[00:54] <JesusMcCloud-lt> i would need a quick fix: i nominated a bug for a series, how do i undo this?
[09:36] <dholbach> hiya
[09:37] <dholbach> could it be that https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/1.0.html is a bit out of date? findPerson only has ws.op, created_after, created_before, text as arguments - the help text lists exclude_inactive_accounts, must_have_email too
[10:06] <dholbach> ok, seems like these arguments are not supported (any more?)
[10:25] <maxb> dholbach: A guess: Sometimes the help text refers to things in the python api which are not exported in the web service api
[10:26] <dholbach> maxb, aha
[14:31] <mvo> leonardr: hey, a quick question about launchpadlib, I see that there is gnome-keyring integration now (nice!) - is there a way for me to interact with it so that I open a embedded webkit instead of launching the users browser
[14:44] <leonardr> mvo: yes, but hold off a bit until i get the interface ready. you will be writing a RequestTokenAuthorizationEngine
[14:45] <mvo> leonardr: ok, cool. is there a bugreport to follow or a branch or somehing (so that I know when I can start hacking on this)? or a rought timeline? (no rush, just curious)
[14:46] <leonardr> mvo: https://code.launchpad.net/~leonardr/launchpadlib/retry-on-invalid-token/+merge/43784
[14:47] <mvo> cool, thanks
[14:47] <leonardr> it would be nice if you worked with doctormo to come up with a shared authorization engine rather than each writing your own
[14:49] <mvo> indeed, that sounds good. I have little interest in writing another one (I had to throw away my first one already ;), so I will be more than happy to join forces with doctormo (or just nick his code)
[15:39] <bigjools> deryck: are you CHR today?
[15:39] <deryck> bigjools: ah, crap.  I am.  I completely forgot.
[15:39] <deryck> bigjools: thanks for the reminder.
[15:42] <deryck> does CHR entail more than watching IRC now that we're the one great Launchpad project?
[15:43] <bigjools> deryck: np, thought you might have forgotten :)
[15:43] <deryck> bigjools: indeed, I did.  Does it involved more than watching IRC now that we've combined projects?  do you know?
[15:44] <bigjools> deryck: good question.  I think we still need to triage bugs and field questions at least
[15:44] <deryck> bigjools: ah, so I need to triage the incoming to Launchpad?  I think some might be hard for me to assess.  I can guess. ;)
[16:07] <mtaylor> I've been told this before - but how do I go about getting a UDD alias to point to my packaging branch?
[16:07] <mtaylor> do I now just file a bug on launchpad?
[16:07] <deryck> mtaylor: I think a question against launchpad is the right way to go.
[16:07] <mtaylor> deryck: thanks!
[16:07] <deryck> np!
[21:02] <RenatoSilva> what's the opposite of backport?
[21:02] <peterbrett> forwardport?
[21:02] <RenatoSilva> peterbrett: is this term actually used?
[21:03] <peterbrett> No idea, but it seems logical :-D
[21:03] <peterbrett> And if you say it people will know what you mean :)
[21:06] <RenatoSilva> peterbrett: I have a release and its updated dev version, I'm writing a patch for both, with a release-patching branch and a repo-patching branch. I write the patch in the released branch, which just accumulates my changes since the release. For the repo-patching branch, I just do merges from both upstream and release-patching branch. I find this the best possible workflow
[21:06] <peterbrett> Sure.
[21:07] <RenatoSilva> peterbrett: you may ask why not patch only the dev version? because it's a plugin and I'm using it and the dev version may become unstable/imcompatible with the app version I'm using
[21:59] <ScottK> Is LP down (or maybe just the web interface for soyuz?
[22:00] <ScottK> https://launchpad.net/builders is currently unreachable for me.
[22:01] <bigjools> wfm
[22:01] <ScottK> Hmmm.  Thanks.
[22:02] <bigjools> yes, the farm is busy :)
[22:04] <ScottK> bigjools: The powerpc builder that gets listed first on that page (I don't recall the name and since I can't load the page I can't tell you) has been stuck for ~7hours.  If you could askh lamont or someone else with the power to take it out back and shoot it in the head, that would probably help with our builder backplog on power.
[22:05] <bigjools> ScottK: s
[22:05] <bigjools> ScottK: adare?
[22:05] <ScottK> Dunno, can't see the list.  It's the build that's not linux.
[22:05] <StevenK> Yes, adare
[22:05] <lamont> ScottK: I'm gonna stab that whole box in the face
[22:05] <bigjools> yeah it looks sick
[22:05] <lamont> adare
[22:06] <ScottK> lamont: How'd the maverick kernel work out on the other box?
[22:07] <ScottK> Back now, BTW.
[22:07] <lamont> so far so good it appears
[22:08] <ScottK> Cool.
[22:12] <lamont> adare rebooting now
[22:14] <lamont> ScottK: lets see how that kernel does.
[22:14] <lamont> and then ross will get upgraded next week, I expect
[22:15] <ScottK> Unfortunately the next build was private so you'll have to be the one to know how it goes.
[22:31] <ScottK> Looks like it's done in any case.