| jewsucanuse | ogasawara, will ndiswrapper (with the 2 patches it needs) be included in the alpha 1 kernel or are the bkl calls to prohibitive? | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| ogasawara | jewsucanuse: not sure, have been tracking ndiswrapper for natty very closely | 00:18 |
| jewsucanuse | there are patches that allow clean compilation on 2.6.37, but there were concerns about how ioctl was being used. | 00:19 |
| ogasawara | s/have been/haven't been/ | 00:20 |
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| === amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === amitk-afk is now known as amitk | ||
| === diwic is now known as diwic_afk | ||
| === ogra_ac_ is now known as ogra_ac | ||
| === amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
| === diwic_afk is now known as diwic | ||
| apw | bug #600453 | 11:58 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 600453 in linux (openSUSE) (and 3 other projects) "[arrandale] [i915] DELL E6510: blank screen on boot (Intel GPU) (affects: 31) (dups: 1) (heat: 206)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600453 | 11:58 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| JFo | morning apw | 14:08 |
| apw | JFo, morning | 14:09 |
| === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
| vish | apw: hi, so what should i ask on the older bug, that they test your kernel and check if there are no problems? | 14:45 |
| apw | vish i have done so, and not had time today to see if they have taken notice yet | 14:46 |
| vish | cool! | 14:46 |
| * vish checks as well.. | 14:46 | |
| === tgardner is now known as tgardner-afk | ||
| vish | apw: they dont seem to mention any problems with the kernel [old in Bug #507148 ], but i get those messages as well.. and have not found any noticeable side-effects due to those messages.. | 15:23 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 507148 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 4 other projects) "[lucid] desktop runs out of video memory on ATI Radeon Mobility 7500 (affects: 8) (heat: 60)" [High,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507148 | 15:23 |
| apw | vish tnakns | 15:29 |
| avinashhm | vinashhm> hi, is any one familiar with lockdep asserting bugs .. I am stuck with a deadlock bug ..i wanted to know if a single task can hold multiple mutexes ???.. error @ @ http://paste.ubuntu.com/539017/ ... any help ??? | 15:39 |
| apw | avinashhm, yes a process can hold any number of mutexes, obviously if you hold more than one you had really really better know what you are doing, ordering is key | 15:52 |
| avinashhm | apw, i am making sure it is in proper order .. last acquired first released .. but still i am having this lockdep error, of "recursive locking" .. i made sure with prints that i amn't acquiring same mutext without releasing .. but still it is cribbing ... :-( | 15:54 |
| apw | it seems likely lockdep is right, and its saying you have a lock you are re-taking | 15:54 |
| apw | that sort of thing is common when you have the lock but interrupts are enabled and the interrupt handler takes the lock too on the same cpu | 15:57 |
| avinashhm | apw, but with prints above here are prints just b4 my mutex_lock and mutex_unlock api's .. so i amn't relocking a mutex which is already locked ... [ end number is the address of the mutext ] ... so i amn't re-taking.. | 16:00 |
| avinashhm | so you mean here .. two processes are holding that lock .. one mine and the other interrupt handler ?? | 16:01 |
| apw | the protections are based on a cpu | 16:01 |
| avinashhm | apw, so what i can do to improve or get unlocked from here ?? | 16:02 |
| avinashhm | apw, so how is it usually interrupts are disabled when we have the lock ?? please pardon me if my questions are childish .. but i amn't familiar with these ...first bug of this type :-) | 16:06 |
| apw | avinashhm, no interrupt handling is manual and separate | 16:07 |
| avinashhm | apw, so how are these type of problems solved usually ?? | 16:07 |
| apw | avinashhm, debugging as you have indicated in combination with the lockdep output and reading the code | 16:08 |
| apw | its a very hard problem | 16:08 |
| avinashhm | apw, to be frank i still didn't understand the problem , is there any place i can look for to understand this lockdep description??? | 16:10 |
| avinashhm | actually the problem is easily reproducible , during bootup .. need to trace .. | 16:10 |
| avinashhm | apw, seems like i am too tired of this problem from morning .. i ll debug further and see you tomorrow ..thanks for the help buddy ... | 16:14 |
| JFo | skaet_, do you have bugs for me? :) | 16:16 |
| skaet_ | have you gone through the ones from the status last week. :) | 16:17 |
| skaet_ | other than that, I won't be taking a pass through the bugs until after alpha 1 goes out today. Some last minute issues are going to keep me busy today. | 16:17 |
| === tgardner-afk is now known as tgardner | ||
| JFo | smb, bug 684304 looks like it may be of interest to you | 17:47 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 684304 in linux (Ubuntu) "cciss module does not identify resources (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/684304 | 17:47 |
| JFo | hggdh just pinged me about it | 17:47 |
| JFo | failing install so it seems | 17:47 |
| smb | JFo, Hm. Yeah, sounds like it needs to interest me. | 17:48 |
| JFo | well, I shall return. I am off to lunch then to a (hopefully warm) coffee shop | 17:48 |
| JFo | smb, :) | 17:48 |
| JFo | bbiab | 17:48 |
