/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/10/#ubuntu-x.txt

=== apachelogger is now known as urllogger
=== urllogger is now known as apachelogger
=== gord|afk is now known as gord
shlomihi01:04
shlomican someone help me configure my netbook01:04
shlomiit seems that the drivers have screwed up01:04
shlomiin pm :)01:04
shlomiplease please01:04
RAOFGenerally the plan would be to debug in the public channel, so more people can help.01:06
shlomiwhat public channel ?01:07
shlomiubuntu-x referred to here , no ?01:08
shlomianyways ill just post the case01:08
RAOFYes, in this channel.01:08
shlomihope someone can throw me a bone01:08
shlomifirst, ive installed ubuntu 9.10 and everything works like a charm01:09
shlomii needed to upgrade for reasons that irrelevant reasons01:09
RAOFOk.01:09
shlomionce i upgraded to 10.4 the problems started01:09
shlomievery couple of minutes the screen corrupts01:10
shlomiwierd lines 01:10
shlomipictures not clear01:10
shlomifont scrambled01:10
shlomiyada yada01:10
shlomiive added launchpad to my repository01:10
shlomitried installing radeonhd01:11
shlomioh sorry01:11
shlomibtw 01:11
RAOFSo, what graphics chip do you have, and what drivers are you using (if there is an option)01:11
shlomi01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS690M [Radeon X1200 Series]01:11
shlomithat i would call is an excellent question :)01:11
shlominow, how to i know what drivers are being loaded01:12
shlomii read the xorg.log.001:12
shlomi[    15.782] (II) LoadModule: "radeon"01:12
shlomi[    15.783] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so01:12
shlomi[    15.783] (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation"01:12
shlomi[    15.783]    compiled for 1.9.0, module version = 6.13.201:12
shlomi[    15.783]    Module class: X.Org Video Driver01:12
shlomi[    15.783]    ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 8.001:12
shlomi[    15.783] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"01:12
shlomi[    15.784] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so01:12
shlomi[    15.784] (II) Module vesa: vendor="X.Org Foundation"01:13
shlomi[    15.784]    compiled for 1.8.99.905, module version = 2.3.001:13
shlomi[    15.784]    Module class: X.Org Video Driver01:13
shlomi[    15.784]    ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 8.001:13
shlomisorry01:13
RAOFshlomi: You want to use a pastebin for that.01:13
shlomihmm01:13
shlomigenious u are :)01:13
shlomisec01:13
shlomiive never used it before01:13
RAOFIn fact, could you pastebin your entire /var/log/Xorg.0.log and dmesg?01:14
shlomihttp://pastebin.com/sW5A7HRH01:14
shlomisec ill add dmesg01:14
shlomiheres the dmesg01:17
shlomihttp://pastebin.com/5KwsAy3K01:17
shlomii think line 677 in the dmesg is the beginning of the drm init01:18
RAOFYeah.  Those logs seem to be pretty inoffensive.  Could you describe the problem a bit more?01:19
shlomi$ glxinfo | grep vendor01:19
shlomiserver glx vendor string: SGI01:19
shlomiclient glx vendor string: Mesa Project and SGI01:19
shlomiOpenGL vendor string: DRI R300 Project01:19
shlomiit's actually really hard01:20
shlomiim in fear it will screw up01:20
shlomifirst, i cant connect my second monitor01:21
shlomiby far it screws up, big time01:21
shlomihang on, what driver is it loading ?01:21
RAOFIt's loading the radeon driver; that's correct.01:21
shlomihow does it know to load that one01:23
shlomiwhere is the settings01:23
shlomi*are01:23
shlomilet's say i wanna load the radeonhd01:23
shlomimaybe that will solve the whole issue01:23
RAOFUnlikely; that driver's been dead for a year and doesn't do 3D.01:25
RAOFIt loads radeon because that's the default for the PCIID of your GPU.01:26
RAOFYou could specify a different driver in xorg.conf if you wanted.01:26
shlomiwould u recommend that01:27
shlomiso that driver i have now is the latest 01:27
shlomi?01:27
RAOFYes.01:27
