| === nenolod_ is now known as nenolod | ||
| fabrice_sp | micahg, if you are still interested in dolphin-emu: I advocated it yesterday, so it's only missing another look from a sponsor. You can find it at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8783 (this apply to other sponsors as well :-) ) | 05:09 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | fabrice_sp: well, I can review everything except the licensing, that I'm still not sure on | 05:09 |
| fabrice_sp | micahg, licensing is the hard part of new packages | 05:10 |
| fabrice_sp | and this one mix a lot of different ones | 05:10 |
| mase_wk | i am packaging up some PHP libraries which are used with a framework. I have src( .php ) XSL and documentation. I was wondering where each is meant to live | 05:11 |
| glennricster | fabrice_sp: I must agree. Licensing is the hard part for sure. | 05:13 |
| fabrice_sp | hey glennricster ! You can speak about it :-) | 05:16 |
| fabrice_sp | mase_wk, have a look at a similar package to be sure you install the files in the right places | 05:16 |
| glennricster | Yeah. I still don't think I have it right though. dolphin-emu has such a mess of licensing in its files. | 05:17 |
| fabrice_sp | oh: I'll check in detail this week end, then: it's a huge work, with all that file with different licenses | 05:17 |
| glennricster | I told the other dolphin-emu devs I would work on getting it into Ubuntu. After this I think I will stick with coding. | 05:18 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| fabrice_sp | please don't disappear after having your package into Ubuntu | 05:18 |
| mase_wk | fabrice_sp: that doesn't help me. None of the libraries have yet been packaged and i haven't foudn any other packages within ubuntu / debian that have the sort of dependance between xsl and php files | 05:18 |
| glennricster | I will maintain it. That won't be as hard as getting the copyright file set up. | 05:19 |
| mase_wk | i can find other php projects so i can copy that, just not sure where to jam the xsl libraries | 05:19 |
| glennricster | I won't disappear. Don't worry. | 05:19 |
| glennricster | fabrice_sp: I learned some new things from you in the process. The dh.tiny format is quite nice. | 05:20 |
| fabrice_sp | glennricster, :-) Yeah, and easier to maintain than the full dh format, IMHO | 05:21 |
| glennricster | Yeah, it would seem so. :) | 05:21 |
| fabrice_sp | mase_wk, perhaps ask in ubuntu-server: they may know better than me or wait here until someone else answers you | 05:22 |
| mase_wk | k | 05:22 |
| === ara_ is now known as ara | ||
| === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
| Rhonda | Something seems to be going awkwardly wrong with planet.ubuntu, I see a big grey area at the top blocking out the first someting blog entries? | 10:13 |
| cdbs | Rhonda: Its fine for me | 10:49 |
| cdbs | I can't see any gray area | 10:50 |
| azeem_ | Rhonda: maybe that is your spam blocker which removed buxy's latest post | 10:50 |
| Rhonda | azeem_: haha. not. And strangely, it works again. The theme seems to be switched back also, so I guess someone was working on it. | 10:51 |
| Rhonda | When inspecing with firebug the footer div did cover the top of the page in very big parts. | 10:52 |
| * ari-tczew is listening to: The Underdog Project - Summer Jam | put your hands up! | 12:28 | |
| === Sarvatt_ is now known as Sarvatt | ||
| ScottK | tumbleweed: Could you look into what's up with Debian bug 575581? In the bug it claims a fix has been uploaded to Debian, but I don't see it. | 18:28 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 575581 in postgrey "postgrey: Upgrade from Lenny to Testing fails with db error" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/575581 | 18:28 |
| === |sistpoty| is now known as sistpoty | ||
| djeenan | hello | 19:35 |
| === ximion1 is now known as ximion | ||
| sistpoty | hm... we need more ppl. working on http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi | 20:44 |
| ScottK | We do. | 20:50 |
| ScottK | sistpoty: There's some ongoing work to produce better documentation on how to deal with the linker issues that should be available around new years. Hopefully that will help. | 20:51 |
| hakermania | Hello :) | 20:55 |
| sistpoty | ScottK: excellent :) | 20:58 |
| evaluate | more people for? | 21:05 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: look at the link, these are packages that fail to build on ubuntu/natty | 21:06 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, so I get it you need people to fix those build issues? (btw, I'm new to packaging myself, I'm just trying to get more involved with ubuntu/debian)... | 21:08 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: exactly | 21:08 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, is there any place I could actually download a package that is listed there? (source + debian) | 21:10 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: if you're on natty, it's just apt-get source <package>... otherwise I'm usually using packages.ubuntu.com/src:<source package name> | 21:11 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: of course launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/<source package name> should also lead you to a link | 21:12 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, unfortunately I need a stable system for my work, so I'm still on maverick (and will probably be for the time being) | 21:12 |
| sistpoty | heh | 21:12 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, say I make some changes to a package and believe that it may build correctly, is there any place I can upload it to test a build or do I need to build it locally? | 21:13 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: you could use a PPA (certainly described in the wiki somewhere), however I prefer to build locally using pbuilder | 21:14 |
