| ingenthr | hi, I think I'm running into a bug with libgoolge-perftools-dev on Karmic; to see if it's a known issue should I be searching Karmic on launchpad or are universe bugs elsewhere? | 02:48 |
|---|---|---|
| ebroder | ingenthr: All bugs in Ubuntu are tracked on Launchpad | 02:48 |
| ingenthr | ebroder: okay, so searching bugs for Karmic on Launchpad, I've done the right thing if I'm running into the issue there, right? | 02:49 |
| micahg | ingenthr: you're better off searching for bugs in the package than bugs in the series | 02:49 |
| ingenthr | micahg: okay, thanks | 02:51 |
| === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth | ||
| AnAnt | Hello | 06:33 |
| AnAnt | context 2010.07.30-1 has been uploaded to experimental, I think the reason is that they want to leave unstable as a staging place for fixing bugs for testing. Do you think it is alright to sync context (which is currently at version 2009.11.26-2) from experimental ? | 06:35 |
| dholbach | good morning! | 07:37 |
| AnAnt | dholbach: Hello | 07:38 |
| dholbach | hey AnAnt | 07:38 |
| udienz | morning dholbach | 07:45 |
| udienz | afternoon at here | 07:45 |
| dholbach | hey udienz :) | 07:45 |
| udienz | dholbach: is Packaging Guide available for translating in launchpad? | 07:47 |
| dholbach | udienz, no, it'll take a bit until we get there | 07:47 |
| dholbach | I'll send an email out today about reviving the packaging guide | 07:48 |
| udienz | dholbach: okay, i'll try to translating Packaging Guide in wiki | 07:49 |
| dholbach | maybe we can re-use some of the bits from there once we have the packaging guide in LP | 07:50 |
| === Rh0nda_ is now known as Rhonda | ||
| === nenolod_ is now known as nenolod | ||
| udienz | dholbach: i hear moin moin can export to docbook http://moinmo.in/DocBook | 10:33 |
| dholbach | udienz, as far as I know it's not turned on for the ubuntu wiki and I'm not sure how well it deals with includes and everything | 10:34 |
| dholbach | I just started a discussion about the packaging guide on u-devel@ | 10:35 |
| udienz | yup. i read it | 10:35 |
| * udienz ready to help | 10:35 | |
| dholbach | excellent - I'm keen to hear everybody's feedback on it | 10:36 |
| dholbach | I hope folks like ReSt as much as I do - it's a lot of fun to write articles in it: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dholbach/+junk/ubuntu-packaging-guide/files (it's quite simple) | 10:37 |
| udienz | downloading... | 10:38 |
| dholbach | just have a look at the .rst files (and compare the output on http://daniel.holba.ch/temp/guide/) | 10:39 |
| nigelb | dholbach: so sphinx extends ReSt? | 10:40 |
| dholbach | nigelb, how? | 10:40 |
| nigelb | dholbach: I mean, the format for sphinx is ReSt (templating kida)? | 10:41 |
| nigelb | *kinda | 10:41 |
| dholbach | nigelb, how does it extend it? | 10:41 |
| nigelb | dholbach: ah, ugh, I assumed wrongly that Sphinx had its own formating for writing content. Apologies. | 10:42 |
| dholbach | ah ok | 10:42 |
| nigelb | And I even read this page the other day. Sigh. | 10:42 |
| nigelb | dholbach: If 1.1 doesn't make it to archives, can we put in a PPA and still use it? | 10:52 |
| nigelb | err, Sphnix 1.1 that is | 10:52 |
| dholbach | nigelb, it's in a PPA already and the way I see the guide evolving we can easily use 1.0 now and use that for getting the first articles set up, then once we have 1.1 we can add translations | 10:53 |
| dholbach | (and maybe backport, let's see) | 10:54 |
| nigelb | dholbach: ok, that sounds cool then, maybe you should add this bit to the discussion too | 10:58 |
| nigelb | since it almost negates on of the CON points for sphinx | 10:58 |
| dholbach | done, thanks nigelb | 11:04 |
| * nigelb hugs dholbach :) | 11:05 | |
| * dholbach hugs nigelb back | 11:07 | |
| === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| lfaraone | bdmurray: can you renew my membership in ~ubuntu-bugcontrol? | 15:24 |
| bdmurray | lfaraone: done | 15:32 |
| AnAnt | Hello, context 2010.07.30-1 has been uploaded to experimental, I think the reason is that they want to leave unstable as a staging place for fixing bugs | 15:45 |
| AnAnt | for testing. Do you think it is alright to sync context (which is currently at version 2009.11.26-2) from experimental ? | 15:45 |
| Laney | I'd ask the maintainer | 15:46 |
| AnAnt | Laney: debbug 606656 | 15:48 |
| * Laney shrugs | 15:49 | |
| Rhonda | I'd say it's a good candidate for a requestsync from experimental. | 15:51 |
| Rhonda | Though I really really hope that squeeze gets out before the import freeze for natty happens, otherwise natty will be in big troubles. | 15:51 |
| Laney | December 30th? :) | 15:52 |
| AnAnt | Rhonda: what trouble ? | 15:52 |
| Rhonda | AnAnt: Of not having really much difference over maverick? | 15:52 |
| ari-tczew | Rhonda: +1 | 15:52 |
| Rhonda | People are holding back upload to unstable (and in some cases even to experimental) because of the Debian freeze. | 15:53 |
| Rhonda | So if squeeze doesn't get out the door it will affect natty quite deeply, too | 15:53 |
| AnAnt | they hope to release by christmas | 15:53 |
| Rhonda | Usually hope dies last. | 15:54 |
