| layn | Hi! | 01:00 |
|---|---|---|
| === emma is now known as em | ||
| pedro_ | hey folks, I'm designing the mentor reporting template, did i miss anything? http://paste.ubuntu.com/538616/ | 12:04 |
| vish | pedro_: how many bugs? or list of bugs? | 12:24 |
| vish | ah, well.. we could just gmane it :) | 12:25 |
| vish | pedro_: when exactly to use the template? dint we abandon the mentorship and start with the mentor group? | 12:26 |
| pedro_ | vish, this is more to report to the bugsquad/mentorship admin team so we can know what is the mentor/student doing | 12:28 |
| pedro_ | vish, we can start using it for the next bugsquad meeting | 12:28 |
| vish | ah... | 12:28 |
| pedro_ | vish, right, with the mentor group you'll have students anyways, and we need some info about how are they doing it :-) | 12:29 |
| vish | yay! i got 3 banshee bugs before kamusin got to them !! ;p | 12:45 |
| vish | no wait 4! | 12:45 |
| kamusin | vish, \o/ heee | 12:48 |
| Psi-Jack | Alright, I'm trying to look into the issue that's a serious lsb-init bug still existant in Ubuntu 10.04.1 regarding status_of_proc, and I'm wondering if anyone here knows about it and if there's any bugs relating directly to it. | 13:22 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| charlie-tca | seb128, bug 683361 | 13:53 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683361 in compiz (Ubuntu) "compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in radeon_bo_get_tiling() (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683361 | 13:53 |
| charlie-tca | changed to public with the coredump attached? | 13:53 |
| === ssj6akshat is now known as synapselover | ||
| Psi-Jack | Okay.. So, what's up with the bug tracker, I'm trying to link a bug to another bug, and it's telling me https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/683650 is a bug in a remote bug tracker, trying to link it for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640 | 13:54 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683650 in dovecot (Ubuntu) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 13:54 |
| === synapselover is now known as ssj6akshat | ||
| seb128 | charlie-tca, yes? | 13:56 |
| seb128 | charlie-tca, not sure if that's a question | 13:56 |
| charlie-tca | I thought you never take bugs from private to public with the coredump | 13:56 |
| seb128 | why not? | 13:57 |
| seb128 | well it's never done automatically | 13:57 |
| charlie-tca | seb128, private data in the dump | 13:57 |
| seb128 | but compiz doesn't hold user datas so I don't see the issue | 13:57 |
| charlie-tca | I see. Okay | 13:57 |
| charlie-tca | Psi-Jack, trying to link them how? | 13:57 |
| seb128 | well in fact the bug made the retracer crash | 13:57 |
| seb128 | so I made it public to easy debugging | 13:58 |
| seb128 | it's going to be retraced and cleaned rsn | 13:58 |
| Psi-Jack | charlie-tca: Still an error. | 13:58 |
| seb128 | I didn't see an issue with making a compiz dump public for a bit | 13:58 |
| seb128 | since it doesn't hold any datas | 13:58 |
| charlie-tca | Ouch. I guess that does matter. Just trying to make sure I understand | 13:58 |
| Psi-Jack | charlie-tca: Oh.. | 13:58 |
| charlie-tca | Psi-Jack, they could be duplicates of each other, but they are both reported against ubuntu | 13:58 |
| Psi-Jack | charlie-tca: On https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640, I click on "Also affects project" | 13:59 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683640 in lsb (Ubuntu) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 13:59 |
| charlie-tca | Psi-Jack, they are not upstream at all. They are both local ubuntu bugs | 13:59 |
| charlie-tca | If one is a duplicate of the other, just use "Mark as duplicate" in the upper right | 14:00 |
| Psi-Jack | It's not a duplicate. I made them both. | 14:00 |
| Psi-Jack | One is for lsb, one is for dovecot being effected by bugs in lsb. | 14:00 |
| charlie-tca | Then you just comment on them | 14:00 |
| charlie-tca | They are both in ubuntu, though. You can't link them as projects of each other. | 14:00 |
| charlie-tca | Thanks, seb128 | 14:01 |
| charlie-tca | Psi-Jack, normally, you would just comment on each one that bug ??? is related to this issue | 14:02 |