| sistpoty | (PPA=personal package archive) | 21:15 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, yes, I have a PPA myself, I know what that is :p I don't have any experience with pbuilder though... | 21:16 |
| sistpoty | !pbuilder > evaluate | 21:16 |
| ubottu | evaluate, please see my private message | 21:16 |
| * sistpoty pets ubottu | 21:16 | |
| evaluate | sistpoty, ok, and I guess I will have to do that on natty, right? | 21:16 |
| * evaluate opens virtualbox | 21:16 | |
| sistpoty | evaluate: you should be able to create a pbuilder-chroot on an older version. Also you can use a ppa to build for natty while on lucid for example | 21:17 |
| evaluate | yeah, but as far as I could see (at least on my PPA), sometimes it takes up to one hour of waiting for a package to be built, I wouldn't have the nerves to wait for that while debugging a package. I guess I'll go with the virtualbox option... | 21:19 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: yeah, that's why I build locally. however pbuilder (which essentially creates a chroot) could be used to build for a different distribution... | 21:19 |
| sistpoty | (build locally for me means to use pbuilder btw) | 21:20 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, I like my main system to be neat & clean, and I guess that pbuilder would also install all dependencies that a package needs, everytime I do a test run, I wouldn't want that on my main system... | 21:20 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: no, it uses a chroot for this, not the main system | 21:21 |
| hakermania | evaluate: After installing a package and "apt-get remove" it you can see which packages are not longer required (where dependencies of uninstalled programs) | 21:22 |
| evaluate | I'll do it in a VB anyway, I've got the processing power :p | 21:22 |
| sistpoty | heh, you lucky one :) | 21:22 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, it's just a laptop, so if you have a desktop computer, you probably got more processing power than me anyway :p | 21:24 |
| sistpoty | heh | 21:25 |
| evaluate | hmm. Virtualbox 4 doesn't let me attach any iso images to my machines. | 21:28 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, I did read something about a 'natty weekly build' somewhere. Does something like this exist, or did I just understand wrong? | 21:30 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: I'm not aware of that, tbh. | 21:32 |
| evaluate | ok then, I'll just use the alpha image I have laying around here... | 21:33 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: there should be daily images though: http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ | 21:35 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: however I'm not too sure of what quality these are at the current phase in the development cycle | 21:36 |
| sistpoty | (bug reports are always appreciated *g*) | 21:36 |
| evaluate | hmm, nice | 21:38 |
| evaluate | virtualbox 4.0 beta won't let me choose a iso to add to a virtual machine and the virtualbox that ubuntu comes with, restarts my X session :-\ | 21:38 |
| sistpoty | *whispering pbuilder at evaluate* | 21:39 |
| evaluate | there seems to be a new beta4 of the 4.0 version, if that doesn't work either, I'm going to go with pbuilder :p | 21:40 |
| ScottK | sudo apt-get install ubuntu-dev-tools, pbuilder-dist natty create, then pbuilder-dist natty build <pkg_version>.dsc to build. | 21:41 |
| sistpoty | s/,/;/ s/then// might almost work as a shell script :) | 21:42 |
| evaluate | there is still hope! | 21:47 |
| evaluate | beta4 actually works. I'm installing it right now and will be ready to go in ~15 min :-) | 21:47 |
| evaluate | ok, I've managed to setup pbuilder and tried downloading and building clutter-gtk. | 22:26 |
| evaluate | and I've got a totally different error than what is on ftbfs: http://pastebin.com/xpxR9NkK | 22:28 |
| evaluate | (I imagine though that I might just eat up your time instead of actually helping, in which case you can just ignore me) | 22:29 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: looks like the package that clutter-gtk build-depends on changed | 22:30 |
| sistpoty | from a quick glimpse, I'd probably mark gir1.0-clutter-1.0 as the package causing b-d's not to be installed correctly | 22:31 |
| ebroder | bdrung: It seems a little weird for a script called "update-maintainer" to start mucking with things other than the Maintainer field | 22:31 |
| bdrung | ebroder: really? i think it belongs together. | 22:32 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, btw, I got the package from here: http://pastebin.com/gDBGyZXD . Not sure if it's the correct/latest one... | 22:32 |
| bdrung | ebroder: changed maintainer => changed development location | 22:32 |
| ebroder | bdrung: I'm not saying they shouldn't be the same tool. I'm musing about whether we should rename the tool | 22:33 |
| bdrung | ebroder: do you have a better name? | 22:33 |
| ebroder | bdrung: Uh... "update-control"? Not really, though | 22:33 |
| bdrung | yes, not really | 22:34 |
| bdrung | ebroder: btw, thanks for the backportpackage script | 22:35 |
| hakermania | update-maintainer-and-other-things | 22:35 |
| hakermania | xD | 22:35 |
| bdrung | update-maintainer-in-debian-control-and-update-vcs-fields-too | 22:35 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, is there anything I need/can do about that package, or should I choose another one? | 22:36 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: actually, it looks like the package you installed is the correct one | 22:37 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: I'm not entirely sure if depending packages have been rebuilt to pick up the new version already, which might explain the failure you got | 22:38 |
| sistpoty | evaluate: I'd suggest to pick another package | 22:38 |
| evaluate | sistpoty, ok :-) | 22:38 |
| tumbleweed | ScottK: sure, will do | 23:04 |
| evaluate | what would be the correct way to make a change to a source file? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!