RAOFYou've got the driver that should work, and you're unlikely to find a better driver.01:27
shlomibtw, i tried turning on the visual effects01:27
shlomihow can i upload a pic 01:27
shlomi(to where ?)01:27
RAOFimageshack?01:27
shlomithanks 01:28
shlomisec01:28
shlomihttp://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6489/screenshotdkp.png01:29
shlomionce i turned the visual effects off the horror stopped :)01:29
shlomiso what r we looking at ?01:29
shlomihow do we fix this ?01:30
RAOFWow, that's really messed up :)01:30
shlomithanks, i take great pride in my creations 01:30
shlomiwhat about mesa01:30
shlomior lets put it this way01:30
shlomiwhat is the difference between 9.10 and 10.401:31
shlomi(although im now with 10.10)01:31
RAOFIf you get that *without* having desktop effects enabled, it's not to do with mesa.01:31
RAOFIf that only occurs when desktop effects are enabled, it may well be mesa.01:31
shlomiwhen desktop effects are off i still get it01:33
shlomiit just fixes itself alot quicker01:33
shlomiu know, ive got to play around with it abit01:33
shlomiclick here, click there01:33
shlomiand it kinda comes back01:33
RAOFI wonder if it has to do with power management.01:34
shlomiinteresting01:34
shlomihow by ?01:34
shlomibtw, ive posted here 01:35
shlomihttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=161452001:35
shlomiwhy would Temüjin say: If you're running the r300g driver from xorg-edgers PPA, report the bug to them.01:35
shlomiwhat's that got to do01:35
shlomi?01:35
shlomiRAOF ?01:38
RAOFThat's saying that if you're using the packages from xorg-edgers (which are snapshots of upstream development) then filing a bug upstream is a good idea.01:39
shlomibut im not right ?01:39
shlomieven though ive added the repositories and updated the packages01:40
RAOFYou are using those packages.01:40
Sarvatthmm01:40
shlomihow do u know ?01:40
shlomiso frustrating01:40
Sarvattshlomi: sudo apt-get install linux-image-2.6.37-8-generic01:40
RAOFBecause you've got xserver-xorg-video-ati version 6.13.2, which isn't in Maverick (but is in xorg-edgers)01:41
shlomiah ok , that means i have to be sharp on the versions01:41
shlomiill keep that in mind01:41
shlomiE: Unable to locate package linux-image-2.6.37-8-generic01:41
shlomiE: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-image-2.6.37-8-generic'01:42
SarvattRS690M is a one of the rarest radeon GPU's and I remember there being problems with the lucid kernel that might not have been fixed01:42
* Sarvatt forgot what the maverick backports kernel was called01:42
shlomibut on karmic (9.10) everything worked like a bell01:43
shlomipitty i don't have logs from then..01:43
Sarvattif you can boot there's obviously been some progress, that GPU was completely non functional with the stock lucid release01:44
shlomik01:44
shlomibut on karmic it worked01:44
shlomiso someone did something %100 right in the past01:44
Sarvattlatitude XT was the only laptop shipping with one of those I think01:44
Sarvatt(they pulled it from the market when AMD bought ATI)01:44
* Sarvatt nods01:44
Sarvattwe switched to KMS in lucid01:44
shlomiim using a Gateway LT31 netbook01:44
shlomi*respect01:45
Sarvattodd, must have codenames mixed up then, whoops!01:45
shlomi??01:45
shlomibetween 9.10 and 10.4 someone played with the drivers01:46
shlomiand ruined my life01:46
shlomi:)01:46
Sarvattdoes linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick exist?01:46
shlomi:|01:47
SarvattI would say disable KMS but can't do that with xorg-edgers :(01:47
shlomioh boy01:48
RAOFSo, given this hint you could try the kernel team PPA backport kernels.01:49
shlomii don't understand 01:49
SarvattI thought they were in lucid-backports now01:49
shlomiwhat are u talking about 01:49
shlomisorry guys01:49
Sarvattupgrading your kernel to fix the bug01:49
shlomiah01:50
