[00:10] <thumper> wallyworld: mumble?
[00:10] <wallyworld> thumper: ok
[00:21] <wallyworld> thumper: https://pastebin.canonical.com/40914/
[02:52] <sinzui> wgrant, wallyworld ping
[02:55] <sinzui> wgrant, wallyworld. I suspect the build that just started will fail. A test I landed broke when I merged tip. I landed a branch to reconcile the security change, but it was too late. I will try to stay up to restart the test if needed, but I am sick and do not trust myself.
[03:05] <wallyworld> sinzui: i can have a look for you.
[03:06] <wallyworld> sinzui: if it fails. you can go to bed if you like :-)
[03:06] <sinzui> wallyworld, Since the revision missed the start, I think someone needs to land branch with testfix in it.
[03:07] <sinzui> wallyworld, the branch can have a trivial text change
[03:07] <wallyworld> sinzui: do you have the details you can tell me?
[03:07] <sinzui> wallyworld, I may have my wits when the cold medicine wears off
[03:08] <wallyworld> sinzui: ok. just let me know what you need me to do. i'll look out for any build failure
[03:09] <lifeless> sinzui: if you have a fix already landed
[03:10] <lifeless> sinzui: it will correct itself automaticallly
[03:10] <lifeless> you need to land with [testfix] if the fix is not in the system.
[03:12] <sinzui> lifeless, maybe I should find the trivial fix now and land a branch with [testfix].
[03:32] <lifeless> sinzui: why? it sounds like you've already landed a branch with a fix?
[03:32] <lifeless> ' I landed a branch to reconcile the security change'
[03:33] <sinzui> lifeless, I did not land it with [testfix] because buildbot was not in testfix mode
[03:34] <lifeless> sinzui: why does that matter?
[03:34] <lifeless> sinzui: it *did* land, didn't it?
[03:34] <sinzui> yes it landed
[03:35] <lifeless> then bb will sort itself out
[03:35] <lifeless> landing something with [testfix] now wouldn't stop us going into testfix mode.
[03:36] <sinzui> lifeless, r12060 landed 30 minutes ago
[03:39] <LPCIBot> Project devel build (292): FAILURE in 3 hr 11 min: https://hudson.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/292/
[03:39] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=abentley][ui=none][bug=669249][bug=151290] Remove
[03:39] <LPCIBot> MailingListManager permission. Update the MailingList __repr__.
[03:39] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=EdwinGrubbs][ui=none][bug=645702] restore devel r11685 that was
[03:39] <LPCIBot> lost in db-devel r9875.
[03:39] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=benji][ui=none][no-qa] Update lazr.restful to use the new version
[03:39] <LPCIBot> with faster WADL generation.
[03:39] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=allenap][ui=none][bug=48464,
[03:39] <LPCIBot> 305856] Move incoming mail handlers out of the canonical.launchpad
[03:39] <LPCIBot> tree.
[03:39] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=henninge][ui=none][bug=687676] Allow registry admin to delete
[03:39] <LPCIBot> teams with super teams.
[05:29] <wgrant> What's the cowboy policy these days?
[05:52] <lifeless> wgrant: if its a crisis, do it. + incident report
[06:51] <LPCIBot> Yippie, build fixed!
[06:51] <LPCIBot> Project devel build (293): FIXED in 3 hr 11 min: https://hudson.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/293/
[06:51] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=sinzui][ui=none][no-qa] Added removeSecurityProxy to fix a test
[06:51] <LPCIBot> that will break when another revision is merged.
[06:51] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=thumper][ui=none][bug=671262] Add filtering to built packages
[06:51] <LPCIBot> listing to allow all recent builds or only those within last 30
[06:51] <LPCIBot> days to be selected.
[06:51] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=abentley][ui=none][bug=683115] Fix bug 683115 by treating reported
[06:51] <LPCIBot> Google totals of less than 0 as 0.
[06:51] <LPCIBot> * Launchpad Patch Queue Manager: [r=abentley][ui=none][bug=48464] Treat target domains on incoming
[06:51] <LPCIBot> mail without regard to case.
[06:51] <_mup_> Bug #683115: ValueError raised getting length of batch results <oops> <qa-untestable> <Launchpad Foundations:In Progress by gary> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/683115 >
[07:12] <lifeless> [07:12] <lifeless>     Hard / Soft  Page ID
[07:12] <lifeless>      155 / 5598  Archive:+index
[07:12] <lifeless>       82 /  258  BugTask:+index
[07:12] <lifeless>       28 /  228  Distribution:+bugs
[07:12] <lifeless>       14 /   13  Cve:+index
[07:12] <lifeless>       12 /  117  ProjectGroupSet:CollectionResource:#project_groups
[07:12] <lifeless>        7 /  229  Distribution:+bugtarget-portlet-bugfilters-stats
[07:12] <lifeless>        7 /   22  DistroSeriesLanguage:+index
[07:12] <lifeless>        5 /    7  ProjectGroup:+milestones
[07:12] <lifeless>        4 /   71  Distribution:+bugs-index
[07:12] <lifeless>        4 /    5  Person:+bugs
[08:55] <bigjools> morning
[09:14] <mrevell> Howdy bugjammers
[11:03] <gmb> allenap: Am I remembering correctly when I think that bug-import.py has no tests?
