[00:03] * penguin42 wonders how many people still use lilo (and why) [00:05] penguin42: anyway, we should grab changes from Debian for it. [00:05] indeed, I'm just curious [00:07] penguin42: we supply great quality packages even to small number of consignees (: [00:08] indeed [00:24] cjwatson: again MoM is hanging :/ === yofel_ is now known as yofel === sam---___---- is now known as sam-_- === rx007_ is now known as rx007 === freeflyi1g is now known as freeflying === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero [08:44] * maco tries to find examples on the google [08:44] stupid irc client [08:45] stupid irc client === axp2__ is now known as axp2 === ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat-away === yofel_ is now known as yofel === emma is now known as em === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk === ssj6akshat-away is now known as ssj6akshat === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates === sam---___---- is now known as sam-_- [18:15] sam-_-, wow what a nick [18:22] hmm? [18:23] ssj6akshat, hmm? === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk [18:23] sam-_-, i mean it is awesome [18:23] dendro-afk: Thanks for the information! [18:24] ssj6akshat, why? [18:24] ssj6akshat, ironie? [18:24] sam-_-, the -_- part [18:24] ssj6akshat, ok... [18:25] ssj6akshat, steal it then :-) === ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat-_- [18:25] sam-_-, :P [18:26] ssj6akshat, your welcome === ssj6akshat-_- is now known as ssj6akshat === ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat|bed === ssj6akshat|bed is now known as ssj6akshat === ssj6akshat is now known as ssj6akshat|bed === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates === Daviey_ is now known as Daviey === FlannelKing is now known as Flannel [23:22] ebroder: hi [23:23] bdrung: Hey, what's up? [23:23] ebroder: we just commented your merge proposal at the same time. :) [23:24] Ha, so we did [23:24] I'll take care of your stuff while I'm rearranging the interface [23:26] ebroder: and you could wrap at 80 lines [23:27] Sure [23:29] ebroder: the "still" in the question sound weird in my ears. [23:31] I...honestly don't know why I wrote it like that [23:31] the "Something" too [23:31] ebroder: the params " " looks to unflexible to me. [23:32] bdrung: I'm going to switch those to required options [23:32] ebroder: i have a local script that works with one parameter [23:32] ebroder: and please allow specifying a version [23:32] * ebroder needs to start taking notes so I don't forget all of this [23:33] ebroder: and one feature request: allow building the package before uploading (refer to sponsor-patch) [23:34] ebroder: if a version is specified, i use "dget -xu https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/${SRC_DIST}/+source/${PACKAGE}/${VERSION}/+files/${PACKAGE}_${NOEPOCH_VERSION}.dsc" [23:34] bdrung: Hmm...I think that for this script it's actually more desirable to verify the version and bail if it's not current [23:35] ScottK actually asked me to include a version, since we have a bunch of backport requests like "please backport foo (1.2.3)" when 1.2.3 is no longer current and we can't actually process that request [23:36] ebroder: in my use cases pull-lp-source gives me an older version :) [23:36] Ok, how about this: if you specify both a source release and a version, they have to match. If you specify just a source release, use pull-lp-source. If you specify just a version, use your dget invoke [23:37] ebroder: yes [23:39] ebroder: why do you call dch with --preserve? [23:39] Because I don't want it renaming the directory on me [23:39] aha, ok [23:40] ebroder: suggestion: if no source release is specified, use the latest [23:40] That's reasonable. For my first draft I was trying to avoid using any more lplib than I had to [23:42] ebroder: will the logging print something to the terminal? [23:42] Yeah, although I wouldn't mind cleaning that up into something more structured [23:45] ebroder: i will ditch my backport script in favor of you backportpackage script (once it allows test building) === jono is now known as Guest6911