/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/13/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

BUGabundoMerry Xtmas everyone <3 http://goo.gl/SzUUv00:38
chrisccoulsonLol00:39
chrisccoulsonb'ah humbug00:40
chrisccoulsonit's not christmas for another 12 days ;)00:40
ftado we have the flash that has h/w acceleration on nvidia? or not yet?01:02
Dimmuxxbeta 10.2 have it01:22
Dimmuxx32bit only though01:23
ftaDimmuxx, i meant, "do we have" as in "does natty have"?01:58
Dimmuxxah01:59
Dimmuxxif https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree is correct then it's still 10.102:00
ftayep :(02:00
Dimmuxxprobably good since noone knows when adobe will release final02:02
Dimmuxxfta: do you know if/when chromium will get vdpau support for <video>?02:03
ftahm, ffmpeg is supposed to support that already02:12
Dimmuxxit does02:13
Dimmuxxhmm, I haven't tried html5 in chromium since I installed my nvidia card so it might already be there02:13
micahgI thought the flash acceleration was only on windows still02:14
Dimmuxxthe old one in 10.1 is windows and osx but the new one in 10.2 is for linux too02:15
micahgah, nicew02:17
Dimmuxxno vdpau in chromium yet though02:17
ftai guess i just need libvdpau-dev in build-deps02:19
ftabut that won't work for hardy..karmic02:19
ftahm02:19
micahgcontrol.in?02:20
Dimmuxxoh so you just need to rebuild it for vdpau?02:20
ftaDimmuxx, ffmpeg has it enabled by default in configure, but without the headers, it's silently disabled02:20
ftamicahg, i'd hate to have to do that02:21
ftamaybe a backport of that lib in the ppas02:21
ftaif it works02:21
Dimmuxxnice, time to build chromium then02:21
ftaDimmuxx, no need, it's in a dedicated package02:21
Dimmuxx?02:22
ftachromium-codecs-ffmpeg.02:22
Dimmuxxah yeah forgot about that02:23
ftathe thing is i can't test on hardy...02:25
ftai should drop that soon anyway02:26
micahgfta: you could backport libvdpau-dev to karmic, but not hardy02:27
ftawhen is karmic eol?02:28
fta!info karmic02:28
micahgsame time as hardy, April 201102:28
ubot2fta: Package karmic does not exist in natty02:28
fta!karmic02:28
ubot2Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) was the eleventh release of Ubuntu. Downloading: http://releases.ubuntu.com/9.10/ - Release Notes: http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/91002:28
ftapff02:28
Dimmuxxhmm, any pointers on how to build it? I downloaded the source package02:35
ftalike any other package02:38
Dimmuxxno autogen.sh or configure or anything in it as far as I can see02:40
DimmuxxIs chromium in pre lucid anyway?02:45
micahgDimmuxx: not in the archive, only is the PPAs02:46
Dimmuxxbut couldn't the ffmpeg package be built with vdpau in the archives then or are they just moved there from the ppas?02:47
ftaeverything is possible, but i don't experiment with the archives builds, i play in PPAs, let it boil there for a while02:50
ftajust had a look at the ppa stats, it looks like a complete garbage02:51
Dimmuxxfta: since you probably already have everything set up, It would be nice if you could build me a amd64 of chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra for maverick so I can test it ;)02:51
ftaDimmuxx, https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/sandbox/+packages03:11
Dimmuxxfta: nice, thanks!03:13
Dimmuxxit uses less cpu at least but still pretty much03:30
ftayou need to use the accelerated hardware of chromium (in case you disabled it)03:35
fta(i did)03:36
DimmuxxI'm on 8 so I had to enable it03:38
Dimmuxxand now the cpu usage looks better03:38
ftafor me, it breaks google maps03:40
Dimmuxxcolors seems wrong03:42
Dimmuxxlike it's 15-240 instead of 0-25503:42
ftawhere?03:42
Dimmuxxhttp://vimeo.com/1604437003:42
micahgchrisccoulson: apparently the seamonkey release tags since 2.0.8 are missing :(04:28
=== micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0b7 in Natty (and Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4) | Seamonkey 2.0.11 in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.13 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1.7 in Lucid-Natty and Stable PPA | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1
dpmhi fta, good morning. I saw this on the launchpad-translators mailing list. I'm not sure if you're subscribed to receive e-mail from there, so I'm mentioning it just in casse you haven't seen it yet:10:19
dpmhttps://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-translators/msg00243.html10:19
fta2dpm, hi, could we allow the es_419 files?11:52
fta2dpm, also, i'm wondering why we have so many "changed" strings.. like thousands already. are the upstream (paid) translations really that bad??11:54
DimmuxxNice, I've got flash vdpau working on my 64bit system. 8-10% cpu usage instead of 90-110%12:11
dpmfta, re: the changed strings, it might be that the upstream translations are indeed not correct. Sometimes they might not follow the terminology for the language, so while not incorrect per se, some things need to be changed to be consistent. In the case of Catalan we're discussing right now what to do, but we've already seen a couple of strings within the translation that use inconsistent terminology.12:46
dpmfta2, ^12:46
dpmfta2, re: es_419, I'm not too sure. In Ubuntu (and most OSS projects) we've got one single Spanish team that takes care of all Spanish translations, regardless of the country variants. For some languages, when the variations are big enough (or the translation community behind it is strong), we do allow _CC variants (e.g. pt_BR), but _419 is not even a country code12:49