| Laney | I think it already has | 15:54 |
| Laney | I heard talk about January. | 15:54 |
| AnAnt | oh | 15:54 |
| * ari-tczew has sponsored a couple of sync requests from experimental. | 15:55 | |
| highvoltage | at least the amount of rc bugs have come down quite nicely | 15:55 |
| Rhonda | highvoltage: Too little to make it for christmas, though. | 15:55 |
| Laney | It needs a new d-i release, amongst other things | 15:55 |
| Laney | AnAnt: Anyway, if you test the version and see that it works well enough then the sync won't be a problem | 15:56 |
| Rhonda | And the closer the release comes, the more eager some people seem to be to do mass RC bug filing. | 15:56 |
| AnAnt | Laney: I'm not much of a context user, I was hoping a context user would be around | 15:56 |
| Rhonda | I mean, someone came around to file a bunch of RCs against logrotate using packages about an issue that was open since three years now. | 15:56 |
| Laney | that reminds me, I have an RC to deal with (probably downgrade) | 15:58 |
| Rhonda | Me too %-) | 15:59 |
| Laney | life would be easier without users. :) | 16:00 |
| Rhonda | Actually it would be less fun, too | 16:00 |
| Rhonda | Ah, the RC is already demoted :) | 16:00 |
| lfaraone | bdmurray: thx | 16:57 |
| micahg | lfaraone: you're an implicit member in bugcontrol | 17:57 |
| lfaraone | micahg: oh, oops | 18:02 |
| lfaraone | micahg: good point | 18:02 |
| === test__ is now known as anoteng | ||
| stefanoUbuntu20 | hello | 20:23 |
| hajour | hai all i try to find TheMuso` .ore he can help with the ##speechcontrol program | 20:29 |
| micahg | cyphermox: regarding ofono, everything was fine except I noticed one file left under .pc, if you want I can take care of this and sponsor it | 21:00 |
| cyphermox | micahg: if you could just let me know what it was and how you fixed it | 21:02 |
| micahg | cyphermox: I'm just going to remove the .pc dir in bzr, it was probably left over from the source format 3 reversion | 21:03 |
| cyphermox | alright | 21:04 |
| micahg | cyphermox: so, you want me to just fix that an upload? | 21:05 |
| cyphermox | sure | 21:06 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: did you saw 2 maintainers for tor? bug 689188 | 21:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 689188 in tor (Ubuntu Natty) "Unblock Tor auto-syncing from Debian" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689188 | 21:30 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: I did. I think it's been unblocked. | 21:30 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: That's right. Do they need to request PPU? | 21:31 |
| ScottK | First they need to show they are able to maintain the packages. | 21:31 |
| ScottK | They can get sponsored in the meantime. | 21:31 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: That's fine for me. Is tor for universe? | 21:31 |
| ScottK | Yes | 21:32 |
| ari-tczew | OK. | 21:32 |
| tumbleweed | ScottK: can you reject googleearth-package from maverick-proposed, please? | 21:35 |
| ScottK | Sure. | 21:35 |
| tumbleweed | thanks | 21:36 |
| tumbleweed | SpamapS: ^ | 21:36 |
| ScottK | Done | 21:38 |
| ebroder | barry: I don't have my LP creds with me at the moment to actually comment on the branches, but if you're making actual source changes instead of no-change rebuilds, you should change the version numbers on your Python packages to ubuntuN, not buildN | 22:10 |
| ari-tczew | that's right, we use -XbuildY only for non-changes upload (when only debian/changelog has been modified) | 22:13 |
| SpamapS | tumbleweed: thanks to you too. :) | 22:32 |
| tumbleweed | SpamapS: yeah I think you need to use arch: i386 amd64 | 22:36 |
| SpamapS | tumbleweed: oh, if its that easy, yaaay. ;) | 22:38 |
| tumbleweed | well, its the easy answer, don't know if there's a better approach | 22:43 |
| micahg | geser: is there a reason why the xubuntu package set isn't showing up on the ubuntuwire FTBFS page? | 23:24 |
| ari-tczew | who knows, what does mean last column? http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/debcheck/debcheck.py?dist=natty&list=ALL | 23:39 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: looks like a couple columns were added w/out the headers being updated | 23:41 |
| ari-tczew | I don't understand these columns. What's the difference between 1st and 2nd... | 23:42 |
| geser | micahg: does it have any FTBFS? the page only lists those package sets who have at least on FTBFS | 23:42 |
| micahg | geser: yes, several | 23:42 |
| geser | hmm, interesting | 23:46 |
| geser | micahg: for some yet unknown reason the xubuntu package set isn't listed in the packagesets collection | 23:53 |
| micahg | geser: oh, is there anything I can do to fix that? | 23:53 |
| geser | micahg: find out why it's not listed there | 23:54 |
| micahg | geser: where's the list? | 23:54 |
| geser | enter "for ps in lp.packagesets: print ps" into lp-shell. That collection gets used for the FTBFS page. | 23:55 |
| geser | the "xubuntu" package set can be queried with edit-acl.py query -P xubuntu -S natty | 23:56 |
| geser | but it doesn't appear in that collection | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!