominate ? [22:17] yes, but we'll probably re-announce for certain channels [22:17] it was applications not nomination afaik [22:17] yes as in yes nominations are closed [22:18] yeah [22:18] ah, sorry, used wrong term [22:18] no more applications sought? [22:18] as I want ops in -ops etc [22:19] popey: people can always apply through launchpad these days [22:20] here's the process, scroll down a bit https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/IrcTeam/OperatorRequirements [22:21] it's not a two-week rally for office or anything like that [22:24] thanks [23:25] topyli, it was reenabled in launchpad? How is it you're not getting a dozen a week from people finding the team pages and compulsively clicking on "join".