=== Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech
=== apachelogger is now known as urllogger
=== urllogger is now known as apachelogger
=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu
=== vorian is now known as Elk
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
[07:45] <dholbach> good morning!
=== warp11 is now known as warp10
=== hrw|gone is now known as hrw
[09:50] <cdbs> tumbleweed: :o Thanks for the guidance, I will take care of it from the next time onwards, when I will work on python packages
[09:52] <tumbleweed> cdbs: no problem, your changes weren't actually harmful, just non-optimal :)
[09:52] <cdbs> tumbleweed: yeah :) Its nice to see uploads tricling into your system when using a development release
[09:52] <cdbs> *trickling
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
=== bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs
[10:22] <udienz> cdbs: thanks for reviewing my merge. i'll try to fix it
[10:24] <cdbs> good
[10:27] <udienz> cdbs: already fix
[10:28] <cdbs> done? /me looks again
[10:28] <cdbs> udienz: I would highly recommend you to forward that diff to Debian
[10:28] <udienz> done :) sukron
[10:29] <udienz> cdbs: forwarding with submittodebian tool?
[10:31] <cdbs> udienz: If you forwarded manually, its fine
[10:37] <udienz> cdbs: ok, i'll submitting to debian now
[10:42] <udienz> cdbs: done submitting to debian
[10:42] <cdbs> udienz: BTW, is signalled already in the list?
[10:43] <udienz> cdbs: yes, signalled. but not signaled
[10:43] <cdbs> udienz: oh, then it looks good from my end, except:
[10:45] <cdbs> in debian/changelog its mentioned that you '+ give Ubuntu MOTU to maintainer' and 'Give Brian Nelson to XSBC-Original-Maintainer'
[10:45] <cdbs> There's no need to mention that in two lines, remove those and add instead:
[10:45] <cdbs> + Set Maintainer: field according to DebianMaintainerField spec.
[10:46] <cdbs> '+ error to download upstream tarball' should become '+ Correct URL to fix downloading of upstream tarball'
[10:46] <cdbs> udienz: ^
[10:47] <cdbs> '+ per Debian Policy, put version number to 3.9.1 ' should become '+ Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1'
[10:47] <cdbs> then it would be fine
[10:48] <udienz> cdbs: done, can i push it again?
[10:48] <cdbs> udienz: yes, please :)
[10:50] <udienz> Pushed up to revision 13.
[10:50] <udienz> cdbs: done pushed
[10:52]  * cdbs looks again
[10:54] <cdbs> udienz: approved
[10:54] <udienz> thanks Bilal
[10:55] <cdbs> udienz: request another review on the ubuntu-sponsors team, since I can't upload to main
[10:56] <udienz> cdbs: sorry, who can send my request?
[10:56] <cdbs> udienz: Click the 'Request another review' link there on that page and then enter ubuntu-sponsors
[10:57] <udienz> cdbs: okay, done. Ubuntu Sponsors Team has been added
[10:57] <cdbs> udienz: good, and thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu!
[10:58] <udienz> cdbs: :D thanks for reviewing. i hope i can help Ubuntu again
[11:00] <udienz> btw, i have another proposed merge
[11:00] <udienz> https://code.launchpad.net/~udienz/ubuntu/maverick/light-themes/light-themes.fix549365/+merge/42840
[11:00] <udienz> https://code.launchpad.net/~udienz/ubuntu-docs/natty-ubuntu-docs.fix677998/+merge/42857
[11:00] <udienz> and i need review from ubuntu-sponsors
[11:21] <evaluate> hello
[11:21] <evaluate> does anyone have a link to the sf logos?
[11:22] <evaluate> I've been searching for them for 15 minutes and can't find the link anywhere...
[11:50] <zul>  /msg Daviey funny i dont remember us saying we should do cobbler
[11:50] <Daviey> zul: funny, how /msg with a space infront fails aswell :)
[11:51] <zul> frig
[12:05] <kim0> I think I've fixed 687968 (Bacula FTBFS). I've proposed for merge (my first time ever) would someone like to pick it up :)
[12:06] <c2tarun> bug 687968
[12:06] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 687968 in bacula (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'bacula' (5.0.2-2ubuntu1) failed to build on natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687968
[12:07] <c2tarun> kim0: i think you should tell this in #ubuntu-bugs someone from review team will check it.
