[19:15] <nirazio> Ubuntu provides Official and Community documentation.Why create the two streams? Is the official documentation more trustworthy? Is the criteria to add to it more strict?
[19:16] <nirazio> anyone???
[19:28] <geekosopher> nirazio: yes, community docs can be created by anyone using the wiki,
[19:29] <nirazio> geekosopher: Why official cant be created??
[19:29] <geekosopher> official docs are the online html version of the system documentation that can be edited only by core-doc team
[19:31] <geekosopher> official version is shipped with every cd. it is installed by default within the system and can be accessed off-line using 'help'
[19:31] <Pendulum> anyone, however, can provide patches and submit them to the core doc team for things they think should be added or fixed
[19:32] <geekosopher> yes, and they are all welcome to join 'contributors' team :)
[19:32] <nirazio> geekosopher: What is the difference between Community and Official doc??
[19:34] <geekosopher> nirazio: if you are asking for the difference in content, the official docs are narrower in scope, dealing only with main help topics
[19:35] <geekosopher> whereas in community section, anyone can put a 'how-to' for any ubuntu-related topic under the sun
[19:41] <nirazio> geekosopher: What you mean by main help topics???
[19:43] <geekosopher> general install and config instructions, what is it that you are actually trying to understand?