[11:33] <jibel> cjwatson, ping.
[14:33] <jibel> skaet_, cjwatson, are there builds ready for publication?
[14:34] <pitti> I tested today's daily on real iron (unity) and in kvm (classic gnome), and at least they boot into a live system
[14:34] <pitti> but we really need the recent gnome-session on an image
[14:34] <pitti> unity is quite horribly broken on today's image
[14:42] <skaet_> pitti, ack.   who's looking into the unity issue?
[14:47] <pitti> skaet_: already uploaded, needs a CD respin
[14:48] <skaet_> pitti,  great.   you handling the respin?
[15:00] <jibel> skaet_, if unity is broken, we need a respin of the desktop images. cant we publish the other flavours to the tracker or is there any other showstopper ?
[15:00] <skaet_> jibel,  that's what I'm looking into now.
[15:00] <pitti> skaet_: can do, if it is urgent
[15:00] <skaet_> pitti, yes, please - would be very good to get testing started, and cjwatson's on vacation today.
[15:08] <pitti> skaet_: ok, checking if gnome-session is properly published
[15:08] <skaet_> pitti, thanks!
[15:08] <pitti> skaet_: I'm in tech board meeting, so can you handle the iso tracker updates?
[15:11] <skaet_> pitti,  if the images are ready,  can do.
[15:12] <pitti> ok, g-session is published; images building
[15:12] <pitti> skaet_: ETA 10 mins for Ubuntu alternates, about an hour for desktops
[15:13] <skaet_> pitti,  ack.   standing by.
[15:13] <skaet_> jibel, ^
[15:27] <jibel> skaet_, ok, thx
[15:30] <pitti> skaet_: hm, seems that building the alternates takes a lot more time now than it used to (in maverick)
[15:31] <skaet_> pitti, hmm, something else to dig into in december I guess.  :(
[15:37] <pitti> skaet_: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/20101130.1/ (i386 still syncing, ETA a minute or so)
[15:40] <pitti> (there now)
[15:40] <pitti> jibel: ^
[15:40] <pitti> skaet_, jibel: FAOD, we'll have to live with the oversizedness for a1; needs to be release-noted
[15:43] <skaet_> pitti,  have note in TechOver to make sure to write it up.
[15:59] <skaet_> pitti,  much point in pushing out edubuntu (will it have the same unity/gnome-session we just respun for with ubuntu?)
[16:00] <pitti> skaet_: can do
[16:00] <pitti> skaet_: queued
[16:00] <pitti> ubuntu desktops should finish soon
[16:00] <skaet_> how about the other flavors?
[16:01] <skaet_> have pushed out the kubuntu bits, and working on server right now.
[16:01] <pitti> kubuntu doesn't need a respin for this
[16:01] <pitti> nor server, obviously
[16:01] <skaet_> :)
[16:01] <pitti> not sure about mythbuntu and studio, though
[16:01] <pitti> are they using unity?
[16:01] <charlie-tca> xubuntu does not use unity. Will it need a respin?
[16:02] <pitti> charlie-tca: no
[16:02] <skaet_> thanks charlie-tca will push it out to the tester then.
[16:02] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[16:22] <skaet_> pitti, not seeing the alternates for xubuntu,  just the desktops - can you double check me.
[16:22] <pitti> skaet_: I didn't rebuild xubuntu, it's not affected by the fix for unity
[16:23] <pitti> skaet_: so today's autobuilt image (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20101130/) shold be okay
[16:23] <skaet_> yup.  I'm just not finding the images where I expected them to be.
[16:23] <skaet_> daily-live is published (desktop images in there),  its alternate I'm not finding.
[16:24] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu did not get a build for today's alternate images. The latest I got is 2010-11-29
[16:24] <pitti> skaet_: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily/current/ ?
[16:24] <pitti> right
[16:24] <pitti> apparently -30 failed to build
[16:29] <cjwatson> looks transient to me, just kick a 'for-project xubuntu cron.daily' rebuild and it should be fine
[16:29] <cjwatson> (not really here)
[16:29] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[16:29] <pitti> charlie-tca: you want one? starting it
[16:30] <charlie-tca> Please
[16:30] <pitti> running
[16:30] <pitti> ETA 20 mins
[16:30] <charlie-tca> thanks
[16:38] <pitti> charlie-tca, skaet_: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily/20101130.1/
[16:38] <pitti> please add to tracker, I'm in desktop meeting
[16:38] <pitti> and chairing
[16:38] <charlie-tca> same fail
[16:39] <pitti> skaet_, jibel: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20101130.1/
[16:39] <skaet_> pitti,  ack.  will do
[16:43] <pitti> skaet_: FYI, we probably want to use tomorrow's dailies for A1 at least for ubuntu desktop
[16:43] <pitti> but I suppose above build sohuld be by and large a first smoketest?
[16:44] <skaet_> yup
[16:49] <cjwatson> urgh.  I'll try to figure out what's wrong with xubuntu daily later today
[16:49] <charlie-tca> Okay
[16:49] <cjwatson> unless somebody not on holiday does it first :P
[16:50] <charlie-tca> I asked Lionel to take a look if he can
[16:55] <cjwatson> he can't
[16:55] <cjwatson> I doubt it anyway.  will require shell access to antimony.