[12:08] <kim0> okie
[12:34] <vish> c2tarun: kim0 is right, this is a better place or #ubuntu-devel (but not in -bugs)
[12:35] <c2tarun> vish: sorry i mostly saw u in bugs and u said that u are in review team, so i suggested him :x
[12:36] <c2tarun> :|
[12:36] <vish> c2tarun: np.. :)
[12:37] <c2tarun> if i find some application on net and it is good but not in ubuntu repositories, who should i ask for its addition into repositories
[12:38] <vish> c2tarun: you need to file a needs packaging bug
[12:38] <c2tarun> vish: ok...
[12:40] <vish> c2tarun: check if one already exists : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=needs-packaging
[12:41] <c2tarun> vish: sure
=== emma is now known as em
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[13:29] <hakermania> Hello everybody.
[13:29] <udienz> Riddell: thanks for your comment at Revu
[13:31] <hakermania> udienz: what's your upload's name ?
[13:32] <udienz> hakermania: udienz
[13:33] <udienz> hakermania: are you MOTU?
[13:33] <hakermania> wish to be :P
[13:33] <hakermania> no
[13:33] <hakermania> I have uploaded wallch in REVU, that's why I asked.
[13:34] <hakermania> xD
[13:34] <udienz> hakermania: hm.. same like me, i;m interest at Ubuntu-MOTU
[13:34] <udienz> ah.. i forget now.. you have problems uploading to revu
[13:35] <hakermania> udienz: I solved them :)
[13:36] <udienz> hakermania: so, how to solved it?
[13:37] <hakermania> udienz: At first I used 'dput revu *changes' but next you have to use 'dput -f revu *changes' (If this was my problem :P). Btw I can't find your upload :/
[13:38] <udienz> hakermania: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8733
[13:39] <hakermania> udienz: There are some Warnings/Notices as I can see... Do you want help to solve them?
[13:40] <udienz> yes why not
[13:41] <udienz> hakermania: this is your package? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch
[13:41] <hakermania> yep
[13:43] <hakermania> if you want you can see my debian/control file to fix yours. It is at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/wallch-1012091930/wallch-1.0/debian/control
[13:43] <udienz> hakermania: ok, but ubuntu-devel-discuss is for main
[13:44] <udienz> why you don't use Ubuntu MOTU?
[13:45] <cdbs> udienz: ubuntu-devel-discuss is for both nowadays
[13:45] <cdbs> that was the old rule
[13:45] <cdbs> that devel-discuss would be for main and motu for universe
[13:45] <cdbs> but now onwards, all packages are using ubuntu-devel-discuss
[13:46] <hakermania> Ok, I don;t think that it's a big deal.
[13:46] <udienz> cdbs: owh.. thanks
[13:46] <hakermania> You must change the Maintainer field with Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
[13:46] <udienz> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField
[13:48] <hakermania> exactly:Otherwise, the Maintainer field will be set to Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> If the Maintainer field is modified, the old value will be saved in a field named XSBC-Original-Maintainer
[13:48] <G__81> whats the channel for unity ?
[13:48] <udienz> hakermania: well my last upload has unsuccessfull
[13:49] <hakermania> udienz: Ok, now change the maintainer to ubuntu-devel bla bla and make a new field named XSBC-Original-Maintainer: with your real name and eail address
[13:49] <hakermania> email*
[13:49] <udienz> hakermania: okay
[13:51] <udienz> hakermania: do you know mailing list to discussing packaging? maybe like debian-mentors
[13:51] <hakermania> No, I don't/
[13:52] <udienz> hakermania: do you have sponsors or mentors?
