[06:12] <DanaG> Say, does ubuntu officially support tegra2?
[06:12] <DanaG> I'm still pondering what would be good as a nas.
[06:13] <DanaG> Must have armv7l, sata (>1 port, preferably), and gigabit.
[06:13] <DanaG> And be not ungodly expensive.
[06:14] <DanaG> Eval kit for that TI one... That's ungodly expensive.
[09:12] <hrw> davidm: TI chips lack sata and GbE
[09:12] <hrw> davidm: sorry
[10:21] <nicofs> I'm trying to make an xubuntu rootfs for ARM using rootstock. but the process always stalls when configuring xulrunner... is there any way to solve that problem? (target device: Toshiba AC100)
[10:40] <LetoThe2nd> make
[10:41] <LetoThe2nd> gnah, ETERM
[10:43] <nicofs> LetoThe2nd: i'm afraid i don't understand...
[10:46] <LetoThe2nd> nicofs: neither was meant for you. the first line was a mistake of me, and i stated it in the second one.
[10:46] <nicofs> LetoThe2nd: ah, ok...
[12:58] <velory> Hi I set up ubuntu 10.10 from http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu to sd card now it asks
[12:58] <velory> Ubuntu 10.10 omap ttyS2
[12:58] <velory> omap login:
[14:44] <Mark____> I'm having trouble with the instructions at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/BeagleNetInstall
[14:44] <Mark____> I'm installing on a Beagle C4.
[14:45] <Mark____> The error says it can't write linux-omap.
[14:45] <Mark____> Any idea how to get around this?
[14:59] <rsalveti> Mark____: what step is failing for you?
[15:05] <Mark____> It says it's installing the base.
[15:06] <Mark____> I looked at the error files in /var/log, but they were empty.
[15:06] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: any idea? I know you did some testing with the net image in the past
[15:07] <GrueMaster> I haven't tested it since lucid.  WIll look into it after the meeting & coffee.
[15:08] <Mark____> I'll start over and keep better notes about the error messages.
[15:11] <Mark____> What's the minimum files needed to get an xM to run uboot?
[15:35] <Mark____> Well, it says "Failed getting Release file http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/lucid/Release"
[15:35] <Mark____> However I can access that path from another machine.
[15:37] <prpplague> davidm: ping
[15:53] <davidm> prpplague, hello
[15:54] <davidm> prpplague, just saw your email, glad you are feeling some better.
[16:02] <prpplague> davidm: thanks
[16:02] <prpplague> davidm: let me get caught up this morning and i'll get with you this afternoon
[16:03] <davidm> prpplague, thanks
[16:03] <davidm> I'll be here, I'm on Eastern time this week
[16:04] <prpplague> dandy
[17:32] <sveinse> I'm having some rather strange problem while playing around with the cross compiler and --sysroot'ed into a rootstocked rootfs
[17:33] <sveinse> My app (Qt) becomes wierd if I add --sysroot=$(MYROOT) -L=/lib -L=/usr/lib   where the latter /usr/lib seems to be the offending part
[17:34] <sveinse> How can I list the functions provided by a an so. I though nm, but it sais "no symbols"...
[17:52] <lool> rsalveti: Hey
[17:52] <lool> rsalveti: around?
[17:52] <rsalveti> lool: yup
[17:52] <lool> rsalveti: Could you chekc the gcc-4.5 + u-boot bug?  is it still relevant?
[17:52] <lool> LP #616614
[17:52] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 616614 in gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "u-boot upstream hangs at "mmc init 1" when compiled with gcc 4.5.1 (native or cross) (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/616614
[17:52] <rsalveti> lool: doesn't happen anymore with upstream u-boot, as we discussed on #linaro yesterday
[17:53] <rsalveti> but I can add a new comment there
[17:53] <lool> rsalveti: please close the bug as you see fit
[17:53] <lool> either invalid or reassign to u-boot + fix released
[17:53] <rsalveti> sure, but we need a new u-boot package update
[17:53] <rsalveti> before closing it
[17:54] <lool> rsalveti: Which u-boot is that?
