[16:37] <Sarvatt_> are the maverick buildd's messed up? I'm getting failures like this that I can't reproduce locally - https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa/+build/2081191/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3A2.13.901%2Bgit20101205.c2fac6ca-0ubuntu0sarvatt2~maverick_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[16:37] <Sarvatt_> checking how to run the C preprocessor... /lib/cpp
[16:37] <Sarvatt_> configure: error: in `/build/buildd/xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.13.901+git20101205.c2fac6ca/build':
[16:37] <Sarvatt_> configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
[16:40] <Sarvatt_> was ok about 12 hours ago, affecting multiple X driver packages just on maverick
[16:47] <geser> can you modify the package to output config.log if configure fails to see the exact reason?
[16:48] <geser> gcc-4.5 didn't change for over a week now
[16:49] <geser> ah, maverick and not natty, sorry; but getting config.log will help to see where exactly it fails in configure
[16:49] <Sarvatt_> it's using 4.4 on maverick and just started in the last 12 hours where the same packages built fine. trying to figure out how to do that now
[16:52] <geser> adding " || cat config.log" to the configure call in debian/rules should do it
[16:54] <Sarvatt_> uploaded, will show up https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all soon
[16:55] <Sarvatt_> (all the input driver failures there are different and expected)
[17:04] <Sarvatt_> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60149920/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3A2.13.901%2Bgit20101205.c2fac6ca-0ubuntu0sarvatt3~maverick_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[17:06] <Sarvatt_> for x-x-v-savage that failed the same way the only change in the past 14 hours since it succeeded was a version bump in configure.ac
[17:07] <geser> /usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:39: fatal error: linux/limits.h: No such file or directory
[17:08] <geser> that seems to be the problem
[17:12] <Sarvatt_> hmm maybe linux-libc-dev is screwed up in the PPA
[17:13] <geser> the official maverick linux build contains that file in linux-libc-dev
[17:13] <Sarvatt_> 2.6.37-8.20 was copied into the PPA about the same time the failures started, looks like the problem is in there. thanks geser
[17:22] <Sarvatt_> yep 2.6.37-8's linux-libc-dev is screwed up, that was it
[17:25] <geser> thanks for finding this bug
[18:53] <fta> "You are over quota on people.ubuntu.com", is there a way to get an extension? i use that space mostly to pass files to security sponsors and to upstream
[18:55] <micahg> fta: per the wiki, I believe you have to mail rt at ubuntu dot com for this
[18:56] <fta> micahg, ok, thanks
[19:42] <fta> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/2075614  no build log?
[19:43] <lifeless> fta: ah, I think theres a bug about that.
[19:44] <lifeless> wgrant: ^ ftbfs with no build log
[19:45] <lifeless> fta: I'd search in launchpad-project bugs for that
[19:48] <thumper> morning
[20:42] <ScottK> Would some launchpad person please see if they can find the link to the build log for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/4:4.7.1-0ubuntu4/+build/2052893
[20:42] <ScottK> It just says failed to build, but no log.
[20:43] <ScottK> wgrant: ^^^?
[20:43] <Laney> fta just mentione a similar issue for a PPA
[20:44] <fta> (for a native ppa, not sure if it matters though)
[20:44] <lifeless> jelmer: ^
[20:45] <jelmer> lifeless: thanks, looking
[20:52] <jelmer> fta: what was your build?
[20:53] <lifeless> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ppa/+build/2075614
[21:04] <jelmer> ScottK, fta, lifeless: it looks like there were some temporary issues scanning builders late yesterday. I'm going to file a bug about this and retry the problematic (half a dozen) builds.
[21:05] <fta> ack
[21:32] <thewrath> hey all
[21:32] <thewrath> do you have a plugin or what not if code is hosted on git?
[23:16] <thumper> thewrath: git repositories can be imported into bzr, but launchpad does not host git natively
[23:17] <thewrath> thumper, so i would have to import them manually then?
[23:17] <thumper> thewrath: no, launchpad has an import service
[23:17] <thumper> and the git one is quite good
[23:17] <thumper> as long as it doesn't use submodules
[23:17] <thewrath> not that i am aware :)