dpmfta2, btw, I pinged you on your other nick earlier on this morning. Did you see the question regarding the handling of \n in strings?12:50
fta2dpm, no, i didn't (i'm at work)12:57
fta2but i will, later today12:58
dpmok, no worries, I wasn't sure how you were using the nicks13:01
fta2dpm, fta2 is always from work13:02
fta2that's why i'm not very responsive13:03
dpmok no worries13:03
fta2dpm, https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/translations/+lang/es   notice how the chromium-strings turned green now that it landed upstream13:56
dpmfta2, awesome, let me have a look. Btw, whereabouts are they committed in the trunk tree? I tried to have a quick look when you said the first changes had been landed, but I could not find them13:58
fta2dpm, i had some issue with my exports (lp imports), a 'bzr add' missing in a shell script, but they were in trunk and in the deb when i told you so13:59
fta2i fixed that early this morning14:00
fta2very early14:00
dpmfta2, ok :). Do you know the location in trunk where they are committed?14:00
fta2dpm, sure: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/third_party/launchpad_translations/14:01
dpmfta2, ah, great, that's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!14:01
fta2or http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/chrome/third_party/launchpad_translations/14:03
fta2i hate viewvc14:04
dpmI'm not very fond of it either :)14:05
fta2dpm, if you look closely at http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/translations/trunk/converter-output.html, you'll notice i use third_party/launchpad_translations for new files, and the regular location for improved files14:08
fta2(in the diffstat)14:08
dpmlooking...14:14
eagles0513875hey guys14:18
dpmfta2, btw, the stable Ubuntu packages have got a chromium-browser-l10n additional package, and I noticed the PPA does not have it. I'm guessing in the PPA the translations are being shipped directly in the chromium-browser package, but why this difference?14:19
fta2dpm, the ppa has it too, it's the same packaging everywhere14:19
dpmfta2, ah, then I must have missed it. Sorry for the noise14:20
fta2np14:20
fta2dpm, but the real question is, should it stay a Suggests or become a Recommends or even a Depends14:21
fta2or simply be merged into the main deb like upstream14:21
dpmfta2, yeah, someone asked me on the weekend why his Chromium was in English, and it turned out he hadn't installed the -l10n package14:21
fta2dpm, initially, i did it that way to 1/ make the main deb smaller (as most users don't need those translations) and 2/ to build it only once (arch all)14:23
fta2dpm, but now, the main deb is so big, i'm not sure it still matters14:23
dpmright14:24
fta216M vs 1.2M14:24
dpmoh14:24
fta2+0.5M for inspector14:24
dpmI think it might make sense to put the translations there then, otherwise people get confused when they are missing. I think even keeping it as it is and changing it to Recommends or Depends would be a big improvement, and people who care about the extra 1.2 MB might have the option of unistalling it (depending on how you end up implementing it)14:26
fta2i for one don't auto install Recommends14:27
fta2but i'm probably out of the scope14:27
dpmis it not default now in Ubuntu?14:27
ftadpm, hey, read it. 1/ no, i'm not a subscriber of that list (btw, did my email make sense? ie, not too technical?) 2/ it's expected, upstream has both real \n and \ + n, so to achieve the full bijection, i had to respect that15:41
fta..Reading the other thread now..15:46
dpmfta, the e-mail was great. The link on the error output with the search URL to pinpoint strings with errors is a really nice touch :)15:52
ftadpm, if you can, please remove the "fta2" from your blog entry, also, i'm always in #chromium, which seems more appropriate, name wise16:33
dpmfta, done16:36
ftathx16:36
ftachrisccoulson, hm, bug 68968717:03
ubot2Launchpad bug 689687 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Warnings in desktop file (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68968717:03
chrisccoulsonfta - i wonder if it needs adding to shared-mime-info?17:04
chrisccoulsoni see that too btw17:04
ftadpm, can you please bounce me the email about \n, i can't find a a way to get it from lp, it's not a real mailing list archive17:06
ftachrisccoulson, i'm not sure what i should answer for this bug17:08
chrisccoulsonfta - i commented already17:10
chrisccoulsoni don't know where to reassign it though ;)17:11
chrisccoulsoni guess someone will investigate it at some point, but i don't really have time to atm17:11
ftachrisccoulson, desktop-file-utils maybe?17:12
chrisccoulsonfta - possibly, i'm not sure though17:12
ftachrisccoulson, they will bounce it someplace else if it's not right ;)17:13
BUGabundoo/19:52
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_fewd
micahgchrisccoulson: do you have the release tag for seamonkey in natty locally?21:15
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah ;)21:15
chrisccoulsonjust pushed it though21:15
micahgchrisccoulson: ok, thanks, I'll push the arm fix to natty tonight then21:16
micahgchrisccoulson: so, we discussed dropping gnome-shell from natty in -desktop last week, do you think we should do this now?  It seems that the gnome3 infrastructure will only be in the PPA for natty and then end up in natty+121:17
chrisccoulsonyes, we should drop it, it's in pretty bad shape21:17
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I'll file the bug later and subscribe the -desktop team so they are away?21:18
micahg*aware21:18
chrisccoulsonthanks21:18
=== BUGa_fewd is now known as BUGabundo

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!