* yofel has an akonadi_imap_resource_4 process that uses 120M or real memory without doing anything | 00:02 | |
c2tarun | I was setting up a virtual box env of natty to reproduce some bugs. i got an error, can anyone help me with setting up the environment please. | 05:45 |
---|---|---|
micahg | c2tarun: maybe try in #ubuntu+1? | 05:46 |
c2tarun | micahg: u mean #ubuntu | 05:46 |
micahg | c2tarun: no, #ubuntu+1 for natty support | 05:47 |
c2tarun | thanks :) | 05:47 |
=== ssj6akshat is now known as akshat|school | ||
c2tarun | where can i find confirmed but unassigned bugs?? | 07:00 |
micahg | c2tarun: have you tried the advanced search in LP? | 07:02 |
c2tarun | thanks :) | 07:02 |
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
htorque | hello everyone, isn't it possible anymore to set my own bug report to "wishlist"? | 08:56 |
nisshh | hggdh, vish, bdmurray, ping | 10:00 |
nisshh | anyway, when you see this, c2tarun just wants to say hi, he is a bit shy about meeting his mentors on irc :) | 10:03 |
c2tarun | hi :) | 10:03 |
c2tarun | vish ping | 11:07 |
nisshh | c2tarun, i pinged them earlier, just wait, they will reply soon :) | 11:08 |
c2tarun | ok :) actually i received mail that papercut-ninjas group is assigned a bug on empathy. I wasn't facing this bug, i just wanted to ask him :) | 11:09 |
=== ogra_ac is now known as ogra | ||
nisshh | c2tarun, thats bug mail, it doesnt mean that you are affected by that particular bug, you are just subscribed to receive it because of a certain team you are in, etc | 11:10 |
c2tarun | ok... :) thanks | 11:11 |
nisshh | :) | 11:11 |
=== ogra is now known as Guest42462 | ||
vish | c2tarun: reduce the font size and then try to resize the window you will notice the combobox vanishes.. | 11:30 |
vish | c2tarun: also, no one in the channel bites.. ;) so, no need to be scared/shy.. :) | 11:31 |
c2tarun | vish: how to reduce the font size of empathy? | 11:45 |
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
=== akshat|school is now known as ssj6akshat | ||
vish | c2tarun: not empathy's, system font size | 11:58 |
c2tarun | vish: got it | 12:00 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
charlie-tca | this place is really quiet for a Bug Day today - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20101209 | 14:40 |
=== AbhiJit_ is now known as AbhiJit | ||
=== CarlFK1 is now known as CarlFK | ||
c2tarun | bug 688094 | 15:32 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 688094 in user-setup (Ubuntu) "package user-setup 1.28ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: failed to sync updated files list file for package user-setup: Input/output error (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/688094 | 15:32 |
c2tarun | what is this bug exactly saying? is it just package not getting installed or some other problem?? | 15:33 |
c2tarun | if a bug is reported for any previous version, say karmic and that bug cannot be reproduced in newer versions like maverick. what should we do?? | 15:43 |
charlie-tca | I comment that I could not reproduce the issue in the latest release, and am closing the bug as invalid for that reason. Add that if they can | 15:47 |
charlie-tca | reproduce the issue in the latest stable release or development release, they can repopen it as new and need to supply the logs | 15:47 |
c2tarun | charlie-tca: thanks :) | 15:48 |
charlie-tca | no problem | 15:48 |
ScottK | charlie-tca: How does that make the bug invalid? | 15:52 |
charlie-tca | It makes it fixed-released, but without a reference for what fixed it, we mark it invalid | 15:53 |
charlie-tca | or am I loose in the head again? | 15:54 |
ScottK | It seems to me that it would be confusing for people to be told their bug is invalid because it's already fixed. | 16:06 |
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
charlie-tca | It leads much less confusion that having it marked fixed, and then they want to references for the fix | 16:10 |
charlie-tca | hm, my keyboard is not typing right again | 16:11 |
bcurtiswx | vish, you work with firefox4? or was that micahg ? | 16:19 |
vish | bcurtiswx: yup, its micahg | 16:20 |
bcurtiswx | vish, k thx | 16:20 |
