/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/10/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech
=== apachelogger is now known as urllogger
=== urllogger is now known as apachelogger
=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu
=== vorian is now known as Elk
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
dholbachgood morning!07:45
=== warp11 is now known as warp10
=== hrw|gone is now known as hrw
cdbstumbleweed: :o Thanks for the guidance, I will take care of it from the next time onwards, when I will work on python packages09:50
tumbleweedcdbs: no problem, your changes weren't actually harmful, just non-optimal :)09:52
cdbstumbleweed: yeah :) Its nice to see uploads tricling into your system when using a development release09:52
cdbs*trickling09:52
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
udienzcdbs: thanks for reviewing my merge. i'll try to fix it10:22
cdbsgood10:24
udienzcdbs: already fix10:27
cdbsdone? /me looks again10:28
cdbsudienz: I would highly recommend you to forward that diff to Debian10:28
udienzdone :) sukron10:28
udienzcdbs: forwarding with submittodebian tool?10:29
cdbsudienz: If you forwarded manually, its fine10:31
udienzcdbs: ok, i'll submitting to debian now10:37
udienzcdbs: done submitting to debian10:42
cdbsudienz: BTW, is signalled already in the list?10:42
udienzcdbs: yes, signalled. but not signaled10:43
cdbsudienz: oh, then it looks good from my end, except:10:43
cdbsin debian/changelog its mentioned that you '+ give Ubuntu MOTU to maintainer' and 'Give Brian Nelson to XSBC-Original-Maintainer'10:45
cdbsThere's no need to mention that in two lines, remove those and add instead:10:45
cdbs+ Set Maintainer: field according to DebianMaintainerField spec.10:45
cdbs'+ error to download upstream tarball' should become '+ Correct URL to fix downloading of upstream tarball'10:46
cdbsudienz: ^10:46
cdbs'+ per Debian Policy, put version number to 3.9.1 ' should become '+ Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1'10:47
cdbsthen it would be fine10:47
udienzcdbs: done, can i push it again?10:48
cdbsudienz: yes, please :)10:48
udienzPushed up to revision 13.10:50
udienzcdbs: done pushed10:50
* cdbs looks again10:52
cdbsudienz: approved10:54
udienzthanks Bilal10:54
cdbsudienz: request another review on the ubuntu-sponsors team, since I can't upload to main10:55
udienzcdbs: sorry, who can send my request?10:56
cdbsudienz: Click the 'Request another review' link there on that page and then enter ubuntu-sponsors10:56
udienzcdbs: okay, done. Ubuntu Sponsors Team has been added10:57
cdbsudienz: good, and thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu!10:57
udienzcdbs: :D thanks for reviewing. i hope i can help Ubuntu again10:58
udienzbtw, i have another proposed merge11:00
udienzhttps://code.launchpad.net/~udienz/ubuntu/maverick/light-themes/light-themes.fix549365/+merge/4284011:00
udienzhttps://code.launchpad.net/~udienz/ubuntu-docs/natty-ubuntu-docs.fix677998/+merge/4285711:00
udienzand i need review from ubuntu-sponsors11:00
evaluatehello11:21
evaluatedoes anyone have a link to the sf logos?11:21
evaluateI've been searching for them for 15 minutes and can't find the link anywhere...11:22
zul /msg Daviey funny i dont remember us saying we should do cobbler11:50
Davieyzul: funny, how /msg with a space infront fails aswell :)11:50
zulfrig11:51
kim0I think I've fixed 687968 (Bacula FTBFS). I've proposed for merge (my first time ever) would someone like to pick it up :)12:05
c2tarunbug 68796812:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 687968 in bacula (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'bacula' (5.0.2-2ubuntu1) failed to build on natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68796812:06
c2tarunkim0: i think you should tell this in #ubuntu-bugs someone from review team will check it.12:07
kim0okie12:08
vishc2tarun: kim0 is right, this is a better place or #ubuntu-devel (but not in -bugs)12:34
c2tarunvish: sorry i mostly saw u in bugs and u said that u are in review team, so i suggested him :x12:35
c2tarun:|12:36
vishc2tarun: np.. :)12:36
c2tarunif i find some application on net and it is good but not in ubuntu repositories, who should i ask for its addition into repositories12:37
vishc2tarun: you need to file a needs packaging bug12:38
