[05:44] <micahg> bdrung: we need the new redland-bindings for m-devscripts in natty, should I upgrade our packaging?  the release has been out for 2.5 months now
[05:45] <micahg> bdrung: that's why adblock-plus is FTBFS ATM
[10:39] <bdrung> micahg: yes
[10:47] <fta2> jdstrand, mdeslaur: hi. for you: bug 689849 + http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/8.0.552.224~r68599/
[10:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 689849 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "8.0.552.215~r67652 -> 8.0.552.224~r68599 security update (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/689849
[13:50] <jdstrand> fta2: thanks!
[14:30] <fta2> dpm, doh! http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/translations/trunk/converter-output.html
[14:37] <dpm> fta2, :( yeah, that's the problem with xml and not having a validator within LP. Let me contact the Brazilian and Hebrew translators, as they seem to be the ones that come up with the most errors
[14:38] <dpm> hm, no one around, I'll ping them later on
[16:10] <fta> dpm, just sent a few rules for those variables to the list(s)
[16:19] <fta> hm, it's moderated
[16:55] <gnomefreak> ok that is just weird. FF4beta keeps asking me to submit data
[17:05] <dpm> fta, approved message, thanks
[17:05] <dpm> (in ubuntu-translations)
[17:05] <dpm> err ubuntu-translators
[17:23] <fta> dpm, btw, why two lists?
[17:33] <dpm> fta, one is the one for people translating Ubuntu, which is the one that most people read. That's why I CC'd it on the announcement, to reach out as many people as possible. The other is for translators doing work on Launchpad-hosted projects not directly related to Ubuntu. Now that the announcement is out, you can simply send the e-mails to launchpad-translators in fact
[17:34] <fta> ok, thanks
[18:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I assume the desire to remove gjs is related to not supporting a xul rdepend?
[18:00] <chrisccoulson> micahg - nothing in the archive needs it now
[18:03] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, that in of itself isn't necessarily a reason to drop it, IMHO, since we're just going to add it back the next release, but being a xul rdepend and needing to port to xulrunner 2.x seems like a very good reason :)
[18:03] <chrisccoulson> it doesn't need any porting, it's already done ;)
[18:06] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I meant for the xul 2.1, 2.2, 2.x jump :)
[18:12] <micahg> chrisccoulson: would you like me to file the bug for gjs removal?
[21:59] <BUGabundo> o/
[22:03] <micahg> bdrung: is there any rush on the redland stuff? (is the weekend ok?)
[22:04] <bdrung> micahg: there is probably no rush. the current adblock-plus version works.
[22:04] <micahg> ok, thanks