bdmurray | mvo: could you look at bug 571392? | 16:23 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 571392 in bcmwl (Ubuntu) "package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 197) (dups: 127) (heat: 1242)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/571392 | 16:23 |
bdmurray | mvo: seems to happen on Live CDs / usb sticks afaict | 16:23 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
charlie-tca | pedro_: kind of difficult to do these compiz bugs in Natty until I can actually log in | 16:35 |
mvo | bdmurray: hrm, is there a log in one of the reports that actually contains anything :/ ? | 16:37 |
bdmurray | mvo: I can write something to check... | 16:39 |
mvo | thanks, that would be cool | 16:41 |
mvo | the ones I looked at where empty | 16:41 |
mvo | :/ | 16:41 |
bdmurray | mvo: bug 579643 has something | 16:46 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 579643 in bcmwl (Ubuntu) "package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (dup-of: 571392)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/579643 | 16:47 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 571392 in bcmwl (Ubuntu) "package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 197) (dups: 127) (heat: 1242)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/571392 | 16:47 |
mvo | thanks | 16:48 |
mvo | bdmurray: it looks like the actual bug is pretty simple to fix, this only affects 10.04? | 16:50 |
bdmurray | mvo: bug 685675 is natty too. What is the bug? | 16:51 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 685675 in bcmwl (Ubuntu) "package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.246.2+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/685675 | 16:51 |
nemo | hey guys. I filed a bug just minutes ago and I wasn't sure what area to put it in | 17:00 |
nemo | someone mind moving it for me? | 17:00 |
nemo | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/688145 | 17:01 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 688145 in ubuntu "Suspend fails on closing laptop lid, hangs hard on reopen with high heat and fan usage. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 17:01 |
yofel | nemo: I would say kernel, since pm shows it tries to suspend and it fails after that, please set the package to linux and run apport-collect on the affected system | 17:05 |
nemo | hm. | 17:05 |
nemo | think I've done apport-collect on this system before, but sure :) | 17:05 |
nemo | done | 17:06 |
nemo | yofel: said "no additional information collected" | 17:06 |
yofel | nemo: yes, you didn't change the package first | 17:07 |
nemo | oh | 17:07 |
nemo | oops. didn't realise that was "in order of operation" :) | 17:07 |
nemo | hm. how do I do that? | 17:07 |
yofel | since you didn't apport didn't know *what* to collect information about | 17:07 |
yofel | nemo: click on the arrow left or 'Ubuntu' in the status line | 17:08 |
nemo | ah. found it | 17:08 |
nemo | yep | 17:08 |
nemo | I thought it had sent me to a bug list when I clicked on Ubuntu, but the arrow worked | 17:08 |
yofel | right, clicking on Ubuntu will send you to the list of bugs filed in ubuntu. | 17:09 |
nemo | yay. appport still uses gksudo. | 17:09 |
nemo | so sick of stuff using that irritating polkit thingy. I even wrap update-manager in the menu with gksudo :) | 17:10 |
nemo | and close and restart it whenever it pops up on its own | 17:10 |
yofel | hehe | 17:10 |
nemo | if polkit integrated w/ ssh/nomachine/fingerprint gui, I'd not hate it so much :) | 17:11 |
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
mvo | bdmurray: hm, hm, I spoke too quickly, I thought it was easy, but it looks like I need to actually run it inside a vm to reprouce | 17:19 |
mvo | but dinner first | 17:19 |
bdmurray | mvo: okay, thanks for working on it! | 17:21 |
bdmurray | the acidbase package could use some bug conslidation | 17:39 |
bdmurray | there seem to be lots of duplicates in there | 17:40 |
=== ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat|sleep | ||
=== ssj6akshat|sleep is now known as ssj6akshat | ||
bdmurray | micahg: re bug 685832 I don't think there is a badge | 18:08 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 685832 in launchpad-gm-scripts "Show MOTU badge? (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/685832 | 18:08 |
micahg | bdmurray: there is one for MOTU, it's the closed hand | 18:09 |
