[00:03]  * penguin42 wonders how many people still use lilo (and why)
[00:05] <ari-tczew> penguin42: anyway, we should grab changes from Debian for it.
[00:05] <penguin42> indeed, I'm just curious
[00:07] <ari-tczew> penguin42: we supply great quality packages even to small number of consignees (:
[00:08] <penguin42> indeed
[00:24] <ari-tczew> cjwatson: again MoM is hanging :/
[08:44]  * maco  tries to find examples on the google
[08:44] <maco> stupid irc client
[08:45] <maco> stupid irc client
[18:15] <ssj6akshat> sam-_-, wow what a nick
[18:22] <sam-_-> hmm?
[18:23] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, hmm?
[18:23] <ssj6akshat> sam-_-, i mean it is awesome
[18:23] <ion> dendro-afk: Thanks for the information!
[18:24] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, why?
[18:24] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, ironie?
[18:24] <ssj6akshat> sam-_-, the -_- part
[18:24] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, ok...
[18:25] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, steal it then :-)
[18:25] <ssj6akshat-_-> sam-_-, :P
[18:26] <sam-_-> ssj6akshat, your welcome
[23:22] <bdrung> ebroder: hi
[23:23] <ebroder> bdrung: Hey, what's up?
[23:23] <bdrung> ebroder: we just commented your merge proposal at the same time. :)
[23:24] <ebroder> Ha, so we did
[23:24] <ebroder> I'll take care of your stuff while I'm rearranging the interface
[23:26] <bdrung> ebroder: and you could wrap at 80 lines
[23:27] <ebroder> Sure
[23:29] <bdrung> ebroder: the "still" in the question sound weird in my ears.
[23:31] <ebroder> I...honestly don't know why I wrote it like that
[23:31] <bdrung> the "Something" too
[23:31] <bdrung> ebroder: the params "<source package> <source release> <dest release> <upload target>" looks to unflexible to me.
[23:32] <ebroder> bdrung: I'm going to switch those to required options
[23:32] <bdrung> ebroder: i have a local script that works with one parameter
[23:32] <bdrung> ebroder: and please allow specifying a version
[23:32]  * ebroder needs to start taking notes so I don't forget all of this
[23:33] <bdrung> ebroder: and one feature request: allow building the package before uploading (refer to sponsor-patch)
[23:34] <bdrung> ebroder: if a version is specified, i use "dget -xu https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/${SRC_DIST}/+source/${PACKAGE}/${VERSION}/+files/${PACKAGE}_${NOEPOCH_VERSION}.dsc"
[23:34] <ebroder> bdrung: Hmm...I think that for this script it's actually more desirable to verify the version and bail if it's not current
[23:35] <ebroder> ScottK actually asked me to include a version, since we have a bunch of backport requests like "please backport foo (1.2.3)" when 1.2.3 is no longer current and we can't actually process that request
[23:36] <bdrung> ebroder: in my use cases pull-lp-source gives me an older version :)
[23:36] <ebroder> Ok, how about this: if you specify both a source release and a version, they have to match. If you specify just a source release, use pull-lp-source. If you specify just a version, use your dget invoke
[23:37] <bdrung> ebroder: yes
[23:39] <bdrung> ebroder: why do you call dch with --preserve?
[23:39] <ebroder> Because I don't want it renaming the directory on me
[23:39] <bdrung> aha, ok
[23:40] <bdrung> ebroder: suggestion: if no source release is specified, use the latest
[23:40] <ebroder> That's reasonable. For my first draft I was trying to avoid using any more lplib than I had to
[23:42] <bdrung> ebroder: will the logging print something to the terminal?
[23:42] <ebroder> Yeah, although I wouldn't mind cleaning that up into something more structured
[23:45] <bdrung> ebroder: i will ditch my backport script in favor of you backportpackage script (once it allows test building)