c2tarunvish: ok...12:38
vishc2tarun: check if one already exists : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=needs-packaging12:40
c2tarunvish: sure12:41
=== emma is now known as em
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
hakermaniaHello everybody.13:29
udienzRiddell: thanks for your comment at Revu13:29
hakermaniaudienz: what's your upload's name ?13:31
udienzhakermania: udienz13:32
udienzhakermania: are you MOTU?13:33
hakermaniawish to be :P13:33
hakermaniano13:33
hakermaniaI have uploaded wallch in REVU, that's why I asked.13:33
hakermaniaxD13:34
udienzhakermania: hm.. same like me, i;m interest at Ubuntu-MOTU13:34
udienzah.. i forget now.. you have problems uploading to revu13:34
hakermaniaudienz: I solved them :)13:35
udienzhakermania: so, how to solved it?13:36
hakermaniaudienz: At first I used 'dput revu *changes' but next you have to use 'dput -f revu *changes' (If this was my problem :P). Btw I can't find your upload :/13:37
udienzhakermania: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=873313:38
hakermaniaudienz: There are some Warnings/Notices as I can see... Do you want help to solve them?13:39
udienzyes why not13:40
udienzhakermania: this is your package? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch13:41
hakermaniayep13:41
hakermaniaif you want you can see my debian/control file to fix yours. It is at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/wallch-1012091930/wallch-1.0/debian/control13:43
udienzhakermania: ok, but ubuntu-devel-discuss is for main13:43
udienzwhy you don't use Ubuntu MOTU?13:44
cdbsudienz: ubuntu-devel-discuss is for both nowadays13:45
cdbsthat was the old rule13:45
cdbsthat devel-discuss would be for main and motu for universe13:45
cdbsbut now onwards, all packages are using ubuntu-devel-discuss13:45
hakermaniaOk, I don;t think that it's a big deal.13:46
udienzcdbs: owh.. thanks13:46
hakermaniaYou must change the Maintainer field with Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>13:46
udienzhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField13:46
hakermaniaexactly:Otherwise, the Maintainer field will be set to Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> If the Maintainer field is modified, the old value will be saved in a field named XSBC-Original-Maintainer13:48
G__81whats the channel for unity ?13:48
udienzhakermania: well my last upload has unsuccessfull13:48
hakermaniaudienz: Ok, now change the maintainer to ubuntu-devel bla bla and make a new field named XSBC-Original-Maintainer: with your real name and eail address13:49
hakermaniaemail*13:49
udienzhakermania: okay13:49
udienzhakermania: do you know mailing list to discussing packaging? maybe like debian-mentors13:51
hakermaniaNo, I don't/13:51
udienzhakermania: do you have sponsors or mentors?13:52
hakermaniaNo, omg I'm 16 --_--13:52
udienzhm.. i dont have mentors now, maybe we can try it :D13:52
udienzhm.. no problem, if you know cdbs or bilal Akhtar, he is 16 too13:53
hakermaniaudienz: No, I don't,  Ok, now change debian/changelog from unstable to natty13:54
udienzhakermania: hm.. but my package has been uploaded now13:56
hakermaniaUploaded and accepted?13:57
udienzhakermania: yup, sponsored by Riddell13:57
hakermaniaWhen why did you accepted the invitation for help? :P13:58
udienz:) i open for all help13:59
udienzhakermania: i got error when checking your packages14:02
udienzwallch source: source-contains-prebuilt-binary wallch14:02
hakermaniaudienz: it's true that I have a little problem with the binary... But I'll solve it... Or you can help me solve it. !14:04
udienztry to remove .pc/ directory at source14:05
hakermaniaudienz:did this worked for you?14:09
Riddellkim0: about https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/ubuntu/natty/bacula/ftbfs-fix/+merge/43327 shouldn't that be a patch?14:10
\shguys, anyone how knows ruby a bit more then I do? is it possible to pass a ruby variable to %x{}?14:10
Riddellapachelogger knows ruby, but is more into java these days14:11
hakermania\sh:14:12
hakermania\sh: #ubuntu-motu not for these issues :)14:12
ari-tczewhakermania: \sh asked here because guess that maybe someone from here could help14:13