[16:58] <charlie-tca> Well, enjoy your day then, if possible. I can wait until tomorrow
[17:06] <pitti> W: Failed to fetch file:/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ftp-universe-ports/dists/natty/m
[17:06] <pitti> ain/binary-powerpc/Packages.bz2  Hash Sum mismatch
[17:06] <pitti> E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used
[17:06] <pitti>  instead.
[17:06] <pitti> well, it still does look transient
[17:06] <pitti> charlie-tca: retrying again for now
[17:06] <pitti> (still in meeting, not much time, sorry)
[17:07] <charlie-tca> No problem. I appreciate every bit of help with this.
[17:24] <pitti> charlieS: ah, it takes significantly longer now, which is a good sign :)
[17:27] <pitti> good night everyone
[17:28] <pitti> skaet_: edubuntu DVD should finish soon
[17:28] <skaet_> pitti, thanks!
[17:35] <highvoltage> fwiw I tested the last edubuntu daily build and it was fine!
[17:37] <charlie-tca> Thanks, pitti
[17:47] <skaet_> thanks highvoltage,  will go ahead then and move it to tracker.
[18:02] <skaet_> highvoltage, done
[18:07] <highvoltage> skaet_: whohoo! is this the image we'll be testing for the alpha release?
[18:08] <skaet_> highvoltage, yup, hot off the build farms.   :)
[18:08] <highvoltage> great
[19:30] <shadeslayer> ahh
[19:30] <shadeslayer> wrong channel :P
[21:02] <ScottK> Are we doing ec2 images for Alpha 1 or if so, is there a respin anticipated?  I'm wondering if I can go ahead and update pyyaml to support python2.7.
[21:03] <charlie-tca> skaet_, the link on the iso tracker for the Ubuntu-netbook image is bad
[21:04] <charlie-tca> instead of daily-live it should be http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook/daily-preinstalled/current/
[21:04] <skaet_> thanks, charlie-tca - will fix.
[21:06] <charlie-tca> that is wrong too
[21:06] <skaet_> ScottK,  its under discussion.  ec2 i386 images have problem, but not sure if fix will make it in from kernel team in time.
[21:06] <charlie-tca> can't seem to find the right link yet
[21:06] <ScottK> skaet_: So it's safe to say it either won't be released or will need a rebuild?
[21:07] <skaet_> ScottK, sort of, ec2 amd64 should be testable, problem seems localized to i386.
[21:07] <ScottK> I see.  Thanks.
[21:13] <ScottK> skaet_: Do you mind if I go ahead and upload pyyaml?  It will result in python-yaml being out of date on ec2, but it will advance python2.7 support.  It can wait until Thursday, I'd just rather get it out of the way while I'm thinking about it.
[21:15] <skaet_> ScottK, is it in the seeds of other images beyond ec2?
[21:15] <ScottK> skaet_: No.  Just ec2.
[21:16] <skaet_> ScottK,  ok, then.
[21:16] <ScottK> Thanks
[21:20] <chrisccoulson> hi, am i ok to upload tbird to fix bug 682748?
[21:20] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 682748 in thunderbird (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "thunderbird doesn't build in natty due to linker changes (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/682748
[21:22] <skaet_> chrisccoulson, yes, good to get in.
[21:22] <chrisccoulson> skaet_, cool, thanks
[22:39] <skaet_> ScottK, Riddell,  most recent kubuntu dvd image I can find is from 2010-11-22.   Should that get uploaded for testing, or should there be a more recent one?
[22:42] <Riddell> skaet_: that's no use
[22:44] <skaet_> Riddell,  ack.   do you have a pointer to a more recent one, or has one just not been built?
[22:45] <Riddell> if it's not on cdimage then it hasn't been built
[22:46] <skaet_> cdimage is where I found the 11-22 one.   Can you kick off the build for it?
[22:47] <skaet_> (assuming we want it available with the alpha 1....)
[22:50] <tgardner> skaet_, just uploaded linux_2.6.37-7.19 to fix bug #676245
[22:50] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 676245 in linux (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 -- no network found on ISO install (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/676245
[22:51] <skaet_> thanks tgardner
[23:37] <GrueMaster> Anyone here that can fix iso.qa tracker entries?  Need the image link for natty-netbook-armel+omap4.img fixed and testcase added.
[23:51] <ScottK> skaet_: I wouldn't worry about the Kubuntu dvd this time around.
[23:53] <skaet_> ScottK,  ok.  thanks.   Can you give me a summary of which images you think are reasonable to ship for Kubuntu at this time?   (or if its easier, just look at the iso tracker and verify I've found the right ones...)
[23:55] <ScottK> skaet_: I think what you have there is fine.
[23:55] <skaet_> ScottK,  thanks!
[23:56] <skaet_> GrueMaster, I can't edit it,  when asking earlier I think it needs to be jibel.
[23:56] <GrueMaster> ok