bdmurray | micahg: for launchpad.net/~motu ? | 18:09 |
micahg | bdmurray: I thought so, let me check | 18:09 |
micahg | bdmurray: yes | 18:10 |
bdmurray | micahg: okay, well regardless motu is part of ubuntu-dev and universe-contributes both of which are shown | 18:10 |
micahg | bdmurray: right, but neither of those are considered domain experts | 18:11 |
bdmurray | micahg: um okay but isn't the this gonna just be one more icon for the people who already have 2 icons? | 18:12 |
micahg | bdmurray: well, core-devs have an extra icon too | 18:13 |
micahg | and motu-swat | 18:13 |
bdmurray | micahg: right and those are subsets of ubuntu-dev but motu is not because they are members of ubuntu-dev | 18:13 |
* micahg is confused | 18:14 | |
micahg | MOTU and core-dev have the same relationship WRT ubuntu-dev | 18:14 |
bdmurray | okay I see how it makes sense now | 18:16 |
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
=== ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat|sleep | ||
bcurtiswx | micahg, does the set as desktop background function work on firefox 4b7 in natty ? | 19:55 |
micahg | bcurtiswx: on KDE or GNOME? | 19:55 |
bcurtiswx | micah, GNOME | 19:55 |
bcurtiswx | micahg* | 19:55 |
* micahg remembers there was a bug about it... | 19:55 | |
bcurtiswx | micahg, OK thx | 19:56 |
micahg | bcurtiswx: no, I meant in general, idk if it works in natty, I would hope so :) | 19:57 |
bcurtiswx | ah, it doesn't work in natty, but since GTK3 is so screwed up i wouldn't know what to do with it ATM | 19:57 |
micahg | er, the original bug was Fixed for Firefox 3.5, if you see an issue, please fule a bug | 19:58 |
micahg | *file | 19:58 |
micahg | bcurtiswx: it shouldn't be using gtk3 AFAIK | 19:58 |
bcurtiswx | well, as of right now g-c-c with the background section is borked due to GTK, which FFX I would assume uses | 19:59 |
=== Richie is now known as WelshDragon | ||
charlie-tca | Is bugbot a person or a script? It is closing bugs | 22:11 |
charlie-tca | well, it is commenting that it is closing them, but leaving them in incomplete. What is it? | 22:12 |
charlie-tca | see it in action on bug 450721 | 22:12 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 450721 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) "xorg crashes by writing emails?! (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 13)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/450721 | 22:13 |
damariei | hello, quick question, what should I do if I come across a bug report and when I try to reproduce it there is no bug? | 22:25 |
charlie-tca | Are you reproducing it in Natty? | 22:26 |
damariei | no maverick | 22:30 |
charlie-tca | Which release did the reporter use? | 22:30 |
damariei | maverick also | 22:30 |
micahcowan | It might help to identify differences between your environ and reporter's that might possibly affect behavior. What's the bug #? | 22:31 |
charlie-tca | You can comment that you could not reproduce it in an up-to-date 10.10, and ask them to try it again. Also ask to have them give you the exact steps they use to reproduce the issue. | 22:31 |
damariei | well nevermind, I was just confused by the wording and I can reproduce it now but I have a new question, is it still a bug if it does actually function but not as the user would intend it to? | 22:33 |
damariei | I am referring to 88241 | 22:33 |
charlie-tca | bug 88241 | 22:33 |
yofel | lp 88241 | 22:33 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 88241 in linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "oops on suspend from dvb driver (heat: 2)" [Medium,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88241 | 22:33 |
damariei | sorry | 22:34 |
damariei | 688241 | 22:34 |
yofel | lp 688241 | 22:34 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 688241 in simple-scan (Ubuntu) "scan will not save a second doc - 'save as' works (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/688241 | 22:34 |
micahcowan | According to the user's description, it sounds like a regression | 22:35 |
yofel | not using gnome, but while overwriting the previous file is the usual 'Save' behaviour, I would not expect that from a scan program | 22:35 |
charlie-tca | So, to save a scanned document, you have to push "save as"? That is a fix of previous wrong behaviour, is it not? | 22:35 |