| tgardner | sconklin, any interesting status from the SRU test review meeting? | 17:58 |
| smb | tgardner, Wasn't there a bug report or some issue with Broadcom NetXtreme of some sort recently? | 18:06 |
| apw | tgardner, ok ... this is confirmed a grub graphics mode handoff issue | 18:51 |
| tgardner | apw, is there a known fix yet? | 18:51 |
| apw | tgardner, there is a work around, turnign off graphics handoff. am working on whats wrong now | 18:52 |
| apw | i think its an unhandled pipe underrun, but am trying to confirm that | 18:52 |
| tgardner | apw, I would have thought removing splash would have corrected it | 18:52 |
| apw | tgardner, nope doesn't change how grub hands off the screen | 18:53 |
| ogasawara | bjf, sconklin: lucid fsl-imx51 rebased and pushed to my repo for review - git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ogasawara/ubuntu-lucid.git fsl-imx51 | 20:01 |
| bjf | ogasawara, cool, will look at it in a bit, not to worried about it though | 20:02 |
| ogasawara | bjf, sconklin: assuming that looks good, package for review/signing is on zinc in my home dir under proposed-pkgs/lucid/linux-fsl-imx51_2.6.31-608.21_source.changes | 20:02 |
| sconklin | ogasawara: both on a call, be with you in a sec | 20:03 |
| JFo | skaet_, I am assuming that, due to the alpha 1 release, that there will be no new bugs on the release team radar for kernel. :) | 20:23 |
| JFo | for this week, I mean | 20:23 |
| skaet_ | JFo, don't make assumptions... ;) all sorts of interesting results coming up from the alpha. ;) | 20:23 |
| JFo | :-/ | 20:23 |
| * JFo was only assuming for one day ;-) | 20:23 | |
| tgardner | skaet_, "interesting" == bad ? | 20:23 |
| skaet_ | weather I'll be able to summarize or not by the end of the day, is a different matter. | 20:24 |
| skaet_ | whether, even. | 20:24 |
| JFo | heh, ok | 20:24 |
| ogra_ac | skaet_, how about we auto-assign them all to JFo then his assumption is true for the rest of us ;) | 20:24 |
| skaet_ | ogra_ac, lol | 20:24 |
| JFo | ogra_ac, :-P | 20:24 |
| * JFo closes bugs with extreme prejudice ;) | 20:25 | |
| ogra_ac | no, with scripts | 20:25 |
| ogra_ac | mind you, i have seen them ;) | 20:25 |
| skaet_ | tgardner, not sure yet... | 20:25 |
| JFo | ogra_ac, :-D | 20:25 |
| * ogasawara lunch | 20:30 | |
| * jjohansen lunch | 20:55 | |
| manjo | tgardner, Checksum doesn't match for /home/manjo/linux_2.6.35-24.42.dsc | 21:14 |
| manjo | tgardner, I did a remote debsign | 21:14 |
| manjo | and dput tells me checksum does not match | 21:14 |
| manjo | tgardner, I signed the .changes and .dsc file | 21:14 |
| tgardner | manjo, you only need to sign the changes file, e.g., 'debsign -r tangerine.buildd:*.changes' | 21:16 |
| manjo | tgardner, ack ... when I signed .changes I get No signature on /home/manjo/linux_2.6.35-24.42.dsc. so I signed the .dsc as well | 21:16 |
| tgardner | how are you packaging? Use the '-us -uc' options so that 'dpkg-buildpackage -S' doen't complain. | 21:17 |
| manjo | tgardner, I did dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa -rfakeroot -I.git -I.gitignore -i'\.git.*' | 21:20 |
| tgardner | so, whats changed? You've done this before. | 21:20 |
| bjf | sconklin, we've had a lucid linux-mvl-dove in -proposed for a while now, any idea what the plans are w.r.t it? I have a rebased lucid linux-mvl-dove locked and loaded | 21:55 |
| sconklin | bjf: I have no idea - I thought that Ike or Eric or someone else was going to handle those | 21:56 |
| bjf | sconklin, i went ahead and handled it, all our branches should be very up-to-date at this point (ogasawara did fsl-imx51 earlier) | 21:57 |
| sconklin | bjf: great! You and ogasawara have blown this release out (in a good way) | 21:58 |
| bjf | sconklin, now i've got an upload and nowhere to go :-) | 22:00 |
| manjo | tgardner, VirtFS is a 9P based passthrough filesystem for virtualized guests. | 22:21 |
| tgardner | manjo, incidentally, I remembered that you should be using 'dput -u' when remote signing and uploading from a machine that doesn't have your GPG key | 22:22 |
| manjo | tgardner, lp dos not allow me to use -u, -u I think says ignore signature | 22:23 |
| lifeless | a friend of mine is seeing this: "Suggestion: Enable the CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG kernel configuration option. This option will allow PowerTOP to collect runtime power management statistics." | 22:58 |
| lifeless | from powertop | 22:58 |
| RAOF | There's an open bug for that, let me hunt it. | 22:58 |
| RAOF | lifeless: bug #632327 | 22:59 |
| lifeless | RAOF: thanks | 22:59 |
| AfC | powertop just told me "Suggestion: Enable the CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG kernel configuration option. This option will allow PowerTOP to collect runtime power management statistics." | 22:59 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 632327 in linux (Ubuntu) "Powertop suggests CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG kernel option (affects: 18) (heat: 123)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/632327 | 22:59 |
| AfC | which is a new one on me. | 22:59 |
| AfC | ah, you're already on it | 22:59 |
| AfC | (was a new on on me. Thanks Robert, Christopher) | 23:00 |
| === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
| joshhunt | not sure if this is the correct forum, but i've got a question about initrd packaging. does ubuntu put the firmware for bnx2 driver in the initrd or do you wait until root is mounted? | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!