RAOFshlomi: You should be able to install the ‘linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick’ kernel; this is in lucid-updates.01:50
shlomiwhen u say lucid-updates u mean the repository01:50
shlomi?01:50
RAOFYes.01:50
shlomibut im maverik01:50
RAOF01:50
shlomiso ide have to define then, correct01:50
RAOFSorry, forgot :)01:50
shlomi?01:50
shlomiare u suggesting that because it worked on 9.1001:51
shlomiwe should downgrade the kernel ?01:51
shlomiscrap that..01:51
RAOFNo, that won't work.01:51
RAOFI'm thinking https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds01:52
RAOFSpecifically, I'd try installing the kernel packages from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.37-rc5-natty/01:53
RAOFWhich is the most recent upstream release, and may have fixes.01:53
shlomiso installing an experimental kernel it is ?01:53
RAOFIt's not a bad plan to experiment with :)01:54
shlomiwhich hopefully somehow is related to misfunctioning of the GPU01:54
shlomiokay01:54
shlomihow do i do thatt ?01:54
shlomisorry :)01:54
* Sarvatt gives up, read "I just installed lucid" in the bug report01:54
* Sarvatt reboots for the 10th time, dang you plymouth!01:55
shlomiso how do i install the kernel ?01:55
shlomidownload it and do dpkg 01:55
shlomijust like that ?01:55
RAOFYup.01:56
RAOFIn fact, you can probably just double-click on the package after you've downloaded it to install.01:56
shlomirespect01:57
shlomibtw how do i do those cool status updates that Servatt does ?01:57
* RAOF wonders whether you mean like this?01:57
shlomii do01:57
shlomijust to make sure01:58
RAOF“/me wonders whether you mean like this?”01:58
shlomii need not the image01:58
RAOFYou need the image; you probably don't need the headers.01:58
* shlomi now knows the truth - 4201:58
shlomiRAOF: download the image and install it ? no need for the headers right ?01:59
shlomii wanted it to be in red01:59
RAOFYup, that's right.02:00
shlomihow do u do the red line ?02:00
RAOFThat's highlighting.  Generally, your client will highlight lines containing your nick.  Eg: shlomi 02:01
shlomishlomi02:02
shlominope didn't highlight it02:02
shlomioh well02:02
shlomiill let you know how it goes02:02
shlomithanks for all the help02:03
shlomii really appreciate it !02:03
RAOFNo problem.02:03
shlomiokay so its installed02:07
shlominow i reboot and what should i expect ?02:07
RAOFWell, ideally you shouldn't notice anything except for that corruption not happening.02:07
shlomi:)02:08
shlomicheers02:08
shlomisee you on the flipside02:08
RAOFIf you need to boot the old kernel for some reason, you can hold down shift during boot.02:08
RAOFTo get the grub menu to come up.02:08
shlomikk02:08
RAOFThat'll let you select previous kernels.02:08
shlomithanks for the tip02:08
shlominever new thstt02:08
shlomiRAOF ?02:12
shlomiu are a true hacker02:12
RAOFYa?02:12
shlomithank you02:12
shlomiamazing02:12
shlomiit never looked better02:12
RAOFThere's still the opportunity for it to break :)02:12
shlomithe other screen works 02:12
shlomihow come ?02:13
RAOFDidn't the corruption happen sporadically?02:13
RAOFOr was that corruption _always_ there?02:13
shlomiit always lurked somewhere therr02:14
RAOFOh, well then.  It's probably fixed then :)02:14
shlomibut when i connected a secondary monitor it flipped02:14
shlominow im watching a movie on the other screen02:15
shlomipretty solid proof02:15
RAOFYeah.  Hurray for people fixing things :)02:15
RAOF02:15
shlomithanks02:16
shlomiin the changelog they mentioned a few things02:16
shlomiabout radeon stuff02:16
shlomii guess somewhere along the line it was fixed02:17
shlomiwierd that it broke somewhere along the line02:18
shlomiokay02:21
shlomiu were right02:21
shlomiits not entirely gone02:21
shlomibtw 02:21
shlomii saw a kernel for maverik02:21
shlomiu recomend i install the natty02:22
shlomiRAOF 02:24
shlomishould i try install v2.6.37-rc2-maverick02:25
shlomikernel ?02:25
