=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk === amitk is now known as amitk-afk === amitk-afk is now known as amitk === amitk is now known as amitk-afk === amitk-afk is now known as amitk [08:16] hello, any chance that bug gets fixed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/662946 [08:16] Launchpad bug 662946 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "linux kernel 2.6.35 slows down the whole system because of kslowdxxx processes (affects: 34) (dups: 2) (heat: 194)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [08:16] if I didn't have lucid's kernel installed, maverick would be unusable...ยต [08:17] is there someone in ubuntu working to find a solution? [08:41] Zdra, i am unaware of anyone being aware of that bug [08:41] still existing ... the original bug that that bug refers (I believe) [08:41] is one I had in early Maverick only which was fixed [08:47] apw, well, looking at the list of subscribers and notified, I'm not the only one suffering that bug :) [08:48] so please, if someone in the team could look at it, I would really appreciate :D [08:50] moin [08:56] Zdra, that is claimed to be fixed by a commit which is included in the Natty kernels, if you could test one of those and confirm that that would help [08:56] apw, is it possible to push that into a ppa so I can install it? [08:56] you should be able to just install the one from the archive [08:57] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.37-6.17 [08:57] has links to the architectures, and from there to the .debs [09:01] apw, well, patch needs to be backported to .35 [09:01] there I see .37 [09:02] Zdra, indeed but without confirmation that the bug is even fixed with the patch there is no point in spending effort on the backport [09:03] apw, ok, I'll try that asap. will get back at you when I had time to test :) [09:03] yep confirmed it is no simple backport [09:46] hi, whats the diff between v2.6.32.26-lucid and v2.6.32.26.11-lucid? [09:47] in the mainline dir [09:49] apw: can you tell me that? [09:50] Kano, they are releases from different stable trees [09:50] i only know one [09:50] whats the 2nd? [09:50] the first is the one from gregs tree, and the second is from smb's .32drm.33 tree [09:51] hmm [09:51] so the first is the only pure mainline [09:51] the latter being the stable upstream for lucid [09:51] Which is 2.6.32.y with drm from 2.6.33 (plus stablepatches) [09:51] depends how you define pure [09:51] unpatched [09:51] the 26.11 is all upstream patches [09:52] its not ubuntu in any way [09:52] well when you would add aufs it would be happy ;) [09:52] to a mainline kernel tree *g* [09:52] which we never will as they are both upstream trees [09:52] No. No addditional drivers compared to mainline [09:53] Just a different drm driver base from a more recent mainline [09:53] the 26.11 tree is maintained using the same rules and incoming patches as the normal stable trees [09:53] just matches the frankenstein nature of the lucid kernel tree [09:53] apw, And the debian kernel too [09:53] (indeed) [09:54] the debian kernel has .33 drm? [09:54] that is my understanding yes [09:55] They were in the same mess with 2.6.32 as we. As far as I know they went the same hybrid way [09:55] smb, they help maintain the hybrid tree don't they? as in submitting patches to you [09:55] Yes, they have been [10:36] apw: will you add http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/all/firmware-realtek/filelist to your firmware package [10:36] hmm its in maverick now... [10:36] fine [11:44] lag, hey ... you have some 5 patches in our delta which should be reviewed for upstreaming [11:45] apw: Okay [11:45] lag, see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelNattyUbuntuDeltaReview [11:45] (and search for your name) === diwic is now known as diwic_afk === diwic_afk is now known as diwic === JanC_ is now known as JanC [13:57] * apw notes that Natty Alpha-1 is right round the corner and I will be closing the tree probabally at the end of the week === yofel_ is now known as yofel === cking is now known as cking-afk === cking-afk is now known as cking [15:36] cnd, i note you have a new blueprint, which has no work items at all ... that needs fixing: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-dx-n-touchpad-support === diwic is now known as diwic_afk [19:57] Hi all, I'm having issues blacklisting the radeon module