[11:03] <allenap> gmb: Je ne sais pas.
[11:04] <gmb> allenap: Okay. I'm going to guess that there aren't any, since I don't remember ever seeing any.
[11:07] <gmb> allenap: Or, there could be tests in, say, test_bugimport.py. Who'da thunk?
[11:10] <allenap> gmb: Cool :)
[11:26] <lifeless> gmb: it has tests
[11:26] <gmb> lifeless: I know, I found them.
[11:26] <gmb> grep FTW.
[11:26] <lifeless> : )
[12:04] <deryck> Morning, all.
[14:34] <allenap> deryck, gmb: Have you encountered bug 86352 after a bug import this year? I haven't, so I'm tempted to close it Invalid or maybe Fix Released.
[14:34] <_mup_> Bug #86352: SchoolTool imported bugs have invalid reporters <oops> <tech-debt> <Launchpad Bugs:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/86352 >
[14:35]  * deryck looks
[14:35] <gmb> allenap: No, I haven't seen it as far as I recall.
[14:36] <deryck> allenap, I haven't seen that either
[14:36] <allenap> Cool, thanks.
[15:11] <jcsackett> sinzui: is there anything besides app/browser/stringformatter to work with on the linkifying?
[15:12] <sinzui> jcsackett, I do not understand your question?
[15:12] <jcsackett> sinzui: the linkifying code is restricted to the stringformatter file, right? just verifying what the find utility is telling me.
[15:12] <jcsackett> sorry, the first version of my question is pretty ambiguous.
[15:13] <sinzui> jcsackett, yes. it is registered as fmt:linkify I think
[15:13] <jcsackett> sinzui: cool. thanks.
[15:13] <jcsackett> sinzui: you were right about the regex. dang, that's a big one. :-P
[15:13] <sinzui> There are some doctests that show the expect links and non-links
[15:20] <sinzui> mrevell, ping
[15:20] <mrevell> sinzui, hi
[15:21] <sinzui> mrevell, My computer tells me I have an eye examine in 10 minutes. I cannot meet :(
[15:22] <sinzui> mrevell, can we talk tomorrow at 16:30 UTC
[15:22] <mrevell> sinzui, No problem. Good luck with the eye exam ... the answer is A E B U I O
[15:22] <mrevell> :)
[18:40] <flacoste> sinzui: https://lpbuildbot.canonical.com/builders/lucid_lp/builds/436/steps/shell_6/logs/summary
[20:36] <lifeless> flacoste: ping
[21:07] <wallyworld_> abentley: thumper: mumble?
[21:18] <wgrant> Does anyone know what's going on with bug #629804? It was marked qa-bad four days ago, and nothing's happened since.
[21:18] <_mup_> Bug #629804: remove workaround for private Librarian files for launchpadlib clients <qa-bad> <Launchpad Foundations:In Progress by lifeless> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/629804 >
[21:30] <thumper> wgrant: sorry, no
[21:35] <lifeless> wgrant: read abels comments, sounds like it needss more work
[21:35] <lifeless> wgrant: roll it back, see the dev wiki for howto
[21:38] <wgrant> lifeless: Or I guess I could fix it.
[21:39] <lifeless> wgrant: yes!
[21:40] <elmo> don't you have to fix that timeout lifeless keeps whinging about first? ;-)
[21:40] <wgrant> I fixed that last week.
[21:40] <wgrant> This bug is blocking the rollout :P
[22:05] <lifeless> wgrant: I would rollback
[22:05] <lifeless> wgrant: and fix
[22:05] <lifeless> but the rollback can be shipped of immediately
[22:05] <lifeless> and will unblock things.
[22:06] <lifeless> We should rollback more often.
[22:12]  * StevenK rollbacks to rev1
[23:05] <poolie> hi all
[23:06] <wgrant> Morning poolie.
[23:27] <poolie> >>  we
[23:27] <poolie> didn't consider that a cronjob needs to get credentials without any user
[23:27] <poolie> input.
[23:27] <poolie> seriously?
[23:31] <wgrant> I'm pretty sure that is the most common use-case.
[23:32] <james_w> "...the first time you run it I assume."
[23:33] <james_w> get an request token and exchange it for an access token without user input
[23:33] <james_w> I don't believe they would be planning to require user input on every use of launchpadlib
[23:33] <poolie> it's bug 686690
[23:33] <_mup_> Bug #686690: 1.8.0 breaks login_with() API compat with existing credentials files, and forces keyrings <desktop-integration> <regression> <launchpadlib :Triaged by benji> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/686690 >
[23:33] <poolie> iiuc they ... well, the subject is pretty selfexplanatory
[23:33] <poolie> it makes it hard to use noninteractively
[23:35] <james_w> ah, sorry, I remembered that phrase occurring later in the conversation
[23:35] <poolie> i was just reading the thread now
[23:39] <poolie> i guess the end state is ok