[08:16] <Zdra> hello, any chance that bug gets fixed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/662946
[08:16] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 662946 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "linux kernel 2.6.35 slows down the whole system because of kslowdxxx processes (affects: 34) (dups: 2) (heat: 194)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[08:16] <Zdra> if I didn't have lucid's kernel installed, maverick would be unusable...µ
[08:17] <Zdra> is there someone in ubuntu working to find a solution?
[08:41] <apw> Zdra, i am unaware of anyone being aware of that bug
[08:41] <apw> still existing ... the original bug that that bug refers (I believe)
[08:41] <apw> is one I had in early Maverick only which was fixed
[08:47] <Zdra> apw, well, looking at the list of subscribers and notified, I'm not the only one suffering that bug :)
[08:48] <Zdra> so please, if someone in the team could look at it, I would really appreciate :D
[08:50] <kraut> moin
[08:56] <apw> Zdra, that is claimed to be fixed by a commit which is included in the Natty kernels, if you could test one of those and confirm that that would help
[08:56] <Zdra> apw, is it possible to push that into a ppa so I can install it?
[08:56] <apw> you should be able to just install the one from the archive
[08:57] <apw> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.37-6.17
[08:57] <apw> has links to the architectures, and from there to the .debs
[09:01] <Zdra> apw, well, patch needs to be backported to .35
[09:01] <Zdra> there I see .37
[09:02] <apw> Zdra, indeed but without confirmation that the bug is even fixed with the patch there is no point in spending effort on the backport
[09:03] <Zdra> apw, ok, I'll try that asap. will get back at you when I had time to test :)
[09:03] <apw> yep confirmed it is no simple backport
[09:46] <Kano> hi, whats the diff between v2.6.32.26-lucid and v2.6.32.26.11-lucid?
[09:47] <Kano> in the mainline dir
[09:49] <Kano> apw: can you tell me that?
[09:50] <apw> Kano, they are releases from different stable trees
[09:50] <Kano> i only know one
[09:50] <Kano> whats the 2nd?
[09:50] <apw> the first is the one from gregs tree, and the second is from smb's .32drm.33 tree
[09:51] <Kano> hmm
[09:51] <Kano> so the first is the only pure mainline
[09:51] <apw> the latter being the stable upstream for lucid
[09:51] <smb> Which is 2.6.32.y with drm from 2.6.33 (plus stablepatches)
[09:51] <apw> depends how you define pure
[09:51] <Kano> unpatched
[09:51] <apw> the 26.11 is all upstream patches
[09:52] <apw> its not ubuntu in any way
[09:52] <Kano> well when you would add aufs it would be happy ;)
[09:52] <Kano> to a mainline kernel tree *g*
[09:52] <apw> which we never will as they are both upstream trees
[09:52] <smb> No. No addditional drivers compared to mainline
[09:53] <smb> Just a different drm driver base from a more recent mainline
[09:53] <apw> the 26.11 tree is maintained using the same rules and incoming patches as the normal stable trees
[09:53] <apw> just matches the frankenstein nature of the lucid kernel tree
[09:53] <smb> apw, And the debian kernel too
[09:53] <apw> (indeed)
[09:54] <Kano> the debian kernel has .33 drm?
[09:54] <apw> that is my understanding yes
[09:55] <smb> They were in the same mess with 2.6.32 as we. As far as I know they went the same hybrid way
[09:55] <apw> smb, they help maintain the hybrid tree don't they?  as in submitting patches to you
[09:55] <smb> Yes, they have been
[10:36] <Kano> apw: will you add http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/all/firmware-realtek/filelist to your firmware package
[10:36] <Kano> hmm its in maverick now...
[10:36] <Kano> fine
[11:44] <apw> lag, hey ... you have some 5 patches in our delta which should be reviewed for upstreaming
[11:45] <lag> apw: Okay
[11:45] <apw> lag, see:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelNattyUbuntuDeltaReview
[11:45] <apw> (and search for your name)
[13:57]  * apw notes that Natty Alpha-1 is right round the corner and I will be closing the tree probabally at the end of the week
[15:36] <apw> cnd, i note you have a new blueprint, which has no work items at all ... that needs fixing: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-dx-n-touchpad-support
[19:57] <SuperTeece299> Hi all, I'm having issues blacklisting the radeon module