[03:02] <CarlFK> https://launchpad.net/+search?field.text=kexec  shows "You are not the bug assignee nor the maintainer of kexec-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)  , and therefore cannot edit this bug's status."
[03:02] <CarlFK> which makes me think something is crawling into places it shouldn't be, or that the results like that need to be filtered out
[03:05] <lifeless> CarlFK: please file a bug
[03:05] <CarlFK> lifeless: will do.  um... where  URL?
[03:06] <lifeless> bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad
[03:09] <CarlFK> thanks
[03:11] <CarlFK> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/686312  anything else before I get back to my previous bug reporting?
[03:11] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 686312 in Launchpad itself "search results show pointless error text" [Undecided,New]
[04:04] <posulliv> lifeless: ping
[04:20] <lifeless> hi?
[04:21] <posulliv> lifeless: hey, real quick lp question
[04:22] <posulliv> lifeless: my company recently purchased a commercial subscription to lp and I'm migrating their svn repos to lp
[04:22] <posulliv> lifeless: they currently want the repos to be private but it appears as public and I'm not sure how to change it?
[04:32] <CarlFK> posulliv: I just poked around and found:
[04:32] <CarlFK> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/40633 " One aspect you should be aware is that code hosted on Launchpad will be  publicly accessible.  So if you're hosting a closed-source project I  suspect you will not want to use the code hosting features."
[04:33] <CarlFK> er... never mind: "Private branches, bugs and PPAs are now available with a commercial subscription."
[04:34] <posulliv> CarlFK: hehe
[04:34] <posulliv> CarlFK: yep, thats my question really. we purchased a commercial subscription but can't figure out how to make branches private
[04:34] <CarlFK> "select 'Other/Proprietary' as the project license"  https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/208
[04:34] <posulliv> CarlFK: did that :)
[04:34] <lifeless> you need to contact the commercial admins
[04:35] <CarlFK> yeah, ok, I'll stop trying to be helpfull :)
[04:35] <lifeless> posulliv: were you given a contact address when you signed up?
[04:35] <lifeless> spm: normal process is via mrevell right? do you know if he wants email to a well-known address, his address, or Questions ?
[04:35] <posulliv> lifeless: I didn't purchase the subscription personally
[04:35]  * spm reads backscroll for context...
[04:36] <spm> posulliv: how long ago was the subscription bought? if hours, it simply may not have been done by the person(s) who do so; if days... that's uncool.
[04:37] <posulliv> spm: last week sometime
[04:37] <spm> lifeless: I think it's bac actually - certainly used to be.
[04:37] <posulliv> spm: but we only started migration today
[04:37] <spm> Oh bother.
[04:37] <lifeless> spm: no, its mrevell
[04:37] <spm> posulliv: can you PM me the project(s), I'll fix now.
[04:37] <lifeless> spm: that I'm sure of.
[04:37] <posulliv> spm: will do
[04:37] <spm> lifeless: I sit corrected :-)
[04:37] <lifeless> spm: better than standing, given our jobs
[04:38]  * lifeless goes to lay in supplies for tonight
[04:38] <spm> :-)
[04:38] <posulliv> lifeless, spm, CarlFK: thanks for the help
[06:54] <karthick87> How to find projects in launchpad that uses a particular programming language?
[07:05] <karthick87> anyone??
[07:32] <CarlFK> carl@dc10:~/src$ bzr branch lp:ubuntu/software-properties
[07:32] <CarlFK> Permission denied (publickey).
[07:33] <CarlFK> i thought I had my key setup already.  how do I see whats going on?
[07:33] <CarlFK> oh, I bet ssh not pgp...
[07:33] <wgrant> Right, you need your SSH key set up.
[07:37] <karthick87> wgrant: Is it possible to find projects in launchpad that uses a particular programming language?
[07:37] <wgrant> karthick87: I don't believe so.
[07:38] <karthick87> wgrant: Any third party tools to do this?
[07:39] <wgrant> karthick87: I don't know of any.
[08:22] <spiv> Weird.  The "Mark as duplicate" ajax just told me "445171 is not a valid bug number or nickname".
[08:22] <spiv> Trying again worked, though.
[08:23] <thumper> spm: a space?
[08:26] <spiv> thumper: assuming you mean me, no.  I didn't edit the text field between tries, I just clicked the little green-tick submit icon again.
[08:26] <thumper> spiv: weird
[08:40] <CarlFK> hekireki: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA
[10:20] <renatosilva> when you read "fixed bug xyz" on a commit comment, do you english native speakers ever read that as "bug xyz was fixed" but with fixed coming first?
[10:21] <renatosilva> in portuguese, we can use passive voice before subject
[10:21] <renatosilva> "bug xyz fixado" == "fixado bug xyz" != "fixou bug xyz"
[10:47] <spiv> renatosilva: you mean "coming first" as in the fix happened before the bug?  No, I never read it that way.
[10:48] <renatosilva> spiv: no
[10:48] <spiv> renatosilva: If you just mean does "fixed bug xyz" has the same meaning as "bug xyz was fixed"... basically yes.