ari-tczewvish: what's for sponsor in bug 15495 ?14:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 15495 in One Hundred Paper Cuts ""Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an "archive" is" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1549514:13
\shhakermania: well, actually it's ubuntu related, as we are pushing puppet to the cloud world ;)14:13
udienzhakermania: it works well14:14
udienzari-tczew, \sh: agreed14:14
vishari-tczew: the patch there "update with the suggested changes" , i'm assuming it has the changes.. i havent test it though..14:15
ari-tczewvish: and this is not adjusted for ubuntu (debdiff)14:15
hakermaniaudienz: Well, there is something unsolved days now... (W: wallch: desktop-command-not-in-package) But it is quite mad. If you check my wallch-1.0.pro file you'll realise that I rename the executable and then place it to /usr/bin/ like the manpages and everything else. I cannot understand why the executable isn't placed where it should. Go private if you want14:15
vishari-tczew: oh!14:15
ari-tczewI don't like when someone has subscribed sponsors when there is only a patch (and not tested!)14:16
vishari-tczew: bah! i assumed it was a debdiff! sorry.14:16
ari-tczew!debdiff | vish14:16
ubottuvish: A simple way to patch Debian/Ubuntu packages is to attach a debdiff to a bug report, or send it to the team which handles the package. Learn more about it from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Howtos/Debdiff14:16
vishari-tczew: i know what a debdiff is.. :)14:16
vishari-tczew: just assumed this was one too.. ;)14:16
ari-tczewvish: I sent a link to you to show how debdiff looks14:17
vishari-tczew: i should have read the patch :/14:17
ari-tczewvish: yes14:17
* vish was doing it at 4am.. but not an excuse..14:18
ari-tczewvish: please remember that we're working on clean up SQ and these activites wasting our time14:18
ari-tczew(blind subscribing)14:18
vishari-tczew: will do..14:18
ari-tczeweven Canonical pays for it14:18
udienz!debian/dirs| hakermania14:20
hakermaniaudienz: ?14:21
udienztry to estting debian/dirs14:21
udienz*set14:21
ari-tczewudienz: maybe send direct link from wiki.u.c will help :)14:21
udienzwait... /me searching at wiki14:22
hakermaniaudienz: my .pro file places fine the other files. 'make install' works just fine, debhelper knows how to install Qt pro files. So, I cannot understand why 'make install' works fine and why debuilding the project doesn't place the bin file in /usr/bin/ (although it does rename it(!))14:23
udienzhakermania: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-sourcepkg.html#sC.2.314:24
hakermaniaudienz: So, create debian/tmp and place there all the files? (manpage, changelog executables) ?14:25
hakermaniaudienz: and consider debian/tmp as being /14:26
hakermania?14:26
kim0Riddell: Hi regarding https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/ubuntu/natty/bacula/ftbfs-fix/+merge/43327 .. You say shouldn't that be a patch14:27
kim0Riddell: I'm quite a newbie about packaging .. any hints as to what I should do14:27
udienzhakermania: no..  use debian/dirs14:27
udienzhakermania: do you want wallch ro /usr/bin/wallch?14:28
hakermaniaudienz: Yes, and my .pro file normally does this!14:29
udienzhakermania: just create debain/dirs14:29
udienz*debian14:29
hakermaniaudienz: I cannot understand. Create a folder named 'dirs' in debian/ will solve my problem?14:30
udienzhakermania: no not folder, but file14:31
hakermaniaudienz: Oh, and what should it contain?14:31
udienzi test your package, i can't build it via pbuilder14:31
udienzusr/bin14:31
hakermaniaOk, w814:31
udienzhakermania: btw, i got  "Can't exec "qmake": No such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 179" during building14:32
hakermaniaqtcreator is needed for building :)14:33
udienzmaybe you missing qmake at debian/control14:33
hakermaniaqtcreator includes qmake :)14:33
udienzowh i mean qt4-qmake14:33
hakermaniaI think this is included in qtcreator as well!14:34
udienzhakermania: well i successfully build your package, but i add some depends14:38
hakermaniaudienz: which?14:39
udienzhakermania: http://paste.ubuntu.com/541889/14:39
hakermaniaAren't qt4-qmake, libqt4-dev included in qtcreator?14:40
udienzhakermania, i don't know14:41
hakermaniaudienz: I do :)14:41
udienzhakermania: http://paste.ubuntu.com/541891/14:41
hakermaniaudienz: After making the 'dirs' file,  /usr/bin/ directory is created but nothing is placed there! So I got lintian error package-contains-empty-directory usr/bin/14:50