[13:52] <hakermania> No, omg I'm 16 --_--
[13:52] <udienz> hm.. i dont have mentors now, maybe we can try it :D
[13:53] <udienz> hm.. no problem, if you know cdbs or bilal Akhtar, he is 16 too
[13:54] <hakermania> udienz: No, I don't,  Ok, now change debian/changelog from unstable to natty
[13:56] <udienz> hakermania: hm.. but my package has been uploaded now
[13:57] <hakermania> Uploaded and accepted?
[13:57] <udienz> hakermania: yup, sponsored by Riddell
[13:58] <hakermania> When why did you accepted the invitation for help? :P
[13:59] <udienz> :) i open for all help
[14:02] <udienz> hakermania: i got error when checking your packages
[14:02] <udienz> wallch source: source-contains-prebuilt-binary wallch
[14:04] <hakermania> udienz: it's true that I have a little problem with the binary... But I'll solve it... Or you can help me solve it. !
[14:05] <udienz> try to remove .pc/ directory at source
[14:09] <hakermania> udienz:did this worked for you?
[14:10] <Riddell> kim0: about https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/ubuntu/natty/bacula/ftbfs-fix/+merge/43327 shouldn't that be a patch?
[14:10] <\sh> guys, anyone how knows ruby a bit more then I do? is it possible to pass a ruby variable to %x{}?
[14:11] <Riddell> apachelogger knows ruby, but is more into java these days
[14:12] <hakermania> \sh:
[14:12] <hakermania> \sh: #ubuntu-motu not for these issues :)
[14:13] <ari-tczew> hakermania: \sh asked here because guess that maybe someone from here could help
[14:13] <ari-tczew> vish: what's for sponsor in bug 15495 ?
[14:13] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 15495 in One Hundred Paper Cuts ""Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an "archive" is" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/15495
[14:13] <\sh> hakermania: well, actually it's ubuntu related, as we are pushing puppet to the cloud world ;)
[14:14] <udienz> hakermania: it works well
[14:14] <udienz> ari-tczew, \sh: agreed
[14:15] <vish> ari-tczew: the patch there "update with the suggested changes" , i'm assuming it has the changes.. i havent test it though..
[14:15] <ari-tczew> vish: and this is not adjusted for ubuntu (debdiff)
[14:15] <hakermania> udienz: Well, there is something unsolved days now... (W: wallch: desktop-command-not-in-package) But it is quite mad. If you check my wallch-1.0.pro file you'll realise that I rename the executable and then place it to /usr/bin/ like the manpages and everything else. I cannot understand why the executable isn't placed where it should. Go private if you want
[14:15] <vish> ari-tczew: oh!
[14:16] <ari-tczew> I don't like when someone has subscribed sponsors when there is only a patch (and not tested!)
[14:16] <vish> ari-tczew: bah! i assumed it was a debdiff! sorry.
[14:16] <ari-tczew> !debdiff | vish
[14:16] <ubottu> vish: A simple way to patch Debian/Ubuntu packages is to attach a debdiff to a bug report, or send it to the team which handles the package. Learn more about it from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Howtos/Debdiff
[14:16] <vish> ari-tczew: i know what a debdiff is.. :)
[14:16] <vish> ari-tczew: just assumed this was one too.. ;)
[14:17] <ari-tczew> vish: I sent a link to you to show how debdiff looks
[14:17] <vish> ari-tczew: i should have read the patch :/
[14:17] <ari-tczew> vish: yes
[14:18]  * vish was doing it at 4am.. but not an excuse..
[14:18] <ari-tczew> vish: please remember that we're working on clean up SQ and these activites wasting our time
[14:18] <ari-tczew> (blind subscribing)
[14:18] <vish> ari-tczew: will do..
[14:18] <ari-tczew> even Canonical pays for it
[14:20] <udienz> !debian/dirs| hakermania
[14:21] <hakermania> udienz: ?
[14:21] <udienz> try to estting debian/dirs
[14:21] <udienz> *set
[14:21] <ari-tczew> udienz: maybe send direct link from wiki.u.c will help :)
[14:22] <udienz> wait... /me searching at wiki
[14:23] <hakermania> udienz: my .pro file places fine the other files. 'make install' works just fine, debhelper knows how to install Qt pro files. So, I cannot understand why 'make install' works fine and why debuilding the project doesn't place the bin file in /usr/bin/ (although it does rename it(!))
