=== jjohansen is now known as jj-afk
=== smb` is now known as smb
=== jj-afk is now known as jjohansen
=== doko__ is now known as doko
=== jjohansen is now known as jj-afk
[15:05] <doko> cjwatson, pitti: please can we shorten the time for the python-defaults migration from -proposed to -updates? I'd like to send a followup on python2.7 and offer a safe way for an upgrade (update to -updates before an update to natty )
[15:10] <lamont> cjwatson: if you get a chance today, please abuse royal and see if you can get it to fall over again, mk?
[15:10] <lamont> because if it does well, then, well.... we'll just have to put the maverick kernel on the rest of the ppc lineup
[15:13] <cjwatson> lamont: kubuntu build running again, then
[15:14] <lamont> ta
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf
=== jj-afk is now known as jjohansen
[16:35] <ScottK> Looks like we have a winner http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/20101215.1/natty-desktop-powerpc.iso
[16:35] <cjwatson> oh good
[16:35] <cjwatson> that said royal seems to be NOT LISTENING again
[16:36] <ScottK> Falling over after the build is complete is progress, I guess.
[17:08] <lamont>  17:07:58 up 20:43,  1 user,  load average: 1.57, 1.48, 1.12 <-- royal likes me just fine...
[17:08] <cjwatson> uh, ok, maybe I was trying to talk http to it from the wrong angle
[20:55] <micahg> skaet: ping
[22:19] <micahg> skaet: ping re: 10.04.2 freeze schedule
[22:19] <skaet> micahg: pong.
[22:19] <skaet> sorry I missed you earlier.
[22:20] <skaet> what about the 10.04.2 freeze schedule?
[22:20] <micahg> skaet: hi, no problem, I was wondering if there will be the standard 2 day before freeze for 10.04.2 or if it'll be longer
[22:20] <micahg> i.e. freeze/generate images the Tuesday before release
[22:21] <skaet> micahg,  probably worth discussing a bit at the next LTS/SRU meeting I think.
[22:21] <micahg> skaet: should I join on Monday?
[22:21] <skaet> Unless its urgent,  I'll add it to the agenda.
[22:21] <micahg> skaet: nope, not urgent, just fact gathering for the xubuntu team
[22:22] <skaet> micahg:  doesn't look like we'll have quorum for a call this year.   (holiday time off starting for most...)
[22:22] <skaet> How about i make sure its on the agenda for the Jan 3 meeting?
[22:22] <micahg> skaet: sounds good, that still gives about a month to move on anything we need to take care of
[22:23] <skaet> micahg,  :)  that will be the plan then.
[22:23] <micahg> should I be at the meeting or just watch for the notes on ubuntu-devel?
[22:23] <skaet> it would be good if you're at the meeting.
[22:23] <micahg> skaet: ok, I'll plan on that then, thank you for your time
[22:24] <skaet> micahg, thank you for raising it.  :)
[22:27] <micahg> glad to help :)