/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/11/29/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ari-tczewchrisccoulson, micahg: could you comment on merges.u.c packages which are not mergeable? we use form 'Do not merge'00:10
micahgari-tczew: we went through this before...00:10
micahgnonetheless, I added the message to nss and nspr00:12
ari-tczewmicahg: yes, but I remember when chrisccoulson told me that some packages are not mergeable with Debian due to another packaging style.00:13
micahgyep, we should add them to the sync blacklist list as well, I'll discuss that with him00:14
ari-tczewmicahg: would be nice, thanks00:14
micahgari-tczew: I appreciate your efforts00:14
ari-tczewmicahg: wow, I'm glad00:15
micahgchrisccoulson: do you need to be explicit in setting -DDEB_NO_OPTIMIZE=1?00:18
chrisccoulsonmicahg - not really ;)00:18
chrisccoulsonthere's a few inconsistencies00:18
micahgchrisccoulson: ok00:20
ari-tczewmicahg: only these 2 packages?00:28
micahgari-tczew: AFAICT, chromium-browser, firefox, seamonkey, thunderbird, and xulrunner* is the other00:29
ari-tczewdid you look on https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe-manual.html ?00:29
micahgari-tczew: I don't see any mozilla packages on that list00:29
ari-tczewmicahg: aha, I'm following there where chrisccoulson is TIL00:30
micahgari-tczew: chrisccoulson last cycle was heavily involved with the desktop team :)00:30
ari-tczewaha00:31
micahgchrisccoulson: about gnash, should we file another bug to fix up the alternatives and just have this merge be updated to install in the correct path?00:51
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i don't mind too much really. it's probably quicker to just do gnash and flashplugin-installer at the same time :)00:59
micahgchrisccoulson: right, but I think it's reasonable to have the merge updated to install only in mozilla/plugins01:00
chrisccoulsonyeah, we should definately do that01:00
chrisccoulsoni want to do that with all plugins really01:00
micahgchrisccoulson: the old postrm will remove the old entries right?01:00
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, it should do01:01
* chrisccoulson looks at http://adren.org/~cyril/debian/MaintainerScripts.html01:01
chrisccoulson:)01:01
micahgchrisccoulson: any harm carrying old alternatives in teh postrm to make sure we get rid of them?01:04
micahgit seems like we should do this for one cycle to be safer01:04
chrisccoulsonwe shouldn't need that really, but if we did, it would probably be better in the preinst script instead01:04
micahgchrisccoulson: preinst gets run before portrm01:05
micahg*postrm01:05
chrisccoulsonyeah, that's ok. it's normally where you'd handle upgrade cleaning. as long as the old postrm doesn't fail if the alternatives are already gone, but they should handle that already01:06
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, lightning backported to Lucid fine, but won't build on earlier series, but idk if I really care01:10
chrisccoulsonyeah, i think i saw that. i think it needs a newer mozilla-devscripts to build on older releases01:11
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, I suppose I can just copy that over from the daily PPA01:11
chrisccoulsonit needs the dh7 sequence01:11
micahgso that would work on karmic only01:11
micahgunless I copy the dh7 backport from the daily PPA as well01:12
chrisccoulsonooh, i got conkeror working :)01:15
chrisccoulsonit wasn't what i thought it was in the end01:15
chrisccoulsonthe chrome.manifest is installed in the wrong place, so i need to move it and adjust all the path names01:15
chrisccoulsonthat was a pure guess though!01:15
micahgcool01:17
chrisccoulsonoh, it's simpler than that. we're just not installing the top-level chrome.manifest, which just includes the pre-existing one01:18
chrisccoulsond'oh!01:18
chrisccoulsoneasy fix though01:18
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
micahg\o/ memory usage is much better with the daily than b705:27
micahgnm, took a second to eat it all :P05:28
dpmfta2, fta, are you around? I've just spoken to henninge and jtv, and we could perhaps reserve ~30 minutes to have a chat to go through the remaining blockers for chromium translations. Would you have time and a preferred time today?09:15
dpmI was thinking of having a chat in #launchpad09:15
fta2dpm, hi09:17
fta2i'm available in a few minutes09:17
dpmfta2, just ping me when ready and we'll chat in #launchpad then. I have a call in ~45 minutes, but we can talk until then09:18
fta2ok09:19
ftadpm, let me know when you have a draft.15:52
dpmfta, yes, I'm on it, I'll e-mail you for review before publishing anything15:53
ftadpm, btw, 1 thing that may be worth insisting on: when there's n variables %{xx}, there must be the same %{xx} in the translated strings (as there's a checker at building time, leading to FTBFS)15:54
ftasame n, i meant15:54
ftadpm, also, where's than html tag, it must stay parsable (there should be very few left). comes to mind the "<!-- x -->" turned into "<!- x ->" which is incorrect => FTBFS15:55
dpmright, I'll take note of these15:56
dpmthanks15:56
ftadpm, i have a sanity checker for that 2nd case, but i reject the faulty strings, it doesn't attempt to fix them15:56
ftaother than that, i have nothing in particular to add15:57
ftadpm, i keep an eye on http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/translations/trunk/converter-output.html but i'm not polyglot so i can't judge if lp translations are better or worse than the upstream ones15:58
dpmfta, I cannot read all languages, but looking at the Spanish translations, it seems that most of the changes in LP are enhancements to the upstream strings16:01
ftadpm, great. and they are at 100% too :)16:02
dpmfta, yeah, these guys are always at the top, also for Ubuntu: http://people.ubuntu.com/~dpm/ubuntu-10.10-translation-stats.html16:03
ftanice16:04
micahgchrisccoulson: Thunderbird wasn't ready for Natty yet :(17:25
chrisccoulsonmicahg - that's ok, it means i have to fix it quicker now ;)17:25
micahgI'll have a look at that this week17:25
micahgoh, if you like17:25
chrisccoulsonyeah, i'll probably fix it this evening. the armel issue seems to something the linaro guys are aware of already17:26
micahgchrisccoulson: even on i38617:26
micahgchrisccoulson: fails in the daily builds as well17:26
chrisccoulsoni'll get i386 and amd64 fixed in a bit, they don't look too difficult to fix17:27
micahgchrisccoulson: is dehydra something we want to keep? should I request an addition to the packageset?17:48
micahgI'm wondering how we missed that in Maverick17:49
* micahg guesses doko wanted it :_/17:51
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, doko seems to mostly take care of it18:01
micahgchrisccoulson: so, should I request addition to the packageset though?18:09
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, you can request it be added to the packageset if you like18:32
micahgchrisccoulson: I can take a crack at the armel failure next weekend if the Linaro guys don't get to it first19:59
micahgif there's not a rush, you can just assign to me and I"ll figure it out20:01
=== micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0b7 in Natty (and Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4) | Firefox 3.6.13/Thunderbird 3.1.7 (lucid/maverick) in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.12 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1.x Now in Maverick/Daily and Stable PPAs | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1
=== micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0b7 in Natty (and Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4) | Firefox 3.6.13/Thunderbird 3.1.7 (lucid/maverick) in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.12 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1.x Stable PPA | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!