[10:48] <wgrant> I think the initial "I" is just being omitted.
[10:49] <renatosilva> that's because fixed is both simple past and past participle, I just wonder if it can ever be read as the latter
[10:49] <renatosilva> better example: undo
[10:50] <renatosilva> "undone commit 123" == "commit 123 undone"?
[10:50] <spiv> "fixed bug xyz" has a suggestion that the writer did it, whereas "bug xyz was fixed" doesn't suggest anything about who (or when) it happened... but in the context of a commit message that's pretty clearly the person that did it is clearly the author of the commit message, and it happened in that commit.
[10:50] <renatosilva> (please discard [I/the commit has] "undone commit 123")
[10:50] <spiv> It would be a little strange to write "commit 123 undone".  It sounds a little weird.
[10:51] <spiv> (I'd probably write it as "Undo commit 123" or "Revert commit 123" or "Reverse commit 123")
[10:51]  * spiv -> dinner
[10:51] <renatosilva> spiv: I used undo for lack of better example sorry, but the question remains
[10:52] <renatosilva> spiv: I have noticed for avoiding confusion implerative is good alternative (it seems it's part of git good pratices), but I still want to know about this specific case
[10:53] <renatosilva> *imperative
[10:53] <renatosilva> I just want to know if in passive voice, you can put the verb before the rest
[10:55] <renatosilva> so that "[verb in past participle] [subject]" == "[subject] [verb in past participle]" (for example "commit 123 undone" == "undone commit 123")
[10:56] <renatosilva> I ask this because I CAN do this in portuguese and I have been doing it in english too, but not clear if I can. I'd likely write "undone commit 123" naturally.
[11:08] <maxb> renatosilva: I think most native English speakers (an I am one) probably rely more on "what feels right" rather than a strict understanding of grammar.
[11:09] <maxb> It's difficult to apply rules of grammar to "Fixed bug XYZ" anyway, because it's a sentence fragment, not a complete sentence.
[11:11] <maxb> If it helps at all "Undone commit 123" feels incorrect - I'd say it would have to be "Undid commit 123", but that still feels rather non-idiomatic, and I'd go for "Revert commit 123" or possibly "Reverted commit 123"
[11:13] <renatosilva> maxb: if you see a commit message like "Undone commit 123", would you read it as it was exactly "Commit 123 undone" but with just the verb coming first?:
[11:14] <renatosilva> ok I use undo but I see that revert is more appropriated, I just don't have any better example in hands where past participle != simple past
[11:22] <maxb> renatosilva: I'd think it read a bit oddly, but yes I'd read it as having the exact same meaning
[11:22] <spiv> renatosilva: I'd understand what was meant, but it would sound a bit odd.  I'd probably guess the author wasn't a native English speaker.
[11:24] <renatosilva> so it can be read as passive voice, but it's not usual to write that way? ok thanks, I think that answers my question :)
[11:25]  * renatosilva needs to stop with this portuguese habit
[11:28] <renatosilva> I have alwyays read comments like "fixed bug 123" as "bug 123 fixed", never thought it was more like "I/the commit fixed bug 123"
[11:43] <renatosilva> thanks all
[19:18] <_Groo_> hi/2 all
[19:18] <_Groo_> im trying to push to a bzr branch in lp, using http since im behind a proxy at work
[19:18] <_Groo_> i used bzr push https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~paulo-miguel-dias/+junk/amarok-ubuntu
[19:19] <_Groo_> but lp gave me this error: bzr: ERROR: At https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~paulo-miguel-dias/+junk/amarok-ubuntu you have a valid .bzr control directory, but not a branch or repository. This is an unsupported configuration. Please move the target directory out of the way and try again.
[19:19] <_Groo_> could anyone enlighten me?
[23:02] <duanedesign> anyone seen this error while uploading a PGP key 'Signature couldn't be verified: (7, 8, u'Bad signature')'
[23:29] <maxb> duanedesign: do you really mean uploading a key?
[23:29] <maxb> I think you might mean uploading a signed CoC
[23:30] <duanedesign> sorry I was relaying messages from another person
[23:45] <fatharrahman> hello
[23:46] <fatharrahman> I reported a bug few  minutes ago but hopefully came here
[23:46] <fatharrahman> may find some solutions
[23:47] <fatharrahman> While trying to sign Ubuntu code of conduct an error as There is 1 error.
[23:47] <fatharrahman> (7, 8, u'Bad signature')
[23:47] <fatharrahman> could this be solved?
[23:52] <maxb> fatharrahman: The most likely cause would seem to be an error in copying the signed text into the form
[23:53] <fatharrahman> how to copy it then ?
[23:54] <fatharrahman> I copied it from .asc
[23:54] <maxb> Could you pastebin the context of what you pasted into the form?
[23:56] <fatharrahman> pastebin where ?
[23:56] <maxb> any pastebin you like
[23:56] <maxb> for example, http://paste.ubuntu.com
[23:56] <fatharrahman> ok
[23:58] <maxb> Please also try running 'gpg --verify UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt.asc'