[00:26] <Sarvatt> soren: http://support.amd.com/us/eyefinity/Pages/eyefinity-dongles.aspx
[18:10] <xelister> Sarvatt: hi
[18:10] <xelister> Sarvatt: ubuntu's naming of fglrx package is stupid
[18:10] <xelister> Sarvatt: it should include number of corresponding upstream (Ati/AMD) Catalyst version like 10.10 or 10.9 - like debian does it
[18:10] <xelister> Sarvatt: can you fix it?
[18:41] <Sarvatt_> tseliot is the person to ask, I don't agree though because we frequently release fglrx that doesn't correspond to a monthly release (like 8.780)
[18:43] <jcristau> dunno what "like debian does it" refers to, the package is named fglrx-driver and fglrx-glx in debian afaict
[18:45] <ion> One could do 8.780+catalyst10.10-0ubuntux or whatever.
[18:46] <Sarvatt_> he means how we varsion it by the actual fglrx version instead of the monthly release codenames. 8.793 instead of 10.11. yeah what ion suggested would be nice
[18:46] <Sarvatt_> version rather, ugh
[18:47] <ion> Btw, xvba-va-driver is uninstallable because it depends on fglrx-driver (>= 1:10-9). Would fglrx having Provides: fglrx-driver fix that?
[18:47] <Sarvatt_> will ask tseliot what he thinks, lucid and maverick shipped fglrx that wasnt a monthly release and looks like natty will too
[18:48] <ricotz> Sarvatt, hi
[18:49] <Sarvatt_> hiya, need to go afk a bit because the stupid cat got out sorry, brb
[18:49] <ricotz> Sarvatt, i have a problem with my intel g31 - it uses i915 but it isnt working with kms
[18:49] <ricotz> ok
[18:52] <jcristau> ion: no, you can't do versioned provides
[18:53] <ion> fglrx’s version is higher than the version of fglrx-driver it depends on. It still won’t work?
[18:58] <jcristau> Depends: fglrx-driver (>= 1:10-9) will never be satisfied by a Provides.
[18:59] <ion> ok