[00:10] chrisccoulson, micahg: could you comment on merges.u.c packages which are not mergeable? we use form 'Do not merge' [00:10] ari-tczew: we went through this before... [00:12] nonetheless, I added the message to nss and nspr [00:13] micahg: yes, but I remember when chrisccoulson told me that some packages are not mergeable with Debian due to another packaging style. [00:14] yep, we should add them to the sync blacklist list as well, I'll discuss that with him [00:14] micahg: would be nice, thanks [00:14] ari-tczew: I appreciate your efforts [00:15] micahg: wow, I'm glad [00:18] chrisccoulson: do you need to be explicit in setting -DDEB_NO_OPTIMIZE=1? [00:18] micahg - not really ;) [00:18] there's a few inconsistencies [00:20] chrisccoulson: ok [00:28] micahg: only these 2 packages? [00:29] ari-tczew: AFAICT, chromium-browser, firefox, seamonkey, thunderbird, and xulrunner* is the other [00:29] did you look on https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe-manual.html ? [00:29] ari-tczew: I don't see any mozilla packages on that list [00:30] micahg: aha, I'm following there where chrisccoulson is TIL [00:30] ari-tczew: chrisccoulson last cycle was heavily involved with the desktop team :) [00:31] aha [00:51] chrisccoulson: about gnash, should we file another bug to fix up the alternatives and just have this merge be updated to install in the correct path? [00:59] micahg - i don't mind too much really. it's probably quicker to just do gnash and flashplugin-installer at the same time :) [01:00] chrisccoulson: right, but I think it's reasonable to have the merge updated to install only in mozilla/plugins [01:00] yeah, we should definately do that [01:00] i want to do that with all plugins really [01:00] chrisccoulson: the old postrm will remove the old entries right? [01:01] micahg - yeah, it should do [01:01] * chrisccoulson looks at http://adren.org/~cyril/debian/MaintainerScripts.html [01:01] :) [01:04] chrisccoulson: any harm carrying old alternatives in teh postrm to make sure we get rid of them? [01:04] it seems like we should do this for one cycle to be safer [01:04] we shouldn't need that really, but if we did, it would probably be better in the preinst script instead [01:05] chrisccoulson: preinst gets run before portrm [01:05] *postrm [01:06] yeah, that's ok. it's normally where you'd handle upgrade cleaning. as long as the old postrm doesn't fail if the alternatives are already gone, but they should handle that already [01:10] chrisccoulson: BTW, lightning backported to Lucid fine, but won't build on earlier series, but idk if I really care [01:11] yeah, i think i saw that. i think it needs a newer mozilla-devscripts to build on older releases [01:11] chrisccoulson: yeah, I suppose I can just copy that over from the daily PPA [01:11] it needs the dh7 sequence [01:11] so that would work on karmic only [01:12] unless I copy the dh7 backport from the daily PPA as well [01:15] ooh, i got conkeror working :) [01:15] it wasn't what i thought it was in the end [01:15] the chrome.manifest is installed in the wrong place, so i need to move it and adjust all the path names [01:15] that was a pure guess though! [01:17] cool [01:18] oh, it's simpler than that. we're just not installing the top-level chrome.manifest, which just includes the pre-existing one [01:18] d'oh! [01:18] easy fix though === yofel_ is now known as yofel [05:27] \o/ memory usage is much better with the daily than b7 [05:28] nm, took a second to eat it all :P [09:15] fta2, fta, are you around? I've just spoken to henninge and jtv, and we could perhaps reserve ~30 minutes to have a chat to go through the remaining blockers for chromium translations. Would you have time and a preferred time today? [09:15] I was thinking of having a chat in #launchpad [09:17] dpm, hi [09:17] i'm available in a few minutes [09:18] fta2, just ping me when ready and we'll chat in #launchpad then. I have a call in ~45 minutes, but we can talk until then [09:19] ok [15:52] dpm, let me know when you have a draft. [15:53] fta, yes, I'm on it, I'll e-mail you for review before publishing anything [15:54] dpm, btw, 1 thing that may be worth insisting on: when there's n variables %{xx}, there must be the same %{xx} in the translated strings (as there's a checker at building time, leading to FTBFS) [15:54] same n, i meant [15:55] dpm, also, where's than html tag, it must stay parsable (there should be very few left). comes to mind the "" turned into "" which is incorrect => FTBFS [15:56] right, I'll take note of these [15:56] thanks [15:56] dpm, i have a sanity checker for that 2nd case, but i reject the faulty strings, it doesn't attempt to fix them [15:57] other than that, i have nothing in particular to add [15:58] dpm, i keep an eye on http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/translations/trunk/converter-output.html but i'm not polyglot so i can't judge if lp translations are better or worse than the upstream ones [16:01] fta, I cannot read all languages, but looking at the Spanish translations, it seems that most of the changes in LP are enhancements to the upstream strings [16:02] dpm, great. and they are at 100% too :) [16:03] fta, yeah, these guys are always at the top, also for Ubuntu: http://people.ubuntu.com/~dpm/ubuntu-10.10-translation-stats.html [16:04] nice [17:25] chrisccoulson: Thunderbird wasn't ready for Natty yet :( [17:25] micahg - that's ok, it means i have to fix it quicker now ;) [17:25] I'll have a look at that this week [17:25] oh, if you like [17:26] yeah, i'll probably fix it this evening. the armel issue seems to something the linaro guys are aware of already [17:26] chrisccoulson: even on i386 [17:26] chrisccoulson: fails in the daily builds as well [17:27] i'll get i386 and amd64 fixed in a bit, they don't look too difficult to fix [17:48] chrisccoulson: is dehydra something we want to keep? should I request an addition to the packageset? [17:49] I'm wondering how we missed that in Maverick [17:51] * micahg guesses doko wanted it :_/ [18:01] micahg - yeah, doko seems to mostly take care of it [18:09] chrisccoulson: so, should I request addition to the packageset though? [18:32] micahg - yeah, you can request it be added to the packageset if you like [19:59] chrisccoulson: I can take a crack at the armel failure next weekend if the Linaro guys don't get to it first [20:01] if there's not a rush, you can just assign to me and I"ll figure it out === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0b7 in Natty (and Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4) | Firefox 3.6.13/Thunderbird 3.1.7 (lucid/maverick) in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.12 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1.x Now in Maverick/Daily and Stable PPAs | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1 === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0b7 in Natty (and Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4) | Firefox 3.6.13/Thunderbird 3.1.7 (lucid/maverick) in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.12 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1.x Stable PPA | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1