damariei | even if you scan another page, instead of asking for a new location for the new page, it automatically overwrites the first one | 22:36 |
yofel | damariei: you say it overwrites the file even though the button is grayed out? | 22:36 |
damariei | yes | 22:36 |
charlie-tca | the document does not have a name already, so pushing save the second saves with the file name entered previously. | 22:36 |
damariei | i.e if i was to scan two pages, click save on the first one (it would ask for a location and name) then click save on the second it would automatically overwrite the first one without asking | 22:38 |
charlie-tca | yofel: I see that as a bug, but I don't see the behavior as reported as one. | 22:39 |
yofel | charlie-tca: not sure how simple-scan is supposed to behave, but overwriting a file is something I expect from an image editor, not a scan program. | 22:40 |
micahcowan | Yeah, especially for one named "simple-scan". | 22:40 |
damariei | exactly | 22:40 |
charlie-tca | How does it know you changed documents? It is assuming that the first scan was not good enough. | 22:40 |
yofel | not sure if xsane has a save or save as button, but it usually increases a suffix number by itself when trying to save again, so that's the behaviour I expect (since I'm used to it) | 22:41 |
damariei | charlie-tca, i clicked on the second page | 22:41 |
micahcowan | It sounds like a regression. If the developers indicate that it's intended behavior, that's another matter, but it sounds like it must be unintentional, to me, particularly if that's how it worked in previous versions. | 22:41 |
* charlie-tca shrugs | 22:41 | |
damariei | yofel, yes I think that is actually how simple-scan functioned previously | 22:41 |
micahcowan | According to the reporter, it is. | 22:41 |
damariei | I myself use simple-scan and do remember it working that way I believe | 22:42 |
damariei | ok so I tried a previous version of simple-scan and yes it does appear to be a regression, what should I do next? | 23:01 |
yofel | damariei: add the 'regression-release' tag and forward to the simple-scan devs | 23:19 |
yofel | damariei: actually it would be worth to try it in natty first (use a live disk) | 23:20 |
yofel | since that has a newer bugfix release | 23:21 |
yofel | (the tag applies anyway) | 23:21 |
yofel | damariei: for future reference: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Regressions | 23:21 |
damariei | yofel, thank you, and is it ok if I cannot actually Triage the bug? (permissions) | 23:31 |
yofel | yes, 'Triaged' and "Won't Fix" can only be set by Bug Control | 23:32 |
yofel | once you triaged the bug just ask here for the Status and Importance to be set | 23:32 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
damariei | yofel, ok I have set regression on bug #688241 and forwarded upstream (https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/688372) can you Triage it? | 23:44 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 688372 in simple-scan "Saving any scans after first scan overwrites the file (Regression 1.x to 2.x) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 23:44 |
ubot2 | damariei: Bug 688241 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/688241 is private | 23:44 |
yofel | ok, short lecture on upstreaming: you only need to file a bug report if the project is NOT hosted on launchpad | 23:48 |
yofel | no harm done, launchpad is confusing sometimes | 23:48 |
yofel | damariei: ok, now the proper way here: on 688241 click on 'also affects project' | 23:48 |
damariei | yofel, ahh thanks, im still learning | 23:49 |
yofel | damariei: that already has simple scan set as projet so just add it | 23:49 |
damariei | yofel, ok done | 23:50 |
yofel | damariei: now go to 688372, and mark it as a dup of 688241 (click on mark as a duplicate on the right) | 23:50 |
damariei | yofel, ok done | 23:51 |
yofel | hm, that might actually be a dup of bug 544108 | 23:56 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 544108 in simple-scan (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Offer to number/date filename if file already exists (affects: 4) (dups: 2) (heat: 31)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544108 | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!