[17:54] <rsalveti> u-boot-linaro
[17:54] <lool> rsalveti: I can switch it to gcc-4.4 if you like, I did so for u-boot-linaro yesterday
[17:55] <lool> rsalveti: that was fixed yesterday by moving to gcc-4.4 until we get a new u-boot-linaro
[17:55] <lool> I can dup your bug against it I guess
[17:55] <lool> LP #690786
[17:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 690786 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "omap3 boot hangs with u-boot-linaro-omap3-beagle=2010.09~rc1.1-0ubuntu4 (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 14)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/690786
[17:55] <rsalveti> yeah, saw that
[17:55] <lool> rsalveti: done
[17:55] <rsalveti> lool: I prefer just to move my bug for the u-boot package and wait the proper fix
[17:56] <rsalveti> that's the package update
[17:56] <lool> rsalveti: Hmm as you please, can you fix the bug to look how you'd like?
[17:56] <rsalveti> lool: sure
[17:56] <lool> rsalveti: Which u-boot will you guys use?  linaro's?
[17:57] <rsalveti> lool: yes
[17:57] <lool> rsalveti: So you could file two bugs; one for missing omap4 support and one to switch back to gcc-4.5
[17:57] <lool> I don't see much value in keeping bugs on older u-boot versions
[17:57] <lool> I mean, we know it's just pending an update
[17:58] <rsalveti> lool: ok, will just dup bug 690786 for omap 4
[17:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 690786 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "omap3 boot hangs with u-boot-linaro-omap3-beagle=2010.09~rc1.1-0ubuntu4 (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 26)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/690786
[17:59] <rsalveti> lool: do we need an extra bug to switch back to gcc4.5?
[17:59] <rsalveti> or is that something expected already when pushing the new version to the archive?
[18:00] <rsalveti> lool: ok, but as you changed the package itself, and not only for omap3, it should probably be fixed for omap 4 too
[18:00] <rsalveti> will check
[18:00] <lool> rsalveti: Well, it's something we have in mind, but a bug wouldn't hurt
[18:01] <rsalveti> lool: sure, will test if the omap 4 u-boot is now working as expected and open a new bug
[18:01] <rsalveti> to get back to 4.5
[18:04] <lool> rsalveti: perfect, thakns
[18:05] <GrueMaster> rsalveti: I tested your kernel RE: bug 688765.  Test passed, comment added.
[18:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 688765 in linux (Ubuntu) "Can't init uart3 (no clocks available) at Beagleboard-xM (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/688765
[18:05] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: great, thanks
[18:05] <rsalveti> will send the pull request as an SRU
[18:05] <rsalveti> but will probably be released just next year hehe
[20:05] <may_null> Hi I've set up ubuntu.10.10 preinstalled images to beagle board from here http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu#Maverick_10.10_2 .. When booting it needs omap username and password .. Can anyone help me what's default
[20:08] <GrueMaster> may_null: which image are you installing?  If you downloaded the image from cdimages.ubuntu.com then it will boot into X and run oem-config allowing you to setup a user account.
[20:08] <may_null> GrueMaster: under  Maverick 10.10 wget http://rcn-ee.net/deb/rootfs/maverick/ubuntu-10.10-r3-minimal-armel.tar.7z
[20:09] <may_null> http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu#Maverick_10.10_2  from here
[20:09] <GrueMaster> According to that link, it is Default user: ubuntu pass: temppwd
[20:10] <may_null> oh I missed that
[20:10] <may_null> thanks :D
[20:33] <may_null> GrueMaster: so I have USB dongle connected to beagle trying to setup network..should I send dhcp offer after used  sudo dhclient usb1 ??
[20:34] <may_null> can2t I search for all wifi connections ?
[21:18] <guerby> rsalveti, FYI I've launched another bootstrap cycle on my pandaboard
[21:22] <GrueMaster> may_null: I really know nothing about that image, but if the wifi driver exists for your device, it should work the same as it would on x86.
[21:25] <may_null> GrueMaster: can you tell me how can I enter WPA password ? well I find my wlan using iwlist and iwconfig but I had to turn of WPA Wlan password protection
[21:25] <may_null> because don't know how to give WPA pass