[02:15] Hello, is there the right place to ask about PPA? [02:20] ries: this channel is a good place [02:22] spiv: People ask me to create a PPA, I am trying to understand what sort of work is needed... currently I setup the applicaiton to be run-in-place after compilation [02:22] should I make a dep package and just upload? [02:25] ries: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA may help you [02:26] ries: you can upload source deb packages to your PPA, and Launchpad will build them for you, and people can install those. [02:26] Ahh ok.. so when I make a deb that works on Debian, then launchpad can pick that up... [02:26] I will read how to make a dep first then... [02:26] deb... [02:28] ries: I think https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide is the recommended starting point for that. [02:29] spiv: very helpfull... I will give this : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/QtApplication a shot [04:58] I'm guessing that if an upstream branch autoimport fails I don't need to inform anyone [05:00] it depends [05:00] do you want it fixed? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [08:07] hello [08:07] I'm looking for a Registry Administrator [08:07] Devil505: what is it you need done? [08:08] jtv, I've registered frugalware linux project https://launchpad.net/frugalware but i just want a page like https://launchpad.net/debian or https://launchpad.net/fedora or https://launchpad.net/gentoo [08:10] Devil505: let me find one for you… [08:11] ok thx:) [08:11] bac: is that something you could help with perhaps? [08:15] I just need the window with CD mirrors, Builds... [08:15] Devil505: Those are only supported for Ubuntu. They're empty for all other distributions at the moment. [08:18] ok and how to change the page to have the same thing as the debian one for example ? [08:19] What about it do you want? [08:21] just want to have Frugalware registered like that https://launchpad.net/gentoo :) [08:21] Devil505: What difference does it make? [08:21] There is extra awkwardness around distros. [08:23] oh ok === doko_ is now known as doko [08:55] hi henninge! [08:55] You have mail. [08:57] jtv: Hi! [08:57] Yes, let me read it. ;) [09:25] henninge: it's well past mumble [09:28] jtv: yes, sorry [09:28] henninge: I got a patch number for recife, so am about to push that change. === jelmer is now known as Guest24864 === Guest24864 is now known as jelmer === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [13:59] any launchpad buildd around? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/59451168/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.apr_1.4.2-6_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [14:00] launchpad buildd admin* === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [14:15] BlackZ: you probably need to talk to lamont about this [14:15] lamont: ^ [14:16] hey guys, I'm having problems with gpg keys on mi PPAs, I had a key 2082CDED, but I lost that one, I created a new one 6AE14EF2, and my packages are signed with this one and everything is ok uploading packages, the problem is that when I try to use this PPA as a dependencie for another PPA, the build bot gets the old key and shows the error NO_PUBKEY 2F9D58B92082CDED [14:16] any clue ? [14:17] Andphe: do your packages build? [14:18] yes, the ones that doesn't require a PPA as dependency to build [14:18] bigjools, ↑↑ [14:18] Andphe: do the other builds fail? NO_PUBKEY is just a warning. [14:19] BlackZ: file a bug on launchpad-buildd please [14:19] BlackZ, bigjools: there should already be one about it [14:19] ok thanks [14:20] do you know the number? [14:20] bigjools: bug 671441 (the title could use an update) [14:20] bigjools, not sure, this is what I get W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2F9D58B92082CDED [14:20] Launchpad bug 671441 in joblib (Ubuntu) "joblib FTBFS in Natty (affected: 1, heat: 289)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/671441 [14:21] Andphe: that's just a warning and appears for all builds [14:21] bigjools, hmmm === jaycee is now known as jcsackett [14:22] bigjools: I confirmed it [14:22] bigjools, ok thanks, at least now I know it's no the keys [14:22] np [14:25] geser: and I updated the title with one more better than the precedent one [14:42] I asked the papercut team about the following bug, as it is the start of a new development cycle... but they said it wasn't desktop so not appropriate. It seems like basic functionality and has been open a while, does it deserve a look? [14:42] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68277 [14:42] Launchpad bug 68277 in Launchpad Bugs ""newest first" doesn't sort bugs correctly (affected: 1, heat: 0)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:52] Can I pin a package for the build proccess ? I'm trying to build something whose dependencies an older than official release [15:00] unless I misunderstood your questions, only the latest version is published for a specific archive (PPA, official archive, etc.) === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [15:14] geser, I'm building a extension for PHP 5.2.14 but the official one is 5.3.3, the php5-dev 5.2.14 package is on my ppa, but the build is getting 5.3.3, so what I'm looking is to fix the build to use mine instead the official one [15:19] Andphe: set a build dependency on an explict version [15:22] bigjools, what I currently have is Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libmcrypt-dev, php5-dev (= 5.2.14) and the package php5_5.2.14.dfsg.1-0ubuntu0ppa3~maverick. is already on my PPA [15:23] I don't know whats up then [15:24] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/59451010/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.php-mcrypt_5.2.14-0ubuntu0ppa1~maverick_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz [15:25] this is the log [15:25] anybody have ideas what might cause the error about tar here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/58855548/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.mongodb_1:1.2.2-1ubuntu1.1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ? [15:25] dpkg-deb: building package `mongodb' in `../mongodb_1.2.2-1ubuntu1.1~ppa1_i386.deb'. [15:25] tar: ./usr/bin/mongo: file changed as we read it [15:25] The build works fine in lucid pbuilder and using sbuild === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [15:57] BlackZ: yeah - we don't have /dev/shm mounted in the build chroots - I'm looking into if we care enough [15:58] lamont: will it be mounted? otherwise seems like we will have to fix all packages using that to not mount it [15:59] BlackZ: that's what I'm looking at figuring out this week [16:14] rockstar: call? [16:16] flacoste, now? I thought it wasn't for a while. [16:16] rockstar: my calendar says now [16:17] rockstar: if you aren't available, we can reschedule [16:17] flacoste, hm, I probably got my UTC math wrong. I can do it now. Mumble? [16:17] rockstar: sure, Code 1-1 === oubiwann is now known as oubiwann-away === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann === jelmer is now known as Guest34932 === Guest34932 is now known as jelmer === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck === yofel_ is now known as yofel === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk === bilalakhtar is now known as papercutter === papercutter is now known as bilalakhtar === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === Meths_ is now known as Meths === apachelogger is now known as FanOfNightrose === FanOfNightrose is now known as apachelogger === apachelogger is now known as phononlogger