hakermania:/14:50
Riddellkim0: take the diff and put it into debian/patches14:54
Riddellkim0: although that has a messy debian/rules, I can't see how the patches get applied14:55
kim0Riddell: Just commented "Bacula does not use a proper patch system. In the diff.gz file there's a lot of direct patching of the source anyway"14:55
Riddellmessy messy14:56
Riddellkim0: ok thanks, I'll commit and upload14:57
kim0Riddell: cool .. indeed it's a messy pkg14:57
hakermaniaudienz: Check the new upload: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=876015:16
hakermaniaDoes it work?15:16
kim0Riddell: not to be pushy :) but you didn't push my bacula patch yet .. It's my first fix, so I'm over excited hehe15:31
Riddellkim0: I'm onto it15:34
kim0thnx15:34
hakermaniakim0: what's the bacula patch?15:35
hakermania:)15:35
kim0hakermania: just a small fix to bacula FTBFS on natty15:36
hakermaniakim0: Is Riddel a MOTU working on your fix?15:36
Riddellkim0: committed and uploaded!15:39
kim0Riddell: Yipee thanks man15:39
Riddellhakermania: I'm an ubuntu dev reviewing his fix15:39
hakermaniaRiddell: Are you responsible for revu's uploads as well?15:39
Riddellhakermania: I can do reviews if wanted15:40
hakermaniaRiddell: So, if I want I can tell you please go and review my project? :)15:41
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
kim0Riddell: shouldn't that merge auto-close this bug 687968 (which I link to the branch)15:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 687968 in bacula (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'bacula' (5.0.2-2ubuntu1) failed to build on natty" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68796815:41
Riddellkim0: looks like it's closed15:42
Riddellhakermania: if you want yes15:42
kim0ah .. wasn't a moment ago :)15:42
hakermaniaRIddell: Oh, this was quite an unexpected answer for me :) My upload is named 'wallch'. Can you have a look on it, please :)15:43
hakermania?15:43
boulabiarhi15:44
boulabiarcan I find here some help for packaging ?15:45
hakermaniaboulabiar: #ubuntu-packaging15:45
udienzhi all, can anyone review bug 68748315:54
ubottuLaunchpad bug 687483 in aspell-en (Ubuntu) "debian/watch is incorrect, some words missing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68748315:54
udienzthanks before15:56
hakermaniaRiddell: ?16:02
Riddellhakermania: comments added to revu16:04
hakermaniaRiddell: Thanx! I'll try to fix the errors the sooner.16:09
Riddelludienz: committed, I'll upload16:10
Riddelludienz: please file a bug with debian with your patch16:10
Riddellboulabiar: did you get the help you needed?16:11
boulabiarno16:11
boulabiarno one answered me there16:11
Riddellboulabiar: what do you need to know?16:11
boulabiarI want to package this https://launchpad.net/ginn16:11
Riddellboulabiar: have you asked Duncan McGreggor if it's ready to package?16:12
boulabiarhe asked me to package it16:13
boulabiarto the utouch ppa16:13
Riddellgroovy16:13
boulabiarhe is my manager16:13
Riddellboulabiar: you don't know where to start or you have a specific problem?16:13
boulabiarI prepared some stuff here https://code.launchpad.net/~boulabiar/ginn/ginn-packaging16:14
boulabiarI don't know what to do next16:14
Riddellboulabiar: looks fine at a glace, does it build?16:17
boulabiarconfigure && make generate the app, but bzr bd don't16:19
Riddelljr@wido:~/src/ginn/ginn-packaging>./configure16:24
Riddellconfigure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in config-aux "."/config-aux16:24
Riddellboulabiar: doesn't work here16:24
Riddellboulabiar: you've committed various files into bzr that shouldn't be there and some are missing which should16:25
Riddellboulabiar: if I take your debian/ directory and the upstream tar and put them together it builds ok16:26
udienzRiddell: i have done submitting to debian via submittodebian tool16:27
Riddelludienz: great16:28
udienzand thanks16:28
Riddellboulabiar: I recommend taking the upstream tar, renaming to ginn_0.2.3.orig.tar.bz2  putting in your debian/ directory, building (with debuild)  fixing until it all works then uploading to revu16:28
Riddellthen ask me or whoever for a review16:28
udienzRiddell: and thanks for reviewing aspell-id package16:28
boulabiarwill do,16:29
