| === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| ari-tczew | could someone open task on maverick in bug 669066 ? | 02:50 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 669066 in fetchmail (Ubuntu) "fetchmailconf: fetchmailconf.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/669066 | 02:50 |
| === v is now known as stalcup | ||
| c2tarun | i create a group name admin in my chroot environment and added a "admin ALL=(ALL) ALL" to /etc/sudoers file. then i created a user account and added this account to admin group. now when i m executing any command with sudo privileges i m getting the error that tarun is not in sudoer list??? can anyone please help | 06:28 |
| ebroder | c2tarun: That's really more about using Ubuntu than developing Ubuntu. #ubuntu might be a little more appopriate. But you want %admin, not admin to refer to a group | 06:30 |
| c2tarun | sorry for asking here and thanks a lot. | 06:35 |
| === stalcup is now known as vorian | ||
| lucas | geser: not easy to add it to the cgi, but you can get it from one of the logs' header | 07:16 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| geser | lucas: I somehow missed to spot the date in the log header as I usually jump to the end of the log | 10:01 |
| danielrichter200 | Hi, I want to upload my new application grub-customizer to revu. Everything seems to be ok (no dput errors), but grub-customizer didn't appear in the list. Uploading to my launchpad ppa is no problem. Do I have to upload gpg keys to devu too (they are allready at launchpad)? | 10:49 |
| danielrichter200 | this is my dput.conf: | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | [revu] | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | fqdn = revu.ubuntuwire.com | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | incoming = /incoming | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | login = anonymous | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | progress_indicator = 2 | 10:53 |
| danielrichter200 | allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 | 10:53 |
| c2tarun | i have an issue with chroot. this comes under ubuntu operations (so i know that this is not the place to ask) but no one is able to solve my problem can i ask it here | 12:52 |
| pqatsi | a question about package naming: | 14:33 |
| pqatsi | wireshark-common: Depends: libwireshark0 (>= 1.4.2-1) but 1.4.2-1~exp2 is to be installed. | 14:33 |
| pqatsi | wireshark: Depends: libwireshark0 (>= 1.4.2-1) but 1.4.2-1~exp2 is to be installed. | 14:33 |
| pqatsi | i cant understand why apt cant see the version number is the same | 14:34 |
| pqatsi | even with ~exp2 | 14:34 |
| pqatsi | ok i use to make packet names like 1.4.2-1ppa1 as example | 14:35 |
| pqatsi | but i think apt should recognize this notation. what is wrong? | 14:35 |
| jcfp | pqatsi: 1.4.2-1~exp2 is smaller than 1.4.2-1, you depend on >= so it won't work | 14:36 |
| jcfp | >= 1.4.2-1~ might work, not sure though | 14:36 |
| pqatsi | jcfp: what passed me by i cant see | 14:36 |
| pqatsi | ? | 14:36 |
| jcfp | that the tilde lowers the version | 14:37 |
| pqatsi | hmmm | 14:37 |
| jcfp | i.e. 1.0-1~foo is smaller than 1.0-1 | 14:37 |
| pqatsi | just tilde do this? | 14:37 |
| jcfp | afaik | 14:37 |
| * pqatsi think its weird.... | 14:37 | |
| jcfp | that's why it's used with ppa, makes ppa lower than official repository | 14:38 |
| coolbhavi | jcfp, exactly | 14:38 |
| pqatsi | jcfp: but this case something conflicts | 14:38 |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, are you installing from PPA? | 14:38 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: this package, yes. | 14:39 |
| pqatsi | but i didnt realize ~lower the version even for = | 14:39 |
| * pqatsi think it will repackage this | 14:39 | |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, thats how ppa's are named as jcfp mentioned | 14:40 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: i know, but i didnt realized tilde breaks = | 14:40 |
| pqatsi | if the version is the same number | 14:40 |
| pqatsi | (major and minor) | 14:41 |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, hmm | 14:41 |
| pqatsi | i used to think tilde brokes only if version is +1 bigger | 14:41 |
| pqatsi | and if version is equal and have both packages in repos, the priority of ppa got lowered | 14:41 |
| pqatsi | anyway | 14:42 |
| pqatsi | i think the packager made a mistake | 14:42 |
| pqatsi | Version: 1.4.2-1~exp2 // Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.21.6), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0), libpcap0.8 (>= 0.9.8), libportaudio2 (>= 19+svn20100220), libwireshark0 (>= 1.4.2-1), libwiretap0, zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), wireshark-common (= 1.4.2-1~exp2) | 14:45 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: the packager forgot to satisfy the libwireshark0 dep. | 14:45 |
| coolbhavi | hmm what do you exactly want to do? | 14:46 |
| coolbhavi | as i see new version of wireshark was uploaded to natty just a while back | 14:47 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: before, install wireshark from this ppa | 14:47 |
| pqatsi | now, ill fix this deps | 14:47 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: suggesting backport? | 14:47 |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, reason? | 14:47 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: no reason, i just need wireshark, and i dont know why this repo are here, but if i have this error, i want to fixit | 14:48 |