| Psi-Jack | Gotcha.. Not sure how launchpad works, but not liking it, but eh well. ;) | 14:03 |
| njin | ara: hello 20101201 amd64 still without panels | 14:03 |
| njin | bug 683403 | 14:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683403 in gnome-session (Ubuntu) "natty 20101130.1 without panel (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683403 | 14:03 |
| charlie-tca | njin, If you don't have the video hardware for unity with compiz, choose "classic desktop" session | 14:04 |
| charlie-tca | That is the no fallback issue | 14:04 |
| Psi-Jack | Okay, so now, it's at least reported. Now to see if I can solve the problem myself. ;) | 14:04 |
| charlie-tca | njin, Is that a duplicate of bug 683356 ? | 14:07 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683356 in compiz (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Unity lost the 2D failback feature (affects: 4) (heat: 20)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683356 | 14:07 |
| njin | charlie-tca: hello, thanks, but now live session are unusable, i'm looking the other report | 14:08 |
| Psi-Jack | Heh, sheash.. | 14:12 |
| Psi-Jack | This is scarey.. Almost looks like whomever made the init-functions knows a "reasonable" amount of lsb standards, but completely failed to grasp the status portion completely. | 14:12 |
| epimeth | Is it possible the package maintainers forgot to add the new linux-headers package to the latest upgrade? | 14:44 |
| charlie-tca | epimeth, what is the issue? | 14:46 |
| epimeth | I upgraded last night and when I went to turn on my computer today my wireless card and nvidia driver werent working... apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) fixed the problem...... I figure that should have been part of the upgrade process no? | 14:46 |
| charlie-tca | I don't know | 14:47 |
| charlie-tca | I suppose file a bug for it | 14:48 |
| epimeth | do I do that in launchpad under kubuntu? or ubuntu? is there a specific package I need to enter it under? | 14:49 |
| charlie-tca | epimeth, using a terminal, ubuntu-bug linux | 14:51 |
| epimeth | charlie-tca: kk, cheers | 14:54 |
| charlie-tca | Thank you | 14:55 |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
| === zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
| === AbhiJit_ is now known as AbhiJit | ||
| === bilalakhtar is now known as cdbs | ||
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| njin | hello to all, bug 683459 I don't know at wich package assign, can you help. Thanks | 17:39 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683459 in ubuntu "hyper and super keys are mapped to the same modifier (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683459 | 17:39 |
| sinurge | njin, no clue :| | 17:41 |
| njin | sinurge, too advanced for me | 17:44 |
| sinurge | njin, for me as well guess lets leave it as what is | 17:45 |
| jcastro | bdmurray: http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/qapkgstatus/unity | 19:02 |
| jcastro | hey I was wondering, why not graph Fix Released? | 19:02 |
| bdmurray | jcastro: because it will only ever increase and no work is required of those bugs | 19:06 |
| njin | bug 683850 | 20:57 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683850 in gconf (Ubuntu) "natty 20101201.1 amd 64, loop at login screen (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683850 | 20:57 |
| njin | ouh, already rebuilded | 20:58 |
| njin | bug 683853 | 21:00 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683853 in gnome-panel (Ubuntu) "natty 20101201.1 amd64 classic desktop in live session, missed restart and shutdown (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683853 | 21:00 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
| === greg_g is now known as greg-g | ||
| Psi-Jack | Okay, so I'd filed a bug using ubuntu-bug -p lsb-base, and it submits it as a bug for lsb, because lsb is the source package for lsb-base, correct? | 23:11 |
| micahcowan | Sounds right to me. | 23:12 |
| Psi-Jack | Yeah, Sarge Hallyn completely fubared up my bug report. | 23:12 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: -p is deprecated BTW, it's just ubuntu-bug lsb-base | 23:12 |