hakermaniaRiddell: All errors fixed except one , thx :)  I cannot understand the error about debian/source/ directory. Debuild errors forced me to place at include-binaries file some sound and executable files' paths. What should I do? orig.tar.gz is created after running 'dh_make -c gpl -s -f ../wallch-1.0.tar.gz', where wallch-1.0.tar.gz is the tarball. So, do I have to include the debian/source/ directory in my source directory before the first compressing?16:31
udienzhakermania: try without -f16:32
udienzdh_make -c gpl -s16:32
hakermaniaudienz: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8760 As you see on the last comment, there is a problem in /source/include-binaries Will this solve this error or what?16:34
RiddellI'd make the .orig.tar.gz by moving the debian/ directory out of the way then running  tar zcf wallch_1.0.orig.tar.gz wallch-1.016:36
udienzhakermania: do you have own branch for this package?16:38
hakermaniaRiddell: i think I'm missing something! The steps I follow are: have the source (including the working makefile, project file, README, COPYING etc etc but NOT the debian/ dir). Then, I compress this source-dir to tar.gz and then I run 'dh_make -c gpl -s -f ../wallch-1.0.tar.gz' .Once the debian/ directory is created I edit the changelog, rules, control files etc. And then run debuild.16:39
hakermaniaudienz: No, it is a simple package from a simple kid. Nothing less nothing more. Democracy :)16:39
Riddellhakermania: some of the files are missing from the .orig.tar.gz so you should make it again16:42
hakermaniaRiddell: Which files specifically?16:42
Riddellthe data/ directory16:43
Riddellwhich is why you have had to add it to debian/source/include-binaries16:43
hakermaniaRiddell: Oh!16:43
udienzhakermania: well, debian/dirs is maybe become usr/bin/16:44
udienznot /usr/bin/16:44
hakermaniaI will be back in 1 hour 20 minutes. English lesson --_--' Btw I'll try out what you suggested16:44
hakermaniaudienz: Ok16:44
udienzRiddell: if you are not busy, can you review my merge at bug 67799816:47
ubottuLaunchpad bug 677998 in Ubuntu Documentation "openldap-server instructions have a small bug" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/67799816:47
udienzkirkland already approved this merging16:47
Riddelludienz: looking16:49
Riddelludienz: done16:59
udienzRiddell: thanks!16:59
* udienz looking for other bugs17:01
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
joaopintohello17:53
joaopintodpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libenet.so.1 needed by debian/assaultcube/usr/lib/games/assaultcube/ac_server (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '').17:53
joaopintoNote: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file.17:53
joaopintoTo help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.17:53
joaopintousing dh7, how do I tell dpkg-shlibdeps that the required .so is also provided by the package ?17:54
udienzhello, i have question again. if upstream package from debian is outdate and i have uploaded to mentors.debian.net and since this minutes a package has not been uploaded can i submit to ubuntu?18:08
micahgudienz: unless it's urgent, give it a few days on mentors18:17
udienzmicahg: thanks, my packages has been submitting to debian-mentors since 6th Dec18:22
kklimondaudienz: it's just as hard to get something into ubuntu as it is to get it into debian. Maybe even harder ;)18:24
hakermaniaRiddell: my orig.tar.gz is not missing the data/ folder!18:29
ScottKkklimonda: It looks like one of your rebuilds misbuilt on powerpc as python-visual still pulls in the older gtkmm-2.4-dev.  I'm trying to figure out which one ...18:45
mhall119if I have a new upstream verion of a package already accepted into the archives, do I still submit it to revu?18:47
ScottKNo18:52
ScottKFile a bug against the package in LP.  Attach the new diff.gz or diff.tar.gz to the bug and subscribe sponsors18:52
mhall119file a bug for getting the new version?18:54
mhall119or for the fixes in it?18:54
mhall119hmmm, the needs-packaging bug is still open, so maybe its not in the archives yet18:55
ScottKmhall119: Those have to be closed by hand, so possibly someone forgot too.18:58
mhall119ok18:58
ScottKA bug for getting the new version.18:58