| * pqatsi want to improve packaging skills | 14:48 | |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, okay but unless you have a strong reason no need of a backport request | 14:49 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: i do just for me | 14:49 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: my main backport project now is backport emdebian tools from debian unstable to stable (for a job) and after, to ubuntu | 14:50 |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, then its fine but officially you need to have a valid reason | 14:50 |
| pqatsi | coolbhavi: i know. oficially dont need a backport | 14:50 |
| pqatsi | just for me | 14:50 |
| coolbhavi | pqatsi, okay :) | 14:51 |
| pqatsi | but if the emdebian job finish well, i will try submit for revu | 14:51 |
| coolbhavi | hey ari-tczew | 15:01 |
| coolbhavi | how are you doing? | 15:01 |
| ari-tczew | hello coolbhavi | 15:01 |
| ari-tczew | I'm quite fine, thanks. how about you? | 15:01 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, I m fine too mate shall I take a look at enna ftbfs now? | 15:03 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: do you ask me to do it? | 15:05 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, if you have no issues ll take a look so | 15:06 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: go ahead | 15:06 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, thanks! | 15:06 |
| ari-tczew | you're welcome | 15:12 |
| pqatsi | Rejected: | 15:45 |
| pqatsi | Not permitted to upload to the RELEASE pocket in a series in the 'CURRENT' state. | 15:45 |
| pqatsi | and just this error, have no another issue in the mail | 15:45 |
| pqatsi | ive used maverick as series | 15:45 |
| pqatsi | after this ive tried to change to stable, but said series dont exist | 15:45 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: use natty - current development cycle. | 15:46 |
| pqatsi | eeven if the package ill send to ppa is specifically for maverick | 15:46 |
| pqatsi | ? | 15:46 |
| ari-tczew | !sru | pqatsi | 15:47 |
| ubottu | pqatsi: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 15:47 |
| pqatsi | ari-tczew: im building for ppa, and must to be available for maverick | 15:48 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: so I guess that problem is with version in debian/changelog | 15:49 |
| ari-tczew | add to version ~maverick1 | 15:49 |
| pqatsi | and keep maverick? | 15:50 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: yes | 15:50 |
| pqatsi | Last: (20070115-14) unstable; urgency=low // Now: (20070115-15~maverick1) maverick; urgency=low | 15:51 |
| pqatsi | this way? | 15:51 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: no no no! please don't change Debian revision | 15:51 |
| ari-tczew | please keep -14 | 15:51 |
| pqatsi | even if im patching souce? | 15:52 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: let use: (20070115-14ubuntu1~maverick1) | 15:53 |
| pqatsi | ok | 15:54 |
| pqatsi | dont work | 16:03 |
| pqatsi | Rejected: | 16:03 |
| pqatsi | Not permitted to upload to the RELEASE pocket in a series in the 'CURRENT' state. | 16:03 |
| pqatsi | aiccu (20070115-15ubuntu1~maverick1) maverick; urgency=low | 16:03 |
| pqatsi | aff, now i saw i didnt reverted | 16:04 |
| pqatsi | sry | 16:04 |
| ari-tczew | [; | 16:04 |
| pqatsi | aiccu (20070115-14ubuntu1~maverick1) maverick; urgency=low | 16:15 |
| pqatsi | again, same error ari-tczew | 16:15 |
| pqatsi | this never happened with me, i cant understand why | 16:15 |
| ari-tczew | pqatsi: could you give me a link to your PPA? | 16:17 |
| pqatsi | https://launchpad.net/~leleobhz/+archive/ppa | 16:18 |
| mr_pouit | pqatsi: are you sure you're uploading to your ppa? (and not the ubuntu archive) | 16:19 |
| pqatsi | ill run dput verbatin | 16:19 |
| pqatsi | let me see | 16:19 |
| ari-tczew | that's what I wanted to ask | 16:19 |
| ari-tczew | what is the command which you use pqatsi? | 16:19 |
| pqatsi | use dput directly, but use .dputrc | 16:20 |
| pqatsi | ill recreate the . file | 16:20 |
| ari-tczew | it should be: dput ppa:leleobhz/ppa *.changes | 16:20 |
| pqatsi | something with my dputrc are wrong... forcing repo in commandline appeared to work | 16:25 |
| wolfrage | Hi I want to confirm a few things. One you can not make blueprints for a PPA in launch pad correct? | 18:06 |
| ari-tczew | wolfrage: -> #launchpad | 18:08 |
| wolfrage | but the question relates to development | 18:09 |
| wolfrage | just trying to get the process for Ubuntu down. | 18:09 |
| wolfrage | With that in mind is it ok to create a project for a patch that I am creating. The patch is actually a feature plugin. It is for Empathy/Telepathy in order to support OTR. | 18:09 |
| wolfrage | I basicly want this because i want to be able to share blueprints and allow others to help me, as I have gotten a few people together that have offered to help. | 18:10 |
| wolfrage | #launchpad is not answering my second question, so as the MOTU, what do you say? Is it ok to use Luanch Pad in this way? | 18:18 |
| wolfrage | I got an answer now. | 18:30 |
| === emma is now known as em | ||
| ari-tczew | gilir: how is going progress of sync lxpanel and lxde-common? | 21:56 |
| === paultag_ is now known as paultag | ||
| gilir | ari-tczew, I'm on it, changes for lxpanel are already in Ubuntu, lxde-common needs changes with the new pcmanfm | 23:34 |
| ari-tczew | gilir: so, can we sync lxpanel? | 23:34 |
| gilir | ari-tczew, no, there are specific Ubuntu changes that can't be sync with Debian | 23:35 |
| ari-tczew | gilir: and these changes are not forwardable? | 23:36 |
| gilir | ari-tczew, no | 23:36 |
| ari-tczew | ok, so package needs merging then | 23:37 |
| gilir | ari-tczew, I can upload to Debian LXDE packaging, so I have no interest to maintain delta with Ubuntu when it's not necessary | 23:37 |
| ari-tczew | gilir: would be nice | 23:38 |
| === em is now known as emma | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!