[14:24] <udienz> hakermania: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-sourcepkg.html#sC.2.3
[14:25] <hakermania> udienz: So, create debian/tmp and place there all the files? (manpage, changelog executables) ?
[14:26] <hakermania> udienz: and consider debian/tmp as being /
[14:26] <hakermania> ?
[14:27] <kim0> Riddell: Hi regarding https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/ubuntu/natty/bacula/ftbfs-fix/+merge/43327 .. You say shouldn't that be a patch
[14:27] <kim0> Riddell: I'm quite a newbie about packaging .. any hints as to what I should do
[14:27] <udienz> hakermania: no..  use debian/dirs
[14:28] <udienz> hakermania: do you want wallch ro /usr/bin/wallch?
[14:29] <hakermania> udienz: Yes, and my .pro file normally does this!
[14:29] <udienz> hakermania: just create debain/dirs
[14:29] <udienz> *debian
[14:30] <hakermania> udienz: I cannot understand. Create a folder named 'dirs' in debian/ will solve my problem?
[14:31] <udienz> hakermania: no not folder, but file
[14:31] <hakermania> udienz: Oh, and what should it contain?
[14:31] <udienz> i test your package, i can't build it via pbuilder
[14:31] <udienz> usr/bin
[14:31] <hakermania> Ok, w8
[14:32] <udienz> hakermania: btw, i got  "Can't exec "qmake": No such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 179" during building
[14:33] <hakermania> qtcreator is needed for building :)
[14:33] <udienz> maybe you missing qmake at debian/control
[14:33] <hakermania> qtcreator includes qmake :)
[14:33] <udienz> owh i mean qt4-qmake
[14:34] <hakermania> I think this is included in qtcreator as well!
[14:38] <udienz> hakermania: well i successfully build your package, but i add some depends
[14:39] <hakermania> udienz: which?
[14:39] <udienz> hakermania: http://paste.ubuntu.com/541889/
[14:40] <hakermania> Aren't qt4-qmake, libqt4-dev included in qtcreator?
[14:41] <udienz> hakermania, i don't know
[14:41] <hakermania> udienz: I do :)
[14:41] <udienz> hakermania: http://paste.ubuntu.com/541891/
[14:50] <hakermania> udienz: After making the 'dirs' file,  /usr/bin/ directory is created but nothing is placed there! So I got lintian error package-contains-empty-directory usr/bin/
[14:50] <hakermania> :/
[14:54] <Riddell> kim0: take the diff and put it into debian/patches
[14:55] <Riddell> kim0: although that has a messy debian/rules, I can't see how the patches get applied
[14:55] <kim0> Riddell: Just commented "Bacula does not use a proper patch system. In the diff.gz file there's a lot of direct patching of the source anyway"
[14:56] <Riddell> messy messy
[14:57] <Riddell> kim0: ok thanks, I'll commit and upload
[14:57] <kim0> Riddell: cool .. indeed it's a messy pkg
[15:16] <hakermania> udienz: Check the new upload: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8760
[15:16] <hakermania> Does it work?
[15:31] <kim0> Riddell: not to be pushy :) but you didn't push my bacula patch yet .. It's my first fix, so I'm over excited hehe
[15:34] <Riddell> kim0: I'm onto it
[15:34] <kim0> thnx
[15:35] <hakermania> kim0: what's the bacula patch?
[15:35] <hakermania> :)
[15:36] <kim0> hakermania: just a small fix to bacula FTBFS on natty
[15:36] <hakermania> kim0: Is Riddel a MOTU working on your fix?
[15:39] <Riddell> kim0: committed and uploaded!
[15:39] <kim0> Riddell: Yipee thanks man
[15:39] <Riddell> hakermania: I'm an ubuntu dev reviewing his fix
[15:39] <hakermania> Riddell: Are you responsible for revu's uploads as well?
