[09:16] <Tm_T> DJones: ok now?
[09:17] <DJones> yes, thanks Tm_T
[09:18] <Tm_T> good good, np (:
[10:35]  * m4v scratches his head at *!*@*bzshellz.* ban in #ubuntu
[10:36] <m4v> shouldn't it be bshellz or is not a typo?
[10:47] <rww> m4v: I'll look into it; thanks.
[10:50] <rww> ikonia: See ^^^. As far as I can tell, m4v is right
[11:17] <ikonia> depends, there was two hosts at one point, one was a real shell provider the other was just a host
[11:17] <ikonia> but that one could be a typo
[11:19] <rww> ikonia: I don't see anything in the bantracker for bzshellz other than your ban, though
[11:20] <rww> I suspect you accidentally added an extra z at some point and your mind ran with it ;)
[11:26] <ikonia> feel free to change it if thats the case
[11:30] <rww> done
[11:31] <ikonia> ta
[14:28] <m4v> is just that I noticed users joining #ubuntu from bshellz when I knew that bshellz used to be banned.
[14:40] <erUSUL> m4v: revised policies about open proxies? i saw an email to the list about it
[14:46] <Pici> It was a typo.
[14:47]  * erUSUL fail
[19:26] <gouki> Is there a rule that "forces" official LoCo channels to be logged? #ubuntu-pt has ubuntulog and ubuntulog2, I would like for them to be removed.
[19:27] <Pici> gouki: It was requested by the Loco Council.
[19:27] <gouki> Pici, so the LoCo council now forces channels to be logged?
[19:28] <Pici> gouki: Yes, your loco's contact should have received an email about it.
[19:28] <gouki> Pici, that's just marvelous.
[19:29] <gouki> Pici, thank you for your help.
[19:30] <Pici> Sure thing.