RAOFThat's a somewhat older kernel (rc2 rather than rc5), and the natty vs maverick naming isn't really relevant.02:25
shlomiah ok02:27
shlomii thought it's actually a different branch02:27
RAOFNo.  It's the same (slightly older) code, but with the configuration file from maverick rather than natty.  The configuration doesn't change much over time, and generally for the better.02:29
shlomiokay02:33
shlomii guess ill have to live with this02:33
shlomido u recommend i update the kernel everyone in a while ?02:34
RAOFEh; maybe.02:36
shlomiis there anyway i can help debug the problem02:37
RAOFIf you're comfortable doing some debugging I'd suggest filing a bug upstream; then the kernel developers can ask questions, propose patches, etc and it's more likely that the problem will be fixed.02:37
shlomithanks02:37
shlomiwhere do i fill it out ?02:38
RAOFbugs.freedesktop.org, under the ‘DRI’ project, component DRM/Radeon02:40
RAOFIf you need help testing patches, pop back up in here and we can provide testing kernels.02:40
shlomithanks02:40
shlomidamn it really screwed up now02:54
shlomiumph02:54
shlomiat least the second screen woeks02:54
shlomicheers02:54
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
vishSarvatt: hi, i tried the x-x-v-ati from edgers and it doesnt fix the issue, (it seemed fine for 2days though).. there are still X freezes.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/541908/ , http://paste.ubuntu.com/541909/  but this time the bt's look different.. o.0  15:14
vishit happens with smooth-scrolling enabled in FF415:14
* vish tries with smooth-scrolling disabled..15:14
vishthe first one was where i tried to ^C and then do a backtrace, which dint work.. so i had to detach and then attach again to bt.. might be the reason for the difference.15:17
kcimci'm new to ppa installs, i'm following the webupd8 tutorial http://j.mp/eIuog4 are there any other packages besides (nvidia-current nvidia-current-modaliases nvidia-settings) that i should be installing to get 260.19.26 ?16:47
kcimci'm just confused because i also see nvidia-graphics-drivers and the xserver-xorg updates16:49
kcimcif this is just dev and not help let me know if there is a better place to ask16:54
bjsnideryou should be using jockey to get it16:56
kcimci'm in ubuntu, it looks like jockey-gtk is the 'additional drivers' app, but i don't see any options but 'remove'17:02
kcimcmaybe because i already ran the apt-get install17:02
bjsnideropent he hardware drivers manager17:04
kcimci'm there, it's the same thing as running jockey-gtk from the terminal17:04
bjsniderdoes it say nvidia-current is installed and it's the .26 version?17:05
kcimcit says 'nvidia accelerated graphics driver (version current) [recommended]' and doesn't say the version number17:06
kcimcthe nvidia x server settings still says 260.19.06 but i haven't restarted yet17:06
bjsniderdoes it indicate the driver is installed?17:06
kcimcyes, 'activated'17:06
bjsniderok, you should be fine17:06
kcimcok, i'll restart and see if nvidia-settings has the new version number17:07
kcimcyup, it's updated17:08
kcimcso in the future i can just go to jockey-gtk and it will check the ppa?17:08
bjsniderno, it will be updated through update-manager like every other package17:09
bjsniderthe first install and switching between drivers is what jockey is for17:09
kcimcaha, i see... that makes more sense17:10
kcimcand now in update-manager i see the packages i didn't install (xserver-xorg-* etc)17:10
kcimcawesome, thanks for the help bjsnider :)17:10
kcimci'm making an interactive piece for a bunch of screens and the nvidia drivers are kind of important to have up to date http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5129/5248093665_890d121d55_z.jpg17:11
=== Bernardo is now known as Bernardo|Away
=== Bernardo|Away is now known as Bernardo
=== Bernardo is now known as Bernardo|Away

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!