[15:40] <Riddell> hakermania: I can do reviews if wanted
[15:41] <hakermania> Riddell: So, if I want I can tell you please go and review my project? :)
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
[15:41] <kim0> Riddell: shouldn't that merge auto-close this bug 687968 (which I link to the branch)
[15:41] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 687968 in bacula (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'bacula' (5.0.2-2ubuntu1) failed to build on natty" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687968
[15:42] <Riddell> kim0: looks like it's closed
[15:42] <Riddell> hakermania: if you want yes
[15:42] <kim0> ah .. wasn't a moment ago :)
[15:43] <hakermania> RIddell: Oh, this was quite an unexpected answer for me :) My upload is named 'wallch'. Can you have a look on it, please :)
[15:43] <hakermania> ?
[15:44] <boulabiar> hi
[15:45] <boulabiar> can I find here some help for packaging ?
[15:45] <hakermania> boulabiar: #ubuntu-packaging
[15:54] <udienz> hi all, can anyone review bug 687483
[15:54] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 687483 in aspell-en (Ubuntu) "debian/watch is incorrect, some words missing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687483
[15:56] <udienz> thanks before
[16:02] <hakermania> Riddell: ?
[16:04] <Riddell> hakermania: comments added to revu
[16:09] <hakermania> Riddell: Thanx! I'll try to fix the errors the sooner.
[16:10] <Riddell> udienz: committed, I'll upload
[16:10] <Riddell> udienz: please file a bug with debian with your patch
[16:11] <Riddell> boulabiar: did you get the help you needed?
[16:11] <boulabiar> no
[16:11] <boulabiar> no one answered me there
[16:11] <Riddell> boulabiar: what do you need to know?
[16:11] <boulabiar> I want to package this https://launchpad.net/ginn
[16:12] <Riddell> boulabiar: have you asked Duncan McGreggor if it's ready to package?
[16:13] <boulabiar> he asked me to package it
[16:13] <boulabiar> to the utouch ppa
[16:13] <Riddell> groovy
[16:13] <boulabiar> he is my manager
[16:13] <Riddell> boulabiar: you don't know where to start or you have a specific problem?
[16:14] <boulabiar> I prepared some stuff here https://code.launchpad.net/~boulabiar/ginn/ginn-packaging
[16:14] <boulabiar> I don't know what to do next
[16:17] <Riddell> boulabiar: looks fine at a glace, does it build?
[16:19] <boulabiar> configure && make generate the app, but bzr bd don't
[16:24] <Riddell> jr@wido:~/src/ginn/ginn-packaging>./configure
[16:24] <Riddell> configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in config-aux "."/config-aux
[16:24] <Riddell> boulabiar: doesn't work here
[16:25] <Riddell> boulabiar: you've committed various files into bzr that shouldn't be there and some are missing which should
[16:26] <Riddell> boulabiar: if I take your debian/ directory and the upstream tar and put them together it builds ok
[16:27] <udienz> Riddell: i have done submitting to debian via submittodebian tool
[16:28] <Riddell> udienz: great
[16:28] <udienz> and thanks
[16:28] <Riddell> boulabiar: I recommend taking the upstream tar, renaming to ginn_0.2.3.orig.tar.bz2  putting in your debian/ directory, building (with debuild)  fixing until it all works then uploading to revu
[16:28] <Riddell> then ask me or whoever for a review
[16:28] <udienz> Riddell: and thanks for reviewing aspell-id package
[16:29] <boulabiar> will do,
[16:31] <hakermania> Riddell: All errors fixed except one , thx :)  I cannot understand the error about debian/source/ directory. Debuild errors forced me to place at include-binaries file some sound and executable files' paths. What should I do? orig.tar.gz is created after running 'dh_make -c gpl -s -f ../wallch-1.0.tar.gz', where wallch-1.0.tar.gz is the tarball. So, do I have to include the debian/source/ directory in my source directory before the first compressing?
[16:32] <udienz> hakermania: try without -f
[16:32] <udienz> dh_make -c gpl -s
[16:34] <hakermania> udienz: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8760 As you see on the last comment, there is a problem in /source/include-binaries Will this solve this error or what?