| Psi-Jack | Same result, either way, launchpad associates it to lsb. | 23:17 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: if you want to drop the bug # here, someone can look into it | 23:19 |
| Psi-Jack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640 | 23:20 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Invalid] | 23:20 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: right, but if the root cause is determined to be in lsb, the bug should be fixed there | 23:22 |
| Psi-Jack | Yep. That's what I said. lsb is the actual source package that makes lsb-base. | 23:23 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: so how is the bug report messed up? | 23:23 |
| Psi-Jack | Well, the bug also effects the LSB init of all the other packages I associated with it, and Sarge marked them all invalid. | 23:24 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: right, but is there an actual issue to be fixed in those packages? | 23:25 |
| Psi-Jack | Which also prohibits them from working properly in a CRM situation, like pacemaker. | 23:25 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: right, but is there anything to be fixed in those packages? | 23:27 |
| Psi-Jack | They themselves are broken as a root cause of lsb being broken. So not technicaly, as far as I know, unless changing lsb-base's init-functions causes errors in them. | 23:27 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: right, so they're affected, but there's nothing to do, hence invalid | 23:27 |
| Psi-Jack | I see.. Sorta.. heh | 23:29 |
| Psi-Jack | Heh. but yeah. Found this one myself because I was trying to put dovecot under pacemaker management control, and when I stopped it, pacemaker started throwing errors because of the return code of dovecot after it was stopped was 4, because the pidfile was deleted as a result of stopping it. Which is correct, except that's expected of stopped services. heh | 23:34 |
| Psi-Jack | micahg: Now, here's a question. | 23:41 |
| Psi-Jack | clamav's package's init'd script for clamav-daemon and clamav-freshclam both aren't directly related to lsb because they re-write in the init script status_of_proc, /instead/ of using the init-functions's status_of_proc function proper. Would this be considered related, and needed to be fixed as a result of that? | 23:42 |
| micahg | Psi-Jack: if it's indeed broke, yes | 23:49 |
| Psi-Jack | Yeah. clamav-daemon literally has in it's script, status_of_proc() { ... } which is pretty much a clone of /lib/lsb/init-function's almost fully. | 23:50 |
| Psi-Jack | I'd call that broken as a result of not being LSB compliant, for starters, for re-defining the function. | 23:51 |
| micahg | ScottK: ^^ | 23:51 |
| ScottK | Psi-Jack: What release are you on? | 23:52 |
| Psi-Jack | 10.04.1 | 23:52 |
| ScottK | Psi-Jack: Neither Debian nor Ubuntu are LSB compliant themselves. It's explicitly not a design goal. It is a goal for LSB compliant packages to work on Debian and Ubuntu. Your point is orthogonal to this. | 23:53 |
| ScottK | Psi-Jack: I'm open to patches on clamav to use the lsb functions however. | 23:54 |
| Psi-Jack | Well, I know ubuntu/canonical is going towards upstart, but for things that /are/ lsb-init oriented, and I'm sure Debian wants to continue to keep in that direction as well, it is important that they /are/ actually lsb-init compliant for CRM control. | 23:55 |
| Psi-Jack | And upstart... I won't go into how many million bugs on it I need to file. ;) | 23:56 |
| ScottK | Psi-Jack: For clamav there's no reason not to use the lsb init stuff. | 23:57 |
| Psi-Jack | Reinventing the wheel whilst stil breaking lsb-init compliancy is a bug. | 23:57 |
| Psi-Jack | So yeah. :) | 23:57 |
| ScottK | The clamav package predates the existance of those functions in Ubuntu/Debian. | 23:57 |
| Psi-Jack | Ahhh. That makes sense. :) | 23:58 |
| ScottK | So if you can diff me a diff to use the lsb-init functions I think that's a reasonable thing to do and I'll get it pushed into Debian as well. | 23:59 |
| Psi-Jack | Yep. I can do that. I'd planned on it, too, because I use that in my pacemaker cluster as well. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!