udienzHello all, if you have more time please review my proposal at bug 54936519:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 549365 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "Terminals have a translucent background" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54936519:01
ebroderudienz: Someone from the design team needs to review that change. It's not an issue of technical review19:02
udienzebroder: which team? do you mean ubuntu-artwork?19:03
ebroderudienz: It looks like vish already pinged the appropriate people. Have some patience, please19:05
udienzebroder: okay i'll waiting19:06
vishudienz: you can directly ping Cimi either on #ubuntu-desktop or on #ayatana19:07
ScottKkklimonda: I think I found it.19:08
udienzvish: well done, i have asked to Cimi. thanks!19:11
vishnp..19:11
kklimondaScottK: right, as I was afraid gtkglextmm for powerpc is still in queue19:19
hakermaniaRiddell: Package updated. All errors mentioned corrected. If you have time please have a check :)19:20
kklimondaScottK: (the libatkmm-1.6.la reference comes from the gtkglextmm, and not from gtkmm/atkmm as one would suspect :))19:21
ScottKkklimonda: It failed so I just retried it.19:22
kklimondaScottK: ah, you are right - I did mention it to doko the other day19:24
ScottKkklimonda: Get your MOTU application done.  If you were MOTU now you could've retried it yourself...19:25
hakermaniaAny motu here that can have a check in my upload :) ?19:26
udienzRiddell: following bug 63189, aspell-id has been uploaded. but i can't see this package at natty19:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 63189 in aspell (Debian) "[needs-packaging] No aspell-id (indonesian) in Ubuntu" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/6318919:30
micahgudienz: I asked that the package be removed form the queue since you said you were going through Debian19:31
micahgand you made changes after upload19:31
micahgin addition the version was incorrectr19:32
udienzmicahg: hm.. how to solving it? seems like aspell-id at debian mentors is ignored by dd19:33
udienz*DD19:33
=== hanska is now known as dapal
micahgudienz: you just started over there, also, I thought there was someone who commented in the wnpp bug in Debian19:34
micahgudienz: there's an unanswered comment in the wnpp bug19:34
micahgcyphermox: BTW, I didn't forget about ofono, I just didn't see an update to do anything with19:36
* micahg made a mistake about aspell-id, still sitting in NEW19:48
micahgudienz: my apologies, I didn't know Riddell reuploaded it, it's currently sitting in NEW and will probably be processed next week19:49
udienzmicahg: sorry i have dicconnect19:49
udienzmicahg: okey no problem..19:50
hakermaniaAny motu that can review my package: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch ? thx19:51
udienzmicahg: i put this package in ubuntu because this package is very important in Indonesia. when i see aspell-id at mentors is slow i'm very sad... anyway thanks for your help19:53
micahgudienz: you need to respond on the wnpp bug, there's an unanswered comment19:53
udienzmicahg: oke, and answered now19:56
ari-tczewmicahg: how about libjdic-java? is it on todo list? ;)20:08
micahgari-tczew: yes :)20:08
ari-tczewmicahg: if you will fix this FTBFS, you're my lord20:09
micahgari-tczew: I'll probably look at it at the end of the month when I have some time off20:09
ari-tczewaha20:10
=== Elk is now known as vorian
hakermaniaIs any MOTU here?21:24
Rhondahakermania: Simply ask your question and you shall be answered if someone knows an answer. :)21:25
hakermaniaRhinda: Thx, I just wanted to ask if someone has time to take alook to my upload :O21:26
Rhondaif you are patient, sure someone will be able to answer. Just ask and wait. :)21:26
ari-tczewhakermania: what's the problem?21:38
hakermaniaari-tczew: There's no problem :)21:43
kim0I just fixed bug 687977 .. If anyone is interested to pick it up22:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 687977 in ibmasm-utils (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'ibmasm-utils' (3.0-1ubuntu10) failed to build on natty" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68797722:01
hakermaniaOK, if any MOTU or reviewer has time please have a look at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch Thx in advance. Have a nice night.22:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!