[16:36] <Riddell> I'd make the .orig.tar.gz by moving the debian/ directory out of the way then running  tar zcf wallch_1.0.orig.tar.gz wallch-1.0
[16:38] <udienz> hakermania: do you have own branch for this package?
[16:39] <hakermania> Riddell: i think I'm missing something! The steps I follow are: have the source (including the working makefile, project file, README, COPYING etc etc but NOT the debian/ dir). Then, I compress this source-dir to tar.gz and then I run 'dh_make -c gpl -s -f ../wallch-1.0.tar.gz' .Once the debian/ directory is created I edit the changelog, rules, control files etc. And then run debuild.
[16:39] <hakermania> udienz: No, it is a simple package from a simple kid. Nothing less nothing more. Democracy :)
[16:42] <Riddell> hakermania: some of the files are missing from the .orig.tar.gz so you should make it again
[16:42] <hakermania> Riddell: Which files specifically?
[16:43] <Riddell> the data/ directory
[16:43] <Riddell> which is why you have had to add it to debian/source/include-binaries
[16:43] <hakermania> Riddell: Oh!
[16:44] <udienz> hakermania: well, debian/dirs is maybe become usr/bin/
[16:44] <udienz> not /usr/bin/
[16:44] <hakermania> I will be back in 1 hour 20 minutes. English lesson --_--' Btw I'll try out what you suggested
[16:44] <hakermania> udienz: Ok
[16:47] <udienz> Riddell: if you are not busy, can you review my merge at bug 677998
[16:47] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 677998 in Ubuntu Documentation "openldap-server instructions have a small bug" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/677998
[16:47] <udienz> kirkland already approved this merging
[16:49] <Riddell> udienz: looking
[16:59] <Riddell> udienz: done
[16:59] <udienz> Riddell: thanks!
[17:01]  * udienz looking for other bugs
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
[17:53] <joaopinto> hello
[17:53] <joaopinto> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libenet.so.1 needed by debian/assaultcube/usr/lib/games/assaultcube/ac_server (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '').
[17:53] <joaopinto> Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file.
[17:53] <joaopinto> To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
[17:54] <joaopinto> using dh7, how do I tell dpkg-shlibdeps that the required .so is also provided by the package ?
[18:08] <udienz> hello, i have question again. if upstream package from debian is outdate and i have uploaded to mentors.debian.net and since this minutes a package has not been uploaded can i submit to ubuntu?
[18:17] <micahg> udienz: unless it's urgent, give it a few days on mentors
[18:22] <udienz> micahg: thanks, my packages has been submitting to debian-mentors since 6th Dec
[18:24] <kklimonda> udienz: it's just as hard to get something into ubuntu as it is to get it into debian. Maybe even harder ;)
[18:29] <hakermania> Riddell: my orig.tar.gz is not missing the data/ folder!
[18:45] <ScottK> kklimonda: It looks like one of your rebuilds misbuilt on powerpc as python-visual still pulls in the older gtkmm-2.4-dev.  I'm trying to figure out which one ...
[18:47] <mhall119> if I have a new upstream verion of a package already accepted into the archives, do I still submit it to revu?
[18:52] <ScottK> No
[18:52] <ScottK> File a bug against the package in LP.  Attach the new diff.gz or diff.tar.gz to the bug and subscribe sponsors
[18:54] <mhall119> file a bug for getting the new version?
[18:54] <mhall119> or for the fixes in it?
[18:55] <mhall119> hmmm, the needs-packaging bug is still open, so maybe its not in the archives yet
[18:58] <ScottK> mhall119: Those have to be closed by hand, so possibly someone forgot too.
[18:58] <mhall119> ok
[18:58] <ScottK> A bug for getting the new version.
[19:01] <udienz> Hello all, if you have more time please review my proposal at bug 549365
[19:01] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 549365 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "Terminals have a translucent background" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/549365
[19:02] <ebroder> udienz: Someone from the design team needs to review that change. It's not an issue of technical review
[19:03] <udienz> ebroder: which team? do you mean ubuntu-artwork?
[19:05] <ebroder> udienz: It looks like vish already pinged the appropriate people. Have some patience, please
[19:06] <udienz> ebroder: okay i'll waiting
[19:07] <vish> udienz: you can directly ping Cimi either on #ubuntu-desktop or on #ayatana
[19:08] <ScottK> kklimonda: I think I found it.
[19:11] <udienz> vish: well done, i have asked to Cimi. thanks!
[19:11] <vish> np..
[19:19] <kklimonda> ScottK: right, as I was afraid gtkglextmm for powerpc is still in queue
[19:20] <hakermania> Riddell: Package updated. All errors mentioned corrected. If you have time please have a check :)
[19:21] <kklimonda> ScottK: (the libatkmm-1.6.la reference comes from the gtkglextmm, and not from gtkmm/atkmm as one would suspect :))
[19:22] <ScottK> kklimonda: It failed so I just retried it.
[19:24] <kklimonda> ScottK: ah, you are right - I did mention it to doko the other day
[19:25] <ScottK> kklimonda: Get your MOTU application done.  If you were MOTU now you could've retried it yourself...
[19:26] <hakermania> Any motu here that can have a check in my upload :) ?
[19:30] <udienz> Riddell: following bug 63189, aspell-id has been uploaded. but i can't see this package at natty
[19:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 63189 in aspell (Debian) "[needs-packaging] No aspell-id (indonesian) in Ubuntu" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/63189
[19:31] <micahg> udienz: I asked that the package be removed form the queue since you said you were going through Debian
[19:31] <micahg> and you made changes after upload
[19:32] <micahg> in addition the version was incorrectr
[19:33] <udienz> micahg: hm.. how to solving it? seems like aspell-id at debian mentors is ignored by dd
[19:33] <udienz> *DD
=== hanska is now known as dapal
[19:34] <micahg> udienz: you just started over there, also, I thought there was someone who commented in the wnpp bug in Debian
[19:34] <micahg> udienz: there's an unanswered comment in the wnpp bug
[19:36] <micahg> cyphermox: BTW, I didn't forget about ofono, I just didn't see an update to do anything with
[19:48]  * micahg made a mistake about aspell-id, still sitting in NEW
[19:49] <micahg> udienz: my apologies, I didn't know Riddell reuploaded it, it's currently sitting in NEW and will probably be processed next week
[19:49] <udienz> micahg: sorry i have dicconnect
[19:50] <udienz> micahg: okey no problem..
[19:51] <hakermania> Any motu that can review my package: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch ? thx
[19:53] <udienz> micahg: i put this package in ubuntu because this package is very important in Indonesia. when i see aspell-id at mentors is slow i'm very sad... anyway thanks for your help
[19:53] <micahg> udienz: you need to respond on the wnpp bug, there's an unanswered comment
[19:56] <udienz> micahg: oke, and answered now
[20:08] <ari-tczew> micahg: how about libjdic-java? is it on todo list? ;)
[20:08] <micahg> ari-tczew: yes :)
[20:09] <ari-tczew> micahg: if you will fix this FTBFS, you're my lord
[20:09] <micahg> ari-tczew: I'll probably look at it at the end of the month when I have some time off
[20:10] <ari-tczew> aha
=== Elk is now known as vorian
[21:24] <hakermania> Is any MOTU here?
[21:25] <Rhonda> hakermania: Simply ask your question and you shall be answered if someone knows an answer. :)
[21:26] <hakermania> Rhinda: Thx, I just wanted to ask if someone has time to take alook to my upload :O
[21:26] <Rhonda> if you are patient, sure someone will be able to answer. Just ask and wait. :)
[21:38] <ari-tczew> hakermania: what's the problem?
[21:43] <hakermania> ari-tczew: There's no problem :)
[22:01] <kim0> I just fixed bug 687977 .. If anyone is interested to pick it up
[22:01] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 687977 in ibmasm-utils (Ubuntu) "[FTBFS] package 'ibmasm-utils' (3.0-1ubuntu10) failed to build on natty" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/687977
[22:51] <hakermania> OK, if any MOTU or reviewer has time please have a look at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch Thx in advance. Have a nice night.